Using oral agents to manage gestational diabetes: what have we learned?

Synthesis, in vitro and in silico screening of 2-amino-4-aryl-6-(phenylthio) pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitriles as novel α-glucosidase inhibitors

Inhibition of α-glucosidase enzyme is of prime importance for the treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM). Apart of many organic scaffolds, pyridine based compounds have previously been reported for wide range of bioactivities. The current study reports a series of pyridine based synthetic analogues for their α-glucosidase inhibitory potential assessed by in vitro, kinetics and in silico studies. For this purpose, 2-amino-4-aryl-6-(phenylthio)pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitriles 1-28 were synthesized and subjected to in vitro screening. Several analogs, including 1-3, 7, 9, 11-14, and 16 showed many folds increased inhibitory potential in comparison to the standard acarbose (IC₅₀ = 750 ± 10 µM). Interestingly, compound 7 (IC₅₀ = 55.6 ± 0.3 µM) exhibited thirteen-folds greater inhibition strength than the standard acarbose. Kinetic studies on most potent molecule 7 revealed a competitive type inhibitory mechanism. In silico studies have been performed to examine the binding mode of ligand (compound 7) with the active site residues of α-glucosidase enzyme.

Effect of Glyburide vs Subcutaneous Insulin on Perinatal Complications Among Women With Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Randomized trials have not focused on neonatal complications of glyburide for women with gestational diabetes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare oral glyburide vs subcutaneous insulin in prevention of perinatal complications in newborns of women with gestational diabetes.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Insulin Daonil trial (INDAO), a multicenter noninferiority randomized trial conducted between May 2012 and November 2016 (end of participant follow-up) in 13 tertiary care university hospitals in France including 914 women with singleton pregnancies and gestational diabetes diagnosed between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation.

INTERVENTIONS

Women who required pharmacologic treatment after 10 days of dietary intervention were randomly assigned to receive glyburide (n=460) or insulin (n=454). The starting dosage for glyburide was 2.5 mg orally once per day and could be increased if necessary 4 days later by 2.5 mg and thereafter by 5 mg every 4 days in 2 morning and evening doses, up to a maximum of 20 mg/d. The starting dosage for insulin was 4 IU to 20 IU given subcutaneously 1 to 4 times per day as necessary and increased according to self-measured blood glucose concentrations.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was a composite criterion including macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and hyperbilirubinemia. The noninferiority margin was set at 7% based on a 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Among the 914 patients who were randomized (mean age, 32.8 [SD, 5.2] years), 98% completed the trial. In a per-protocol analysis, 367 and 442 women and their neonates were analyzed in the glyburide and insulin groups, respectively. The frequency of the primary outcome was 27.6% in the glyburide group and 23.4% in the insulin group, a difference of 4.2% (1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 10.5%; P=.19).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This study of women with gestational diabetes failed to show that use of glyburide compared with subcutaneous insulin does not result in a greater frequency of perinatal complications. These findings do not justify the use of glyburide as a first-line treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01731431.

Metformin in gestational diabetes mellitus: predictors of poor response

OBJECTIVE

Metformin can be regarded as a first-line treatment in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) due to its safety and effectiveness. However, a proportion of women do not achieve adequate glycemic control with metformin alone. We aim to identify predictors of this poor response to metformin.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective multicentre cohort study of women with GDM who started metformin as first-line treatment. The assessed cohort was divided into a metformin group and metformin plus insulin group. Biometric and demographic characteristics, glycemic control data, obstetric, neonatal and postpartum outcomes were compared between groups and analysed in order to identify predictors of poor response to metformin. Data were analysed using STATA, version 13.1.

RESULTS

Of the 388 women enrolled in the study, 135 (34.8%) required additional insulin therapy to achieve the glycemic targets. Higher age (aOR: 1.08 (1.03-1.13), P = 0.003), higher pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) (1.06 (1.02-1.10), P = 0.003) and earlier introduction of metformin (0.89 (0.85-0.94), P < 0.001) were independent predictors for insulin supplementation. Regarding all the analysed outcomes, only cesarean delivery rates and postpartum glucose levels were higher in women requiring insulin supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although almost 35% of women did not achieve adequate glycemic control with metformin, insulin supplementation was not associated with poor neonatal outcomes. Higher age, higher pre-pregnancy BMI and earlier introduction of metformin could be used as predictors of poor response to metformin.

Insulin detemir versus glyburide in women with gestational diabetes mellitus

AIM

To evaluate the safety, efficacy and pregnancy outcomes of insulin detemir (IDet) versus glyburide treatment in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with GDM who were treated with either glyburide or IDet for GDM in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients with GDM were enrolled, 62 were administered glyburide and 29 IDet. Maternal age, pregestational body mass index (BMI) and rate of abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) blood glucose values were not significantly different between groups. Good glycemic control rates were comparable. Hypoglycemic episodes were reported only in the glyburide group (19.4% versus 0%, p = 0.01). Maternal weight gain during pregnancy was significantly higher among women in the glyburide group (8.8 ± 5.1 kg, p < 0.001) compared to those in the IDet group (2.1 ± 19.9 kg, p = 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on IDet treatment in patients with GDM. By our preliminary results, IDet is a viable treatment option in women with GDM. Further large prospective studies are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of IDet in GDM patients.

Oral Medications for Diabetes in Pregnancy: Use in a Rural Population

IN BRIEF The oral agents glyburide and metformin are both recommended by many professional societies for the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Both therapeutic modalities have published safety and efficacy data, but there remains much debate among experts. Providers need a clear treatment plan for GDM based on a predictable level of clinical success in obtaining treatment goals. The proper selection of ideal candidates is paramount in achieving clinical success with the use of these medications in the treatment of GDM. This article presents clinical strategies for using oral agents in the management of GDM based on a pragmatic approach taken in a group of rural Native American women.