1
|
Pourfaraji SM, Moghadam MN, Moradi AM, Shirmard FO, Mohammadzadeh N, Jafarian A. Long-term survival after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a single-center study in Iran. BMC Surg 2024; 24:131. [PMID: 38702645 PMCID: PMC11067153 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02420-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) has been associated with improved survival in these patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of liver metastasectomy, also finding independent factors related to survival after liver metastasectomy. METHODS In a retrospective study, all patients with CRLM who underwent resection of liver metastases between 2012 and 2022 at Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex in Tehran, Iran, were enrolled. All patients were actively followed based on clinicopathologic and operative data. RESULTS A total of 248 patients with a median follow-up time of 46 months (Range, 12 to 122) were studied. Eighty-six patients (35.0%) underwent major hepatectomy, whereas 160 (65.0%) underwent minor hepatectomy. The median overall survival was 43 months (Range, 0 to 122 months), with estimated 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of 91%, 56%, and 42%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a metastasis size > 6 cm, major hepatectomy, rectum as the primary tumor site, and involved margin (< 1 mm) were independent factors associated with decreased overall survival (OS). CONCLUSION Surgical resection is an effective treatment for patients with CRLM that is associated with relatively favorable survival. A negative margin of 1 mm seems to be sufficient for oncological resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mehdi Nazari Moghadam
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation, School of Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Mohammad Moradi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation, School of Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Narjes Mohammadzadeh
- Department of Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Ali Jafarian
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation, School of Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kitano Y, Ono Y, Kobayashi K, Oba A, Sato T, Ito H, Inoue Y, Shinozaki E, Yamaguchi K, Saiura A, Baba H, Takahashi Y. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: a single-institution retrospective study. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:282-290. [PMID: 37985325 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to extract prognostic factors in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for borderline resectable colorectal liver metastasis (BR-CRLM) (tumor size ≥5 cm, number of tumors ≥4, or resectable extrahepatic diseases) and assess validity of this strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Since 2010, patients with BR-CRLM were treated with hepatectomy after six cycles of NAC. Prognostic factors of these patients were evaluated using clinicopathological data. RESULTS Of 650 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for CRLM from 2010 to 2018, 246 BR-CRLM cases underwent hepatectomy after NAC (BR-NAC). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 16.7% and the 5-year overall survival rate (5y-OS) was 52.9%. Number of tumors ≥6, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level ≥25 ng/mL, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, and progressive disease (PD) after NAC were identified as independent poor prognostic factors for OS. Patients were divided into four groups according to the number of risk factors, and prognoses of the four groups were well stratified. CONCLUSION In patients with BR-NAC, number of tumors ≥6, CEA ≥25 ng/mL, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, and PD after NAC were independent poor prognostic factors. Patients with three or four risk factors showed poor prognosis and may need to switch chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Kitano
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Ariake, Japan; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ono
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Ariake, Japan.
| | - Kosuke Kobayashi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Ariake, Japan
| | - Atsushi Oba
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Ariake, Japan
| | - Takafumi Sato
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Ariake, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ito
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Ariake, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Ariake, Japan
| | - Eiji Shinozaki
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Ariake, Japan
| | - Kensei Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Ariake, Japan
| | - Akio Saiura
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Ariake, Japan; Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Ariake, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saklani A, Kazi M, Desouza A, Sharma A, Engineer R, Krishnatry R, Gudi S, Ostwal V, Ramaswamy A, Dhanwat A, Bhargava P, Mehta S, Sundaram S, Kale A, Goel M, Patkar S, Vartey G, Kulkarni S, Baheti A, Ankathi S, Haria P, Katdare A, Choudhari A, Ramadwar M, Menon M, Patil P. Tata Memorial Centre Evidence Based Management of Colorectal cancer. Indian J Cancer 2024; 61:S29-S51. [PMID: 38424681 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_66_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This review article examines the evidence-based management of colorectal cancers, focusing on topics characterized by ongoing debates and evolving evidence. To contribute to the scientific discourse, we intentionally exclude subjects with established guidelines, concentrating instead on areas where the current understanding is dynamic. Our analysis encompasses a thorough exploration of critical themes, including the evidence surrounding complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy in colon cancers. Additionally, we delve into the evolving landscape of perioperative chemotherapy in both colon and rectal cancers, considering its nuanced role in the context of contemporary treatment strategies. Advancements in surgical techniques are a pivotal aspect of our discussion, with an emphasis on the utilization of minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery in both colon and rectal cancers, including advanced rectal cases. Moving beyond conventional radical procedures, we scrutinize the feasibility and implications of endoscopic resections for small tumors, explore the paradigm of organ preservation in locally advanced rectal cancers, and assess the utility of total neoadjuvant therapy in the current treatment landscape. Our final segment reviews pivotal trials that have significantly influenced the management of colorectal liver and peritoneal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avanish Saklani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Mufaddal Kazi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Advanced Centre of the Treatment, Research, and Education in Cancer, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Ashwin Desouza
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Ankit Sharma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Advanced Centre of the Treatment, Research, and Education in Cancer, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Rahul Krishnatry
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Shivkumar Gudi
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Vikas Ostwal
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Anant Ramaswamy
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Aditya Dhanwat
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Prabhat Bhargava
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Shaesta Mehta
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Sridhar Sundaram
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Aditya Kale
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Mahesh Goel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Shraddha Patkar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Gurudutt Vartey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Suyash Kulkarni
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Akshay Baheti
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Suman Ankathi
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Purvi Haria
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Aparna Katdare
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Amit Choudhari
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Mukta Ramadwar
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Munita Menon
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Prachi Patil
- Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fernández Montes A, Alonso V, Aranda E, Élez E, García Alfonso P, Grávalos C, Maurel J, Vera R, Vidal R, Aparicio J. SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for the systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (2022). Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:2718-2731. [PMID: 37133732 PMCID: PMC10425293 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03199-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in Spain. Metastatic disease is present in 15-30% of patients at diagnosis and up to 20-50% of those with initially localized disease eventually develop metastases. Recent scientific knowledge acknowledges that this is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous disease. As treatment options increase, prognosis for individuals with metastatic disease has steadily improved over recent decades. Disease management should be discussed among experienced, multidisciplinary teams to select the most appropriate systemic treatment (chemotherapy and targeted agents) and to integrate surgical or ablative procedures, when indicated. Clinical presentation, tumor sidedness, molecular profile, disease extension, comorbidities, and patient preferences are key factors when designing a customized treatment plan. These guidelines seek to provide succinct recommendations for managing metastatic CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Fernández Montes
- Medical Oncology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario, Ourense (CHUO), C/ Ramón Puga, 56, 32005 Ourense, Spain
| | - Vicente Alonso
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - Enrique Aranda
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Elena Élez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall D’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pilar García Alfonso
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Grávalos
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joan Maurel
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ruth Vera
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Rosario Vidal
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jorge Aparicio
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kasai S, Ashida R, Sugiura T, Ohgi K, Yamada M, Otsuka S, Kagawa H, Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Uesaka K. Long‐term outcomes of staged liver resection for synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer and the clinical impact of early recurrence: A single‐center retrospective cohort study. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2022; 7:318-325. [PMID: 36998298 PMCID: PMC10043767 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term outcomes of staged liver resection for synchronous liver metastases (SLM) from colorectal cancer (CRC), and to elucidate the prognostic impact and predictors of early recurrence (ER), which was defined as recurrence within 6 mo. Methods Patients with SLM from CRC, except for initially unresectable SLM, from January 2013 to December 2020 were included. First, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) after staged liver resection were evaluated. Second, eligible patients were classified as follows: patients who were unresectable after resection of CRC (UR), patients with ER, and patients without ER (non-ER), and their OS after resection of CRC were compared. In addition, risk factors for ER were identified. Results The 3-y OS and RFS rates after resection of SLM were 78.8% and 30.8%, respectively. Next, the eligible patients were classified as follows: ER (N = 24), non-ER (N = 56), and UR (N = 24). The non-ER group had a significantly better OS than the ER (3-y OS: 89.7% vs 48.0%, P = .001) and UR (3-y OS: 89.7% vs 61.6%, P < .001) groups, while there was no significant difference between the ER and UR groups in OS (3-y OS: 48.0% vs 61.6%, P = .638). Increasing carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) before and after resection of CRC was identified as an independent risk factor for ER. Conclusion Staged liver resection for SLM from CRC was feasible and useful for oncological evaluation, as changes in CEA could predict ER, which was associated with a poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunsuke Kasai
- Division of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
- Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Ryo Ashida
- Division of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
| | - Teiichi Sugiura
- Division of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
| | - Katsuhisa Ohgi
- Division of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
| | - Mihoko Yamada
- Division of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
| | - Shimpei Otsuka
- Division of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
| | - Hiroyasu Kagawa
- Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
| | - Akio Shiomi
- Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
| | - Yusuke Kinugasa
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Katsuhiko Uesaka
- Division of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jones A, Kaelberer Z, Clancy T, Fairweather M, Wang J, Molina G. Association between race, hospital volume of major liver surgery, and access to metastasectomy for colorectal liver metastasis. Am J Surg 2022; 224:522-529. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
7
|
Di Martino M, Dorcaratto D, Primavesi F, Syn N, Blanco-Terés L, Dupré A, Piardi T, Rhaiem R, Fernández GB, De Armas Conde N, Rodríguez Sanjuán JC, Santiago RF, Fernández-Moreno MC, Ferret G, Ben SL, Suárez Muñoz MÁ, Perez-Alonso AJ, Koh YX, Jones R, Vennarecci G, Martín-Pérez E. Liver resection in elderly patients with extensive CRLM: Are we offering an adequate treatment? A propensity score matched analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2021; 48:1331-1338. [PMID: 35000821 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on the management of elderly patients with extensive colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are scarce and conflicting. This study assesses differences in management and long-term oncological outcomes between older and younger patients with CRLM and a high Tumour Burden Score (TBS). METHODS International multicentre retrospective study on patients with CRLM and a category 3 TBS, submitted to liver resection. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age (younger and older than 75) and were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and multivariable regression models. Differences in management and oncological outcomes including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS The study included 386 patients, median follow-up was 48 months. The unmatched comparison revealed a higher ASA score (p = 0.035), less synchronous CRLM (47% vs 68%, p = 0.003), a lower median number of lesions (1 vs 3, p = 0.004) and less perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) (66% vs 88%, p < 0.001) in the elderly group. Despite the absence of CTx being an independent predictor of decreased RFS and OS (HR 0.760, p = 0.044 and HR 0.719, p = 0.049, respectively), the elderly group still received less CTx (OR 0.317, p = 0.001) than the younger group. After PSM (n = 100 patients), the two groups were comparable, however, CTx administration was still significantly lower in the elderly group. CONCLUSION Liver resection should be considered in patients aged 75 and older, even if they present with extensive liver disease. Despite CTx being associated with improved oncological outcomes, a large percentage of elderly patients with CRLM are undertreated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Di Martino
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain; Department Hepatobiliar Surgery and Liver Transplant. A.O.R.N. Cardarelli, Napoli, Italy
| | - Dimitri Dorcaratto
- Department of Surgery, Liver, Biliary, and Pancreatic Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Salzkammergutklinikum Vöcklabruck, Vöcklabruck, Austria.
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
| | - Lara Blanco-Terés
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Aurélien Dupré
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France; Department of Surgery, HPB Unit, Simone Veil Hospital, Troyes, France.
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France.
| | - Gerardo Blanco Fernández
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplantation Surgery. University Hospital of Badajoz. INUBE (Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura). University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
| | - Noelia De Armas Conde
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplantation Surgery. University Hospital of Badajoz. INUBE (Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura). University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
| | | | | | | | - Georgina Ferret
- Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
| | | | | | - Alejandro J Perez-Alonso
- Unidad de Cirugia HBP y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
| | - Robert Jones
- Department of Surgery, Liver, Biliary, and Pancreatic Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Giovanni Vennarecci
- Department Hepatobiliar Surgery and Liver Transplant. A.O.R.N. Cardarelli, Napoli, Italy.
| | - Elena Martín-Pérez
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kitano Y, Hayashi H, Matsumoto T, Kinoshita S, Sato H, Shiraishi Y, Nakao Y, Kaida T, Imai K, Yamashita YI, Baba H. Borderline resectable for colorectal liver metastases: Present status and future perspective. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:756-763. [PMID: 34512899 PMCID: PMC8394381 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i8.756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) may offer the best opportunity to improve prognosis. However, only about 20% of CRLM cases are indicated for resection at the time of diagnosis (initially resectable), and the remaining cases are treated as unresectable (initially unresectable). Thanks to recent remarkable developments in chemotherapy, interventional radiology, and surgical techniques, the resectability of CRLM is expanding. However, some metastases are technically resectable but oncologically questionable for upfront surgery. In pancreatic cancer, such cases are categorized as “borderline resectable”, and their definition and treatment strategies are explicit. However, in CRLM, although various poor prognosis factors have been identified in previous reports, no clear definition or treatment strategy for borderline resectable has yet been established. Since the efficacy of hepatectomy for CRLM was reported in the 1970s, multidisciplinary treatment for unresectable cases has improved resectability and prognosis, and clarifying the definition and treatment strategy of borderline resectable CRLM should yield further improvement in prognosis. This review outlines the present status and the future perspective for borderline resectable CRLM, based on previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Kitano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Hayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
| | - Takashi Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
| | - Shotaro Kinoshita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
| | - Hiroki Sato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
| | - Yuta Shiraishi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
| | - Yosuke Nakao
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
| | - Takayoshi Kaida
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
| | - Katsunori Imai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
| | - Yo-ichi Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Molina G, Ferrone CR, Qadan M. Failure to Refer Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases to a Multidisciplinary Oncology Team Should be a "Never-Event". J Natl Med Assoc 2020; 112:553-555. [PMID: 32576388 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- George Molina
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cristina R Ferrone
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vera R, González-Flores E, Rubio C, Urbano J, Valero Camps M, Ciampi-Dopazo JJ, Orcajo Rincón J, Morillo Macías V, Gomez Braco MA, Suarez-Artacho G. Multidisciplinary management of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: a consensus of SEOM, AEC, SEOR, SERVEI, and SEMNIM. Clin Transl Oncol 2019; 22:647-662. [PMID: 31359336 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02182-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has the second-highest tumor incidence and is a leading cause of death by cancer. Nearly 20% of patients with CRC will have metastases at the time of diagnosis, and more than 50% of patients with CRC develop metastatic disease during the course of their disease. A group of experts from the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology, the Spanish Association of Surgeons, the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology, the Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, and the Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging met to discuss and provide a multidisciplinary consensus on the management of liver metastases in patients with CRC. The group defined the different scenarios in which the disease can present: fit or unfit patients with resectable liver metastases, patients with potential resectable liver metastases, and patients with unresectable liver metastases. Within each scenario, the different strategies and therapeutic approaches are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Vera
- Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Calle Irunlarrea, 3, 31008, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
| | | | - C Rubio
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Urbano
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Vithas Hospitals Group, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Valero Camps
- Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Rotger (Quiron Salud), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - J J Ciampi-Dopazo
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - J Orcajo Rincón
- Nuclear Medicine, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - V Morillo Macías
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
| | - M A Gomez Braco
- Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - G Suarez-Artacho
- Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Qadan M, D’Angelica MI, Kemeny NE, Cercek A, Kingham TP. Robotic hepatic arterial infusion pump placement. HPB (Oxford) 2017; 19:429-435. [PMID: 28132735 PMCID: PMC5633044 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2016] [Revised: 12/10/2016] [Accepted: 12/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) placement is associated with improved outcomes in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). In this study, we examined outcomes following robotic HAIP placement, which were compared with open and laparoscopic placement. METHODS A retrospective review of HAIP placements by 2 surgeons at a single institution was carried out. All statistical tests were 2-sided and p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS There were a total of 53 open HAIP cases, 21 laparoscopic cases, and 24 robotic cases. Robotic HAIP placement was associated with a significantly lower conversion rate to open operation than laparoscopic pump placement (17 vs. 67%; p = 0.0009). When cases with concomitant resections were excluded, there was a trend towards shorter median length of hospital stay with robotic pump placement compared with open and laparoscopic placement (4 vs. 5 vs. 5 days, respectively; p = 0.09). Complication rates were equivalent among the 3 groups when concomitant resections were excluded. CONCLUSION Robotic HAIP placement is a safe minimally-invasive procedure that is associated with a significantly lower conversion rate to open operation compared with laparoscopic placement and a trend towards shorter hospitalization compared with open placement.
Collapse
|