Current Treatment Options for Older Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma

Case report: Sustained complete remission with all-oral MEPED therapy in a patient with Hodgkin's disease developing resistance to pembrolizumab

Targeted chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) have expanded the spectrum of therapies for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin's disease and significantly improved the proportion of patients with long-term disease control. However, there is no standardized therapeutic option in case of further progression. Recently, we demonstrated that therapy with MEPED (metronomic chemotherapy, everolimus, pioglitazone, etoricoxib, dexamethasone) is highly effective in patients with r/r Hodgkin's disease. The benefit after pre-treatment with ICPi has not been studied, yet. Here, we report a patient with progressive Hodgkin's disease on Pembrolizumab for the first time who achieved sustained complete remission (CR) after initiation of MEPED therapy. A 57-year-old patient was pre-treated with brentuximab vedotin for relapsed advanced Hodgkin's disease and had received Pembrolizumab for progression from November 2020 to July 2022. Due to further progression, MEPED therapy was started in August 2022 and continued until May 2023. It consisted of a strictly oral daily (28-day cycle) application of low-dose treosulfan 250 mg, everolimus 15 mg, pioglitazone 45 mg, etoricoxib 60 mg, and dexamethasone 0.5 mg. Treatment response was evaluated by F-18 FDG-PET/CT (PET/CT). CR was defined by a negative Deauville score (DS) of 1-3. Already 3 months after starting MEPED, a CR (DS: 3) was confirmed by PET/CT in November 2022. The next follow-up in May 2023 continued to show CR (DS: 3). The therapy was very well tolerated. No hematological or other organ toxicity was observed. However, in May 2023 the patient presented with leg edema and weight gain, most likely due to pioglitazone and the PET/CT revealed suspected everolimus-induced pneumonitis, so MEPED was discontinued and diuretic therapy and treatment with prednisolone was started with gradual dose reduction. This resulted in a rapid complete resolution of the symptoms. The next PET-CT in July 2023 continued to show CR (DS: 3) without evidence of pneumonitis. Currently, therapy with MEPED has not been resumed. In conclusion, we demonstrate for the first time that MEPED therapy is highly effective in a patient with Hodgkin's disease who has been refractory to ICPi. Sustained CR was achieved over 11 months after initiation of MEPED therapy. Further studies on a larger patient cohort should be performed.

Management of limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a rare type of B-cell malignancy with bimodal age distribution targeting young adults and elderly. Prognostic models are available to identify risk of recurrence and response to treatment. Currently, positron emission tomography scanning is most useful in optimizing therapy. Outcomes are generally excellent with standard chemotherapy or combined modality therapy. Balancing efficacy and the risk of late effects in Hodgkin lymphoma is essential, including early detection of potential complications. Incorporation of novel therapies such as brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors are being explored in the frontline setting, having already demonstrated improved survival and tolerable toxicity in advanced HL. Furthermore, the addition of these agents have the potential to transform treatment paradigms for early-stage HL and may result in improved outcomes with decreased risks of late toxicities that continue to afflict long-term survivors. However, the patient population, sequencing, and combinations with cytotoxic chemotherapy all remain still standing questions as results of current and upcoming randomized trials are awaited. In this article, we discuss the current data on the approach to initial treatment of early-stage classical HL, review toxicity profiles, and examine upcoming novel therapy trials.

Clinical Dilemmas in the Treatment of Elderly Patients Suffering from Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Review

Elderly patients make up a significant number of cases of newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma. However, unlike in young patients, the outcomes of elderly patients are poor, and they are under-represented in phase III trials. Prior to treatment initiation, geriatric assessment should ideally be performed to address the patient's fitness and decide whether to pursue a curative or palliative approach. The ABVD regimen is poorly tolerated in unfit patients, with high treatment-related mortality. Alternative chemotherapy approaches have been explored, with mixed results obtained concerning their feasibility and toxicity in phase II trials. The introduction of brentuximab vedotin-based regimens led to a paradigm shift in first- and further-line treatment of elderly Hodgkin lymphoma patients, providing adequate disease control within a broader patient population. As far as checkpoint inhibitors are concerned, we are only just beginning to understand the role in the treatment of this population. In relapsed/refractory settings there are few options, ranging from autologous stem cell transplantation in selected patients to pembrolizumab, but unfortunately, palliative care is the most common modality. Importantly, published studies are frequently burdened with numerous biases (such as low numbers of patients, selection bias and lack of geriatric assessment), leading to low level of evidence. Furthermore, there are few ongoing studies on this topic. Thus, elderly Hodgkin lymphoma patients are hard to treat and represent an unmet need in hematologic oncology. In conclusion, treatment needs to be personalized and tailored on a case-by-case basis. In this article, we outline treatment options for elderly Hodgkin lymphoma patients.

Filling the Gap: The Immune Therapeutic Armamentarium for Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Despite years of clinical progress which made Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) one of the most curable malignancies with conventional chemotherapy, refractoriness and recurrence may still affect up to 20–30% of patients. The revolution brought by the advent of immunotherapy in all kinds of neoplastic disorders is more than evident in this disease because anti-CD30 antibodies and checkpoint inhibitors have been able to rescue patients previously remaining without therapeutic options. Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation still represents a significant step in the treatment algorithm for chemosensitive HL; however, the possibility to induce complete responses after allogeneic transplant procedures in patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning regimens informs on its sensitivity to immunological control. Furthermore, the investigational application of adoptive T cell transfer therapies paves the way for future indications in this setting. Here, we seek to provide a fresh and up-to-date overview of the new immunotherapeutic agents dominating the scene of relapsed/refractory HL. In this optic, we will also review all the potential molecular mechanisms of tumor resistance, theoretically responsible for treatment failures, and we will discuss the place of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the era of novel therapies.

The outcome of older adults with classic Hodgkin lymphoma in British Columbia

Outcomes in older adults with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have traditionally been poor, in part, related to poor tolerance to standard chemotherapy. Herein, we evaluated the survival of patients with cHL aged ≥60 years in British Columbia in a population-based analysis. From 1961 to 2019, 744 patients with newly diagnosed cHL were identified. With a median follow-up of 9 years, 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) have improved by decade comparison (both P < .001), remaining stable in the past 20 years (DSS, P = .35; OS, P = .26). In the modern management era (2000-present), 361 of 401 patients (90%) received active therapy for cHL and had a 5-year OS of 60%. For those who received curative-intent therapy (n = 327), the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and DSS were 60%, 65%, and 76%, respectively, and estimates were superior in those who were 60 to 69 years of age (72%, 77%, and 83%, respectively) compared with those who were 70 to 79 years of age (54%, 57%, and 70%, respectively) and ≥80 years of age (28%, 39%, and 63%, respectively) (P < .05 for all). Overall, pulmonary toxicity occurred in 58 of 279 patients (21%) treated with bleomycin, with 22 of 58 (38%) occurring after cycles 1 or 2, accounting for 8 of 20 (40%) treatment-related deaths. Outcomes in older adults with cHL have improved in recent decades; however, they remain poor for those aged ≥70 years, even in the modern treatment era. Furthermore, treatment-related toxicity remains a significant concern and use of bleomycin should be avoided in most patients.

Treatment Responses, Toxicity, and Survival in Patients with Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Aged ≥50 Years: A Single-Center Experience Over Two Decades

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment responses, toxicity, and survival among cHL patients aged ≥50 years.

Methods

We retrospectively identified all newly diagnosed cHL patients and only included cases who were ≥50 years old at the time of diagnosis and with data available between 1999 and 2020.

Results

There were 101 patients, of which 52 were between 50 and 59 years of age, and 49 patients were ≥60 years old. Sixty-two patients were male, and the most common histopathological subtype was mixed cellularity cHL (58.4%). ECOG PS, CCI, CIRS, and ACE-27 scores were significantly higher in patients aged ≥60 years than those of 50–59 age group. While all patients aged 50–59 years received ABVD as first-line therapy, 79% (n=39) of cases aged ≥60 years had ABVD. In patients receiving ABVD, 95% and 92.7% of the cases aged 50–59 and ≥60 years had CR, respectively (p=0.999). Age groups were comparable in terms of hematological and non-hematological toxicities (p=0.369, p=0.127, respectively). Although not statistically significant, median survival was longer in patients receiving a transplant than in those without transplantation (108 months vs 52 months, p=0.069). In multivariate analysis, the risk of progression was higher in patients with lymphocyte ≤600/mm³ and in those who were unresponsive to first-line therapy (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). Patients with B symptoms, age ≥60 years, and CIRS >3 had higher risk of mortality (p=0.001, p=0.012, p=0.038, respectively). By using these 3 parameters, we defined a new risk score, which divided our patient cohort into two as low- and high-risk groups. Low-risk patients had significantly higher survival rates than the high-risk group (83.9% vs 40.5%, p<0.001).

Discussion

This new prognostic score should be further tested and validated in other patient populations. Although our study has some limitations including the limited number of patients and its retrospective nature, there are not so many studies in elderly cHL patients and elderly and/or frail patients are generally excluded in most of the clinical trials. Thus, this real-life single-center experience would contribute to the literature.

Biomodulatory Treatment Regimen, MEPED, Rescues Relapsed and Refractory Classic Hodgkin's Disease

Introduction: Current combined intensive chemotherapy and radiation regimens yield excellent survival rates in advanced classic Hodgkin’s lymphoma (cHL). However, acute toxicity in elderly, comorbid patients can be challenging and long-term survival in refractory patients remains poor.

Patients and Methods: We report on six patients with r/r HL, three patients with long-term follow-up, three newly treated, after biomodulatory therapy. All patients received MEPED (treosulfan 250 mg p.o. daily, everolimus 15 mg p.o. daily to achieve serum trough levels of 15 ng/ml, pioglitazone 45 mg p.o. daily, etoricoxib 60 mg p.o. daily and dexamethasone 0.5 mg p.o. daily). Patients had either received every at that time approved systemic treatment or were ineligible for standard treatment, including immune checkpoint inhibition (ICPi) due to prior demyelinating autoimmune polyneuropathy, myasthenia gravis and previous allogeneic hematopoietic-stem-cell transplant (alloHSCT). Medication was administered continuously from day 1. One patient with relapse after alloHSCT received trofosfamide 50 mg daily instead of treosulfan to avoid risk of increased myelotoxicity. The patients were treated in individual healing attempts outside a clinical trial after institutional review board approval. ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography scan (FDG-PET/CT) was performed to monitor treatment and follow-up.

Results: In the three newly treated patients, CT scans showed partial remissions after 2–5 months on MEPED treatment. Two patients had achieved PET Deauville score 2 and 3, while the third remained positive at Deauville score 5. One patient achieving PR became eligible for alloHSCT, while the other two patients continued treatment with MEPED. All patients eventually achieved continuous complete remission (cCR), one after consecutive alloHSCT, one after discontinuing MEPED consolidation for >1 year and one on on-going MEPED consolidation, respectively. Only one patient experienced Grade 3 toxicity (bacterial pneumonia) requiring temporary discontinuation of MEPED for 10 days. All three previously published patients received allo HSCT for consolidation and have achieved cCR.

Conclusions: MEPED is well tolerated with low toxicity and highly efficacious in relapsed/refractory cHL, including severely comorbid patients. Due to its immunomodulatory components, MEPED might also have a synergistic potential when combined with ICPi but requires further evaluation within a clinical trial.