Does Cystocele Repair Improve Overactive Bladder Symptoms?

Resolution of Overactive Bladder Symptoms After Anterior and Apical Prolapse Repair

IMPORTANCE

Patients often present with both overactive bladder (OAB) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) concerns. It is unknown whether treatment of POP improves OAB.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether OAB improves after anterior/apical POP repair for anterior wall prolapse.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective study of women with anterior/apical prolapse at or beyond the hymen and concomitant OAB symptoms, undergoing apical repair. Overactive bladder severity was evaluated with the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6) questionnaire and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 preoperatively and 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcome was a reduction of ≥11 points or greater on the UDI-6 at 6 months. Those who reported an ≥11-point reduction were termed responders. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with reduction in OAB symptoms after POP surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients met the criteria for analysis, with 79.5% reporting improved OAB symptoms after POP repair at 6 months. There were no preoperative differences between groups. The mean preoperative UDI-6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 scores were higher in the responder group (51.1 ± 16.8 vs 26.4 ± 15.1 [P < 0.001] and 44.6 ± 23.8 vs 22.8 ± 21.4 [P = 0.001], respectively), and the presence of detrusor overactivity was lower (29.0% vs 54.2%, P = 0.02). After regression, a higher preoperative UDI-6 total was associated with an increased likelihood of symptom improvement at 6 months (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14 per point [1.08-1.19]), whereas detrusor overactivity on preoperative urodynamics was associated with a decreased likelihood of OAB symptom improvement (adjusted odds ratio, 0.10 [0.02-0.44]).

CONCLUSION

Overactive bladder symptoms improve in the majority of patients undergoing apical repair for anterior/apical prolapse beyond the hymen.

Surgical management of female pelvic organ prolapse with and without urinary incontinence: A single center experience

The study reports a single center experience with surgical management of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with and without urinary incontinence.Between January 2006 and July 2016, 93 consecutive patients with anterior and/or apical symptomatic POP underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) or pubovaginal cystocele sling (PCS); 25 patients had concomitant stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Subjective outcome was assessed by the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (short form) (PFIQ-7) investigating bladder, bowel and vaginal functions, sexual activity, and daily life. Objective outcomes included the POP anatomic correction by Baden Walker HWS classification, urinary tract infection (UTI) rates, urge urinary incontinence (UUI), and SUI rates. Data were prospectively collected.Forty-three patients underwent PCS, 29 ASC, and 21 LSC. Mean follow-up was 54.88 ± 33.1, 28.89 ± 23.5, and 16.8 ± 11.3 months for PCS, ASC, and LSC, respectively. POP recurrence occurred in 10.5%, 7.5%, and 0% while de novo (ie, in untreated compartment/s) POP occurred in 15.8%, 7.4%, and 4.8% of patients who have undergone PCS, ASC, and LSC, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of POP-free survival showed no difference among the 3 procedures. All procedures significantly reduced PFIQ-7 scores improving quality of life and the rates of recurrent UTIs and concomitant UUI. PCS cured all cases with concomitant SUI; de novo SUI occurred only in 7.4% and 4.8% of patients who have undergone ASC and LSC, respectively. Mean surgical time was significantly shorter for PCS compared to ASC and LSC (P = .0001), and for ASC compared to LSC (P = .004); there was no difference in postoperative pain and hospital stay. Compared to ASC/LSC, PCS involved a higher rate (27.9% vs 6%; P = .01) of minor complications, mainly transient urinary retention, and a lower rate (0% vs 8%; P = .06) of complications requiring surgery.In this single center experience, PCS was not only provided similar subjective and objective results than ASC and LSC but also able to correct concomitant SUI without causing de novo SUI and was safer than other 2 techniques, in female POP repair.