Endoscopy-based pancreatic function tests

Pancreatic enzyme supplementation after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Gastrectomy for gastric cancer is a significant cause of secondary exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy may influence nutritional status and quality of life after gastrectomy, but the pertinent clinical research to date remains controversial. A randomized controlled trial to test this hypothesis was carried out.

METHODS

After gastrectomy, 43 patients with gastric cancer were randomly assigned to a normal diet (Normal-d; n = 21) or to a pancreatic enzyme supplementation diet (PES-d; n = 22) and were followed up during a 12-month period, assessing nutritional status and quality of life through body mass index (BMI), instant nutritional assessment (INA) class status, serum pre-albumin (SPA) values, and GastroiIntestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI).

RESULTS

BMI was not significantly influenced by the type of diet; INA class status was significantly improved in the PES-d arm, particularly during the first 3 months after gastrectomy; SPA levels increased in both arms at 6 months after gastrectomy, reaching significantly higher values in the PES-d arm at 12 months. GIQLI was not significantly influenced by the type of diet throughout the follow-up period; however, this index significantly improved in the PES-d arm between the first and third month after gastrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

PES-d improves nutritional status and quality of life after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, particularly within 3 months from the operation. A larger, multicenter trial is necessary to address the potential influence of several confounding variables such as disease stage and adjuvant treatments.

Quantification of pancreatic function using a clinically feasible short endoscopic secretin test

OBJECTIVES

Clinical and morphological criteria are not precise enough to diagnose early chronic pancreatitis (CP). We investigated if short endoscopic pancreas function testing as a part of routine upper endoscopy could improve clinical diagnostics.

METHODS

Patients with suspected CP underwent modified secretin-stimulated upper endoscopy (short endoscopic secretin test, or EST). Duodenal juice was collected during 15 minutes starting 30 minutes after stimulation. A modified scoring system for CP after Layer with bicarbonate and fecal elastase 1 (FE1) was used. We tested with receiver operating characteristic curves the diagnostic accuracy of bicarbonate and FE1 and with analysis of variance how precise the 2 parameters can discriminate the groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients aged 19 to 67 years and 25 healthy controls aged 19 to 64 years were included. Twenty-four patients fulfilled the modified Layer Score for CP or non-CP. The overall accuracy of the EST versus FE1 test was 85%/71%, with positive and negative predictive values of 100%/79% and 80%/69%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Short EST is rapid and easy to perform and can be incorporated in daily routines. We demonstrate that EST is superior to FE1 in the assessment of pancreatic insufficiency and may prove to be useful in diagnosing early or mild CP.

Diagnosing exocrine pancreatic insufficiency after surgery: when and which patients to treat

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) is a common problem after surgery of the pancreas and stomach. It is usually caused by inadequate pancreatic enzyme activity resulting from insufficient enzyme production, insufficient enzyme activation or disturbed enzyme deactivation. A variety of direct and indirect pancreatic function tests such as the secretin-cerulein test, the faecal elastase test and the (13)C-mixed triglyceride breath test are used to assess exocrine pancreatic function. Few studies have addressed pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) following pancreatic surgery. These studies suggest beneficial effects of enzyme replacement after pancreatic resections. A number of studies have been performed to assess post-gastrectomy maldigestion and PERT. The treatment options remain controversial, although the published evidence is in favour of PERT leading to an overall improvement of symptoms. In conclusion, EPI following pancreatic surgery and total or partial gastrectomy remains a common clinical challenge. As a result of the lack of solid evidence, more clinical trials, particularly randomized, controlled clinical trials, are urgently needed.