Adenosine A1 antagonists and the cardiorenal syndrome

Exploration of chalcones and related heterocycle compounds as ligands of adenosine receptors: therapeutics development

Adenosine receptors (ARs) are ubiquitously distributed throughout the mammalian body where they are involved in an extensive list of physiological and pathological processes that scientists have only begun to decipher. Resultantly, AR agonists and antagonists have been the focus of multiple drug design and development programmes within the past few decades. Considered to be a privileged scaffold in medicinal chemistry, the chalcone framework has attracted a substantial amount of interest in this regard. Due to the potential liabilities associated with its structure, however, it has become necessary to explore other potentially promising compounds, such as heterocycles, which have successfully been obtained from chalcone precursors in the past. This review aims to summarise the emerging therapeutic importance of adenosine receptors and their ligands, especially in the central nervous system (CNS), while highlighting chalcone and heterocyclic derivatives as promising AR ligand lead compounds.

New potent and selective A1 adenosine receptor antagonists as potential tools for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases

The synthesis of 9-alkyl substituted adenine derivatives presenting aromatic groups and cycloalkyl rings in 8- and N⁶-position, respectively, is reported. The compounds were tested with radioligand binding studies showing, in some cases, a low nanomolar A₁ adenosine receptor affinity and a very good selectivity versus the other adenosine receptor subtypes. Functional assays at human adenosine receptors and at a mouse ileum tissue preparation clearly demonstrate the antagonist profile of these molecules, with inhibitory potency at nanomolar level. A molecular modeling study, consisting in docking analysis at the recently reported A₁ adenosine receptor crystal structure, was performed for the interpretation of the obtained pharmacological results. The N⁶-cyclopentyl-9-methyl-8-phenyladenine (17), resulting the most active derivative of the series (K_i = 2.8 nM and IC₅₀ = 14 nM), was also very efficacious in counteracting the effect of the agonist CCPA on mouse ileum contractility. This new compound represents a tool for the development of new agents for the treatment of intestinal diseases as constipation and postoperative ileus.

Can we prevent or treat renal dysfunction in acute heart failure?

Most patients with heart failure (HF) already have or develop renal dysfunction; this might contribute to their poor outcome. Current treatment for HF can also contribute to worsen renal function. High furosemide doses are traditionally associated with worsening renal function (WRF), but patients with fluid overload may benefit of aggressive fluid removal. Unfortunately, promising therapies like vasopressin antagonists and adenosine antagonists have not been demonstrated to improve outcomes. Likewise, correction of low renal blood flow through dopamine, inotropic agents, or vasodilators does not seem to be associated with a clear benefit. However, transient WRF associated with acute HF treatment may not necessarily portend a poor prognosis. In this review, we focus on the strategies to detect renal dysfunction in acute HF, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and the potential treatments.

Adenosine and protection from acute kidney injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major clinical problem without effective therapy. Development of AKI among hospitalized patients drastically increases mortality and morbidity. With increases in complex surgical procedures together with a growing elderly population, the incidence of AKI is rising. Renal adenosine receptor manipulation may have great therapeutic potential in mitigating AKI. In this review, we discuss renal adenosine receptor biology and potential clinical therapies for AKI.

RECENT FINDINGS

The four adenosine receptor subtypes (A(1)AR, A(2A)AR, A(2B)AR, and A(3)AR) have diverse effects on the kidney. The pathophysiology of AKI may dictate the specific adenosine receptor subtype activation needed to produce renal protection. The A(1)AR activation in renal tubules and endothelial cells produces beneficial effects against ischemia and reperfusion injury by modulating metabolic demand, decreasing necrosis, apoptosis, and inflammation. The A(2A)AR protects against AKI by modulating leukocyte-mediated renal and systemic inflammation, whereas the A(2B)AR activation protects by direct activation of renal parenchymal adenosine receptors. In contrast, the A(1)AR antagonism may play a protective role in nephrotoxic AKI and radiocontrast induced nephropathy by reversing vascular constriction and inducing naturesis and diuresis. Furthermore, as the A(3)AR activation exacerbates apoptosis and tissue damage due to renal ischemia and reperfusion, selective A(3)AR antagonism may hold promise to attenuate renal ischemia and reperfusion injury. Finally, renal A(1)AR activation also protects against renal endothelial dysfunction caused by hepatic ischemia and reperfusion injury.

SUMMARY

Despite the current lack of therapies for the treatment and prevention of AKI, recent research suggests that modulation of renal adenosine receptors holds promise in treating AKI and extrarenal injury.

Evolving treatment strategies for management of cardiorenal syndrome

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment of acute decompensated heart failure in the presence of progressive renal dysfunction is a commonly encountered dilemma in clinical practice. Also known as cardiorenal syndrome, this complex disease state has forced researchers and clinicians to develop new treatment strategies to relieve the symptomatic congestion of heart failure while preserving renal function. Loop diuretics remain the standard of pharmacologic treatment of acute heart failure, but their effects on renal function have been called into question. The DOSE trial set out to determine optimal diuretic dosing strategies but no clear regimen was firmly established. Initial studies with vasopressin antagonists showed promise in their ability to increase urine output, provide short-term symptom relief, and correct hyponatremia while maintaining renal function. Unfortunately, the EVEREST trial did not demonstrate any benefit on long-term clinical outcomes. Adenosine antagonists also appeared to be an emerging therapeutic option, but the recently completed PROTECT trial failed to establish their role in the treatment of cardiorenal syndrome. Both nesiritide and low-dose dopamine have endured years of trials with mixed results. Most recently, findings from the ASCEND-HF trial showed that nesiritide was safe with no adverse effects on renal function or mortality and was associated with a modest improvement in dyspnea. The ongoing ROSE study, sponsored by the National Institutes of Health Heart Failure Research Network, will attempt to confirm the safety and efficacy profiles of low-dose nesiritide and dopamine, as well as clarify their roles within acute heart failure management. Despite its inherent complexities, ultrafiltration has demonstrated potential benefit in several clinical outcomes compared to traditional pharmacotherapy. The results of the CARRESS-HF trial will reveal how the use of ultrafiltration specifically applies to patients with cardiorenal syndrome. The most exciting aspects about our evolving understanding of the cardiorenal system are the innovative treatments that have emerged as a result. The creation of chimeric natriuretic peptides, targeted intra-renal pharmacotherapy, the novel use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and combination treatment strategies demonstrate that despite our varied success in treating cardiorenal syndrome in the past, there are highly encouraging translational therapies rapidly developing in the pipeline.

Recent developments in adenosine receptor ligands and their potential as novel drugs

Medicinal chemical approaches have been applied to all four of the adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes (A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3)) to create selective agonists and antagonists for each. The most recent class of selective AR ligands to be reported is the class of A(2B)AR agonists. The availability of these selective ligands has facilitated research on therapeutic applications of modulating the ARs and in some cases has provided clinical candidates. Prodrug approaches have been developed which improve the bioavailability of the drugs, reduce side-effects, and/or may lead to site-selective effects. The A(2A) agonist regadenoson (Lexiscan®), a diagnostic drug for myocardial perfusion imaging, is the first selective AR agonist to be approved. Other selective agonists and antagonists are or were undergoing clinical trials for a broad range of indications, including capadenoson and tecadenoson (A(1) agonists) for atrial fibrillation, or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, respectively, apadenoson and binodenoson (A(2A) agonists) for myocardial perfusion imaging, preladenant (A(2A) antagonist) for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, and CF101 and CF102 (A(3) agonists) for inflammatory diseases and cancer, respectively.

Cardiorenal syndrome: diagnosis, treatment, and clinical outcomes

The pathophysiologic interactions that link the heart and kidney are multiple and complex, and have been grouped under the umbrella term "cardiorenal syndrome." In the setting of acute decompensated heart failure, worsening renal function has been directly associated with poor clinical prognosis and complicates treatment. However, the pathophysiology underlying acute cardiorenal syndrome remains incompletely understood and treatment options remain limited. Traditionally, the development of worsening renal function in acute decompensated heart failure has been attributed to renal arterial underfilling due to reduced cardiac output or intravascular volume depletion. However, increasing data have expanded our understanding of the roles that venous congestion and intra-abdominal pressure play in driving renal injury, with important implications for therapeutic management and the development of novel renal-sparing therapies.

Cardiorenal Syndrome: The Clinical Cardiologists' Perspective

The term cardiorenal syndrome has evolved over the years. The understanding of the interactions between these two organ systems has led to better recognition and treatment strategies. As cardiovascular mortality is high in individuals with renal dysfunction, it is imperative to understand the pathophysiology behind the disease process. This knowledge may better serve these patients with this syndrome and improve their outcomes. In this review, we examine the key issues of the cardiorenal syndrome from a cardiologist's perspective.

Cardiorenal syndrome in acute decompensated heart failure

Renal dysfunction is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure. Furthermore, worsening renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), the so-called cardiorenal syndrome, impacts short and long-term morbidity and mortality. In recent years, more evidence has surfaced from clinical trials and heart failure registries that a complex cross-talk between the kidney and heart in patients with ADHF exists. Meanwhile, management of patients presenting with ADHF and concomitant renal dysfunction continues to be challenging. Therefore, understanding the interaction of the heart and kidneys is pivotal in tailoring therapy of these patients. We have extensively reviewed the pathophysiology of ADHF, the role of neurohoromones as well as other biomarkers and predictors of mortality in these patients based on the current evidence. Moreover, we have discussed the current and future pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies for treatment of this deadly disease. The strength of the evidence is limited, however, due to a paucity of randomized controlled trials in this patient population. What is evident from current national statistics; however, are the poor results in treating the congestion of ADHF. In this regard, the role of secondary hyperaldosteronism is discussed in the diuretic section as well as diuretic resistance in ADHF. In conclusion, since renal function is the single most important prognostic factor in the outcome of patients with ADHF, a better understanding of the pathophysiology of the cardiorenal syndrome is needed to target therapy and ultimately improve the mortality of patients with ADHF.

Cardiorenal syndrome: biomarkers linking kidney damage with heart failure

All the vital organs of the body share information by virtue of various biological mediators. Primary pathology of a major organ can lead to dysfunction of the other. Cardiorenal syndrome is an important example of such organ crosstalk. Primary dysfunction of the heart or kidney can lead to injury of the other organ. As molecular injury occurs prior to clinical dysfunction, effective interventions can be planned if one can detect this organ dysfunction at an earlier stage by virtue of some biological markers. Such biomarkers can be substances in urine, serum, imaging maneuvers or any other quantifiable parameters. Some currently available biomarkers are not sensitive enough to provide timely diagnosis of the disorder. An important research priority is the development of newer biomarkers or a panel of biomarkers for the early diagnosis of organ dysfunction, as well as nature of injury, guidance for therapeutic interventions and prognosis. Many newer biomarkers have been studied for both heart and kidney dysfunction. This article focuses on newer biomarkers for the cardiorenal syndrome.

Heart failure with normal ejection fraction: consideration of mechanisms other than diastolic dysfunction

More than half of patients with heart failure (HF) have a normal ejection fraction (EF). These patients are typically elderly, are predominantly female, and have a high incidence of multiple comorbid conditions associated with development of ventricular hypertrophy and/or interstitial fibrosis. Thus, the cause of HF has been attributed to diastolic dysfunction. However, the same comorbidities may also impact myocardial systolic, ventricular, vascular, renal, and extracardiovascular properties in ways that can also contribute to symptoms of HF by way of mechanisms not related to diastolic dysfunction. Accordingly, the descriptive term HF with normal EF has been suggested as an alternative to the mechanistic term diastolic HF. In this article, we review the current understanding of nondiastolic mechanisms that may contribute to the HF with normal EF syndrome to highlight potential pathways for research that may lead to new targets for therapy.

Adenosine A(1) receptors determine glomerular hyperfiltration and the salt paradox in early streptozotocin diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

In early type 1 diabetes mellitus, changes in proximal reabsorption influence glomerular filtration rate (GFR) through tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF). Due to TGF, a primary increase in proximal reabsorption causes early diabetic hyperfiltration, while a heightened sensitivity of the proximal tubule to dietary salt leads to the so-called salt paradox, where a change in dietary salt causes a reciprocal change in GFR ('tubulocentric principle'). Here, experiments were performed in adenosine A(1) receptor knockout mice (A(1)R-/-), which lack an immediate TGF response, to determine whether A(1)Rs are essential for early diabetic hyperfiltration and the salt paradox.

METHODS

GFR was measured by inulin disappearance in conscious A(1)R-/- and wild-type (WT) mice after 4 weeks of streptozotocin diabetes on a control NaCl diet (1%), and measurements were repeated after 6 days of equilibration on a low-NaCl (0.1%) or a high-NaCl (4%) diet.

RESULTS

A(1)R-/- and WT were similar with respect to blood glucose, dietary intakes and body weight changes on a given diet. Diabetic hyperfiltration occurred in WT, but was blunted in A(1)R-/-. A reciprocal relationship between GFR and dietary salt was found in WT diabetics, but not A(1)R-/- diabetics or nondiabetics of either strain.

CONCLUSION

A(1)Rs determine glomerular hyperfiltration and the salt paradox in early diabetes, which is consistent with the tubulocentric principle.