Biology and Treatment of Hairy Cell Leukemia

Updates in hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and variant-type HCL (HCL-V): rationale for targeted treatments with a focus on ibrutinib

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and HCL-like disorders such as hairy cell leukemia variant (HCL-V) and splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL) are rare indolent B-cell malignancies. Purine analogs (PNAs), alone or in association with rituximab (R), are the standard of care for HCL in the first-line setting. However, PNAs are toxic and patients may become resistant to these drugs. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies are needed. Several recent in vitro studies highlighted the importance of the interactions between HCL cells and their microenvironment, in particular with bone marrow stromal cells, endothelial cells, and the extracellular matrix. In these interactions, chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules play a major role. Moreover, the importance of signaling pathways, like BRAF, BCR, and CXCR4 has been underlined. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a fundamental signal transmitter of BCR and CXCR4 in HCL. Preclinical and recent clinical data showed an efficacy of ibrutinib, a BTK inhibitor (BTKi), in HCL and HCL-V. These promising results joined those of other emerging drugs like BRAF or MEK inhibitors and anti-CD22 immunotoxins.

Plain Language Summary

Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors (BTKi) in hairy cell leukemia (HCL) and variant-type HCL The treatment of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) has changed significantly in recent years. In the first-line settings, treatment with purine analogs (PNAs) with or without anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies remains the gold standard in 2022. In relapsed/refractory HCL, other drugs are needed: BRAF inhibitors: vemurafenib monotherapy with or without rituximab or dabrafenib in combination with trametinib, an MEK inhibitor (MEKi), as well as the anti-CD22 antibody drug conjugate moxetumomab pasudotox. There are arguments for the use of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi). Ibrutinib was recently tested in a multisite phase 2 study in 37 patients with either HCL (28 patients: 76%) or HCL-V (nine patients: 24%) including two who were previously untreated. Patients received single-agent ibrutinib at 420 mg daily (24 patients) or 840 mg daily (13 patients) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The overall response rate (ORR) at 32 weeks was 24%, increasing to 36% at 48 weeks and reaching 54% at any time since starting ibrutinib. Seven patients achieved a complete response (CR) as the best response at any time on study, while 13 patients had a partial response (PR) and 10 patients had stable disease (SD). Interestingly, the response rate was not statistically different between HCL and HCL-V patients, suggesting that ibrutinib could be an option in both entities. The estimated 36-month progression-free survival (PFS) was 73% and the estimated 36-month overall survival (OS) was 85%, with no differences between HCL and HCL-V. The frequency of cardiovascular grade 1–2 adverse events (AEs) was 16% for atrial fibrillation; 3% for atrial flutter; 32% for hypertension; and 0%, 3%, and 11%, respectively, for grade ⩾ 3 AEs. Unlike in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), where the mechanism of action of ibrutinib is well known, the mechanism of action of ibrutinib in HCL appears to be unclear. No mutations were identified in patients with progressive disease, suggesting that the mechanisms of resistance could be different between HCL and CLL. The BTKi that are not yet approved are challenged by the new other targeted treatments.

Advances in the Treatment of Hairy Cell Leukemia Variant

OPINION STATEMENT

Hairy cell leukemia variant (HCL-V) is a rare B cell lymphoproliferative disorder with a clinical-pathological distinction from the classic form of hairy cell leukemia (HCL-C). HCL-V is more aggressive in nature, has a higher tendency to be refractory to conventional purine analog pharmacotherapies, and leads to a poorer prognosis. Hence, these differing features bring paramount importance to the diagnosis and management of HCL-V. While there is no genetic mutation diagnostic of HCL-V, genetic profiling efforts have identified potential therapeutic targets (i.e., MAP2K1, KDM6A, CREBBP, ARID1A, CCND3, U2AF1, KMT2C) and yielded prognostic markers (i.e., IGHV4-34 rearrangements). To date, combination chemoimmunotherapies, such as cladribine and rituximab, have shown the best results in HCL-V. Future directions include targeted therapies such as moxetumomab pasudotox, ibrutinib, trametinib, and binimetinib and potentially anti-CD22 chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. The purpose of this review is to provide an outline of the diagnostic approach and an update on the therapeutic advancements in HCL-V.

Moxetumomab Pasudotox in Hairy Cell Leukaemia: A Profile of Its Use

Moxetumomab pasudotox (Lumoxiti^®), an anti-CD22 recombinant immunotoxin, is an important treatment option that is approved in adults with relapsed or refractory hairy cell leukaemia (HCL) who have received at least two prior lines of treatment with systemic therapies including purine nucleoside analogues. In a pivotal phase III trial, treatment with moxetumomab pasudotox resulted in approximately one third of patients achieving durable complete response lasting more than 6 months, as well as improvements in other haematological parameters and disease-related symptoms. Moxetumomab pasudotox had a generally manageable tolerability profile; the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included nausea, peripheral oedema, headache and pyrexia. AEs of special interest (including haemolytic uraemic syndrome and capillary leak syndrome) were generally manageable and reversible with monitoring and supportive care.

Patients with relapsed/refractory hairy-cell leukemia

Background

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare chronic B‐cell neoplasm with good long‐term prognosis. First and second‐line therapies include purine nucleoside analogues (PNAs) and rituximab, but until recently, limited alternative options were available for patients with two or more relapses.

Aim

The aim of this study is to describe our real‐life experience with HCL patients in third and fourth‐line therapies.

Methods and Results

Data from 49 HCL patients with two or more relapses, including 16 patients with three or more relapses, were collected from the French retrospective HCL cohort covering the period from 1980 until 2011. They were analyzed to assess hematological response, relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after third (L3) and fourth line (L4). The median age at diagnosis was 53 years. PNAs were the most frequently used treatments. As L3 therapy, 29 patients received PNAs (66%) and 15 (34%) other treatments (rituximab [11%] or interferon [7%] alone or in combination [16%]). The distribution of L4 treatments was similar. The overall hematological response rate (OHRR) after L3 was 97% (complete hematological response 86%) with a 40% five‐year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), a median RFS of 104 months, and a median OS of 235 months. After L4, the OHRR was 94% with a two‐year CIR of fourth relapse of 27%. Eleven secondary cancers (5‐year cumulative incidence of 12%) were diagnosed in 10 patients. Patients with ≥2 relapses experience frequent further relapses, with increasingly shorter time to next treatment as the number of treatment lines increases. Furthermore, treatment strategies are associated with substantial toxicities.

Conclusion

All these points lead to the need for novel treatments.

[Hairy cell leukemia: What are the best treatment options for relapsed or refractory patients?]

Hairy cell leukemia is a rare form of leukemia: three hundred new cases are diagnosed each year in France. The diagnosis is based on: (1) morphological examination of the blood and bone marrow smear, (2) analysis by flow cytometry of hairy cells, which express three or the four following markers: CD11c, CD25, CD103 and CD123, (3) identification of the BRAF^V600E mutation, a true molecular marker of the disease. The management of treatment has evolved considerably in recent years. As of today, the purine analogues remain the standard treatment in the first line. Relapses are however observed in about 40% of cases. In the event of a first relapse, the preferred option is treatment with immunochemotherapy i.e. a combination of cladribine plus rituximab. Subsequent relapses are treated with moxetumomab pasudotox or BRAF inhibitors which provide indisputable benefits if third-line treatment is required. We will discuss in patients with relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia the needs for personalized medicine and the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment modality. The good prognosis for LT requires treatments that are not immunosuppressive, non-myelotoxic, and do not increase the risk of secondary cancers.

BRAFV600E mutation in the wrong place: a case of concomitant polycythemia vera, hairy cell leukemia, and thyroid adenoma

BACKGROUND

Polycythemia vera (PV) is one of the Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), characterized by a pan-myelosis with an erythroid-predominant proliferation mainly driven by somatic JAK2V617F gain-of-function mutation. Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare B-cell lineage lymphoproliferative disease (LPD) with a typic immunophenotypic profile. BRAFV600E, leading to constitutive activation of the RAF/MEK/ERK signalling pathway and increased cell proliferation, is identified as the driver mutation in almost all cases. Although the risk of developing an LPD is significantly increased in patients with MPN compared with the general population, few cases of co-occurring PV and HCL are reported to date. BRAF is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes in human cancer and some point mutations were identified in multiple neoplasms in addition to HCL, including follicular and papillary thyroid adenoma and carcinoma.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here we report a molecular diagnostic challenge in a woman with a concomitant diagnosis of JAK2V617F PV, BRAFV600E HCL, and HRASQ61K thyroid follicular adenoma.

CONCLUSION

In the age of molecular and precision medicine, this case underlines the importance of integrating molecular results with clinical, radiologic, cytologic, and histopathologic investigations.