Endoscopic Disease Activity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

UCFNNet: Ulcerative colitis evaluation based on fine-grained lesion learner and noise suppression gating

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease characterized by recurrent symptoms and significant morbidity. The exact cause of the disease remains unknown. The selection of current treatment options for ulcerative colitis depends on the severity and location of the disease in each patient. Therefore, developing a fully automated endoscopic images for evaluating UC is crucial for guiding treatment plans and facilitating early prevention efforts.

METHODS

We propose a network called ulcerative colitis evaluation based on fine-grained lesion learner and noise suppression gating (UCFNNet). UCFNNet contains three novel modules. Firstly, a fine-grained lesion feature learner (FG-LF Learner) is proposed by integrating local features and a Softmax category prediction (SCP) module to improve the feature accuracy in small lesion areas. Subsequently, a graph convolutional feature combiner (GCFC) is developed to connect features across adjacent convolutional layers and to incorporate short connections between input and output, thereby mitigating feature loss during transmission. Thereafter, a noise suppression gating (NS gating) technique is designed by implementing a grid attention mechanism and a feature gating (FG) module to prioritize significant lesion features and suppress irrelevant and noisy regions in the input feature map.

RESULTS

We evaluate the performance of the proposed network on both privately-collected and publicly-available datasets. The evaluation of UC achieves excellent results on privately-collected dataset, with an accuracy (ACC) of 89.57 %, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 85.52 %, precision of 89.26 %, recall of 89.48 %, and F1-score of 89.78 %. The results are also impressive on publicly-available dataset, with ACC of 85.47 %, MCC of 80.42 %, precision of 85.62 %, recall of 84.00 %, and F1-score of 84.53 %, surpassing the performance of state-of-the-art techniques.

CONCLUSION

Our proposed model introduces three innovative algorithm modules, which outperform the current state-of-the-art methods and achieve high ACC and F1-score. This indicates that our method has superior performance compared to traditional machine learning and existing deep methods, which means that our method has good application prospects. Meanwhile, it has been verified that the proposed model demonstrates good interpretability. The source code is available at github.com/YinLeRenNB/UCFNNet.

Clinical value of the Toronto inflammatory bowel disease global endoscopic reporting score in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic evaluation in diagnosing and managing ulcerative colitis (UC) is becoming increasingly important. Several endoscopic scoring systems have been established, including the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) score and Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES). Furthermore, the Toronto Inflammatory Bowel Disease Global Endoscopic Reporting (TIGER) score for UC has recently been proposed; however, its clinical value remains unclear.

AIM

To investigate the clinical value of the TIGER score in UC by comparing it with the UCEIS score and MES.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 166 patients with UC who underwent total colonoscopy between January 2017 and March 2023 at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (Qingdao, China). We retrospectively analysed endoscopic scores, laboratory and clinical data, treatment, and readmissions within 1 year. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, receiver operating characteristic curve, and univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States) and GraphPad Prism version 9.0.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, Boston, Massachusetts, United States).

RESULTS

The TIGER score significantly correlated with the UCEIS score and MES (r = 0.721, 0.626, both P < 0.001), showed good differentiating values for clinical severity among mild, moderate, and severe UC [8 (4-112.75) vs 210 (109-219) vs 328 (219-426), all P < 0.001], and exhibited predictive value in diagnosing patients with severe UC [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.897, P < 0.001]. Additionally, the TIGER (r = 0.639, 0,551, 0.488, 0.376, all P < 0.001) and UCEIS scores (r = 0.622, 0,540, 0.494, and 0.375, all P < 0.001) showed stronger correlations with laboratory and clinical parameters, including C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, length of hospitalisation, and hospitalisation costs, than MES (r = 0.509, 0,351, 0.339, and 0.270, all P < 0.001). The TIGER score showed the best predictability for patients' recent advanced treatment, including systemic corticosteroids, biologics, or immunomodulators (AUC = 0.848, P < 0.001) and 1-year readmission (AUC = 0.700, P < 0.001) compared with the UCEIS score (AUC = 0.762, P < 0.001; 0.627, P < 0.05) and MES (AUC = 0.684, P < 0.001; 0.578, P = 0.132). Furthermore, a TIGER score of ≥ 317 was identified as an independent risk factor for advanced UC treatment (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

The TIGER score may be superior to the UCIES score and MES in improving the accuracy of clinical disease severity assessment, guiding therapeutic decision-making, and predicting short-term prognosis.

Efficacy of vedolizumab as maintenance therapy in a patient with ulcerative colitis receiving haemodialysis in end-stage kidney failure: A case report

This report describes vedolizumab's clinical efficacy and safety in a patient with severe ulcerative colitis on haemodialysis for an end-stage kidney failure. The patient was a 75-year-old man on long-standing chronic diffusive three times per week haemodialytic treatment due to vascular nephropathy. At the presentation, the patient had severe bloody diarrhoea treated with a steroid cycle with temporary benefits and then developed steroid dependence. Upon remission, the patient started vedolizumab (Entivyo^®) as maintenance therapy. After 6 weeks of induction, patient started the maintenance therapy with an infusion every 8 weeks. After the sixth infusion, the interval was prolonged to 9 weeks because of the good and fast response. Vedolizumab treatment proceeded without adverse events. However, no changes in renal function were noted during the same period, no complications were reported, and the patient regularly continued haemodialysis. At the second induction infusion (week 2) and the second maintenance infusion (week 22), we measured vedolizumab serum level before and after haemodialysis, observing no significant changes. Our case is the first report about using vedolizumab in a patient under haemodialysis, showing that vedolizumab can be safe, well tolerated, and effective in patients undergoing haemodialysis. However, more extensive trials are needed to prove its use in these patients.

Clinical relevance of endoscopic peri-appendiceal red patch in ulcerative colitis patients

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence is suggesting appendectomy as an alternative treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), especially in case of histological appendiceal inflammation. Therefore, preoperative identification of appendiceal inflammation could be beneficial. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of peri-appendiceal red patch (PARP) on colonoscopy. In addition, prognostic relevance of PARP for disease course and its predictive value for histological appendiceal inflammation in patients undergoing appendectomy was assessed.

METHODS

UC patients undergoing colonoscopy in 2014/2015 were included to determine PARP-prevalence in a cross-sectional study. Findings were correlated to patient and disease characteristics, upscaling of treatment and colectomy rates after cross-sectional colonoscopy. In patients undergoing appendiceal resection, histopathological inflammation was assessed using the Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI).

RESULTS

In total, 249 patients were included of which 17.7% (44/249) had a PARP. Patients with PARP were significantly younger with a shorter disease course. The majority of patients with PARP (61.4%) was in endoscopic remission. Patients with PARP required more upscaling of medical therapy (81.8% vs. 58.0%, p < 0.01), and more PARP patients underwent colectomy (13.6% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.04). Patients with PARP had a higher median RHI in resection specimens (14 vs. 7, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

PARP was present during colonoscopy regardless disease activity and was predominantly found in UC patients with younger age and shorter disease duration. PARP patients had a more severe course of UC, and in case of appendectomy, more severe histopathological appendiceal inflammation. Appendectomy as an experimental therapy for UC has been suggested to be predominantly effective in UC patients with appendiceal inflammation. This study demonstrates that presence of a PARP on colonoscopy predicts appendiceal inflammation. After consensus has been reached on the therapeutic effect of appendectomy, assessing PARP presence during colonoscopy could therefore contribute to identifying patients most likely to respond.

Characterization of γδ T Cells in Intestinal Mucosa From Patients With Early-Onset or Long-Standing Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Their Correlation With Clinical Status

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is a complex chronic inflammatory disease of the human gut with no clear aetiology. Traditionally, dysregulated adaptive immune responses play an important role even though accumulating evidence suggests a role also for innate immunity. Because of the well-known plasticity of γδ T cells, we investigated their percentage occurrence, phenotypic features and effector functions in the intestinal mucosa of early-onset and long-standing IBD patients, as compared to healthy subjects.

METHODS

Fresh biopsies from 30 Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients were obtained and digested, and cells were analysed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

We found a reduced frequency of Vδ1 T cells in tissue from early and late IBD patients (2.24% and 1.95%, respectively, vs 5.44% in healthy tissue) but an increased frequency of Vδ2 T cells in the gut of late IBD patients (3.19% in late patients vs 1.5% in early patients and 1.65% in healthy tissue). The infiltrating Vδ2 T cells had predominant effector memory and terminally differentiated phenotypes and produced elevated levels of tumour necrosis factor-α [TNF-α] and interleukin-17 [IL-17]. The frequency of tissue Vδ2 T cells correlated with the extent of the inflammatory response and the severity of IBD.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that tissue Vδ1 T cells are decreased in IBD patients while Vδ2 T cells are increased in the gut of IBD patients and contribute to TNF-α production. Moreover, we identify an as yet unappreciated role of Vδ2 T cells in IL-17 production in the gut of long-standing IBD patients, suggesting that they also participate in the chronic inflammatory process.

Novel computer-assisted diagnosis system for endoscopic disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Evaluation of endoscopic disease activity for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is important when determining the treatment of choice. However, endoscopists require a certain period of training to evaluate the activity of inflammation properly, and interobserver variability exists. Therefore, we constructed a computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) system using a convolutional neural network (CNN) and evaluated its performance using a large dataset of endoscopic images from patients with UC.

METHODS

A CNN-based CAD system was constructed based on GoogLeNet architecture. The CNN was trained using 26,304 colonoscopy images from a cumulative total of 841 patients with UC, which were tagged with anatomic locations and Mayo endoscopic scores. The performance of the CNN in identifying normal mucosa (Mayo 0) and mucosal healing state (Mayo 0-1) was evaluated in an independent test set of 3981 images from 114 patients with UC, by calculating the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs). In addition, AUROCs in the right side of the colon, left side of the colon, and rectum were evaluated.

RESULTS

The CNN-based CAD system showed a high level of performance with AUROCs of 0.86 and 0.98 to identify Mayo 0 and 0-1, respectively. The performance of the CNN was better for the rectum than for the right side and left side of the colon when identifying Mayo 0 (AUROC = 0.92, 0.83, and 0.83, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of the CNN-based CAD system was robust when used to identify endoscopic inflammation severity in patients with UC, highlighting its promising role in supporting less-experienced endoscopists and reducing interobserver variability.

Usefulness of fecal calprotectin by monoclonal antibody testing in adult Japanese with inflammatory bowel diseases: a prospective multicenter study

Background/Aims

Noninvasive objective monitoring is advantageous for optimizing treatment strategies in patients inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Fecal calprotectin (FCP) is superior to traditional biomarkers in terms of assessing the activity in patients with IBD. However, there are the differences among several FCP assays in the dynamics of FCP. In this prospective multicenter trial, we investigated the usefulness of FCP measurements in adult Japanese patients with IBD by reliable enzyme immunoassay using a monoclonal antibody.

Methods

We assessed the relationship between FCP levels and disease or endoscopic activity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC, n=64) or Crohn’s disease (CD, n=46) compared with healthy controls (HCs, n=64).

Results

FCP levels in UC patients strongly correlated with the Disease Activity Index (r_s=0.676, P<0.0001) and Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES; r_s=0.677, P<0.0001). FCP levels were significantly higher even in patients with inactive UC or CD compared with HCs (P=0.0068, P<0.0001). The optimal cutoff value between MES 1 and 2 exhibited higher sensitivity (94.1%). FCP levels were significantly higher in active UC patients than in inactive patients (P<0.001), except those with proctitis. The Crohn’s Disease Activity Index tended to correlate with the FCP level (r_s=0.283, P=0.0565).

Conclusions

Our testing method using a monoclonal antibody for FCP was well-validated and differentiated IBD patients from HCs. FCP may be a useful biomarker for objective assessment of disease activity in adult Japanese IBD patients, especially those with UC.

Endoscopic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic assessment of mucosal disease activity is routinely used to determine eligibility and response to therapy in clinical trials of ulcerative colitis. The operating properties of the existing endoscopic scoring indices are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the development and operating characteristics of endoscopic scoring indices for the evaluation of ulcerative colitis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 5 July 2016. We also searched references and conference proceedings (Digestive Disease Week, United European Gastroenterology Week, European Crohn's and Colitis Organization).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Any study design (e.g. randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case series) that evaluated endoscopic indices for evaluation of ulcerative colitis disease activity were considered for inclusion. Eligible participants were adult patients (> 16 years), diagnosed with ulcerative colitis using conventional clinical, radiologic and endoscopic criteria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed the studies identified from the literature search. These authors also independently extracted and recorded data on the number of patients enrolled; number of patients per treatment arm; patient characteristics including age and gender distribution; endoscopic index; and outcomes such as reliability (intra-rater and inter-rater), validity (content, construct, criterion), responsiveness and feasibility. Any disagreements regarding study inclusion or data extraction were resolved by discussion and consensus with a third author. Risk of bias was assessed by determining whether assessors were blinded to clinical information and whether assessors scored the endoscopic index independently. We also assessed the methodological quality of the validation studies using the COSMIN checklist MAIN RESULTS: A total of 23 reports of 20 studies met the pre-defined inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Of the 20 included validation studies, 19 endoscopic scoring indices were assessed, including the Azzolini Classification, Baron Score, Blackstone Endoscopic Interpretation, Chinese Grading System of Ulcerative Colitis, Endoscopic Activty Index, Jeroen Score, Magnifying Colonoscopy Grade, Matts Score, Mayo Clinic Endoscopic Subscore, Modified Baron Score, Modified Mayo Clinic Endoscopic Subscore, Osada Score, Rachmilewtiz Endoscopic Score, St. Mark's Index, Ulcerative Colitis Colonoscopic Index of Serverity (UCCIS), endoscopic component of the Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS), Witts Sigmoidoscopic Score and Watson Grade. The individuals who performed the endoscopic scoring were blinded to clinical and/or histologic information in ten of the included studies, not blinded to clinical and/or histologic information in one of the included studies, and it was unclear whether blinding occurred in the remaining nine included studies. Independent observation was confirmed in four of the included studies, unclear in five of the included studies, and non-applicable (since inter-rater reliability was not assessed) in the remaining eleven included studies. The methodological quality (COSMIN checklist) of most of the included studies was rated as 'good' or 'excellent'. One study that assessed responsiveness was rated as 'fair'. The inter-rater reliability of nine endoscopic scoring indices including the Baron Score, Blackstone Endoscopic Interpretation, Endoscopic Activity Index, Matts Score, Mayo Clinic Endoscopic Subscore, Osada Score, UCCIS, UCEIS, Watson Grade was assessed in seven studies, with estimates of correlation, ƙ, ranging from 0.44 to 0.97. The iIntra-rater reliability of seven endoscopic scoring indices including the Baron Score, Blackstone Endoscopic Interpretation, Matts Score, Mayo Clinic Endoscopic Subscore, Osada Score, UCCIS and UCEIS was assessed in three studies, with estimates of correlation, ƙ, ranging from 0.41 to 0.86. No studies assessed content validity. Three studies evaluated the criterion validity of three endoscopic scoring indices including the Rachmilewitz Endoscopic Score, Magnifying Colonoscopy Grade and the UCCIS. These indices were correlated with objective markers of disease activity including albumin, blood leukocytes, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, hemoglobin, mucosal interleukin-8 concentration and platelet count. Correlation estimates ranged from r = -0.19 to 0.83. Thirteen endoscopic scoring indices were tested for construct validity in 13 studies. Estimates of correlation between the endoscopic scoring indices and other measures of disease activity ranged from r = 0.27 to 0.93. Two studies explored the responsiveness of four endoscopic scoring indices including the Mayo Endoscopic Subscore, Modified Baron Score, Modified Mayo Endoscopic Subscore and UCEIS. One study concluded that the Modified Baron Score, Modified Mayo Endoscopic Subscore and UCEIS had similar responsiveness for detecting disease change in ulcerative colitis. The other included study concluded that the UCEIS may be the most accurate endoscopic scoring tool. None of the included studies formally assessed feasibility.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

While the UCEIS, UCCIS and Mayo Clinic Endoscopic Subscore have undergone extensive validation, none of these instruments have been fully validated and only two studies assessed responsiveness. Further research on the operating properties of these indices is needed given the lack of a fully-validated endoscopic scoring instrument for the evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis.

The First Endoscopy in Suspected Inflammatory Bowel Disease

In a patient presenting with suspected inflammatory bowel disease, the initial endoscopic evaluation is a valuable tool for determining the correct disease diagnosis and the extent and severity of disease. A full colonoscopy and ileoscopy should be performed when possible, with systematic biopsies from each segment. When a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease is established, it is possible to distinguish between Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, and specific endoscopic features may assist in this categorization. Because patchy healing can occur with treatment, it is important to obtain a thorough and accurate assessment of disease characteristics and distribution before initiating therapy.