Gastrointestinal food allergies: do they exist?

Progress in understanding the relationship between food intolerance and functional gastrointestinal disorders

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are a group of conditions characterized by the presence of chronic or recurrent gastrointestinal symptoms. Currently, the exact pathogenesis of FGIDs is still unknown, and their diagnosis relies on the exclusion of organic diseases. A number of studies have found that food intolerances can induce FGIDs and therefore has important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of FGIDs. In this paper, we review the recent progress in understanding the relationship between FGIDs and food intolerances in terms of pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, detection, and relationship between food intolerance and other diseases.

Survey of UK and New Zealand gastroenterologists' practice regarding dietary advice and food exclusion in irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the dietary advice practice of UK and New Zealand (NZ) adult gastroenterologists in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

METHODS

A questionnaire regarding dietary advice practice was emailed or mailed to all members of the British Society of Gastroenterology (n=983) and the NZ Society of Gastroenterology (n=54).

RESULTS

363 questionnaires were returned in the UK (response rate 37%) and 51 in NZ (94%). More respondents gave specific dietary advice to more than 25% of their patients on IBS than IBD (84% vs 27% UK, 90% vs 55% NZ; p=0.001 for both) and gave advice about dietary exclusions to more than 25% of patients on IBS than IBD (61% vs 13% UK, 77% vs 14% NZ; p<0.001 for both). They were most likely to provide dietary advice to patients with small bowel Crohn's disease, difficult to control IBD, diarrhoea predominant IBS and difficult to control IBS. The majority of respondents agreed strongly or a little that dietary exclusion was effective in the treatment of IBS, compared to the minority in IBD (71% vs 39% UK, 84% vs 43% p<0.05 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

UK and NZ gastroenterologists give dietary advice more commonly to IBS than IBD patients. The majority of gastroenterologists have some confidence in the use of dietary exclusion in IBS, the converse is true in IBD. However, the advice given is largely empiric and mostly comprises the exclusion of fibre, dairy and wheat.

In vitro model for IgE mediated food allergy

BACKGROUND

In intestinal food allergy, the non-specificity of gastrointestinal symptoms and the limited access to the reacting organ are the reasons for the limited understanding of the pathophysiology of this disease and the difficulties in establishing an appropriate diagnosis in the individual patient.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an in vitro model reproducing pathophysiological mechanisms of IgE mediated food allergy.

METHODS

Distal duodenum biopsies of nine patients with food allergy and 10 control subjects were cultured for 3 h with medium alone and with 1 mg/ml of peptic-tryptic digest of wheat gliadin, wheat albumins, and apple proteins. Each biopsy was used for conventional histological examination and for immunohistochemical detection of IgE-positive cells. We have also analyzed the expression of tight junction proteins, occludin, claudin-1, and ZO-1 by immunoconfocal microscopy. Histamine and tryptase release were measured in the culture medium and collected at 0, 30 min, and 3 h of culture using an enzyme and radio immunoassay, respectively.

RESULTS

Exposure of small intestinal biopsy specimens of patients with food allergy to food allergens led to a significative increase of IgE-positive cells with a significative increase of histamine and tryptase release and an altered expression of tight junction proteins. No differences were found in intestinal biopsies of controls, cultured with or without food antigens.

CONCLUSIONS

Small intestinal organ culture is a functional model of food allergy and could be considered as an in vitro oral food challenge, with evident reduction of costs and risks for the patients.

Alterations of food antigen-specific serum immunoglobulins G and E antibodies in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Post-prandial worsening of symptoms as well as adverse reactions to one or more foods are common in the patients with functional gastrointestinal diseases, such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia (FD). However, the role played by true food allergy in the pathogenesis of these diseases is still controversial and there are no well-established tests to identify food allergy in this condition.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate serum food antigen-specific IgG, IgE antibody and total IgE antibody titres in controls and patients with IBS and FD, and to correlate symptoms with the food antigen-specific IgG titres in IBS and FD patients.

METHODS

Thirty-seven IBS patients, 28 FD patients and 20 healthy controls participated in this study. Serum IgG and IgE antibody titres to 14 common foods including beef, chicken, codfish, corn, crab, eggs, mushroom, milk, pork, rice, shrimp, soybean, tomatoes and wheat were analysed by ELISA. Serum total IgE titres were also measured. Last, symptomatology was assessed in the study. Results IBS patients had significantly higher titres of IgG antibody to crab (P=0.000), egg (P=0.000), shrimp (P=0.000), soybean (P=0.017) and wheat (P=0.004) than controls. FD patients had significantly higher titres of IgG antibody to egg (P=0.000) and soybean (P=0.017) than controls. The percentage of individuals with detectable positive food antigen-specific IgE antibodies of the three groups did not show any significant differences (P=0.971). There were no significant differences between IBS patients, FD patients and controls in the serum total IgE antibody titres (P=0.978). Lastly, no significant correlation was seen between symptom severity and serum food antigen-specific IgG antibody titres both in IBS and FD patients.

CONCLUSION

Serum IgG antibody titres to some common foods increased in IBS and FD patients compared to controls. But there is no significant correlation between symptom severity and elevated serum food antigen-specific IgG antibodies in these patients.

Nutrition and motility disorders

The purpose of this article is to give an overview of the relation between feeding and gastrointestinal symptoms and complaints, and to review different motility disorders that have implications for food intake. We also report the consequences for nutrition state and the evidence-based principles of dietary modification in patients with motility disorders.

Gastrointestinal allergy in adults

The prevalence of food allergy reaches 3% in the adult population. Chronic gastrointestinal allergy is a rare entity: 4.2% of food allergies in adults, and represents 3.2% of all intestinal disorders. Non-specific symptoms are the rule but eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders are the subject of much interest. Endoscopy and biopsies of the gastrointestinal tract help the differential diagnoses. Food allergy is suspected from the patient's history leading to skin tests and laboratory tests identifying a sensitization but allergy is only confirmed by standardized challenges or eviction diets over a sufficiently long period. New types of investigations coupling oral challenges to foods to gastroenterological techniques should be studied further.

Gastrointestinal food allergy: new insights into pathophysiology and clinical perspectives

Adverse reactions to food that result in gastrointestinal symptoms are common in the general population; while only a minority of such individuals will have symptoms due to immunologic reactions to foods, gastrointestinal food allergies do exist in both children and adults. These immune reactions are mediated by immunoglobulin E-dependent and -independent mechanisms involving mast cells, eosinophils, and other immune cells, but the complexity of the underlying mechanisms of pathogenesis have yet to be fully defined. Knowledge of the spectrum of adverse reactions to foods that affect the digestive system, including gastrointestinal food allergy, is essential to correctly diagnose and manage the subset of patients with immunologically mediated adverse reactions to foods. Potentially fatal reactions to food necessitate careful instruction and monitoring on the part of health care workers involved in the care of individuals at risk of anaphylaxis. New methods of diagnosis and novel strategies for treatment, including immunologic modulation and the development of hypoallergenic foods, are exciting developments in the field of food allergy.

Role of probiotics in the management of patients with food allergy

OBJECTIVE

This review will concentrate on the potential use of probiotics in treating or preventing allergic disorders of the gastro-intestinal tract. In small infants, most reactions to foods are manifested in the gastro-intestinal tract. As children get older, cutaneous and even systemic or respiratory manifestations of food intolerances may be more common. In most instances, allergic disorders in the gut cause inflammation in the mucosa.

DATA SOURCES

Recently, the role of gut microflora in allergic disease has gained increasing interest with reports of probiotics being used to treat food allergy.

STUDY SELECTION

Pertinent scientific reports on the role of probiotics in the management of patients with food allergy will be reviewed. A recent study to determine the effect of very early probiotic colonization will be extensively reviewed as it presents an intriguing concept of a preventive strategy related to food allergy development

RESULTS

Significant improvement has been noted in infants receiving Lactobacillus GG in their extensively hydrolyzed formula.

CONCLUSIONS

It is likely more studies will be forthcoming with different probiotic organisms in the prevention and treatment of allergic disorders in children and adults.

[Allergy-associated colitis. Characterization of an entity and its differential diagnoses]

There is substantial evidence that allergic reactions exist in the gastrointestinal tract (GI). However, patients with food allergy-related enteropathy pose a diagnostic challenge to physicians because the clinical features are variable, unspecific, occur in other gastrointestinal disorders, and specific diagnostic tools are missing. Several recent studies and reviews have focused on the function of eosinophilic granulocytes in GI disease. The role of eosinophils in the pathophysiology of GI hypersensitivity reactions is poorly defined. However, some findings have been reported that imply an involvement of eosinophils in allergic reactions of the gut. The presumptive histology of allergy-associated colitis in colonic and ileal biopsies is based on prominent pure eosinophilic infiltration of a normal lamina propria, submucosa and epithelium with variable degrees of degranulation. An immunoperoxidase stain for eosinophilic peroxidase is supportive in establishing the diagnosis if suspected. Neutrophils or mononuclear infiltrates are not significantly increased and damage to the intestinal tissue is not prominent. Despite characteristic histologic changes in colonic biopsy specimens, a final diagnosis depends on careful clinical examination and exclusion of several differential diagnoses.

Revisiting the "hygiene hypothesis" in gastrointestinal allergy

The "hygiene hypothesis" in its original form hypothesized that infection in early childhood acquired through unhygienic contact with siblings or the mother may prevent the development of allergic disease. Several recent epidemiologic surveys showing an inverse relationship between the frequency of infectious disease and the incidence of allergic diseases lend support to this hypothesis. Allergen sensitization of the immune system can occur early in utero against a background of neonatal commitment to a Th2 immune response involving the production of Th2 cytokines (eg, interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13) that are the principal mediators of allergic inflammation. Continued allergen exposure is associated with predominantly CD4+ Th2 cell proliferation but does not exclude a minor Th1 allergen-specific subpopulation that can be further expanded nonspecifically and polyclonally by microbial superantigens or as bystanders, by interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and IL-2 released from Th1 effectors responding to antigens associated with infectious pathogens. Th1 cytokines can also subvert allergen-specific Th2 lymphocytes to become allergen-specific Th1 cells-a process reminiscent of the increased tendency of the maturing immune system of growing adults to mount a Th1 response to some environmental and dietary antigens. Unlike Th2 cytokines, IFN-gamma and IL-2 inhibit B-cell production of IgE and, hence, delimit the capacity of mast cells to degranulate and release allergenic mediators. The ability of infectious agents through their danger signals to initiate a Th1 response that deviates the Th2 allergenic bias is the basis of the hygiene hypothesis.

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis is a rare gastrointestinal (GI) disorder of undetermined cause characterized by infiltration of eosinophils in the GI tract. Eosinophils accumulate in tissues and may release highly cytotoxic granular proteins, which cause severe tissue damage characteristic of eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Eotaxin may play a role in the recruitment of eosinophils into tissue in combination with chemoattractants and cytokines, including interleukin 3 and 5 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Food allergy, especially in children, can be a triggering factor, and an amino acid-based diet may be helpful. Accumulation of eosinophils in the gut is a common feature in food-induced GI disorders that can be regulated through a complex molecular network involving Th2 cells, various cytokines, and chemokines. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis has a wide spectrum of clinical presentation depending on the site of involvement. It may be confused with irritable bowel syndrome or dyspepsia and, rarely, mimics pancreatitis or appendicitis. Diagnosis is important and is usually made by a pathologist. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis is a treatable disease; patients generally respond to steroid therapy, although relapse is common. Non-enteric-coated budesonide, a locally acting corticosteroid with little risk of adrenal suppression, may be substituted, although more experience is needed. Promising new drugs for eosinophilic gastroenteritis include montelukast, a selective leukotriene receptor antagonist, and suplaplast tosilate, a selective Th2 cytokine inhibitor with inhibitory effects on allergy-induced eosinophilic infiltration and IgE production. Although it is likely a separate disease, more experience has accumulated, and an elimination or specific amino acid-based diet appears to be helpful in treatment.

Diet in the irritable bowel syndrome

Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) often request dietary recommendations. They must eat, and they want to know what to eat. Present national guidelines recommend dietary treatment with fiber for IBS patients with constipation. Diet recommendations are made based on symptoms. There may be different dietary recommendations for constipation, diarrhea, and pain or bloating. This article reviews the relationship of foods to IBS and issues of food intolerances and hypersensitivities, and recommendations for diet therapy. The role of dietary fiber, both soluble and insoluble, is reviewed. Although there are few studies to substantiate exact diets, broad dietary plans are recommended for the different symptoms of IBS. In addition, the recent literature on probiotics and prebiotics pertinent to IBS is reviewed.

Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis

There are no evidence-based studies of the treatment of patients with eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Treatment decisions depend on experience gained from observations linking causative entities, principal clinical manifestations, and anticipated natural history of the disease. Because clinical symptoms and organ involvement probably vary with etiology, classification as to the likely cause (eg, food allergy or other dietary intolerance, idiosyncratic drug reaction, occult infection, idiopathic) determines the decisions made about dietary, pharmacologic, and surgical treatment. Elimination of foods and the use of elemental diets, corticosteroids, and mast cell inhibitors (eg, cromolyn sodium, ketotifen), alone or in combination, all have their place, depending on the age of the patient, organ involved, clinical presentation, and clinical urgency. Isolated cases are diagnosed only at surgical exploration for acute abdominal catastrophes; in these instances, further therapy depends on whether resection is done, but most patients remain in remission after surgery. Occult parasitism remains an elusive and unrecognized cause of an unknown number of cases, suggesting that empiric antihelminthic therapy should be tried in some patients. Individual reports of success with nonsystemic steroids and leukotriene inhibitors have been published.