Cardiac resynchronization therapy update: evolving indications, expanding benefit?

Smart Pacemaker: A Review

Since the first pacemaker was implanted, nearly 60 years have passed. Since then, pacemaker technology has made major advancements that have increased both its safety and effectiveness in treating people with bradyarrhythmias. The repeated stimulation of cells in specialized "pacemaker" regions of the mammalian heart and the transmission of stimulus via the ventricles serve as evidence that the electrical function of the mammalian heart is necessary for a regular mechanical (pump) role. The development of action potentials in individual cardiac cells is linked to myocardial electrical activity and the heart's regular cooperative electrical functioning. A container or pulse initiator that houses the battery and electronics, as well as lines that connect to the myocardium to deliver a depolarizing pulse and detect intrinsic cardiac stimulation, are all parts of a pacemaker. Defibrillators could be used with artificial hearts that have electrical pacemakers integrated into them in order to treat arrhythmia, heart failure, and cardiac arrest. Modern pacemakers have units for supporting patients with other disorders like "heart failure," which happens when the heart does not pump as forcefully as it should. While many pacemakers are effective in treating different types of arrhythmias (irregular heartbeats), they also have units for treating them.

The Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization without a Defibrillator on Morbidity and Mortality: An Individual-Patient-Data Meta-Analysis of COMPANION and CARE-HF

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality for patients with heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, QRS duration >130 ms and in sinus rhythm.

OBJECTIVES

To identify patient-characteristics that predict the effect, specifically, of CRT-pacemakers (CRT-P) on all-cause mortality or the composite of hospitalisation for heart failure or all-cause mortality.

METHODS

An individual patient-data meta-analysis of the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) and Cardiac Resynchronization - Heart Failure (CARE-HF) trials. Only patients assigned to CRT-P or control (n = 1738) were included in order to avoid confounding from concomitant defibrillator therapy. The influence of baseline characteristics on treatment effects was investigated.

RESULTS

Median age was 67 (59-73) years, most patients were men (70%), 68% had a QRS duration of 150-199 ms and 80% had left bundle branch block (LBBB). Patients assigned to CRT-P had lower rates for all-cause mortality (HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.81; p < 0.0001) and the composite outcome (HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.78; p < 0.0001). No pre-specified characteristic, including sex, aetiology of ventricular dysfunction, QRS duration (within the studied range) or morphology or PR interval significantly influenced the effect of CRT-P on all-cause mortality or the composite outcome. However, CRT-P had a greater effect on the composite outcome for patients with lower body surface area (BSA) and those prescribed beta-blockers.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT-P reduces morbidity and mortality in appropriately selected patients with heart failure. Benefits may be greater in smaller patients and in those receiving beta-blockers. Neither QRS duration nor morphology independently predicted the benefit of CRT-P.