Pericardial Effusion and Cardiac Tamponade in the New Millennium

The Role of POCUS and Monitoring Systems during Emergency Pericardial Effusion in the NICU

Central venous catheterization is, now, one of the most routinely used procedures in the NICUs, helping during the care of very sick infants. Pericardial effusion is a very rare but severe complication, with a high mortality. The cases described are part of an ongoing retrospective study where the use of central catheters inserted in our surgical NICU, and its complications is being analyzed. 16 cases over 13 years are presented in this article, varying in severity from mild, self-resolving cases that were discovered during routine cardiac POCUS to cases with important hemodynamic impact associated with cardiac tamponade and cardiac arrest. Due to immediate intervention, only one of the cases led to catheter-related mortality and that was under particular conditions. Our aim is to highlight the severity of this complication, the importance of early intervention, and the impact of a highly technologized unit and widely available cardiac POCUS.

Asymptomatic Chronic Large Pericardial Effusions: To Drain or to Observe?

Pericardial effusions, especially large ones, have traditionally been regarded with concern by clinicians due to the sometimes unpredictable development of life-threatening cardiac tamponade. In the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on pericardial diseases, the simplified algorithm for pericardial effusion triage and management recommends pericardial drainage in cases of cardiac tamponade and/or suspicion of bacterial or neoplastic etiology. In the presence of acute pericarditis, empiric anti-inflammatory treatment should be given, while when a specific indication known to be associated with pericardial effusion is found, then treatment of the underlying cause is indicated. Notably, the most challenging subgroup of patients includes those with large, asymptomatic, C-reactive-protein-negative, idiopathic effusions. In the latter subjects, pericardial drainage is proposed in cases of chronic effusions (lasting more than three months). However, this recommendation is based on scant data stemming from small-sized non-randomized studies. Nevertheless, recent evidence in a larger cohort of patients pointed out that a watchful waiting strategy is a safe option in terms of complication-free survival. This review summarizes the contemporary evidence on this challenging topic and provides recommendations for tailoring individual patient treatments.

The BALTO Registry: Long-term results of percutaneous BALloon pericardioTomy in oncological patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy (PBP) in oncological patients who present with a malignant pericardial effusion (MPE).

BACKGROUND

The use of PBP as a treatment for MPE is not standardized due to the limited evidence. Furthermore, the performance of a second PBP for a recurrence after a first procedure is controversial.

METHODS

The BALTO Registry (BALloon pericardioTomy in Oncological patients) is a prospective, single-center, observational registry that includes consecutive PBP performed for MPE from October 2007 to February 2022. Clinical and procedural, characteristics, as well as clinical outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-six PBP were performed in 61 patients (65% female). Mean age was of 66.4 ± 11.2 years. In 15 cases, a second PBP procedure was performed due to recurrence despite the first PBP. The procedure could be performed effectively in all cases with only two serious complications. Ninety-five percent of cases were discharged alive from the hospital. During a median follow-up of 6.3 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0.9-10.8), MPE recurred in 24.5% cases although no recurrences were reported after the second procedure. No evidence of malignant pleural effusion developed on follow-up. The median overall survival time was 5.8 months (IQR, 0.8-10.2) and the time to recurrence after the first PBP was 2.4 months (IQR, 0.7-4.5).

CONCLUSIONS

PBP is a safe and effective treatment for MPE. It could be considered an acceptable therapy in most MPE, even in those who recur after a first procedure.

BMP2 gene transfer induces pericardial effusion and inflammatory response in the ischemic porcine myocardium

Pro-angiogenic gene therapy is being developed to treat coronary artery disease (CAD). We recently showed that bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) and vascular endothelial growth factor-A synergistically regulate endothelial cell sprouting in vitro. BMP2 was also shown to induce endocardial angiogenesis in neonatal mice post-myocardial infarction. In this study, we investigated the potential of BMP2 gene transfer to improve cardiomyocyte function and neovessel formation in a pig chronic myocardial infarction model. Ischemia was induced in domestic pigs by placing a bottleneck stent in the proximal part of the left anterior descending artery 14 days before gene transfer. Intramyocardial gene transfers with adenovirus vectors (1 × 1012 viral particles/pig) containing either human BMP2 (AdBMP2) or beta-galactosidase (AdLacZ) control gene were performed using a needle injection catheter. BMP2 transgene expression in the myocardium was detected with immunofluorescence staining in the gene transfer area 6 days after AdBMP2 administration. BMP2 gene transfer did not induce angiogenesis or cardiomyocyte proliferation in the ischemic pig myocardium as determined by the quantitations of CD31 or Ki-67 stainings, respectively. Accordingly, no changes in heart contractility were detected in left ventricular ejection fraction and strain measurements. However, BMP2 gene transfer induced pericardial effusion (AdBMP2: 9.41 ± 3.17 mm; AdLacZ: 3.07 ± 1.33 mm) that was measured by echocardiography. Furthermore, an increase in the number of immune cells and CD3+ T cells was found in the BMP2 gene transfer area. No changes were detected in the clinical chemistry analysis of pig serum or histology of the major organs, implicating that the gene transfer did not induce general toxicity, myocardial injury, or off-target effects. Finally, the levels of fibrosis and cardiomyocyte apoptosis detected by Sirius red or caspase 3 stainings, respectively, remained unaltered between the groups. Our results demonstrate that BMP2 gene transfer causes inflammatory changes and pericardial effusion in the adult ischemic myocardium, which thus does not support its therapeutic use in chronic CAD.

Pericardial Effusion and Cardiac Tamponade Pathophysiology and New Approaches to Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The objective of this manuscript is to examine up-to-date approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of pericardial effusions and cardiac tamponade.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Society of Cardiology have improved our management of the patient with pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade, but significant knowledge gaps remain. Novel diagnostic and triage strategies have been suggested, and recent information have improved our facility to assess the presence and size of a pericardial effusion, assess its hemodynamic impact, and determine its cause. Despite these recent findings, there is a scarcity of evidence-based data to direct the management of pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade. While the first-line function of echocardiography in managing these disorders is undisputed, there are increasingly niche functions for multimodality imaging.

A case of cardiac tamponade caused by T4N2M1 lung squamous cell carcinoma invading the aorta

In patients with known lung squamous cell carcinoma, it is necessary to be alert to the presence of cancer cell infiltration in the large blood vessels and the heart. In this report, we report a case of a 49-year-old man who was previously diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, underwent autoimmune cell therapy, and was diagnosed posthumously with lung cancer invading the aorta and heart, resulting in severe cardiac tamponade. This case illustrates the value and key points of autopsy in evaluating sudden deaths.

Chronic Pericardial Effusion: Causes and Management

Chronic pericardial effusion is a common pericardial syndrome whose approach has been well standardised in recent years. The main challenge associated with this condition is the progression (sometimes unheralded) to cardiac tamponade. Pericardial effusions may present either as an isolated finding or in the context of a specific etiology including autoimmune, neoplastic, or metabolic disease. Among investigations used during diagnostic work-up, echocardiography is of paramount importance for the diagnosis, sizing, and serial evaluation of the hemodynamic impact of effusions on heart diastolic function. In an individualised manner, advanced imaging including computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging should be performed, especially if baseline tests are inconclusive. Triage of these patients according to the most recent 2015 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases should take into account the presence of hemodynamic compromise as well as suspicion of malignant or purulent pericarditis as first step, C-reactive protein serum level measurement as second step, investigations for a specific condition known to be associated with pericardial effusion as third step, and finally the size and the duration of the effusion. Treatment depends on the evaluation of the above-mentioned parameters and should ideally be tailored to the individual patient. Prognosis of chronic pericardial effusions depends largely on the underlying etiology. According to novel data, the prognosis of individuals with idiopathic, chronic (> 3 months), large (> 2 cm), asymptomatic pericardial effusions is usually benign and a watchful waiting strategy seems more reasonable and cost-effective than routine drainage as previously recommended.

Cardiac tamponade

Cardiac tamponade is a medical emergency caused by the progressive accumulation of pericardial fluid (effusion), blood, pus or air in the pericardium, compressing the heart chambers and leading to haemodynamic compromise, circulatory shock, cardiac arrest and death. Pericardial diseases of any aetiology as well as complications of interventional and surgical procedures or chest trauma can cause cardiac tamponade. Tamponade can be precipitated in patients with pericardial effusion by dehydration or exposure to certain medications, particularly vasodilators or intravenous diuretics. Key clinical findings in patients with cardiac tamponade are hypotension, increased jugular venous pressure and distant heart sounds (Beck triad). Dyspnoea can progress to orthopnoea (with no rales on lung auscultation) accompanied by weakness, fatigue, tachycardia and oliguria. In tamponade caused by acute pericarditis, the patient can experience fever and typical chest pain increasing on inspiration and radiating to the trapezius ridge. Generally, cardiac tamponade is a clinical diagnosis that can be confirmed using various imaging modalities, principally echocardiography. Cardiac tamponade is preferably resolved by echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis. In patients who have recently undergone cardiac surgery and in those with neoplastic infiltration, effusive-constrictive pericarditis, or loculated effusions, fluoroscopic guidance can increase the feasibility and safety of the procedure. Surgical management is indicated in patients with aortic dissection, chest trauma, bleeding or purulent infection that cannot be controlled percutaneously. After pericardiocentesis or pericardiotomy, NSAIDs and colchicine can be considered to prevent recurrence and effusive-constrictive pericarditis.

Anagrelide-induced pericardial effusion in a patient with essential thrombocythemia

Pericardial effusion leading to cardiac tamponade can occur due to a multitude of etiologies, one of which is medication adverse effects. In patients with comorbid conditions, this can prove to be a challenge in its co-management along with the primary disease. We present a rare case of anagrelide-induced pericardial effusion that is presented with tamponade physiology in a patient with essential thrombocythemia. After cautiously weighing the risks and benefits of further invasive interventions following an unsuccessful pericardiocentesis, the decision was to stop anagrelide while managing the pericardial effusion medically. Therefore, managing pericardial effusion should be tailored to each patient individually through shared decision-making.

Variations in current clinical practice of postoperative pericardial effusion: a questionnaire study

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative pericardial effusion (PPE) occurs frequently after cardiac surgery, potentially leading to life-threatening cardiac tamponade. Specific treatment guidelines are currently lacking, possibly leading to variations in clinical practice. Our goal was to assess clinical PPE management and evaluate variation between centres and clinicians.

METHODS

A nationwide survey was sent to all interventional cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons in the Netherlands, regarding their preferred diagnostic and treatment modality of PPE. Clinical preferences were explored utilising four patient scenarios, each with a high/low echocardiographic and clinical suspicion of cardiac tamponade. Scenarios were also stratified by three PPE sizes (<1 cm, 1-2 cm, >2 cm).

RESULTS

In total, 46/140 interventional cardiologists and 48/120 cardiothoracic surgeons responded (27/31 contacted centres). Cardiologists favoured routine postoperative echocardiography in all patients (44%), whereas cardiothoracic surgeons preferred routine imaging after specific procedures, especially mitral (85%) and tricuspid (79%) valve surgery. Overall, pericardiocentesis (83%) was preferred over surgical evacuation (17%). Regarding all patient scenarios, cardiothoracic surgeons significantly preferred evacuation compared with cardiologists (51% vs 37%, p<0.001). This was also observed with cardiologists employed in surgical centres compared with non-surgical centres (43% vs 31%, p=0.02). Inter-rater analysis varied from poor to near-excellent (к 0.22-0.67), suggesting varying PPE treatment preferences within one centre.

CONCLUSION

There is significant variation in the preferred management of PPE between hospitals and clinicians, even within the same centre, possibly due to the lack of specific guidelines. Therefore, robust results of a systematic approach to PPE diagnosis and treatment are needed to formulate evidence-based recommendations and optimise patient outcome.

Can Asthma Cause Pericardial Effusion? Insights Into an Intriguing Association

BACKGROUND

Pericardial effusion (PE) is a commonly encountered condition in clinical practice, but its etiology can be difficult to identify, with many cases remaining classified as idiopathic. This study aimed to investigate whether an association exists between asthma and idiopathic PE (IPE).

METHODS

Patients who had been diagnosed with PE in the authors' outpatient cardiology clinics between March 2015 and November 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The study population was divided into 2 groups-non-IPE (NIPE) and IPE-based on whether a cause had been identified. Demographic, laboratory, and clinical data for the 2 groups were examined statistically.

RESULTS

A total of 714 patients were enrolled in the study after exclusion of 40 cases. Of these 714 patients, 558 were allocated to the NIPE group and 156 to the IPE group (NIPE group median [IQR] age, 50 [41-58] years vs IPE group median [IQR] age, 47 [39-56] years; P = .03). Asthma was significantly more prevalent among patients in the IPE group than among those in the NIPE group (n = 54 [34.6%] vs n = 82 [14.7%]; P < .001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, asthma (odds ratio, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.53-4.67]; P = .001) was found to be an independent predictor of IPE. In the IPE group, patients with asthma had either mild or moderate PE, with the right atrium being the most common location in these patients.

CONCLUSION

Asthma was an independent predictor of mild to moderate IPE. The right atrium was the most frequently encountered location for PE in patients with asthma.

A Case of a Large Malignant Pericardial Effusion on Computed Tomography Without Electrocardiographic Gating

A 67-year-old female was admitted due to dyspnea. A computed tomography (CT) disclosed a suspicious pulmonary mass and a pericardial effusion. A transthoracic echocardiogram confirmed a large-volume circumferential pericardial effusion. A pericardiocentesis was performed, and the cytological and histochemical studies later confirmed the diagnosis of pulmonary adenocarcinoma. This case report highlights the casualty of having found a cardiac tamponade through a CT not synchronized with an electrocardiogram.

Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy: efficacy in a series of malignant and nonmalignant cases

OBJECTIVE

In the case of malignant pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade, balloon pericardiotomy is an established minimally invasive option to the surgical creation of a subxiphoid pericardial window. Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy effectively drains recurrent pericardial fluid by creating a pleuro (-abdominal-) pericardial communication. Design. A series of 26 patients with underlying malignant (n = 12) and nonmalignant (n = 14) diseases underwent percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy between 2008 and 2021. All interventions were done through a subxiphoid access under local anesthesia. Results. The mean survival in the malignant and nonmalignant groups was 1.2 versus 48.0 months, respectively (p < .001). There were neither severe periinterventional complications nor in-hospital deaths. In two patients with nonmalignant disease the surgical creation of a pericardial window was necessary during follow-up. The originally described procedure was modified by the removal of all catheters at the end of the intervention. The procedure was safe. It prevented immobility and facilitated an early discharge from the hospital. Conclusion. Our experiences show that percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy is a minimally invasive approach to successfully provide palliation in the group of patients with underlying malignant disease. On the other hand, we have shown that this technique is safe and feasible in the treatment of pericardial effusion based on nonmalignant disease. We think thereby that pericardial balloon pericardiotomy can be considered as a less invasive alternative to surgery in both groups of patients.

Percutaneous pericardial catheter drainage for symptomatic uremic pericardial effusions with narrow safety margins

Background

Percutaneous pericardial catheter drainage (PCD) for pericardial effusion is generally known to be limited by the high risk associated with effusions that are less than 10 mm thick. The objective was to report cases who underwent percutaneous PCD for symptomatic uremic pericardial effusions, which were less than 10 mm thick after cardiologist declined to perform the PCDs because of the narrow safety margins.

Materials and methods

Thirteen consecutive cases (11 patients) (median age, 56 years, range, 31–83) with symptomatic uremic pericardial effusion (thickness <10 mm) affecting the pericardial space anterior to the right ventricle underwent ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous PCD between September 2015 and April 2022. Information regarding the clinical criteria, echocardiographic features, PCD details, nature of effusion, and outcomes, including success and complications were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

Pigtail catheter (8.5-Fr) insertion was successful for all patients, with a median procedure time of 7 minutes (range 4~12) without procedure-related complications. The median amount of drainage on the day of PCD was 700 mL (range, 250–1100). The median duration of catheter indwelling was 5 days (range, 1~32). In one case, the catheter was removed after 1 day due to chest pain. For all patients, pericardial effusion evacuation was achieved with relief of associated symptoms, representing 100% clinical success.

Conclusion

Percutaneous PCD may be safely performed for patients with symptomatic uremic pericardial effusions and narrow safety margins of less than 10 mm.

Fatal Cardiac Tamponade Due to a Pericardial Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor

The patient was a 34-year-old woman who suddenly collapsed. On arrival, she was in cardiac arrest. Cardiac ultrasound revealed cardiac tamponade; thus, urgent thoracotomy with pericardiotomy was performed. Spontaneous circulation was temporarily obtained; however, her circulation was not stabilized, and she ultimately died. An autopsy revealed a pericardial inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) causing bloody cardiac tamponade. There were no signs of cardiac rupture, myocardial infarction or aortic dissection. We reported the first case of fatal bloody cardiac tamponade due to pericardial IMT in an adult. An autopsy is important for clarifying the etiology in cases of fatal cardiac tamponade of unknown cause.

The safety of pericardiocentesis in patients under antithrombotic therapy: A single-center experience

Objective

This study aimed to analyze the characteristics of patients with pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis and to evaluate the safety of pericardiocentesis without discontinuation of anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing pericardiocentesis in our hospital between 2012 and 2022. Patients were categorized into the Antithrombotic Group if they had used any antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs on the day of pericardiocentesis; otherwise they were categorized into the Non-antithrombotic Group. All procedures were performed by experienced cardiologists with echocardiographic guidance. Bleeding events were defined using the National Institutes of Health scale of adverse events.

Results

A total of 501 consecutive patients were identified and 70 cases were under antithrombotic drugs (Antithrombotic Group). Patients in Antithrombotic Group were older, had more comorbidities, presented with lower platelet counts and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (all p < 0.05). Malignancy was the most common etiology for pericardial effusion in both groups (28.6% in Antithrombotic Group and 54.7% in Non-antithrombotic Group) and tuberculosis was the second etiology in the Non-antithrombotic Group (21.9%), while procedure-related effusion (17.1%) accounted for the second cause in the Antithrombotic Group. Two patients in the Antithrombotic Group had mild oozing at the puncture site that resolved without interventions (2.9 vs. 0%, p = 0.019), and no bleeding events higher than Grade 1 occurred in either group.

Conclusion

Although antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs may put patients undergoing pericardiocentesis at theoretically higher risk of bleeding, our study demonstrated that they are not associated with increased major bleeding complications.

Pericardial effusion among children: Retrospective analysis of the etiology and short-term outcome in a referral center in the south of Iran

Background and Aims

We reinvestigated the causes, symptoms, and management of childhood pericardial effusion (PE) and its gradual changes during recent years in a referral pediatric cardiology center in the south of Iran.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the profile of PE patients who were under 18 years old from 2015 to 2020. The patient's demographic, clinical, and paraclinical information was extracted and analyzed using SPSS software.

Result

In general, 150 out of 63,736 admitted patients (0.23% of the total pediatric admissions) were diagnosed with PE (male/female 1:1.17). The median age was 3.25 years (range:\ 2 days to 18 years; interquartile range: 9.5), and 50% of them were under 3 years of age. 32.6% had moderate to severe PE. Most patients presented with acute symptoms (68%) and respiratory problems, as the most common symptoms (30.6%). Tamponade signs were presented in 2% (n = 3) of the patients, and 80.7% (n = 121) were in a stable hemodynamic condition. In total, renal failure (22%) and parapneumonic effusion were the leading etiologies. Viral (7%) and bacterial (5%) pericarditis were the seventh and eighth causes; however, in severe cases, renal failure (22%) and bacterial pericarditis (14%) were dominant. In total, 14.1% (n = 21) of the patients needed pericardiocentesis that increased to 78.3% (n = 18) in severe cases. Only 6% had persistent PE for more than 3 months.

Conclusion

Childhood PE is mostly a result of renal failure and noninfectious causes. True pericarditis cases are not common, except in severe cases. It is more common in less than 3-year-old patients, and chronicity is rare. Severe cases had a high chance of pericardiocentesis, but other cases were mainly managed by treatment of the underlying causes.

Recent advances in pericarditis

Pericardial diseases are an heterogeneous group of entities, ranging from acute pericarditis to asymptomatic pericardial effusions. New advances in understanding the processes underlying them have been made. In 2020 a prospective study defined the reference intervals of the component of normal pericardial fluid, that was found to be rich in nucleated cells, proteins, albumin and LDH, at levels compatible with the inflammatory exudates of other biological fluids such as pleural or peritoneal fluid; Light's criteria should not be used to evaluate it. Recently we also analyzed systematically large chronic idiopathic non-inflammatory pericardial effusions, observing that a non-invasive wait-and-see approach may be the best choice in clinical practice in oligosymptomatic cases. Concerning acute recurrent pericarditis (RP), an innovative interaction between cardiologists, internists and pediatric rheumatologists led to the intuition of a pivotal role of IL-1 in recurrent pericarditis characterized by an evident inflammatory recurrent phenotype, and recent data have shown the striking efficacy of anakinra and rilonacept in these patients. The proper selection of the patient is important; the ideal candidate for anti-IL-1 therapy is the patient with RP with high levels of serum C-reactive protein, high fever, neutrophil leukocitosis, pleuropulmonary involvement, frequent exacerbations and resistant to conventional therapy. On the contrary, anti-IL-1 drugs are not indicated in patients with pericardial effusion whose cause is not attributable to inflammatory phenomena. Finally, many patients with RP are women of childbearing age, and the possibility for these women to become pregnant must be addressed by multidisciplinary teams.

Clinico-cytopathologic analysis of 574 Pericardial Effusion Specimens: Application of the international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology (ISRSFC) and long-term clinical follow-up

INTRODUCTION

A pericardial effusion (PE) has a variable etiology and the primary role is diagnosis of metastatic malignancy. We analyzed the PE cytology in a large cohort in accordance with the international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology (ISRSFC) and evaluated the long-term patient outcomes.

METHODS

PE specimens from 2010 to 2014 with an available clinical history, cytologic data, and pericardial biopsy results were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 574 PE specimens were obtained from 486 patients, representing 1.5% (574/38,589) of all body fluid specimens. Three hundred and eighty-two (66.6%) cases were "negative," 54 (9.4%) cases were "atypia of undetermined significance," 10 (1.7%) cases were "suspicious for malignancy," and 128 (22.3%) cases were "malignancy". The most common origin for malignant PE was the lung (82.1%), in both men (70.5%) and women (50.6%). Breast cancer (20%) in women and gastric cancer (4.9%) in men were the second most common malignant PE, respectively. The mean interval from the occurrence of malignant PE to death was 10.06 months (range; 0-116.03 months, median 3.5 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 16.7%. In addition, the 1-year survival rates after malignant PE onset were 0% for gastric cancer, 13.9% for lung cancer, 19.8% for breast cancer, and 21.1% for the other cancers (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Our present study is the first to our knowledge to classify the pericardial fluid from 574 cases in accordance with the recently published ISRSFC, and to present the long-term outcomes of patients with malignant PE at the same time. Moreover, we report for the first time that it is gastric and not lung cancer patients that have the poorest prognosis after the occurrence of malignant PE.

Eosinophilic pericardial effusion in a cat with complex systemic disease and associated peripheral eosinophilia

An 11-year-old domestic shorthair cat was referred for investigation of dry cough of 1-week duration and cardiomegaly. Echocardiography revealed pericardial effusion, and eosinophils were identified as the predominant cell type in fluid collected by pericardiocentesis. Thoracic computed tomography imaging and bronchoscopy were supportive of mild lower airway disease, while bronchoalveolar lavage confirmed eosinophilic inflammation and concurrent Mycoplasma felis infection. A few months after the initial presentation, there was clinical deterioration, and further investigation suggested intestinal lymphoma. It was hypothesized that pericardial effusion and lower airway inflammation were an early manifestation of hypereosinophilic syndrome, possibly as a paraneoplastic consequence of lymphoma.

Multimodality imaging in pericardial diseases

With a rapidly growing spectrum, non-specific symptoms and overlapping etiologies, pericardial diseases can represent a real diagnostic challenge. Consequently, multimodality imaging has taken a front seat in the diagnosis and management of these conditions. Cardiac CT offers an excellent anatomical characterization of pericardial thickening, fat stranding and/or presence of calcifications. and is also the preferred modality to assess extra-cardiac structures. Active pericardial inflammation, edema and fibrosis comprise pericardial characterization using CMR and allows for a precise diagnosis, disease staging and patient specific tailoring of therapies. PET scan still occupies a very modest role in the evaluation of pericardial diseases, but might help discriminating malignant pericardial effusion and extra-pulmonary tuberculous. More than ever, clinicians need to master how these modalities complement each other while avoiding unnecessary cost and to translate this knowledge into a more customized patient's care approach. The aim of this review is to recognize the role of multimodality imaging in the investigation of various pericardial diseases, assess how these modalities can impact the clinical course and treatment of these affections and finally elucidate their role in the patient's prognostication.

Treatment of acute cardiac tamponade: A retrospective analysis of classical intermittent versus continuous pericardial drainage

•

Acute cardiac tamponade is a highly relevant complication in modern cardiology.

•

Continuous pericardial drainage is safe and does not increase total drainage volume.

•

Continuous drainage associates with lower rates of open-heart surgical interventions.

•

Continuous drainage associates with reduced re-tamponades and mortality on day 5.

Background

Acute cardiac tamponade is a life-threatening pathology in modern cardiology as catheter-based interventions become increasingly relevant. Pericardiocentesis is usually the primary treatment of choice. However, protocols for handling of draining pigtail catheters are very variable due to limit data and require further investigation.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 52 patients with acute cardiac tamponade requiring immediate pericardiocentesis from January 2017 to August 2020. Patients were treated with a classical approach of intermittent manual aspiration or continuous pericardial drainage using a redon drainage system.

Results

Mean age of patients was 74 years in both groups. Most common causes for cardiac tamponade were percutaneous coronary interventions in about 50% and transaortic valve implantations in 25% of all cases. 28 patients were treated with classic intermittent drainage from 2017 to 2020. 24 patients were treated with continuous drainage from December 2018–2020. Compared to classical intermittent drainage treatment, continuous drainage was associated with a lower rate of a surgical intervention or cardiac re-tamponade and a lower mortality at 5 days (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.9, log-rank p = 0.03). Despite a longer total drainage time under continuous suction, drainage volumes were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion

Acute cardiac tamponade can be efficiently treated by pericardiocentesis with subsequent continuous negative pressure drainage via a pigtail catheter. Our retrospective analysis shows a significantly lower mortality, a decreased rate of interventions and lower rates of cardiac re-tamponade without any relevant side effects when compared to classical intermittent manual drainage. These findings require further investigations in larger, randomized trials.

The role of point-of-care ultrasound in the diagnosis of pericardial effusion: a single academic center retrospective study

Background

Symptomatic pericardial effusion (PCE) presents with non-specific features and are often missed on the initial physical exam, chest X-ray (CXR), and electrocardiogram (ECG). In extreme cases, misdiagnosis can evolve into decompensated cardiac tamponade, a life-threatening obstructive shock. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) on the diagnosis and therapeutic intervention of clinically significant PCE.

Methods

In a retrospective chart review, we looked at all patients between 2002 and 2018 at a major Canadian academic hospital who had a pericardiocentesis for clinically significant PCE. We extracted the rate of presenting complaints, physical exam findings, X-ray findings, ECG findings, time-to-diagnosis, and time-to-pericardiocentesis and how these were impacted by POCUS.

Results

The most common presenting symptom was dyspnea (64%) and the average systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 120 mmHg. 86% of people presenting had an effusion > 1 cm, and 89% were circumferential on departmental echocardiogram (ECHO) with 64% having evidence of right atrial systolic collapse and 58% with early diastolic right ventricular collapse. The average time-to-diagnosis with POCUS was 5.9 h compared to > 12 h with other imaging including departmental ECHO. Those who had the PCE identified by POCUS had an average time-to-pericardiocentesis of 28.1 h compared to > 48 h with other diagnostic modalities.

Conclusion

POCUS expedites the diagnosis of symptomatic PCE given its non-specific clinical findings which, in turn, may accelerate the time-to-intervention.

Laparoscopic transdiaphragmatic pericardial fenestration in palliative care: how I do it

BACKGROUND

The optimal therapeutic strategy for drainage of malignant pericardial effusion is not yet determined. Several techniques are described, with different benefits and disadvantages. The literature suggests that surgical drainage of pericardial effusions has less effusion recurrence; however, randomized controlled trials are not available. Due to the nature of the disease, quality of life should always be considered while making treatment decisions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients from November 2016 until June 2019 of our institution in the Netherlands was performed. All patients underwent laparoscopic pericardial fenestration after echocardiography and request for operative treatment by the cardiologist. The same operation technique was performed in every case.

RESULTS

Four out of five of our patients needed pericardial fenestration because of oncological diseases. No hemodynamically instability was noted during this fast technique, achieving direct relief of symptoms. No treatment-related morbidity or mortality, nor the need for re-intervention was encountered. We compared the outcome of our five patients with the existing evidence in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

In this article, we highlight the laparoscopic transdiaphragmatic pericardial fenestration as a treatment of preference in a non-acute palliative setting. This laparoscopic approach is safe, and can be a valuable alternative among the other well-known approaches.

Delayed pericardial tamponade following central venous recanalization

A patient with central venous occlusion at the junction of the superior vena cava and right atrium underwent endovascular revascularization. The leakage of contrast agents was detected during sharp recanalization that was then managed with covered stent deployment. The initial symptom of facial swelling disappeared and the vital signs were stable after treatment. Regrettably, the patient suffered from the clinical features of cardiac tamponade on the third day post-treatment, which was confirmed by computed tomography. Finally, a pericardial effusion was drained, leading to dramatic improvement in the cardiovascular status of the patient.

Cardiac Tamponade Secondary to IVC Filter Retrieval

Cardiac tamponade is a rare but potentially fatal complication of inferior vena cava filter retrieval. We discuss such a case to facilitate prompt recognition and prevention of this complication by medical providers. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).

Application of the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) on Reporting Pericardial Effusion Cytology

INTRODUCTION

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) has recently been announced. Pericardial effusion (PE) is a clinical manifestation of a large variety of both neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions. Herein, we have applied the ISRSFC on reporting PE cytopathology and report our experience in a large academic institution.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

After the Institutional Research Board approval, the electronic pathology database of a large academic institution was queried for PEs collected from January 2014 to January 2019. The diagnosis, patient demographics, and specimen volume were recorded for each case. The ISRSFC was applied and the cases were divided into 5 categories: nondiagnostic (ND), negative for malignancy (NFM), atypia of uncertain significance (AUS), suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and malignant (MAL). Each category was evaluated separately.

RESULTS

A total of 299 cases were identified, 162 females and 137 males. The age of the subjects ranged from less than a year to 89 years (average 51.25 years). The volume ranged from 3 to 1,700 mL (average 298 mL). There were 252 NFM (84.3%), 13 AUS (4.3%), 4 SFM (1.3%), and 30 MAL (10%) cases. Metastatic lung cancer followed by metastatic breast cancer were the most common malignancies involving pericardial fluid (PF). No cases were diagnosed as ND. However, no mesothelial cells were seen in 97 specimens (38% of the negative cases). None of these patients developed malignant PE in at least 6 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The ISRSFC is a user-friendly reporting system which is easily applicable on serous fluid including PF. The vast majority of PEs was benign (84.3%). Our study shows that the presence of mesothelial cells is not necessary for specimen adequacy in serous effusions as no mesothelial cells were identified in 38% of the negative cases. Metastatic lung carcinoma was the most common diagnosis of malignant effusions.

Total electrical alternans in a patient with malignant pericardial tamponade

We present a case of a 59-year-old man with acute abdominal pain and progressive shortness of breath. A focused assessment with sonography for trauma scan showed free fluid in the hepatorenal recess and in the recto-uterine recess. Later, due to clinical deterioration and the differential possibility of a pulmonary embolism or aortic dissection, a CT scan was performed which revealed large pericardial effusion. This, together with a dilated vena cava inferior and portal system, raised the suspicion of cardiac tamponade. The diagnosis was confirmed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). In retrospect, the ECG at admission showed a sinus tachycardia, low-voltage QRS complexes and a total electrical alternans corresponding with the swinging heart seen on TTE. An electrical alternans on ECG is an important diagnostic clue but is often missed, causing an unnecessary delay to proper diagnostic and therapeutic measures.