Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization: One Time Versus Staged Procedures for the ACS Population

Staged versus "one-time" multivessel intervention in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome

Objective

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of “one-time” versus staged multivessel stenting in elderly (≥ 60 years) patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and multivessel disease (MVD).

Methods

We analyzed data of consecutive NSTE-ACS patients with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who were enrolled in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region between 2008 and 2012. A total of 1090 eligible patients aged ≥ 60 were further categorized into “one-time” group (n = 623) and staged PCI group (n = 467) according to intervention strategy. The primary endpoint was composite outcome of myocardial infarction (MI) or cardiac death during 3-year follow-up.

Results

The estimated 3-year composite rate of cardiac death or MI was 7.0% in the staged PCI group and 9.5% in the “one-time” group (P = 0.110). Multivariate analysis confirmed the benefit of staged PCI on the primary events in the elderly (HR: 0.638, 95% CI: 0.408–0.998, P = 0.049). In a propensity score matched cohort, staged PCI was associated with lower rates of primary events (6.1% vs. 10.4%, P = 0.046) and MI (3.4% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.037) at three years. In addition, there were reduced trends in the stent thrombosis at 30 days (0.3% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.177) and at three years (1.1% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.199) in the staged PCI group. There was no significant difference in the 3-year target vessel revascularization (15.5% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.746).

Conclusions

In elderly NSTE-ACS patients with MVD, staged PCI might be an optimal strategy associated with reduced long-term cardiac death or MI compared with “one-time” PCI strategy, which needs further confirmation.

The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) for evaluation of non-culprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease

BACKGROUND

Adenosine administration is currently required for evaluation of stenosis severity with fractional flow reserve (FFR). The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) was recently introduced as an adenosine-free alternative in patients with stable CAD. The aim of the present study was to replicate the findings of previous iFR studies using an independent calculation algorithm and to evaluate the iFR for the assessment of non-culprit vessels in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

53 patients with ACS (65%) and at least one non-culprit intermediate lesion and 29 (35%) with stable CAD were included. A total of 123 stenoses were evaluated with both FFR and iFR. Classification match of iFR in ACS was not inferior to stable CAD (79.5% in ACS and 84.4% in CAD; p=0.497). Accordingly, no difference was observed in iFR/FFR correlation between ACS and stable CAD (r=0.66 in ACS vs. r=0.69 in CAD). Overall, a significant correlation was found between iFR and FFR (r=0.68; p<0.001) with a good diagnostic efficiency at ROC analysis (area under the curve: 0.87). In addition, neither the localization of the stenosis within the coronary tree (p=0.147) nor the time interval from the acute event (p=0.550) significantly influenced the concordance of iFR with FFR.

CONCLUSIONS

The iFR is a promising method for the assessment of non-culprit lesion severity in patients with acute coronary syndrome.