1
|
Rizzi A, Kloecker DE, Pitocco D, Khunti K, Davies MJ, Zaccardi F. Translating trial results into interpretable risk estimates: Systematic analysis of cardiorenal outcome trials of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2024; 34:1129-1133. [PMID: 38336546 DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS In a randomised controlled trial (RCT), the between-arm difference in the average probability of an event per unit of time (i.e., yearly incidence risk difference, YIRD) is an easy-to-interpret treatment effect metric. We aimed to quantify the YIRD in cardiorenal RCTs of GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2is. METHODS AND RESULTS We digitally searched for RCTs published up to March 1st, 2023, including subjects with type 2 diabetes randomised to GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2is and investigating cardiorenal outcomes or death. We extracted information from Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots to obtain time-to-event individual data and estimate within-arm yearly incidence risk and YIRD. Data from 19 RCTs (28 kM plots) were analysed: comparing treatment to placebo, in GLP-1RA RCTs the YIRD ranged from 0.2 % (95 % CI: -0.7 %, 1.1 %) to -1.9 % (-3.1, -0.7), for primary outcome; and from -0.2 % (-0.5, 0.2) to -0.4 % (-0.7 %, -0.0 %), for mortality. With the exception of SOLOIST-WHF (YIRD 11.9 % for primary outcome), corresponding estimates in SGLT-2is RCTs were: from -0.1 % (-0.4, 0.1) to -5.0 % (-7.7, -2.6), for primary outcome; and from -0.1 % (-0.2, 0.1) to -1.9 % (-4.4 %, 0.6 %), for mortality. CONCLUSION The YIRD metric complements other relative treatment effect estimates and helps quantify the absolute benefit of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Rizzi
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK; Diabetes Care Unit, Catholic University, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
| | - David E Kloecker
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
| | - Dario Pitocco
- Diabetes Care Unit, Catholic University, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK; NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care-East Midlands, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
| | - Melanie J Davies
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care-East Midlands, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK; NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
| | - Francesco Zaccardi
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK; NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care-East Midlands, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK; NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Berg DD, Moura FA, Bellavia A, Scirica BM, Wiviott SD, Bhatt DL, Raz I, Bohula EA, Giugliano RP, Park JG, Feinberg MW, Braunwald E, Morrow DA, Sabatine MS. Assessment of Atherothrombotic Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 81:2391-2402. [PMID: 37344040 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk of atherothrombotic events is not uniform in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Tailored risk assessment may help guide selection of pharmacotherapies for cardiovascular primary and secondary prevention. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to develop a risk model for atherothrombosis in patients with T2DM. METHODS We developed and validated a risk model for myocardial infarction (MI) or ischemic stroke (IS) in a pooled cohort of 42,181 patients with T2DM from 4 TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) clinical trial cohorts. Candidate variables were assessed with multivariable Cox regression, and independent variables (P < 0.05) were retained in the final model. Discrimination and calibration were assessed. Treatment interactions with dapagliflozin (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor) and evolocumab (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor) were explored in the DECLARE-TIMI 58 (Dapagliflozin Effect on CardiovascuLAR Events-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 58) and FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects with Elevated Risk) trials, respectively. RESULTS Sixteen variables were independent predictors of MI or IS. The model identified a >8-fold gradient of MI or IS rates between the top vs bottom risk quintiles in the validation cohort (3-year Kaplan-Meier rate: 14.9% vs 1.4%; P < 0.0001). C-indexes were 0.704 and 0.706 in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The model was well-calibrated in both primary and secondary prevention. Absolute reduction in the rates of MI or IS tended to be greater in patients with higher baseline predicted risk for both dapagliflozin (absolute risk reduction: 2.1% vs 0.2%) and evolocumab (absolute risk reduction: 3.2% vs 1.0%). CONCLUSIONS We developed and validated a risk score for atherothrombotic events, leveraging 16 routinely assessed clinical variables in patients with T2DM. The score has the potential to improve risk assessment and inform clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D Berg
- TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Filipe A Moura
- TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrea Bellavia
- TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin M Scirica
- TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephen D Wiviott
- TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Itamar Raz
- Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Erin A Bohula
- TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert P Giugliano
- TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeong-Gun Park
- TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mark W Feinberg
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eugene Braunwald
- TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David A Morrow
- TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marc S Sabatine
- TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Scheen AJ, Bonnet F. Efficacy and safety profile of SGLT2 inhibitors in the elderly: How is the benefit/risk balance? DIABETES & METABOLISM 2023; 49:101419. [PMID: 36640828 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2023.101419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a highly prevalent health condition in the aging population. Older adults with T2DM have higher risks of cardiovascular disease, heart failure (long underestimated) and premature death than those without diabetes. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have proven their ability to improve cardiovascular prognosis and reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (hHF). However, several adverse events have been reported, whose incidence and severity might be increased in the elderly population. The aims of this comprehensive review were to analyze the benefit-risk ratio of SGLT2i therapy in older patients with T2DM by collecting data from (i) large prospective placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trials (including those dedicated to heart failure), using both original publications and dedicated post-hoc analyses across different age groups and (ii) observational cohort studies, describing the effects of SGLT2is versus other glucose-lowering agents on cardiovascular outcomes and hHF in elderly patients or these effects in different age groups. Overall, consistent results showed a similar relative risk reduction in cardiovascular mortality and hHF with SGLT2is independently of age. The absolute risk reduction may be greater in elderly because of a higher background risk in older versus younger patients. Similarly, the safety profile of SGLT2is appeared comparable in older versus younger patients. In conclusion, the benefit/risk balance favors the use of SGLT2is in older patients at risk of cardiovascular disease and/or heart failure. Caution may be required in very old frail patients, especially those exposed to an increased risk of volume depletion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André J Scheen
- Division of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Disorders, Department of Medicine, CHU, Liege, Belgium; Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research on Medicines (CIRM), Liège University, Liege, Belgium.
| | - Fabrice Bonnet
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Université ́ Rennes 1, Rennes, France; INSERM U1018, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|