Advances in device lead extraction

Safe and Simplified Salvage Technique for Exposed Implantable Cardiac Electronic Devices under Local Anesthesia

Background

Skin erosion is a dire complication of implantable cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators. Classical treatments involve removal of the entire generator and lead systems, however, these may result in fatal complications. In this study, we present our experience with a simplified salvage technique for exposed implantable cardiac electronic devices (ICEDs) without removing the implanted device, in an attempt to reduce the risks and complication rates associated with this condition.

Methods

The records of 10 patients who experienced direct ICED exposure between January 2012 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The following surgical procedure was performed in all patients: removal of skin erosion and capsule, creation of a new pocket at least 1.0–1.5 cm inferior to its original position, migration of the ICED to the new pocket, and insertion of closed-suction drainage. Patients with gross local sepsis or septicemia were excluded from this study.

Results

Seven patients had cardiac pacemakers and the other 3 had implantable cardiac defibrillators. The time from primary ICED placement to exposure ranged from 0.3 to 151 months (mean, 29 months. Postoperative follow-up in this series ranged from 8 to 31 months (mean follow-up, 22 months). Among the 10 patients, none presented with any signs of overt infection or cutaneous lesions, except 1 patient with hematoma on postoperative day 5. The hematoma was successfully treated by surgical removal and repositioning of the closed-suction drainage.

Conclusions

Based on our experience, salvage of exposed ICEDs is possible without removing the device in selected patients.

Management of exposure of cardiac pacemaker systems

The erosion and exposure of pacemakers are relatively uncommon occurrences but, given the number of these devices inserted yearly, they are nevertheless occurrences that plastic surgeons are likely to encounter in practice. Although there is a general agreement that clinically infected devices are best removed, it has been established that exposed but noninfected devices can usually be managed conservatively with coverage procedures. Reports in the literature, to date, describe a number of different procedures for coverage, and these reports generally comprise small numbers of patients. This study describes 16 patients referred to a single surgeon over a 14-year period with exposure or suspected impending exposure of their cardiac pacemaker systems. Fourteen patients required surgical revision for coverage of either the generator or defunctionalized wires. Equivalent success was achieved with either subfascial or submuscular coverage in 11 patients with generators present. Three patients with exposure of defunctionalized wires achieved successful coverage with submuscular burial. There was no correlation of culture results with recurrence of exposure.

Salvage of Exposed Implantable Cardiac Electrical Devices and Lead Systems With Pocket Change and Local Flap Coverage

Erosion and exposure of pacemaker (PPM) and implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) devices are potentially dire complications, which have classically required the removal of the entire generator and lead systems. This study evaluates a series of cases wherein debridement, irrigation, pocket change, and local flap coverage were used for the successful salvage of indwelling leads after exposure and infection of implantable cardiac defibrillator devices. Patients with skin erosion, infection, and/or exposure of prepectoral infraclavicular cardiac defibrillator devices were treated over a 23-month period between June 2004 and April 2006. The surgical technique involved wide excision of the exposure site with a rhombic incision pattern, followed by removal of the generator unit and complete debridement of the peridevice capsule. Subclavian atrioventricular (AV) leads were preserved. The pocket was irrigated with antibiotic solution. A new pocket plane was selected and developed, and a new generator unit was implanted. A rhombic flap was developed and transposed to achieve tension-free closure over closed suction drains. Data were reviewed retrospectively. Six patients were treated, all male, mean age 66 years (range, 50 to 83 years). All patients presented with "new" exposure of the implantable generator within 48 hours. None demonstrated gross purulence, sepsis, or endocarditis. Initial gram stain was negative for bacteria in all cases, 1 (17%) grew sensitive Staphylococcus epidermidis species. Mean follow-up is 22 months (range, 8 to 31 months). One patient (17%) developed a hematoma, successfully treated by aspiration. Five patients (83%) were treated successfully, with no wound dehiscence, generator or lead exposure, or recurrence of infection. One patient (17%) developed drainage and exposure at a separate site (AV lead) at 10 months postoperative and required generator and lead explantation and site change to the contralateral anterior chest wall. In conclusion, in the absence of sepsis or gross infection, skin excision, pocket change, generator change with lead preservation, closed-suction drainage, and flap coverage for tension-free closure should be considered in the treatment of early ICD and PPM exposure.

Extracción de electrodos de marcapasos y desfibrilador mediante técnicas percutáneas

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

There is an increasing need for endocardial pacing and defibrillators leads to be removed. However, the procedure can be complex and it is not risk-free. We reviewed our experience between April 1989 and June 2006 with the percutaneous extraction of leads.

METHODS

In total, 314 electrodes were extracted from 187 patients. The leads had been implanted over an average period of 69.16 months (range 0.11-234.6 months, median 60.25 months). Some 115 were atrial leads, 196 were ventricular, and three were in the coronary veins; of these, 78 had been abandoned in the vascular bed.

RESULTS

Indications for removal were infection (26.1%), dysfunction (22.9%), erosion (25%), endocarditis (20.7%), and bacteremia (2.7%). Overall, 58.8% of patients were referred from other departments. In 96.8%, the electrodes were completely removed. Simple traction was used in 23.4%, and countertraction techniques (with and without radiofrequency current support) were used in 60.7%. For abandoned leads, a biopsy clamp was used in combination with countertraction (4.3%) or a femoral approach with a snare (10.1%). A sternotomy was required in three of the 10 patients with remaining electrode fragments. The complication rate was 4.6% (with major complications in 2.5%). Complications were associated with age < 60 years (odds ratio [OR]=5.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-27.23), the presence of endocarditis (OR=4.97: 95%CI, 1.04-23.70), and right side implantation (OR=17.09; 95% CI, 2.15-135.70).

CONCLUSIONS

In the majority of cases, pacing and defibrillator leads can be removed without difficulty using modern extraction techniques. However, because there is a risk of complications during extraction, even though it is low, the procedure should be carried out in specialized centers with surgical facilities.

Transxyphoid Approach to Retrieval of Retained Pacemaker Leads Using Laser Sheath

The problem of retained intracardiac foreign bodies remains a concern, particularly in symptomatic patients with endocarditis. This report describes a recently applied technique using transxyphoid application of the Spectranetics Laser Sheath (SLS) for retrieval of a retained right atrial (RA) pacemaker lead. This approach represents modification of the Byrd's technique.

Implantation of an Epicardial Dual Chamber ICD Following Unsuccessful Percutaneous Extraction of a Failed Ventricular Shocking Electrode

This report describes the case of a 22-year-old patient presenting with ICD electrode failure where attempted percutaneous electrode extraction was unsuccessful. In view of the patient's young age, an operative approach was considered most appropriate. The failed electrode was surgically extracted and a new epicardial pacing/defibrillator system inserted.

Upgrade of a chronic unipolar pacemaker to a biventricular pacemaker system

With the development of cardiac resynchronization for patients with symptomatic heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony, there are patients with chronic pacemakers that meet the indications for biventricular pacing. Typically, this involves placement of the left ventricular lead with generator change to a dual chamber biventricular pacemaker, maintaining use of the right-sided leads. There are patients with older pacemaker systems that have unipolar leads with 5/6-mm pin connectors. These patients present challenges to upgrade that are separate from typical IS-1 system upgrades. Currently there are no pacemakers manufactured that accept the chronic 5/6-mm unipolar leads directly with the additional IS-1 left heart lead. This report presents one such case in which a combination of adaptor and lead replacement resulted in upgrade to a biventricular system.

The use of radiofrequency catheter ablation to extract a chronic permanent pacemaker lead after failed laser extraction

Even with the latest advances in pacemaker lead extraction techniques, successful lead extraction via percutaneous techniques still cannot be achieved in up to 2% of procedures at qualified centers reiterating the need for further development in this area. We present an example of a novel technique using radiofrequency (RF) energy delivered with a steerable ablation catheter to facilitate lead removal using an 8-french guiding sheath (SRO, Daig corporation) and a bidirectional steerable 4 mm tip ablation catheter (EPT). With a short series of RF ablations, the pacemaker lead tip was successfully freed without complications.