Insulin secretagogues: who, what, when, and how?

Comparison between the effect of glibenclamide and captopril on experimentally induced diabetic nephropathy in rats

HYPOTHESIS

This study aimed to elucidate the role of glibenclamide in the prevention of diabetic nephropathy and to compare it with a reference drug captopril in rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were two main groups of rats. Control group (I) was subdivided into four subgroups which received distilled water, vehicle of streptozotocin, glibenclamide or captopril. The streptozotocin-diabetic Group (II) was subdivided into three subgroups: untreated, glibenclamide or captopril treated. Measurement of arterial blood pressure, serum glucose and creatinine levels, 24 h urinary protein and albumin/creatinine ratio, kidney weight and its histological examination were done after 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

In treated diabetic rats captopril reduced blood pressure significantly, while no significant change in the mean arterial blood pressure or blood glucose level was recorded with glibenclamide treatment. Glibenclamide and captopril-treated diabetic rats showed significant decrease in serum creatinine level, urine volume, urinary protein excretion, albumin:creatinine ratio and kidney:body weight ratio compared with the diabetic non-treated group. Histological examination of diabetic kidneys treated with either glibenclamide or captopril showed reduced glomerular hypertrophy, glomerulosclerosis, tubular degeneration and interstitial fibrosis compared with untreated diabetic rats.

CONCLUSION

Glibenclamide attenuated some biochemical and histological changes produced by diabetic nephropathy, despite persistent hyperglycemia and hypertension.

Cloning and expression of canine glucagon receptor and its use to evaluate glucagon receptor antagonists in vitro and in vivo

Glucose homeostasis is maintained by the combined actions of insulin and glucagon. Hyperglucagonemia and/or elevation of glucagon/insulin ratio have been reported in diabetic patients and in animal models of diabetes. Therefore, antagonizing glucagon receptor function has long been considered a useful approach to lower hyperglycemia. Dogs serve as an excellent model for studying glycemic control and various aspects of glucagon biology in vivo; however, the amino acid sequence of the dog glucagon receptor has not been reported. To better understand the pharmacology of the dog glucagon receptor and to characterize glucagon receptor antagonists, we cloned a cDNA corresponding to the glucagon receptor from dog liver RNA. The dog glucagon receptor shares a significant (>75%) homology at both nucleotide and amino acid levels with the glucagon receptor from human, monkey, mouse, and rat. The protein is highly conserved among all species in areas corresponding to the 7 trans-membrane domains. However, it shows significant divergence at the carboxy terminus such that the receptor from dog has the longest cytoplasmic tail among all species examined. When expressed in chinese hamster ovary cells, the dog glucagon receptor bound [125I]Glucagon with a K(d) of 477+/-106 pM. Glucagon stimulated the rise of intracellular cAMP levels in these cells with an EC(50) of 9.6+/-1.7 nM and such effects could be blocked by known peptidyl and non-peptidyl small molecule antagonists. In addition we show that a small molecule glucagon receptor antagonist with significant activity in cell based assays also blocked the ability of glucagon to induce elevation in blood glucose in beagle dogs. These data demonstrate that the cloned cDNA encodes a functional dog glucagon receptor. The availability of the dog cDNA will facilitate the understanding of glucagon pharmacology and aid in the characterization of novel glucagon antagonists that may serve as anti-hyperglycemic treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus.