Mantle Cell Lymphoma: First-line Therapy in Patients Not Eligible for Stem Cell Transplantation

Intensive induction regimens after deferring initial therapy for mantle cell lymphoma are not associated with improved survival

INTRODUCTION

While most patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) receive therapy shortly after diagnosis, a subset of patients with indolent-behaving disease can safely defer treatment. In this subgroup, we evaluated the importance of treatment intensity in patients with MCL who defer initial therapy.

METHODS

Out of 1134 patients with MCL from 12 academic centers, we analyzed 219 patients who initiated therapy at least 90 days after diagnosis. Patients who received induction with high-dose cytarabine and/or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first remission were considered to have received intensive therapy (n = 88) while all other approaches were non-intensive (n = 131).

RESULTS

There was no difference in progression-free (PFS; P = .224) or overall survival (OS; P = .167) in deferred patients who received non-intensive vs. intensive therapy. Additionally, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were performed for PFS and OS. Treatment at an academic center (HR 0.43, P = .015) was associated with improved OS in both univariate and multivariate models, while intensity of treatment was not associated with improved OS in either model.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that intensified initial treatment is not associated with improved survival after deferring initial therapy, although prospective studies are needed to determine which of these patients with MCL may benefit from intensive therapy.

Walking a tightrope: clinical use of ibrutinib in mantle cell lymphoma in the elderly

Representative clinical case. A 74-year-old male patient was diagnosed with stage 3 mantle cell lymphoma in 2012. Because he was ineligible for intensive treatment (age, previous myocardial infarction [MI]), he received rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemoimmunotherapy for 6 cycles (reaching complete response) and then rituximab maintenance (RM) for 2 years. One year after the end of RM, he relapsed with disseminated disease. He was started on ibrutinib 560 mg/day. Two weeks after the start of ibrutinib, he developed grade 3 diarrhea that required interruption of ibrutinib. Two weeks after the regular dose was restarted (month 3), the patient had repeated bleeding (patient was receiving aspirin for previous MI) and had to stop ibrutinib again. Because the patient was in partial response (PR) with lack of disease-associated symptoms, he was restarted on ibrutinib 280 mg/day with no further adverse events, and he had maintained PR at last follow-up (month 9 on ibrutinib).