1
|
Rosen R, Vandenplas Y, Singendonk M, Cabana M, DiLorenzo C, Gottrand F, Gupta S, Langendam M, Staiano A, Thapar N, Tipnis N, Tabbers M. Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice Guidelines: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2018; 66:516-554. [PMID: 29470322 PMCID: PMC5958910 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000001889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 483] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
This document serves as an update of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) 2009 clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in infants and children and is intended to be applied in daily practice and as a basis for clinical trials. Eight clinical questions addressing diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic topics were formulated. A systematic literature search was performed from October 1, 2008 (if the question was addressed by 2009 guidelines) or from inception to June 1, 2015 using Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials. The approach of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was applied to define and prioritize outcomes. For therapeutic questions, the quality of evidence was also assessed using GRADE. Grading the quality of evidence for other questions was performed according to the Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS) and Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tools. During a 3-day consensus meeting, all recommendations were discussed and finalized. In cases where no randomized controlled trials (RCT; therapeutic questions) or diagnostic accuracy studies were available to support the recommendations, expert opinion was used. The group members voted on each recommendation, using the nominal voting technique. With this approach, recommendations regarding evaluation and management of infants and children with GERD to standardize and improve quality of care were formulated. Additionally, 2 algorithms were developed, 1 for infants <12 months of age and the other for older infants and children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Rosen
- Center for Motility and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA
| | - Yvan Vandenplas
- KidZ Health Castle, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Michael Cabana
- Division of General Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Carlo DiLorenzo
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Frederic Gottrand
- CHU Lille, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Lille, France
| | - Sandeep Gupta
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Illinois, Peoria, IL
| | - Miranda Langendam
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annamaria Staiano
- Department of Translational Medical Science, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples ‘‘Federico II,’’ Naples, Italy
| | - Nikhil Thapar
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Neelesh Tipnis
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS
| | - Merit Tabbers
- Emma Children's Hospital/AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ning L, Li L, Zhang SD. Weisu granules combined with conventional Western medicines for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2014; 22:5492-5495. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v22.i35.5492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To explore the clinical effects of Weisu granules combined with conventional Western medicines in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
METHODS: Eighty-four patients with GERD were randomly divided into either an experiment group or a control group. Both the control and experiment groups were treated with conventional Western medicines, and the experiment group was additionally treated with Weisu granules. Symptom score, endoscopic score, and clinical effects were compared for the two groups.
RESULTS: Symptom score and endoscopic score were significantly lower post treatment than prior treatment in both groups (7.47 ± 2.51 vs 18.96 ± 2.88, 11.49 ± 2.35 vs 19.72 ± 2.79, 1.49 ± 0.61 vs 2.49 ± 0.62, 1.64 ± 0.63 vs 2.47 ± 0.69; P < 0.05). Symptom score and endoscopic score post treatment were significantly lower in the experiment group than in the control group (7.47 ± 2.51 vs 1.49 ± 0.61, 11.49 ± 2.35 vs 1.64 ± 0.63, P < 0.05). The clinical effects with regard to symptom improvement were better in the experiment group than in the control group (95.24% vs 80.95%, P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in clinical effects with regard to endoscopic improvement (78.57% vs 71.43%, P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Weisu granules combined with conventional Western medicines in GERD can improve clinical symptoms and clinical effects, and can be a treatment of choice for elderly patients with GERD.
Collapse
|