Approach to patients with refractory constipation

Diverting Loop Ileostomy in the Management of Medically Refractory Constipation Cases Not Falling Into Classical Categories

BACKGROUND

The approach to constipation refractory to medical management does not necessarily follow classical teaching and is challenging. Although the role of surgery is unclear, diverting loop ileostomy may be offered to gauge symptom response followed by colectomy for appropriate patients.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to examine outcomes in patients with constipation not falling into classical subtypes who underwent diverting loop ileostomy creation as the initial surgical intervention. Our secondary aim was to offer patients colectomy and anastomosis and examine their outcome if they improved after ileostomy.

DESIGN

The study design was a retrospective review.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in the pelvic floor center of our colorectal surgery department from January 2006 to December 2018.

PATIENTS

Patients with medically refractory constipation referred for surgical consideration and not falling into classical constipation categories (slow transit, normal transit, or pelvic floor dysfunction) underwent evaluation with transit marker study, cinedefecography, and anal physiology and were offered ileostomy as initial surgical management.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary measures were symptom improvement and self-reported quality of life improvement with increased patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients underwent diverting loop ileostomy as initial surgical therapy. Group 1 had 54 (62%) patients who self-reported symptom improvement, discontinued anticonstipation medication, and had ileostomy output >200 mL/day. Of these 54 patients, 25 had colectomy with anastomosis, 16 (64%) of whom had symptom improvement, stayed off bowel medication, and had >1 bowel movement daily. Group 2 had 33 patients who did not meet the above criteria after initial ileostomy. Nine patients in group 2 elected colectomy with anastomosis after intensive counseling; 6 (66%) reported the same positive results above.

LIMITATIONS

The study limitations included: 1) no objective outcome measures of patient's perceived symptom improvement and satisfaction and 2) retrospective review.

CONCLUSION

Initial creation of diverting loop ileostomy may be offered to a subset of refractory constipation patients not falling into classical categories after thorough workup. Patients who self-report symptom improvement, have ileostomy output >200 mL/day, and do not require bowel medication may have acceptable results with subsequent colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B854.

ILEOSTOMA EN ASA DERIVATIVA EN CASOS DE ESTREIMIENTO REFRACTARIOS AL TRATAMIENTO MDICO, QUE NO PERTENECEN A LAS CATEGORAS CLSICAS

ANTECEDENTES:El enfoque del estreñimiento refractario al tratamiento médico, que no siempre se presenta como las formas descritas clasicamente, es un desafío. Si bien el papel de la cirugía no está claro, se puede ofrecer una ileostomía en asa para medir la respuesta de los síntomas, seguida de colectomía en pacientes seleccionados.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados de pacientes con estreñimiento, que no pertenecen a las formas clásicas de presentación, que se les realizó una ileostomía en asa de derivación, como intervención quirúrgica inicial. El objetivo secundario fue ofrecer a los pacientes una colectomía con anastomosis primaria y evaluar si mejoraban sus resultados después de la ileostomía.DISEÑO:El diseño del estudio fue una revisión retrospectiva.MARCO:Este estudio se realizó en el centro del piso pélvico de nuestro departamento de cirugía colorrectal, e incluyo los pacientes atendidos entre enero de 2006 y diciembre de 2018.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron los pacientes con estreñimiento refractario al tratamiento médico, derivados para evaluación quirúrgica, que no presentaban las formas clásicas de presentación (tránsito lento, tránsito normal, disfunción del suelo pélvico). Estos se sometieron a evaluación con estudio de tránsito colónico, cinedefecografía y fisiología anal, y se les ofreció una ileostomía en asa como tratamiento quirúrgico inicial.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las primeras medidas fueron la mejora de los síntomas y la calidad de vida informado por el paciente.RESULTADOS:Ochenta y siete pacientes fueron sometidos a ileostomía en asa como tratamiento quirúrgico inicial. El grupo 1 tenía 54 (62%) pacientes que informaron mejoría de los síntomas, interrumpieron la medicación proquinética y tuvieron un débito por la ileostomía >200 cc/día. De estos 54 pacientes, 25 se sometieron a colectomía más anastomosis primaria y 16 (64%) tuvieron una mejoría de los síntomas, dejaron de tomar medicamentos proquinéticos y tuvieron más de una evacuación al día. El grupo 2 tenía 33 pacientes que no cumplían con los criterios de mejoría de los síntomas después de la ileostomía inicial. Nueve pacientes del grupo 2 eligieron colectomía con anastomosis después de un asesoramiento intensivo, 6 (66%) informaron resultados positivos de mejoría de los síntomas.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones del estudio incluyeron 1) ninguna medida de resultado objetiva de la mejora y satisfacción de los síntomas percibidos por el paciente 2) revisión retrospectiva.CONCLUSIÓNES:La creación inicial de una ileostomía en asa de derivación se puede ofrecer a un subgrupo de pacientes con estreñimiento refractario que no entran en las categorías clásicas después de un estudio exhaustivo. La mejoría de los síntomas, informado por los pacientes, producción de ileostomía >200 cc/día y que no requieren medicación proquinética, pueden tener resultados aceptables con colectomía y anastomosis ileorrectal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/Bxxx. (Traducción-Dr. Rodrigo Azolas).

Effects of Automatic Abdominal Massage Device in Treatment of Chronic Constipation Patients: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Manual abdominal massage has been shown to effectively treat slow-transit constipation, but it is labor-intensive. To offer an alternative treatment option for constipation, the Bamk-001 automatic abdominal massage device was developed. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the Bamk-001 device on symptom profiles and colon transit time (CTT) in patients with chronic constipation.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with chronic functional constipation diagnosed using the Rome IV criteria were enrolled prospectively from December 2018 to February 2019. All patients received device-assisted automatic abdominal massage for 15 min twice daily, once in the morning before breakfast and once at night, for 14 days. CTT was measured before and at the end of the study period. Slow-transit constipation and very-slow-transit constipation were defined as CTT ≥ 48 h and ≥ 72 h, respectively. Patients' symptom profiles regarding overall defecation satisfaction and device-related adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 37 patients, the mean age was 40.1 ± 11.8, and 5.4% (n = 2) were men. The Bamk-001 device significantly improved CTT from 54.0 (33.6-75.6) to 28.8 (18.0-52.8) h (p = 0.001) in patients with chronic constipation. In subgroup analysis, CTT improved significantly from 54.0 (33.6-75.6) to 28.8 (18.0-52.8) h (p = 0.003) and from 88.2 (74.4-124.8) to 45.6 (27.3-74.1) h (p = 0.005) in the slow-transit and very-slow-transit constipation groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Moreover, all patient symptoms were alleviated after treatment. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

The Bamk-001 automatic abdominal massage device showed significant care efficacy, including the improvement in CTT and symptom profiles in patients with slow-transit constipation. The use of an automatic abdominal massage device as an adjunct in the management of constipation is a potentially beneficial intervention for patients with slow-transit constipation.

Treatment of slow transit constipation-induced ileus during pregnancy by colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Slow transit constipation is a major cause of chronic constipation. During pregnancy, changes in hormone levels and the physical effects of an enlarged uterus could cause new onset slow transit constipation or aggravate a pre-existing constipation. The management of slow transit constipation-induced ileus during pregnancy is a medical dilemma.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 28-year-old pregnant woman presented to the emergency department with a 7-day history of worsening bloating and abdominal colic. The patient was in her third trimester (27 weeks). She had a 5-year history of constipation which had worsened with her pregnancy, and neither flatus nor stool could be passed.

DIAGNOSIS

Based on the constipation history and computed tomography, a slow transit constipation-induced ileus was confirmed.

INTERVENTIONS

As medications for the management of constipation and endoscopic efforts to remove the blockage were ineffective and the patient's symptoms worsened, Cesarean section and colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis were performed.

OUTCOMES

After the procedure, the patient recovered and defecated well. At the 6-month follow-up, the patient reported that she defecated two to three times per day without difficulty.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy can worsen pre-existing constipation and cause ileus. In cases where drug treatment is unsuccessful, colectomy, and ileorectal anastomosis may be necessary.

Usefulness of Bisacodyl Testing on Therapeutic Outcomes in Refractory Constipation

BACKGROUND

Although chronically constipated patients usually respond to medical treatment, there is a subgroup with scarce/no response, generally labeled as refractory or intractable. However, whether this lack of response is real or due to ancillary causes (suboptimal dosage, lack of compliance etc.) is unknown.

AIMS

To see whether a pharmacologic test (bisacodyl colonic intraluminal infusion during manometric assessment) may predict the therapeutic outcome.

METHODS

Data of patients undergoing 24/h colonic manometry for severe intractable constipation in whom the bisacodyl test (10 ml of drug dissolved into saline and injected through the more proximal recording port) had been carried out were retrieved and analysed, and correlations with the therapeutic outcome made.

RESULTS

Overall, charts from 38 patients (5 men) were available; of these, only 21% displayed naive high-amplitude propagated contractions (average, less than 2/24 h), mostly meal-induced, during the recordings. A bisacodyl response was present in 31.6% patients, with a mean number of events of 1.8 per patient. After bisacodyl testing, 47.3% patients underwent intensive medical treatment, 44.7% surgery (medical failures), and 8% transanal irrigation, a procedure employed to treat refractory patients. The presence of naive propulsive contractions significantly correlated with the response to bisacodyl infusion (p < 0.0001), and with a favourable outcome to intensive medical treatment (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The bisacodyl test may be clinically useful to better categorize constipated patients erroneously labelled as intractable and to exclude true colonic inertia, thus avoiding surgery in more than 30% of these subjects.

Does colectomy predispose to small intestinal bacterial (SIBO) and fungal overgrowth (SIFO)?

Objectives

After subtotal colectomy, 40% of patients report chronic gastrointestinal symptoms and poor quality of life. Its etiology is unknown. We determined whether small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) or small intestinal fungal overgrowth (SIFO) cause gastrointestinal symptoms after colectomy.

Methods

Consecutive patients with unexplained abdominal pain, gas, bloating and diarrhea (>1 year), and without colectomy (controls), and with colectomy were evaluated with symptom questionnaires, glucose breath test (GBT) and/or duodenal aspiration/culture. Baseline symptoms, prevalence of SIBO/SIFO, and response to treatment were compared between groups.

Results

Fifty patients with colectomy and 50 controls were evaluated. A significantly higher (p = 0.005) proportion of patients with colectomy, 31/50 (62%) had SIBO compared to controls 16/50 (32%). Patients with colectomy had significantly higher (p = 0.017) prevalence of mixed SIBO/SIFO 12/50 (24%) compared to controls 4/50 (8%). SIFO prevalence was higher in colectomy but not significant (p = 0.08). There was higher prevalence of aerobic organisms together with decreased anaerobic and mixed organisms in the colectomy group compared to controls (p = 0.008). Patients with colectomy reported significantly greater severity of diarrhea (p = 0.029), vomiting (p < 0.001), and abdominal pain (p = 0.05) compared to controls, at baseline. After antibiotics, 74% of patients with SIBO/SIFO in the colectomy and 69% in the control group improved (p = 0.69).

Conclusion

Patients with colectomy demonstrate significantly higher prevalence of SIBO/SIFO and greater severity of gastrointestinal symptoms. Colectomy is a risk factor for SIBO/SIFO.

Understanding and treating refractory constipation

Chronic constipation is a frequently encountered disorder in clinical practice. Most constipated patients benefit from standard medical approaches. However, current therapies may fail in a proportion of patients. These patients deserve better evaluation and thorough investigations before their labeling as refractory to treatment. Indeed, several cases of apparent refractoriness are actually due to misconceptions about constipation, poor basal evaluation (inability to recognize secondary causes of constipation, use of constipating drugs) or inadequate therapeutic regimens. After a careful re-evaluation that takes into account the above factors, a certain percentage of patients can be defined as being actually resistant to first-line medical treatments. These subjects should firstly undergo specific diagnostic examination to ascertain the subtype of constipation. The subsequent therapeutic approach should be then tailored according to their underlying dysfunction. Slow transit patients could benefit from a more robust medical treatment, based on stimulant laxatives (or their combination with osmotic laxatives, particularly over the short-term), enterokinetics (such as prucalopride) or secretagogues (such as lubiprostone or linaclotide). Patients complaining of obstructed defecation are less likely to show a response to medical treatment and might benefit from biofeedback, when available. When all medical treatments prove to be unsatisfactory, other approaches may be attempted in selected patients (sacral neuromodulation, local injection of botulinum toxin, anterograde continence enemas), although with largely unpredictable outcomes. A further although irreversible step is surgery (subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or stapled transanal rectal resection), which may confer some benefit to a few patients with refractoriness to medical treatments.

Treatment of chronic constipation with colchicine: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial

OBJECTIVE

Refractory constipation is a common GI complaint seen by physicians in all practice settings. We have previously shown that p.d. colchicine (0.6 mg t.i.d.) increases the number of spontaneous bowel movements, hastens GI transit, and improves GI symptoms in patients with chronic constipation during an 8-wk, open-label therapeutic trial. The aim of this study was to determine if p.d. colchicine will increase spontaneous bowel movements and accelerate colonic transit in patients with idiopathic chronic constipation in a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

METHODS

A total of 16 patients (15 women, one man) with a mean age of 47 yr (age range 25-89) with chronic idiopathic constipation who were refractory to standard medical therapy participated in the study. Patients randomly received either colchicine 0.6 mg p.o. t.i.d. or an identical placebo p.o. t.i.d. for a total of 4 wk in a double-blind, crossover fashion. Patients recorded their daily number of bowel movements and daily symptoms of daily nausea, abdominal pain, and bloating. Mean colonic transit was calculated at baseline, weeks 6 and 12.

RESULTS

Colchicine increased the number of bowel movements and accelerated colonic transit compared with baseline and placebo conditions. There were no significant differences between conditions on ratings of nausea and bloating. During colchicine administration, mean abdominal pain was greater than the baseline or placebo conditions, however, the pain decreased significantly by the last week the patient was on colchicine.

CONCLUSION

Colchicine increases the frequency of bowel movements and hastens colonic transit in patients with chronic constipation. Colchicine may be an effective agent available to practitioners to treat a subset of patients with chronic constipation who are refractory to standard medical therapy.

Slow Transit Constipation

The diagnosis of slow transit functional constipation is based upon diagnostic testing of patients with idiopathic constipation who responded poorly to conservative measures such as fiber supplements, fluids, and stimulant laxatives. These tests include barium enema or colonoscopy, colonic transit of radio-opaque markers, anorectal manometry, and expulsion of a water-filled balloon. Plain abdominal films can identify megacolon, which can be further characterized by barium or gastrografin studies. Colonic transit of radio-opaque markers identifies patients with slow transit with stasis of markers in the proximal colon. However, anorectal function should be characterized to exclude outlet dysfunction, which may coexist with colonic inertia. Because slow colonic transit is defined by studies during which patients consume a high-fiber diet, fiber supplements are generally not effective, nor are osmotic laxatives that consist of unabsorbed sugars. Stimulant laxatives are considered first-line therapy, although studies often show a diminished colonic motor response to such agents. There is no evidence to suggest that chronic use of such laxatives is harmful if they are used two to three times per week. Polyethylene glycol with or without electrolytes may be useful in a minority of patients, often combined with misoprostol. I prefer to start with misoprostol 200 mg every other morning and increase to tolerance or efficacy. I see no advantage in prescribing misoprostol on a TID or QID basis or even daily because it increases cramping unnecessarily. This drug is not acceptable in young women who wish to become pregnant. An alternative may be colchicine, which is reported to be effective when given as 0.6 mg TID. Long-term efficacy has not been studied. Finally, biofeedback is a risk-free approach that has been reported as effective in approximately 60% of patients with slow transit constipation in the absence of outlet dysfunction. Although difficult to understand conceptually, it is worth attempting and certainly so in patients with associated pelvic floor dyssynergia. Subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is often effective in those patients with colonic inertia, normal anorectal function, and lack of evidence of generalized intestinal dysmotility. However, morbidity is significant both early and late in the disease process and must be balanced against current disability. Ileostomy is preferred in the presence of anorectal dysfunction or with associated impairment of continence mechanisms. Similar considerations apply to the patient with disabling functional megacolon. An alternative approach is ileostomy with disconnection of the colon, which is more acceptable to some patients who may hope for future reconnection if recovery occurs. An additional alternative approach for patients with colonic inertia or megacolon who are not good surgical risks is tube cecostomy (or in children, use of the appendix as a conduit to the cecum). This permits either decompression (in megacolon) or antegrade enemas (in colonic inertia). Our surgeons are not enthusiastic about this approach, and I have little experience with it. In general, the use of partial resections of the colon should be discouraged, because marker studies do not define pathophysiology in patients with slow transit constipation.