1
|
Haldeman PB, Harfouche C, Rosales R, Trimm C, Chun L, Reid C, Flint JH, Chiarappa F. Immediate and delayed flap reconstruction have equivalent outcomes and associated costs following soft tissue sarcoma surgery. J Surg Oncol 2024. [PMID: 39155702 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Surgical treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) involves wide resection of the tumor, which can necessitate soft tissue reconstruction with local or free tissue flaps. This retrospective study compares cost, surgical and oncologic outcomes between patients undergoing reconstruction with immediate versus delayed flap coverage following STS resection. METHODS Thirty-four patients who underwent planned flap reconstruction following resection of primary STS were identified retrospectively. Twenty-four (71%) received immediate reconstruction during the index surgery and 10 (29%) underwent planned delayed reconstruction. Preoperative patient-specific metrics, tumor characteristics, and surgical and patient outcomes were collected. Total hospital charges associated with every encounter during the perioperative period were obtained. RESULTS Patient demographics, comorbidities, tumor metrics, and surgical characteristics were equivalent between groups. Postoperative wound complications, reoperations, readmissions, and disease-specific survival did not differ between cohorts. Costs associated with each reconstruction strategy were equivalent on bivariate and multivariate testing, when accounting for operating room time, hospital length of stay, and reoperation rate. CONCLUSIONS Our study identifies no significant difference in patient outcome measures or cost between planned immediate and delayed flap reconstruction following STS resection. These results support the implementation of either treatment strategy in keeping with patient-centered, multidisciplinary care principles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pearce B Haldeman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Cyril Harfouche
- Department of Plastic Surgery, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Ricardo Rosales
- Department of Plastic Surgery, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Conner Trimm
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Liane Chun
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Christopher Reid
- Department of Plastic Surgery, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - James H Flint
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Frank Chiarappa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gouin F, Michot A, Jafari M, Honoré C, Mattei JC, Rochwerger A, Ropars M, Tzanis D, Anract P, Carrere S, Gangloff D, Ducoulombier A, Lebbe C, Guiramand J, Waast D, Marchal F, Sirveaux F, Causeret S, Gimbergues P, Fiorenza F, Paquette B, Soibinet P, Guilloit JM, Le Nail LR, Dujardin F, Brinkert D, Chemin-Airiau C, Morelle M, Meeus P, Karanian M, Le Loarer F, Vaz G, Blay JY. Improved Metastatic-Free Survival after Systematic Re-Excision Following Complete Macroscopic Unplanned Excision of Limb or Trunk Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1365. [PMID: 38611043 PMCID: PMC11010862 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether re-excision (RE) of a soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of limb or trunk should be systematized as adjuvant care and if it would improve metastatic free survival (MFS) are still debated. The impact of resection margins after unplanned macroscopically complete excision (UE) performed out of a NETSARC reference center or after second resection was further investigated. METHODS This large nationwide series used data from patients having experienced UE outside of a reference center from 2010 to 2019, collected in a French nationwide exhaustive prospective cohort NETSARC. Patient characteristics and survival distributions in patients reexcised (RE) or not (No-RE) are reported. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was conducted to adjust for classical prognosis factors. Subgroup analysis were performed to identify which patients may benefit from RE. RESULTS Out of 2371 patients with UE for STS performed outside NETSARC reference centers, 1692 patients were not reviewed by multidisciplinary board before treatment decision and had a second operation documented. Among them, 913 patients experienced re-excision, and 779 were not re-excised. Characteristics were significantly different regarding patient age, tumor site, size, depth, grade and histotype in patients re-excised (RE) or not (No-RE). In univariate analysis, final R0 margins are associated with a better MFS, patients with R1 margins documented at first surgery had a better MFS as compared to patients with first R0 resection. The study identified RE as an independent favorable factor for MFS (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.53-0.93; p = 0.013). All subgroups except older patients (>70 years) and patients with large tumors (>10 cm) had superior MFS with RE. CONCLUSIONS RE might be considered in patients with STS of limb or trunk, with UE with macroscopic complete resection performed out of a reference center, and also in originally defined R0 margin resections, to improve LRFS and MFS. Systematic RE should not be advocated for patients older than 70 years, or with tumors greater than 10 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francois Gouin
- Surgery Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France (G.V.)
| | - Audrey Michot
- Surgery Department, Institut Bergonié, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Mehrdad Jafari
- General and Digestive Oncologic Surgery, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Charles Honoré
- Surgery Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Jean Camille Mattei
- Orthopedic and Traumatologic Surgery Department, Hôpital Nord, Hopital de la Conception, APHM, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Alexandre Rochwerger
- Orthopedic and Traumatologic Surgery Department, Hôpital Nord, Hopital de la Conception, APHM, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Mickael Ropars
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, CHU de Rennes, 35033 Rennes, France;
| | - Dimitri Tzanis
- Surgery Department, Institut Curie, PSL University, 75248 Paris, France;
| | - Philippe Anract
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, Unités de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Sébastien Carrere
- Surgery Department, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | | | - Agnès Ducoulombier
- Senology Surgery Department, Onco-Gynécologique et Reconstructrice, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 06100 Nice, France
| | - Céleste Lebbe
- Reconstructive et Esthetic Plastic Surgery, Hôpital Saint Louis, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Guiramand
- Surgery Department, Institut Paoli Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Denis Waast
- Orthopedic and Traumatologic Surgery Clinic, CHU Nantes, 44093 Nantes, France
| | - Frédéric Marchal
- Surgery Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN, UMR 7039, 54000 Nancy, France
| | | | - Sylvain Causeret
- Surgery Department, Centre George-François Leclerc, 21079 Dijon, France;
| | - Pierre Gimbergues
- Surgery Department, Centre Jean Perrin, 63011 Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Fabrice Fiorenza
- Orthopedic and Traumatology Surgery Department, CHU Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Brice Paquette
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Jean Minjoz University Hospital, 25000 Besançon, France;
| | - Pauline Soibinet
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Godinot, 51100 Reims, France
| | - Jean-Marc Guilloit
- Visceral et Digestive Surgery Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14076 Caen, France
| | - Louis R. Le Nail
- Onco-Orthopedic Surgery Department, Hôpital Trousseau, CHRU de Tours, 37000 Tours, France
| | - Franck Dujardin
- Medical Oncology and Surgical Oncology Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, 76038 Rouen, France
| | - David Brinkert
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, CHU de Strasbourg, 67200 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Claire Chemin-Airiau
- Clinical Research and Innovation Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Magali Morelle
- Clinical Research and Innovation Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Pierre Meeus
- Surgery Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France (G.V.)
| | - Marie Karanian
- Department of Biopathology, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - François Le Loarer
- Anatomo-Pathology Surgery Department, Institut Bergonié, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Gualter Vaz
- Surgery Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France (G.V.)
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, 69008 Lyon, France
- Department of Medicine, Léon Bérard Center, Unicancer, 69008 Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sakamoto A, Noguchi T, Matsuda S. System describing surgical field extension associated with flap reconstruction after resection of a superficial malignant soft tissue tumor. World J Clin Oncol 2023; 14:471-478. [PMID: 38059186 PMCID: PMC10696220 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v14.i11.471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Flap reconstruction after resection of a superficial malignant soft tissue tumor extends the surgical field and is an indicator for potential recurrence sites. AIM To describe a grading system for surgical field extension of soft tissue sarcomas. METHODS Grading system: CD-grading is a description system consisting of C and D values in the surgical field extension, which are related to the compartmental position of the flap beyond the nearby large joint and deeper extension for the pedicle, respectively. C1/D1 are positive values and C0/D0 are negative. With a known location, 1/0 values can be "p" (proximal), "d" (distal), and "b" (in the tumor bed), and the description method is as follows: flap type, CxDx [x = 0, 1, p, d or b]. RESULTS Four representative patients with subcutaneous sarcomas who underwent reconstruction using fasciocutaneous flaps are presented. The cases involved a distal upper arm (elbow) synovial sarcoma reconstructed using a pedicled latissimus dorsi (pedicled flap: CpDp); a distal upper arm (elbow) pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma reconstructed using a transpositional flap from the forearm (transpositional flap: CdD0); an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma in the buttocks reconstructed using a transpositional flap (transpositional flap: C0D0); and a myxofibrosarcoma in the buttocks reconstructed using a propeller flap from the thigh (pedicled flap: CdDd). CONCLUSION The reconstruction method is chosen by the surgeon based on size, location, and other tumor characteristics; however, the final surgical field cannot be determined based on preoperative images alone. CD-grading is a description system consisting of C and D values in the surgical field extension that are related to the compartmental position of the flap beyond the nearby large joint and deeper extension for the pedicle, respectively. The CD-grading system gives a new perspective to the flap reconstruction classification. The CD-grading system also provides important information for follow-up imaging of a possible recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akio Sakamoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takashi Noguchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Shuichi Matsuda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jawad AM, Duraku LS, Susini F, Chaudhry T, George S, Jester A, Power DM. Resect, rewire, and restore: Nerve transfer salvage of neurological deficits associated with soft tissue tumors in a retrospective cohort series at a tertiary reconstructive center. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 85:523-533. [PMID: 37280143 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.04.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
AIMS We aimed to explore the effectiveness of nerve transfer as an intervention to restore neurological deficits caused by extremity tumors through direct nerve involvement, neural compression, or as a consequence of oncological surgery. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases was conducted, including all patients who underwent nerve transfers to restore functional deficits in limbs following soft tissue tumor resection. The threshold for a successful nerve transfer was a BMRC motor grade of 4/5 and sensory grade of 3-3+/4 with protective sensation. RESULTS In total, 29 nerve transfers (25 motor and 4 sensory) were completed in 11 patients, aged 12-70 years at referral, over a 6-year period to 2020. This included 22 upper limb and 3 lower limb motor nerve transfers. The timing of delayed nerve transfer reconstructions was 1-15 months following primary oncological resection, with immediate simultaneous reconstructions performed in 4 cases. The threshold for success was achieved in 82% of upper limb and 33% of lower limb motor nerve transfers, while all sensory transfers were successful in restoring protective sensation. CONCLUSION Nerve transfer surgery, a well-established technique in restoring deficits following traumatic nerve injury, is further demonstrably relevant in extremity oncological reconstruction, especially as it can be performed remotely to the tumor location or resection site and introduces a healthy nerve or fascicle to rapidly reinnervate distal muscles without sacrificing major function. This study further illustrates the importance of early recognition and referral to specialist services where multi-disciplinary surgical resection and reconstructive planning can be conducted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV Clinical Case Series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali M Jawad
- Department of Hand and Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Hands Plastics and Peripheral Nerve (HaPPeN) Research Group, United Kingdom
| | - Liron S Duraku
- Hands Plastics and Peripheral Nerve (HaPPeN) Research Group, United Kingdom; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Francesca Susini
- Department of Hand and Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Tahseen Chaudhry
- Department of Hand and Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Hands Plastics and Peripheral Nerve (HaPPeN) Research Group, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel George
- Department of Hand and Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Hands Plastics and Peripheral Nerve (HaPPeN) Research Group, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Jester
- Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Dominic M Power
- Department of Hand and Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Hands Plastics and Peripheral Nerve (HaPPeN) Research Group, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Traweek RS, Martin AN, Rajkot NF, Guadagnolo BA, Bishop AJ, Lazar AJ, Keung EZ, Torres KE, Hunt KK, Feig BW, Roland CL, Scally CP. Re-excision After Unplanned Excision of Soft Tissue Sarcoma is Associated with High Morbidity and Limited Pathologic Identification of Residual Disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:480-489. [PMID: 36085392 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12359-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with unplanned excision (UPE) of trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) present a significant management challenge for sarcoma specialists. Oncologic re-resection has been considered standard practice after UPE with positive or uncertain margins. A strategy of active surveillance or "watch and wait" has been suggested as a safe alternative to routine re-excision. In this context, the current study sought to evaluate short-term outcomes and morbidity after re-resection to better understand the risks and benefits of this treatment strategy. METHODS A retrospective, single-institution study reviewed patients undergoing oncologic re-resection after UPE of an STS during a 5-year period (2015-2020), excluding those with evidence of gross residual disease. Short-term clinical outcomes were evaluated together with final pathologic findings. RESULTS The review identified 67 patients undergoing re-resection after UPE of an STS. Of these 67 patients, 45 (67%) were treated with a combination of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and surgery. Plastic surgery was involved for reconstruction in 49 cases (73%). The rate of wound complications after re-resection was 45 % (n = 30), with 15 % (n = 10) of the patients experiencing a major wound complication. Radiation therapy and plastic surgery involvement were independently associated with wound complications. Notably, 45 patients (67%) had no evidence of residual disease in the re-resection specimen, whereas 13 patients (19 %) had microscopic disease, and 9 patients (13%) had indeterminate pathology. CONCLUSION Given the morbidity of re-resection and limited identification of residual disease, treatment plans and discussions with patients should outline the expected pathologic findings and morbidity of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond S Traweek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Allison N Martin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nikita F Rajkot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christopher P Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Free Functional Latissimus Dorsi Reconstruction of the Quadriceps and Hamstrings following Oncologic Resection of Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Thigh. Sarcoma 2021; 2021:8480737. [PMID: 34924809 PMCID: PMC8674066 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8480737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Limb-salvage surgery combined with radiotherapy has become the primary treatment for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. Free functional latissimus flaps (FFLF) are an option to restore function in the setting of volumetric muscle loss. The purpose of the current study was to examine the use of FFLF in patients undergoing resection of thigh sarcoma. Methods Twelve patients with a sarcoma involving the hamstring (n = 6), quadriceps (n = 5), or combined (n = 1) defects which included multiple muscle groups were reviewed. This included 9 males and 3 females with a mean age and body mass index of 56 ± 12 years and 31.3 ± 5.7 kg/m2. Results The mean defect volume and operative time was 3,689 ± 2,314 cm3 and 587 ± 73 minutes. Following reconstruction, the mean knee range of motion (ROM), MSTS93 score, and muscle strength was 89 ± 24°, 90 ± 15%, and 4 ± 1; with 75% of patients ambulating without gait aids. Seven (58%) patients sustained a complication, namely, delayed wound healing (n = 2). Conclusion Although there was a high incidence of complications, FFLF can restore active knee ROM and function, with most patients ambulating without gait aids following reconstruction of large oncologic defects in the thigh.
Collapse
|
7
|
Liang Y, Guo TH, Xu BS, Hong DC, Qiu HB, Zhou ZW, Zhang X. The Impact of Unplanned Excision on the Outcomes of Patients With Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Trunk and Extremity: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 10:617590. [PMID: 33552992 PMCID: PMC7862753 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.617590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Unplanned excision (UPE) of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is often chosen in the early phase by general physicians without any radiological evaluation. Purpose The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of UPE on the clinical outcomes of patients with STS of the trunk and extremity. Materials and Methods Patients with STS of the trunk and extremity who underwent R0 resection between 1998 and 2016 were included and divided into the UPE and planned excision (PE) groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control the selection bias. The endpoints were disease-specific survival (DSS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Results In total, 458 patients (277 males, 181 females; median age: 43 years) were included: 329 (71.8%) in the PE group and 129 (28.2%) in the UPE group. The follow-up time ranged from 7.1 to 313.78 months, with a median of 112.18 months. UPE patients were more likely to have a smaller or superficial lesion and were more frequently administered adjuvant therapy. After PSM, compared with the PE group, the UPE group had a longer LRFS (P=0.015), but there was no difference between the two groups regarding DSS and MFS. Residual disease was observed in 77.5% of the re-resected specimens in the UPE group and was a risk factor for DSS (P = 0.046) and MFS (P = 0.029) but was not associated with local recurrence (LR) (P=0.475) or LRFS (P=0.334). Moreover, we found no difference in DSS, LRFS or MFS according to the interval from UPE to definitive resection. Conclusion STS treated with UPE had distinct characteristics. Patients who undergo UPE followed by an additional wide R0 resection have similar oncological survival compared to patients who undergo an initial PE, although the high incidence of residual tumor in the UPE group leads to an unfavorable clinical course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tian-Hui Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Melanoma and Sarcoma Medical Oncology Unit, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bu-Shu Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Melanoma and Sarcoma Medical Oncology Unit, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dong-Chun Hong
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Melanoma and Sarcoma Medical Oncology Unit, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hai-Bo Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Wei Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xing Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Melanoma and Sarcoma Medical Oncology Unit, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Du XH, Wei H, Zhang P, Yao WT, Cai QQ. Heterogeneity of Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Its Implications in Targeted Therapy. Front Oncol 2020; 10:564852. [PMID: 33072594 PMCID: PMC7538626 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.564852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas are a set of malignancies of mesenchymal origin. Due to the rarity and similarity in clinical presentation, they are grouped together and treated similarly in clinic. The response rates for current chemotherapy are around 20% and the median overall survival for advanced soft tissue sarcoma are less than 2 years. Thus, the current strategy with identical treatment for all soft tissue sarcomas is far from satisfactory. In this study, we first reviewed the current clinical and genomic findings of soft tissue sarcoma, paying special attention to the heterogeneities among different tumors. Then we reviewed the state-of-art understanding of targeted therapy in soft tissue sarcoma. We observed tremendous heterogeneity both in clinical and genomic settings between different tumors. Individualized treatment plans demonstrated better response and disease control and should be advocated. In summary, heterogeneity of soft tissue sarcomas requires the development of individualized treatment plans such as targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin-Hui Du
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hua Wei
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Wei-Tao Yao
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qi-Qing Cai
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|