Innovations in the Endovascular Management of Critical Limb Ischemia: Retrograde Tibiopedal Access and Advanced Percutaneous Techniques

Distal Bypass Versus Infrageniculate Endovascular Intervention for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) carries a high risk of amputation and warrants urgent intervention. CLTI involving the infrageniculate vessels, in particular, carries a considerably higher risk of major limb amputation. Open surgical bypass is the historical gold standard for the treatment of tibial arterial disease; however, endovascular therapy provides an attractive alternative in this high-risk patient population. In this article, we review the existing literature regarding distal bypass and infrageniculate endovascular intervention in patients with CLTI.

Viabahn-Assisted Extra-Arterial Bypass Combined With Surgical Arterial Endarterectomy as a Salvage Technique to Treat Critical Limb Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Revascularization of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) is always challenging because of long occlusive arterial lesions with severe calcification and poor general condition. Here we describe a novel hybrid technique to treat a CLI patient.

METHODS

The patient was a 60-year-old male with left foot ulcer. Preoperative scan showed long calcific and occlusive lesions running from the left proximal common femoral artery to P1 of the popliteal artery (PA). Surgical endarterectomy was performed on the proximal femoral artery. Then, retrograde PA access was achieved to protect the vital collateral artery at the proximal PA. When the retrograde V18 guidewire failed to advance because of severe occlusion in the middle one-third of the SFA, we punctured the artery with the V18 guidewire, and manually introduced it into the lumen of the proximal SFA. Three Viabahn stent grafts were successively implanted, parts of which were situated outside the SFA.

RESULTS

Computed tomography 1 week after surgery showed patent blood flow to the left toes. Good recovery was observed during a 1-year follow up, the toe wound healed after amputation, and no rest pain recurred. Ultrasound showed 60% stenosis in the PA stent, while the other stents were patent. The anklebrachial index of the left limb was 0.48.

CONCLUSIONS

This case illustrates successful use of Viabahn-assisted extra-arterial bypass combined with surgical arterial endarterectomy to salvage the limb after CLI. This novel technique might be an alternative in carefully selected patients.

Retrograde Revascularization of Tibial Arteries in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia: Plantar-Arch Versus Transpedal Approach

PURPOSE

To compare retrograde plantar-arch and transpedal-access approach for revascularization of below-the-knee (BTK) arteries in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) after a failed antegrade approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively we identified 811 patients who underwent BTK revascularization between 1/2014 and 1/2020. In 115/811 patients (14.2%), antegrade revascularization of at least 1 tibial artery had failed. In 67/115 (58.3%), patients retrograde access to the target vessel was achieved via the femoral access and the plantar-arch (PLANTAR-group); and in 48/115 patients (41.7%) retrograde revascularization was performed by an additional retrograde puncture (TRANSPEDAL-group). Comorbidities, presence of calcification at pedal-plantar-loop/transpedal-access-site, and tibial-target-lesion was recorded. Endpoints were technical success (PLANTAR-group: crossing the plantar-arch; TRANSPEDAL-group: intravascular placement of the pedal access sheath), procedural success [residual stenosis <30% after plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA)], and procedural complications limb salvage and survival. Correlations between calcification at access site/tibial-target-lesion and technical/procedural-success were tested.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 50/67 (75%) patients of the PLANTAR-group and in 39/48 (81%) patients of the TRANSPEDAL-group (p=0.1). Procedural success was obtained in 23/67 (34%) patients of the PLANTAR-group and in 25/48 (52%) patients of the TRANSPEDAL-group (p=0.04). In 14/49 (29%) cases with calcification at the pedal-plantar loop, technical success was not achieved (p=0.04), and in 33/44 (75%) patients with calcification at the tibial-target-lesion, procedural success was not attained (PLANTAR-group) (p=0.026). In the TRANSPEDAL-group, correlations between calcification at access site/tibial-target-lesion and technical/procedural-success were not observed (p=0.2/p=0.4). In the PLANTAR-group, minor complications occurred in 13/67 (19%) and in the TRANSPEDAL-group in 4/48 patients (8%) (p=0.08). Limb salvage at 12 (18) months was 90% (82%) (PLANTAR-group; 95%CI 15.771-18.061) and 84% (76%) (TRANSPEDAL-group; 95%CI 14.475-17.823) (Log-rank p=0.46). Survival at 12 (18) months was 94% (86%) (PLANTAR-group; 95%CI 16.642-18.337) and 85% (77%) (TRANSPEDAL; 95%CI 14.296-17.621) (Log-rank p=0.098).

CONCLUSION

Procedural success was significantly higher using the transpedal-access approach. Calcifications at pedal-plantar loop and target-lesion significantly influenced technical/procedural failure using the plantar-arch approach. No significant difference between both retrograde techniques in terms of feasibility, safety, and limb salvage/survival was found.

Successful Peripheral Vascular Intervention in Patients with High-risk Comorbidities or Lesion Characteristics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Certain comorbidities and lesion characteristics are associated with increased risk for procedural complications, limb events, and cardiovascular events following peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of high-risk modifiable and unmodifiable patient characteristics and its relative impact on clinical outcomes such as amputation risk and mortality. Furthermore, general approaches to potentially mitigating these risks through pre-intervention planning and use of modern devices and techniques are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diabetes, tobacco use, and older age remain strong risk factors for the development of peripheral arterial disease. Recent data highlight the significant risk of polyvascular disease on major limb and cardiac events in advanced PAD, and ongoing studies are assessing this risk specifically after PVI. Challenging lesion characteristics such as calcified disease and chronic total occlusions can be successfully treated with PVI by utilizing novel devices (e.g., intravascular lithotripsy, re-entry devices) and techniques (e.g., subintimal arterial "flossing" with antegrade-retrograde intervention). Understanding high-risk patient comorbidities and lesion characteristics will improve our ability to counsel and manage patients with advanced PAD. Continued device innovation and novel techniques will aid in procedural planning for successful interventions to improve clinical outcomes.

Revascularization of multiple tibial arteries is not associated with improved limb salvage

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the benefit of performing multiple tibial artery revascularization compared with single vessel revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all patients with CLTI treated with below-the-knee endovascular intervention from 2012 to 2019. Group 1 included patients who had undergone single tibial artery revascularization. Group 2 included patients who had undergone multiple (two or more) tibial artery revascularization. More proximal disease, if present, was treated, in addition to the tibial disease. The primary endpoint was freedom from amputation. The secondary endpoints included the reintervention rates and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 527 limbs in 470 patients with CLTI (nonhealing ulcers, 62%; gangrene, 33%; and ischemic rest pain, 5%) were included in the present study. Of the 527 limbs, 245 (46%) had undergone single vessel revascularization and 282 (54%) had undergone multiple vessel revascularization. The mean follow-up was 19 ± 18 months. No difference was found in freedom from amputation between the two groups (68% vs 63%; P = .109). On multivariable analysis, the factors associated with amputation included dialysis (odds ratio [OR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.45), dyslipidemia (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.96-1.94), and gangrene (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.50-2.98). No differences were found in the reintervention rates between the two groups (21.2% vs 16.7%; P = .13). The overall survival rate was 73% in both study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the present large, single-center study have demonstrated that multiple below-the-knee vessel revascularization is not associated with improved limb salvage compared with single vessel revascularization.

Technical Success and Complication Rates of Retrograde Arterial Access for Endovascular Therapy for Critical Limb Ischaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Antegrade crossing techniques via transfemoral access are often challenging and may be associated with technical and clinical failure when treating patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI). The objective of this study was to summarise all available literature regarding retrograde endovascular treatment of patients with CLI and to investigate the technical success and complication rate of retrograde access.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central until May 2020. A meta-analysis of 31 observational studies (29 retrospective and two prospective; 26 and five studies with low and moderate risk of bias, respectively) was conducted with random effects modelling. The incidence of adverse events peri-procedurally and during follow up were calculated.

RESULTS

The 31 studies enrolled 1 910 patients who were treated endovascularly for femoropopliteal and/or infrapopliteal lesions causing CLI. Most of the patients had diabetes while more than half of the overall population had coronary artery disease and dyslipidaemia. All lesions were located in the infra-inguinal segment and most were chronic total occlusions (96%; 95% CI 85%-100%). Seven studies reported moderate or severe calcification in approximately half of the cases (45%; 95% CI 30%-60%). The overall technical success of the retrograde approach was 96% (18 studies; 95% CI 92%-100%). Perforation, flow limiting dissection, distal embolisation, and local haematoma at the retrograde access site were infrequent and observed in 2.1%, 0.6%, 0.1%, and 1.3% of the patients, respectively. The six month primary patency rate was 78% (five studies; 95% CI 46%-99%), the six month limb salvage rate was 77% (four studies; 95% CI 70%-84%).

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that the retrograde or bidirectional antegrade/retrograde approach is safe and effective and facilitates angioplasty when antegrade treatment fails. However, prospective studies with standardised wound care and surveillance protocols are needed to investigate retrograde techniques in patients with CLI who failed antegrade revascularisation, to improve long term limb salvage and survival.

The "Pull, Cast, and Fix" Technique for Bypass in the Midpopliteal (P2) Arterial Segment in Chronic Femoropopliteal Occlusions

Femoropopliteal bypass operations can be difficult when the occlusive disease involves the superficial femoral artery and the popliteal arterial segment above the knee joint (supragenicular artery, P1). In case of lack of suitable vein graft or when the surgeon wishes to spare to infrapopliteal segment, the choice of the midpopliteal artery as anastomotic site becomes challenging because of its location. Moreover, totally endovascular recanalization procedures in such cases can be complex and demanding, whereas other reported hybrid revascularization techniques require advanced technical skills and raise significantly the cost. Therefore, we present our suggestion of a "pull, cast, and fix" technique to encounter these challenges and facilitate a successful bypass with a synthetic graft in the upper midpopliteal (P2) segment, combing a secure endarterectomy and anastomosis even under marginal visualization by means of securing the lumen with a soft feeding tube after the artery has been pulled via a Satinsky vascular clamp. Accordingly, the procedure is accomplished with placement of a flexible self-expandable stent in the midpopliteal artery through the synthetic graft.

Digital Subtraction Angiography Prior to an Amputation for Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI): An Expert Recommendation Statement From the CLI Global Society to Optimize Limb Salvage

Despite recent guideline updates on peripheral artery disease (PAD) and critical limb ischemia (CLI) treatment, the optimal treatment for CLI is still being debated. As a result, care is inconsistent, with many CLI patients undergoing an amputation prior to what many consider to be mandatory: consultation with an interdisciplinary specialty care team and a comprehensive imaging assessment. More importantly, quality imaging is critical in CLI patients with below-the-knee disease. Therefore, the CLI Global Society has put forth an interdisciplinary expert recommendation for superselective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) that includes the ankle and foot in properly indicated CLI patients to optimize limb salvage. A recommended imaging algorithm for CLI patients is included.

WITHDRAWN: One-Year Freedom from Amputation, Survival, and Cost of Care following Tibial and Pedal Endovascular Interventions for Critical Limb Ischemia: The Role of Atherectomy and Drug-Eluting Stents

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal

Endovascular Therapy in an "All-Comers" Risk Group for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Demonstrates Safety and Efficacy When Compared with the Established Performance Criteria Proposed by the Society for Vascular Surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to describe the applicability of the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) objective performance goals (OPGs) as a tool to evaluate results in the context of endovascular management of noncomplex and complex patients (i.e., end stage renal disease/history of prosthetic conduit) with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with CLTI undergoing endovascular procedures from March 2016 to April 2017 were included, and medical records were examined. Patients were categorized as OPG risk (OPGR) and non-OPG risk (nOPGR) groups in accordance with the SVS performance criteria. We compared clinical events between the two groups and then further to the SVS OPGs. Thirty-day outcomes (safety) were major amputation (AMP), major adverse limb events (MALEs), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and 1-year outcomes (efficacy) were limb salvage, MALE + 30-day perioperative death (MALE + POD), and survival. Mortality was demonstrated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were included (OPGR = 58.3% vs. nOPGR = 41.7%). Mean follow-up was 20 months (range, 1-40 months). Retrograde pedal access was used in 65.2% of patients. The overall AMP rate was 2.7% (OPGR = 4.7%, nOPGR = 0%, P = 0.225, vs. SVS OPG<3%), MALE was 4.1% (OPGR = 7.1%, nOPGR = 0%, P = 0.135, vs. SVS OPG<8%), and MACE was 6.9% (OPGR = 2.3%, nOPGR = 13.3%, P = 0.071, vs. SVS OPG<8%). The limb salvage was 90.3% (OPGR = 88%, nOPGR = 93.3%, P = 0.46, vs. SVS OPG>84%), MALE + POD was 76.4% (OPGR = 78.6%, nOPGR = 73.4%, P = 0.606, vs. SVS OPG>71%), and survival was 77.7% (OPGR = 83.3%, nOPGR = 70%, P = 0.18, vs. SVS OPG>80%).

CONCLUSIONS

The SVS OPGs set appropriate safety and efficacy standards as a bar for new technologies. In this series, endovascular therapy in all-comers exceeded the safety and efficacy endpoints proposed by the limited risk OPG panel.

Feasibility of a circulation model for the assessment of endovascular recanalization procedures and periprocedural thromboembolism in-vitro

Aim of this study was to establish a simple and highly reproducible physiological circulation model to investigate endovascular device performance. The developed circulation model included a pneumatically driven pulsatile pump to generate a flow rate of 2.7 L/min at 70 beats per minute. Sections from the superficial femoral arteries were used in order to simulate device/tissue interaction and a filter was integrated to analyze periinterventional thromboembolism of white, red and mixed thrombi. The working fluid (3 L) was a crystalloid solution constantly tempered at 36.5 °C. To evaluate the model, aspiration thrombectomy, stent-implantation and thrombectomy with the Fogarty catheter were performed. Usability of the model was measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS) – Score. Histological specimens were prepared and analyzed postinterventional to quantify tissue/device interaction. Moreover, micro- and macroembolism were evaluated for each thrombus entity and each device. Results were tested for normality using the D’Agostino-Pearson test. Statistical comparisons of two groups were performed using the Student’s t-test. All devices were able to remove the occlusions after a maximum of 2 attempts. First-pass-recanalization was not fully achieved for aspiration thrombectomy of mixed thrombi (90.6%), aspiration thrombectomy of red thrombi (84.4%) and stent-implantation in occlusions of red thrombi (92.2%). Most micro- and macroembolism were observed using the Fogarty catheter and after stent-implantation in occlusions of white thrombi. Histological examinations revealed a significant reduction of the vascular layers suggesting vascular damage after use of the Fogarty catheter (327.3 ± 3.5 μm vs. 440.6 ± 3.9 μm; p = 0.026). Analysis of SUS rendered a mean SUS-Score of 80.4 which corresponds to an excellent user acceptability of the model. In conclusion, we describe a stable, easy to handle and reproducible physiological circulation model for the simulation of endovascular thrombectomy including device performance and thromboembolism.

Arteriovenous Fistula of the Peroneal Artery Complicating a Retrograde Access: Successful Endovascular Treatment with Covered Stent Implantation

An 80-year-old woman developed a recurrent chronic limb-threatening ischemia of the right lower limb after a popliteal artery (PA) recanalization with retrograde puncture of the peroneal artery (PR). The angiography showed the PA restenosis and an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) at the previous peroneal retrograde access site. After the PA angioplasty, the AVF was identified through selective contrast injections in multiple projections. A coronary balloon-expandable covered stent was deployed at the AVF site with complete resolution of the AVF. The final angiography demonstrated the patency of PA and PR with complete resolution of the AVF. The patient was discharged without complications, with regression of rest pain. The foot lesion healed within 2 months.

Multidisciplinary Care for Critical Limb Ischemia: Current Gaps and Opportunities for Improvement

Critical limb ischemia (CLI), defined as ischemic rest pain or nonhealing ulceration due to arterial insufficiency, represents the most severe and limb-threatening manifestation of peripheral artery disease. A major challenge in the optimal treatment of CLI is that multiple specialties participate in the care of this complex patient population. As a result, the care of patients with CLI is often fragmented, and multidisciplinary societal guidelines have not focused specifically on the care of patients with CLI. Furthermore, multidisciplinary care has the potential to improve patient outcomes, as no single medical specialty addresses all the facets of care necessary to reduce cardiovascular and limb-related morbidity in this complex patient population. This review identifies current gaps in the multidisciplinary care of patients with CLI, with a goal toward increasing disease recognition and timely referral, defining important components of CLI treatment teams, establishing options for revascularization strategies, and identifying best practices for wound care post-revascularization.

Retrograde Pedal Access-Cutting Edge or Comical?

Retrograde pedal access is a technique utilized with increasing frequency by many interventionists to address patients with advanced multilevel peripheral artery disease and significant comorbidities. This approach to revascularization is being used both in patients who fail traditional antegrade access and in some patients thought to be poor candidates for antegrade approach. However, the lack of randomized controlled trial data, or long-term results, coupled with the associated potential risks including dissection, spasm, and thrombosis have rendered retrograde pedal access a controversial topic. This article details the pros and cons associated with the debate surrounding retrograde pedal access and highlights the current literature and remaining questions regarding outcomes of this technique.