1
|
DeWitt JM, Arain M, Chang KJ, Sharaiha R, Komanduri S, Muthusamy VR, Hwang JH. Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound: Current Status and Future Directions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:24-40. [PMID: 32950747 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The evolution of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) from a diagnostic to a therapeutic procedure has resulted in a paradigm shift toward endoscopic management of disease states that previously required percutaneous or surgical approaches. The past few years have seen additional techniques and devices that have enabled endoscopists to expand its diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities. Some of these techniques initially were reported more than a decade ago; however, with further device development and refinement in techniques there is potential for expanding the application of these techniques and new technologies to a broader group of interventional gastroenterologists. Lack of formalized training, devices, and prospective data regarding their use in addition to a scarcity of guidelines on implementation of these technologies into clinical practice are contributing factors impeding the growth of the field of interventional EUS. In April 2019, the American Gastroenterological Association's Center for Gastrointestinal Innovation and Technology conducted its annual Tech Summit and a key session focused on interventional EUS. This article is a White Paper generated from the conference, discusses the published literature pertaining to the topic of interventional EUS, and outlines a proposed framework for the implementation of interventional EUS techniques into clinical practice. Three primary areas of interventional EUS are addressed: (1) EUS-guided access; (2) EUS-guided tumor ablation; and (3) endohepatology. There was general agreement among participants on several key components. The introduction of these novel interventions requires better tools, more data on safety/outcomes, and improved training for endoscopists. Participants also agreed that widespread implementation and use of these techniques will require support from Gastrointestinal Societies and other key stakeholders including payers. Continued work by the Gastrointestinal Societies and manufacturers to provide training programs, appropriate equipment/work environments, and policies that motivate endoscopists to adopt new techniques is essential for growing the field of interventional EUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M DeWitt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Mustafa Arain
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Kenneth J Chang
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California
| | - Reem Sharaiha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Sri Komanduri
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Joo Ha Hwang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cañete Ruiz Á, Foruny Olcina JR, González-Panizo F, Caminoa A, Navarro A, Juzgado Lucas D, Albillos Martínez A, Vázquez Sequeiros E. A prospective, controlled assessment of the technical characteristics of a novel forward-viewing echoendoscope. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS : ORGANO OFICIAL DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE PATOLOGIA DIGESTIVA 2018; 110:365-371. [PMID: 29421916 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5062/2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a highly useful technique for the diagnosis and management of different gastrointestinal (GI) tract conditions. OBJECTIVE to prospectively assess the clinical usefulness of a novel forward-viewing echoendoscope (FV-CLA). METHODS this was a cross-sectional observational study. All patients that underwent EUS over a two-month period were considered for the study. All mediastinal, perigastric and periduodenal stations were consistently assessed with a rating from 0 to 10 points with regard to the ease to obtain ultrasonographic sections and the quality of ultrasound images. The identified lesions were punctured when clinically indicated. RESULTS a total of 45 patients were included. EUS was completed in 100% of patients, with two minor complications recorded. Echoendoscope maneuverability was graded as "A" (9-10 points), overall plane visibility was graded as "B" (7-8 points) and only stations 4L and 5 visualization were graded as "D" (< 7 points). Visualization of the pancreas and the rest of the EUS stations were rated as excellent or very good. The feasibility to perform EUS-FNA, even from the second portion of the duodenum, was graded excellent or very good. CONCLUSION the FV-CLA allows a complete, high-quality examination of the upper GI tract, including EUS-FNA punctures. Some mediastinal stations are hardly accessible with this new device. A formal validation of the FV-CLA for EUS-guided therapy would be of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Agustín Albillos Martínez
- Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal. Universidad de Alcalá. IRICYS
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khashab MA, El Zein MH, Sharzehi K, Marson FP, Haluszka O, Small AJ, Nakai Y, Park DH, Kunda R, Teoh AY, Peñas I, Perez-Miranda M, Kumbhari V, Van der Merwe S, Artifon EL, Ross AS. EUS-guided biliary drainage or enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with surgical anatomy and biliary obstruction: an international comparative study. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4:E1322-E1327. [PMID: 27995197 PMCID: PMC5161123 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-110790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims: How enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (e-ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) compare in patients with surgically altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy is currently unknown. The aims of this study were to compare efficacy and safety of both techniques and study predictors of these outcomes. Patients and methods: This was an international, multicenter comparative cohort study at 10 tertiary centers. Outcomes data included technical success (biliary access with cholangiography and stent placement [when indicated]), clinical success (resolution of biliary obstruction) and adverse events (AEs) (graded according to the ASGE lexicon). Results: A total of 98 patients underwent EUS-BD (n = 49) or e-ERCP (n = 49). Technical success was achieved in 48 (98 %) patients in the EUS-BD group as compared to 32 (65.3 %) patients in the e-ERCP group (OR 12.48, P = 0.001). Clinical success was attained in 88 % of patients in EUS-BD group as compared to 59.1 % in the e-ERCP group (OR 2.83, P = 0.03). Procedural time was significantly shorter in the EUS-BD group (55 min vs 95 min, P < 0.0001). AEs occurred more commonly in the EUS-BD group (20 % vs. 4 %, P = 0.01). However, the majority (90 %) of AEs were mild/moderate. Length of stay was significantly longer in the EUS-BD group (6.6 d vs. 2.4 d, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: EUS-BD can be performed with a higher degree of clinical efficacy and shorter procedure time than e-ERCP in patients with surgically-altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy. Whether or not this approach should be first-line therapy in this patient population is highly dependent on the indication for the procedure, the patient's anatomy, and local practice and expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mouen A. Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, United
States,Corresponding author Mouen A. Khashab,
MD Associate Professor of
MedicineDirector of Therapeutic
EndoscopyJohns Hopkins
Hospital1800 Orleans St, Suite 7125
BBaltimore, MD
21205+1-443-287-1960
| | - Mohamad H. El Zein
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, United
States
| | - Kaveh Sharzehi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | | | - Oleh Haluszka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Aaron J. Small
- Division of Hepatology and Gastroenterology,
Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate
School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Do Hyun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, University
of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South
Korea
| | - Rastislav Kunda
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology,
Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anthony Y. Teoh
- Department of Surgery, The Chinese University
of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Irene Peñas
- Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega,
Valladolid University, Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, United
States
| | | | | | - Andrew S. Ross
- Division of Hepatology and Gastroenterology,
Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Widmer JL, Michel K. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Treatment beyond Drainage: Hemostasis, Anastomosis, and Others. Clin Endosc 2014; 47:432-9. [PMID: 25325004 PMCID: PMC4198561 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2014.47.5.432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2014] [Accepted: 06/20/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the introduction of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the 1990s, it has evolved from a primarily diagnostic modality into an instrument that can be used in various therapeutic interventions. EUS-guided fine-needle injection was initially described for celiac plexus neurolysis. By using the fundamentals of this method, drainage techniques emerged for the biliary and pancreatic ducts, fluid collections, and abscesses. More recently, EUS has been used for ablative techniques and injection therapies for patients with for gastrointestinal malignancies. As the search for minimally invasive techniques continued, EUS-guided hemostasis methods have also been described. The technical advances in EUS-guided therapies may appear to be limitless; however, in many instances, these procedures have been described only in small case series. More data are required to determine the efficacy and safety of these techniques, and new accessories will be needed to facilitate their implementation into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Widmer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kahaleh Michel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|