Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Pre-TAVR: Current State of the Evidence

New Whole-Heart motion correction algorithm enables diagnostic CT of aortic valve and coronary arteries in systolic phase for transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the ability of new generation snapshot freeze (NGSSF) algorithm in improving diagnostic image quality of both aortic valve and coronary arteries for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) candidates in TAVI planning CT.

METHODS

Sixty-four TAVI candidates underwent TAVI planning CT were enrolled. Scans from coronary CT angiography were reconstructed at 20%, 30%, 40%, and 75% R-R cardiac phases with NGSSF and standard (STD) algorithm. In each phase, following parameters were compared: aortic valve measurements and their reproducibility; image quality of aortic valve and coronary arteries. The diagnostic accuracies of TAVI planning CT for coronary artery stenosis in 30% R-R phase with NGSSF and STD algorithms were calculated in 47out of 64 patients with invasive coronary angiography as reference standard.

RESULTS

For subjective image quality evaluation, the excellent rate for aortic valve improved from 25.0% to 93.8% and the interpretable rate for coronary arteries increased from 20.3% to 95.3% in the 30% phase images with NGSSF compared with images with STD. For the detection of > 50% coronary artery stenosis, the 30% phase images with NGSSF provided a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 81.48%, negative predictive value of 91.7%, and positive predictive value of 78.3% on a per-patient basis; While images with STD, had a corresponding results of 95.0%, 33.33%, 90.0%, and 51.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

NGSSF significantly improves image quality for both aortic valve and coronary arteries compared with STD for TAVI patients of all heart rates. NGSSF enables the accurate measurement for aortic valve and satisfactory diagnostic performance for coronary arteries stenosis in the same systolic phase for TAVI planning.

Management of coronary artery disease in patients with aortic stenosis

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disorder in the elderly population. As a result of the shared pathophysiological processes, AS frequently coexists with coronary artery disease (CAD). These patients have traditionally been managed through surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and coronary artery bypass grafting. However, increasing body of evidence supports transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) as an alternative treatment for severe AS across the spectrum of operative risk. This has created the potential for treating AS and concurrent CAD completely percutaneously. In this review we consider the evidence guiding the optimal management of patients with severe AS and CAD. While invasive coronary angiography plays a central role in detecting CAD in patients with AS undergoing surgery or TAVI, the benefits of complementary functional assessment of coronary stenosis in the context of AS have not been fully established. Although the indications for revascularisation of significant proximal CAD in SAVR patients have not recently changed, routine revascularisation of all significant CAD before TAVI in patients with minimal angina is not supported by the latest evidence. Several ongoing trials will provide new insights into physiology-guided revascularisation in TAVI recipients. The role of the heart team remains essential in this complex patient group, and if revascularisation is being considered careful evaluation of clinical, anatomical and procedural factors is essential for individualised decision-making.

Personalised Treatment in Aortic Stenosis: A Patient-Tailored Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Approach

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) has become a game changer in the management of severe aortic stenosis shifting the concept from inoperable or high-risk patients to intermediate or low surgical-risk individuals. Among devices available nowadays, there is no clear evidence that one device is better than the other or that one device is suitable for all patients. The selection of the optimal TAVI valve for every patient represents a challenging process for clinicians, given a large number of currently available devices. Consequently, understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each valve and personalising the valve selection based on patient-specific clinical and anatomical characteristics is paramount. This review article aims to both analyse the available devices in the presence of specific clinical and anatomic features and offer guidance to select the most suitable valve for a given patient.