Thienopyridine-Associated Drug-Drug Interactions: Pharmacologic Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance

Potential proton pump inhibitor-related adverse effects

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most common medications taken by patients worldwide. PPIs are used to treat acid-related disorders, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease, Helicobacter pylori infection, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug/stress ulceration. For some of these diseases, long-term treatment is necessary. With such prolonged use, concern and investigation into potential adverse effects has increased. In addition, data are available regarding potential anticancer effects of PPIs, especially regarding solid tumors. The aim of this review is to assess the literature on PPIs with regard to common concerns, such as drug-drug interactions, the intestinal microbiome, dementia and central nervous system disease, and osteoporosis, as well as to highlight potential negative and positive impacts of the drug in cancer.

Antiplatelet Agents for the Treatment and Prevention of Coronary Atherothrombosis

Antiplatelet drugs provide first-line antithrombotic therapy for the management of acute ischemic syndromes (both coronary and cerebrovascular) and for the prevention of their recurrence. Their role in the primary prevention of atherothrombosis remains controversial because of the uncertain balance of the potential benefits and risks when combined with other preventive strategies. The aim of this consensus document is to review the evidence for the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet drugs, and to provide practicing cardiologists with an updated instrument to guide their choice of the most appropriate antiplatelet strategy for the individual patient presenting with different clinical manifestations of coronary atherothrombosis, in light of comorbidities and/or interventional procedures.

A new mechanism of action of thienopyridine antiplatelet drugs - a role for gastric nitrosthiol metabolism?

This article outlines a new hypothesis that illustrates the potential role of the stomach (and subsequent chemical reactions involving nitrite therein) in modifying thienopyridines, such as clopidogrel. Gastric modification of thienopyridines can occur before standard accepted biotransformation pathways ensue. We hypothesised that thienopyridines expose the free thiol group once acidified (by the stomach) before biotransformation into active metabolites, and in the presence of nitrite (from saliva and the stomach) to form nitrosothiol derivatives (Thienopyridine induced-SNO formation). We have performed in vitro studies with each of the thienopyridines tablets/compounds confirming direct Th-SNO formation from the parent (inactive) drug by the following mechanism. Thienopyridine-SH + H(+ (Stomach)) +  [Formula: see text] ↔ Thienopyridine-SNO + H2O Thienopyridine-SNO (an S-nitrosothiol molecule) would have the potential to participate in all the reactions expected of native nitric oxide (NO) with added benefit that the NO "moiety" is protected, transportable and largely preserved from further reactive metabolism. All these biochemical steps are present in humans and could occur prior to enzymatic biotransformation.

[Antiplatelet therapy: resistance to traditional antiaggregation drugs and role of new antiplatelet agents]

Platelet aggregation plays a key role in the development of major cardiovascular events (MACE) related to atherothrombosis. Since the appearance of coronary stenting, the importance of measuring and modulating platelet activity has considerably increased in the scientific literature during the last decade. Double antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel administrated to stent carriers has widely demonstrated its efficacy in the prevention of MACE compared with aspirin alone. These benefits are also present when a conservatory approach is chosen for acute coronary syndrome management. However, there are an important number of patients who develop MACE despite optimal dual antiplatelet therapy, most likely related to an incomplete platelet activity inhibition. Many studies suggest an important inter-individual variability in the response to the drugs, maybe related, at least in part, to the use of different assessment techniques of platelet aggregation. Other authors suggest an incomplete platelet inhibition as a possible explanation for the presence of MACE in patients under optimal antiplatelet therapy. Resistance to usual drugs has become a clinically relevant issue that requires an individual approach where new antiplatelet agents, such as prasugrel or ticagrelor, could play an important role as stated in current consensus documents.

High on-treatment platelet reactivity and P2Y12 antagonists in clinical trials

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has substantially decreased the rate of cardiovascular events. Within the past decade, the variability in pharmacodynamic response as well as the moderate antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel has raised major concerns, since high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity has consistently been associated with increased risk for ischaemic events in PCI patients. The variability in response could be linked to genetic polymorphisms impacting on activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes as well as clinical and demographic variables, but, taken together, factors identified so far can explain only up to approximately 12% of this variability in adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation on clopidogrel. Regulatory agencies as well as major cardiac societies suggest the use of other anti-platelet medications or alternative dosing strategies for clopidogrel in patients with reduced effectiveness of clopidogrel. This review will focus on the current status of alternate strategies for more sufficient suppression of high platelet reactivity.

Pharmacology of ectonucleotidases: relevance for the treatment of cardiovascular disorders

ATP and other extracellular nucleotides have diverse and potent effects in different organs. Evidence indicates that extracellular nucleotides and nucleosides deliver crucial signals by acting upon a wide variety of purinergic receptors, which include 19 members separated in three families. Purinergic receptors encompass adenosine-sensitive receptors (P1) as well as the ATP and ADP-responsive receptors (P2). On the other side, P2 receptors are divided into ionotropic P2X receptors and G protein-coupled receptors P2Y. This system of purinergic signaling is made further complex by the fact that ectonucleotidases, membrane bound enzymes, participate in the metabolism of extracellular nucleotides, which are released by cells. Hence, ectonucleotidases are important modulators of purinergic receptor function. It should be pointed out that the ectonucleotidases includes enzymes with different substrate preferences and by their action generate different nucleotides and nucleosides as well as phosphate and pyrophosphate. A growing body of evidence points toward the fact that the expression pattern of different ectonucleotidases and purinergic receptors is implicated in several cardiovascular disorders. In this perspective, a short account is given on the role of ectonucleotidases into the pathobiology of some cardiovascular disorders and the need to develop a novel pharmacology based on those recent findings.