1
|
Chen K, Wong TH, Tan YG, Tay KJ, Tan WC, Chan J, Ho H, Cheng C, Teoh JYC, Chiu PKF, Wang HJ, Saad MB, Kanesvaran R, Li YQ, Ng CT, Tuan JKL, Yuen JSP. Cardio-oncology in advanced prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1386597. [PMID: 38947889 PMCID: PMC11211357 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1386597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Treatment intensification with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPi) have led to improved survival in advanced prostate cancer. However, ADT is linked to significant cardiovascular toxicity, and ARPi also negatively impacts cardiovascular health. Together with a higher prevalence of baseline cardiovascular risk factors reported among prostate cancer survivors at diagnosis, there is a pressing need to prioritise and optimise cardiovascular health in this population. Firstly, While no dedicated cardiovascular toxicity risk calculators are available, other tools such as SCORE2 can be used for baseline cardiovascular risk assessment. Next, selected patients on combination therapy may benefit from de-escalation of ADT to minimise its toxicities while maintaining cancer control. These patients can be characterised by an exceptional PSA response to hormonal treatment, favourable disease characteristics and competing comorbidities that warrant a less aggressive treatment regime. In addition, emerging molecular and genomic biomarkers hold the potential to identify patients who are suited for a de-escalated treatment approach either with ADT or with ARPi. One such biomarker is AR-V7 splice variant that predicts resistance to ARPi. Lastly, optimization of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors for patients through a coherent framework (ABCDE) and exercise therapy is equally important. This article aims to comprehensively review the cardiovascular impact of hormonal manipulation in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, propose overarching strategies to mitigate cardiovascular toxicity associated with hormonal treatment, and, most importantly, raise awareness about the detrimental cardiovascular effects inherent in our current management strategies involving hormonal agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Chen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ting Hong Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yu Guang Tan
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Chong Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Johan Chan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Henry Ho
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Christopher Cheng
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Peter Ka-Fung Chiu
- S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Hung Jen Wang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Marniza Binti Saad
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ravindran Kanesvaran
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - You Quan Li
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Choon Ta Ng
- Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - John Shyi Peng Yuen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Campodonico F, Foppiani L, Campodonico V, Introini C. Practical implications of androgen receptor inhibitors for prostate cancer treatment. EXPLORATION OF TARGETED ANTI-TUMOR THERAPY 2024; 5:543-550. [PMID: 38966166 PMCID: PMC11220289 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Antiandrogens have been used for the treatment of prostate cancer as a single agent or in combination with hormone deprivation therapy. New generation antiandrogens act like androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs). Their binding complex blocks the pathways of cellular proliferation and differentiation of the prostate. Enzalutamide, apalutamide and darolutamide are the new ARIs that demonstrated acceptable tolerability and toxicity, both active in hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). There is no evidence of superiority of one drug over the other, therefore the therapeutic choice depends on the safety profile in relation to the individual patient, their comorbidities and clinical condition. ARIs have also shown promising results in association with new drugs that are active on patients with metastatic CRPC carrying the mutated breast cancer gene (BRCA). Before undergoing new antiandrogenic therapies, patients should be evaluated for cardiological and metabolic risk and possible drug interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Campodonico
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Urology Unit, Galliera Hospital, 16128 Genova, Italy
| | - Luca Foppiani
- Internal Medicine, Galliera Hospital, 16128 Genova, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Introini
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Urology Unit, Galliera Hospital, 16128 Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Farzat M, Wagenlehner FM. On the relationship between various anticoagulants and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-surgeon serial analysis. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:174. [PMID: 38613654 PMCID: PMC11016122 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01933-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer patients often have other health conditions and take anticoagulants. It was believed that surgery under anticoagulants could worsen surgical results. This study aims to explore the safety of robot-assisted prostatectomy in anticoagulated patients, without any exclusion criteria. The study included 500 patients who underwent RARP by a single surgeon between April 2019 and August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, consisting of 376 men (75.2%), did not receive any anticoagulation, while Group 2, with 124 patients (24.8%), received different forms of anticoagulation. Then, the anticoagulation group was divided into 4 subgroups according to their definite anticoagulation: the aspirin 15.6%, new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) 5.4%, Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) 2%, and dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) 1.8% subgroup. Postoperative complications and readmission rates were compared between the two study groups and subgroups. Patients in the combined group 2 were older and they also carried more comorbidities compared to men in group 1 (p = 0.03, p = 0.001).The study groups had similar oncological results, with 40.4% of patients having locally advanced cancers. Catheter days were longer in the anticoagulation group (4.5 vs 4 days, p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed between study groups for overall, minor, and major complications (p = 0.160, 0.100, and 0.915, respectively). In addition, readmissions were low (5.6%) and similar between the study groups (p = 0.635). Under cautious management, RARP under diverse anticoagulation regimes is safe and has comparable results to men with no medications. Further prospective studies must be conducted to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Farzat
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Wichernstraße 40, 57074, Siegen, Germany.
- Department of Urology and Robotic Urology, Diakonie Klinikum, Siegen, Germany.
| | - Florian M Wagenlehner
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus-Liebig University of Giessen, Wichernstraße 40, 57074, Siegen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Merseburger AS, Bakshi G, Chen DY, Chiong E, Jabbour M, Joung JY, Lai AYH, Lawrentschuk N, Le TA, Ng CF, Ng CT, Ong TA, Pang JST, Rabah DM, Ragavan N, Sase K, Suzuki H, Teo MMH, Uemura H, Woo HH. Cardiovascular disease risk assessment and multidisciplinary care in prostate cancer treatment with ADT: recommendations from the APMA PCCV expert network. World J Urol 2024; 42:156. [PMID: 38483562 PMCID: PMC10940372 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04852-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the mainstay approach for prostate cancer (PCa) management. However, the most commonly used ADT modality, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS The PCa Cardiovascular (PCCV) Expert Network, consisting of multinational urologists, cardiologists and oncologists with expertise in managing PCa, convened to discuss challenges to routine cardiovascular risk assessment in PCa management, as well as how to mitigate such risks in the current treatment landscape. RESULTS The experts identified several barriers, including lack of awareness, time constraints, challenges in implementing risk assessment tools and difficulties in establishing multidisciplinary teams that include cardiologists. The experts subsequently provided practical recommendations to improve cardio-oncology care for patients with PCa receiving ADT, such as simplifying cardiovascular risk assessment, individualising treatment based on CVD risk categories, establishing multidisciplinary teams and referral networks and fostering active patient engagement. A streamlined cardiovascular risk-stratification tool and a referral/management guide were developed for seamless integration into urologists' practices and presented herein. The PCCV Expert Network agreed that currently available evidence indicates that GnRH antagonists are associated with a lower risk of CVD than that of GnRH agonists and that GnRH antagonists are preferred for patients with PCa and a high CVD risk. CONCLUSION In summary, this article provides insights and guidance to improve management for patients with PCa undergoing ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel S Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - Ganesh Bakshi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, P. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Center, Mumbai, India
| | - Dong-Yi Chen
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Edmund Chiong
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, and Department of Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Michel Jabbour
- Division of Urology, Saint Georges Hospital, Balamand University, Achrafieh, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Jae Young Joung
- Center for Urological Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Allen Yu-Hung Lai
- Global Health Program, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology and Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Chi Fai Ng
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong
| | - Choon Ta Ng
- Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Teng Aik Ong
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Jacob See-Tong Pang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Danny M Rabah
- The Cancer Research Chair and Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Narasimhan Ragavan
- Department of Urology, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India
| | - Kazuhiro Sase
- Clinical Pharmacology and Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyoshi Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Henry H Woo
- Department of Urology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Chris O.Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reiss AB, Gulkarov S, Pinkhasov A, Sheehan KM, Srivastava A, De Leon J, Katz AE. Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Focus on Cognitive Function and Mood. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 60:77. [PMID: 38256338 PMCID: PMC10819522 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men in the United States. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is currently the primary treatment for metastatic prostate cancer, and some studies have shown that the use of anti-androgen drugs is related to a reduction in cognitive function, mood changes, diminished quality of life, dementia, and possibly Alzheimer's disease. ADT has potential physiological effects such as a reduction in white matter integrity and a negative impact on hypothalamic functions due to the lowering of testosterone levels or the blockade of downstream androgen receptor signaling by first- and second-generation anti-androgen drugs. A comparative analysis of prostate cancer patients undergoing ADT and Alzheimer patients identified over 30 shared genes, illustrating common ground for the mechanistic underpinning of the symptomatology. The purpose of this review was to investigate the effects of ADT on cognitive function, mood, and quality of life, as well as to analyze the relationship between ADT and Alzheimer's disease. The evaluation of prostate cancer patient cognitive ability via neurocognitive testing is described. Future studies should further explore the connection among cognitive deficits, mood disturbances, and the physiological changes that occur when hormonal balance is altered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison B. Reiss
- Department of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA; (S.G.); (K.M.S.); (A.S.); (J.D.L.)
| | - Shelly Gulkarov
- Department of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA; (S.G.); (K.M.S.); (A.S.); (J.D.L.)
| | - Aaron Pinkhasov
- Department of Psychiatry, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA;
| | - Katie M. Sheehan
- Department of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA; (S.G.); (K.M.S.); (A.S.); (J.D.L.)
| | - Ankita Srivastava
- Department of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA; (S.G.); (K.M.S.); (A.S.); (J.D.L.)
| | - Joshua De Leon
- Department of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA; (S.G.); (K.M.S.); (A.S.); (J.D.L.)
| | - Aaron E. Katz
- Department of Urology, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA;
| |
Collapse
|