Advances in interventional cardiovascular MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Cardiac Interventions

Performing intraoperative cardiovascular procedures inside an MR imaging scanner can potentially provide substantial advantage in clinical outcomes by reducing the risk and increasing the success rate relative to the way such procedures are performed today, in which the primary surgical guidance is provided by X-ray fluoroscopy, by electromagnetically tracked intraoperative devices, and by ultrasound. Both noninvasive and invasive cardiologists are becoming increasingly familiar with the capabilities of MR imaging for providing anatomic and physiologic information that is unequaled by other modalities. As a result, researchers began performing animal (preclinical) interventions in the cardiovascular system in the early 1990s.

Electromagnetic navigation for thoracic aortic stent-graft deployment: a pilot study in swine

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility of electromagnetic tracking as a method to augment conventional imaging guidance for the safe delivery, precise positioning, and accurate deployment of thoracic aortic endografts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Custom guide wires were fabricated, and the delivery catheters for thoracic aortic endoprostheses were retrofitted with integrated electromagnetic coil sensors to enable real-time endovascular tracking. Preprocedure thoracic computed tomographic (CT) angiograms were obtained after the placement of fiducial skin patches on the chest wall of three anesthetized swine, enabling automatic registration. The stent-graft deployment location target near the subclavian artery was selected on the preprocedure CT angiogram. Two steps were analyzed: advancing a tracked glidewire to the aortic arch and positioning the tracked stent-graft assembly by using electromagnetic guidance alone. Multiple CT scans were obtained to evaluate the accuracy of the electromagnetic tracking system by measuring the target registration error, which compared the actual position of the tracked devices to the displayed "virtual" electromagnetic-tracked position. Postdeployment CT angiography and necropsy helped confirm stent-graft position and subclavian artery patency.

RESULTS

A stent-graft was successfully delivered and deployed in each of the three animals by using real-time electromagnetic tracking alone. The mean fiducial registration error with autoregistration was 1.5 mm. Sixteen comparative scans were obtained to determine the target registration error, which was 4.3 mm +/- 0.97 (range, 3.0-6.0 mm) for the glidewire sensor coil. The mean target registration error for the stent-graft delivery catheter sensor coil was 2.6 mm +/- 0.7 (range, 1.9-3.8 mm). The mean deployment error for the stent-graft, defined as deployment deviation from the target, was 2.6 mm +/- 3.0.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery and deployment of customized thoracic stent-grafts with use of electromagnetic tracking alone is feasible and accurate in swine. Combining endovascular electromagnetic tracking with conventional fluoroscopy may further improve accuracy and be a more realistic multimodality approach.