Role of the Pharmacist for Improving Self-care and Outcomes in Heart Failure

Pharmacist-led medication management services: a qualitative exploration of transition-of-care cardiovascular disease patient experiences

OBJECTIVE

Hospitalisation due to medication-related problems is a major health concern, particularly for those with pre-existing, or those at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Postdischarge medication reviews (PDMRs) may form a core component of reducing hospital readmissions due to medication-related problems. This study aimed to explore postdischarge CVD patients' perspectives of, and experiences with, pharmacist-led medication management services. A secondary aim explored attitudes towards the availability of PDMRs.

DESIGN

An interpretative qualitative study involving 16 semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach.

SETTING

Patients with CVD discharged to a community setting from the John Hunter Hospital, an 820-bed tertiary referral hospital based in New South Wales, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with pre-existing or newly diagnosed CVD who were recently discharged from the hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 16 interviews were conducted to reach thematic saturation. Nine participants (56%) were male. The mean age of participants was 57.5 (±13.2) years. Three emergent themes were identified: (1) poor medication understanding impacts transition from the hospital to home; (2) factors influencing medication concordance following discharge and (3) perceived benefits of routine PDMRs.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a clear need to further improve the quality use of medicines and health literacy of transition-of-care patients with CVD. Our findings indicate that the engagement of transition-of-care patients with CVD with pharmacist-led medication management services is minimal. Pharmacists are suitable to provide essential and tailored medication review services to patients with CVD as part of a multidisciplinary healthcare team. The implementation of routine, pharmacist-led PDMRs may be a feasible means of providing patients with access to health education following their transition from hospital back to community, improving their health literacy and reducing rehospitalisations due to medication-related issues.

Illustrating How to Use the Validated Alsayed_v1 Tools to Improve Medical Care: A Particular Reference to the Global Initiative for Asthma 2022 Recommendations

Purpose

The current research aimed to illustrate a real case using the validated Alsayed_v1 tools as tutorial training to improve the knowledge and skills of healthcare practitioners in the clinical problem-solving process necessary to implement medical and pharmaceutical care.

Patients and Methods

The Alsayed_v1 instruments consist of principal components: data collection, assessment of treatments, the medical problem oriented plan (MPOP), as well as a care plan and patient education.

Results

This study illustrated a real case of asthma patient using the validated Alsayed_v1 tools. These validated and clinically tested tools provide a coding system for the MPOP that permits easy documentation with an open hierarchical structure where higher levels are broad and lower levels are particular, and the possibility to enter free text. The section dedicated to treatment assessments is intended to synthesize patient information to facilitate the identification of the MPOPs. Effective management requires the development of a partnership between the patient with asthma (or the patient's caregivers) and his healthcare professional(s). This partnership aims to allow the patient to control his condition with guidance from the healthcare professional(s), discuss and agree on therapy goals, and develop a personalized, written, self-management asthma care plan.

Conclusion

By implementing Alsayed_v1 tools, the clinical practitioner can actively give the best practice for optimal patient outcomes.

Outcome Benefits Seen With 1 Year of Optimized Sacubitril/Valsartan for the Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure Managed by Pharmacists in a Cardiology Practice

BACKGROUND

Pharmacists' care in heart failure (HF) management has been shown to better clinical outcomes, including use of guideline-directed medical therapy and hospital readmission, although the impact observed has varied among studies.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the rates of all-cause hospitalization and hospitalization from HF (hHF) and changes in surrogate markers (left-ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association Functional Classification [NYHA FC], diuretic requirements) for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) on angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) therapy optimized within a pharmacist clinic.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients with HFrEF on sacubitril/valsartan from July 7, 2015, through January 1, 2018.

RESULTS

For the primary outcome analysis, 70 patients with pre/post hospitalization data had a reduction in the rate of all-cause hospitalization from 45.7% in the 12 months prior to ARNi therapy initiation to 24.3% during the first year on optimized ARNi therapy (P = 0.004). The rate of hHF reduced from 24.3% to 8.6% (P = 0.003). For the secondary outcome analyses at the 6-month assessment point, which included 104 patients, ejection fraction improved from 26% to 34% (P < 0.001), NYHA FC improved or remained unchanged in 86.6% of patients, and weekly loop diuretic dosing requirements were significantly reduced.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Real-world use of sacubitril/valsartan optimized within a pharmacist clinic was associated with reduced prevalence of all-cause and hHF during the first year of ARNi therapy. This study corroborates pharmacist involvement in HF management, which could be used to support further research and expanded pharmacist services.

Pharmacist-led intervention on the reduction of inappropriate medication use in patients with heart failure: A systematic review of randomized trials and non-randomized intervention studies

BACKGROUND

Polipharmacy has been identified as a contributing factor to the high hospital readmission rates of heart failure (HF) patients. Nevertheless, there limited evidence on pharmacist-led intervention on the reduction of inappropriate medication use in patients.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the available evidence resulting from interventions, led by pharmacists (alone or as part of a professional team), aimed at reducing inappropriate medications in patients with heart failure.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE through PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Scopus until June 2020. We reviewed both randomized controlled trials and non-randomized intervention studies.The quality of evidence was assessed in accordance with the modified Cochrane Collaboration tool to assess risk of bias for randomized controlled trials. The search and extraction process followed PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Of the 4367 records screening, 9 studies were included in the analysis. In 4 (44.4%) studies, the intervention was carried out by a pharmacist working together with a physician; in 4 (44.4%) the intervention was carried out by a pharmacist alone, and in 1 study, the pharmacist collaborated with a nurse. Only 5 (55.5%) studies described the utilization of guidelines or recommendations to carry out the deprescription, and 3 of these showed improved clinical outcomes in the interventional group compared to the control group. The other studies (4, 44.4%) did not follow a specific guideline or recommendation to evaluate the appropriateness of medication, and none of them showed statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between interventional and control groups.

CONCLUSION

Only those studies where pharmacists evaluated the appropriateness of treatment to specific HF guidelines showed significant differences in patients' clinical outcomes. The development and validation of a specific tool to evaluate medication appropriateness in patients with HF, could contribute to the improvement of patient health.

Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (PIP-HFrEF)

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic debilitating and potentially life-threatening condition. Heart Failure patients are usually at high risk of polypharmacy and consequently, potentially inappropriate prescribing leading to poor clinical outcomes. Based on the published literature, a comprehensive HF-specific prescribing review tool is compiled to avoid medications that may cause HF or harm HF patients and to optimize the prescribing practice of HF guideline-directed medical therapies. Recommendations are made in line with the last versions of ESC guidelines, ESC position papers, scientific evidence, and experts' opinions.

Empowering People Living with Heart Failure

Heart failure is a chronic disease with a multitude of different clinical manifestations. Empowering people living with heart failure requires education, support structure, understanding the needs of patients, and reimaging the care delivery systems currently offered to patients. In this article, the authors discuss practical approaches to activate and empower people with heart failure and enable patient-provider dialogue and shared decision making.

The effect of inpatient pharmaceutical care on nephrotic syndrome patients after discharge: a randomized controlled trial

Background Clinical pharmacists can play an important role in chronic diseases management, but limited attention has been given to the pharmaceutical care of nephrotic syndrome patients. Objective To evaluate the impact of inpatient pharmaceutical care on medication adherence and clinical outcomes in nephrotic syndrome patients. Setting A tertiary first-class hospital in Shanxi, China. Method We conducted a randomized controlled trial on 61 patients with nephrotic syndrome. The intervention consisted of medication reconciliation, pharmacist visits every day, discharge counseling and education by 2 certificated pharmacist, while the control group received usual care. Assessments were performed at baseline, month-1, month-3 and month-6 after hospital discharge. Main outcome measure medication adherence and patients' clinical outcomes. Results 61 patient completed the trial. Baseline variables were comparable between the two groups. The decline in medication adherence of patients in the intervention group after hospital discharge was restrained effectively at month-6 (p < 0.05). However, the groups did not differ in clinical outcomes, medication discrepancies, adverse drug events and readmission rate. The rate of return visits of the pharmaceutical care group was higher at month-1 and month-6 after discharge (p < 0.05). Conclusion Pharmaceutical inpatient care improved adherence in patients with nephrotic syndrome after hospital discharge, the effect of the intervention on clinical outcomes, medication discrepancies, adverse drug events or readmission was insignificant. These results are promising but should be tested in other settings prior to broader dissemination.

Impact of community pharmacist-led interventions in chronic disease management on clinical, utilization, and economic outcomes: An umbrella review

BACKGROUND

Chronic disease represents a significant burden to the United States (US) health care system, with approximately 50% of all adults in the US having one or more chronic disease conditions. Pharmacist-led chronic disease management interventions are of special interest since 80% of medical treatments involve the use of prescription drugs. Moreover, community pharmacists are among the most accessible health care professionals to provide care for populations with chronic diseases. The impact of care provided by community pharmacists isn't well defined, with interventions taking on diverse forms with varied effects on outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to summarize evidence from secondary literature on community pharmacist-led chronic disease management interventions and the impact on clinical, utilization, and economic outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and narrative reviews using MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE.com and Cochrane Library databases published between January 1, 2007 and October 17, 2017. The following data were extracted: citation details, review type, number of primary studies included, disease state, description of the intervention, outcomes assessed, and results.

RESULTS

Our search strategy retrieved 2296 titles and abstracts of which 15 references met our inclusion criteria. Selected articles covered 7 main diseases -diabetes, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS). Community pharmacist-led interventions mostly consisted of patient consultations and education. In diabetes, interventions achieved significant reductions in hemoglobin A1c, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Reviews also reported favorable reductions in blood pressure, improved medication adherence and reduced readmission rates in patients with heart failure, improved lung function in patients with respiratory conditions, and increased medication adherence in those with HIV/AIDs. Literature reporting economic and utilization outcomes were limited and mostly focused on pharmacy interventions in diabetes. In some cases, community pharmacy services demonstrated a decrease in medical and health care costs in patients with diabetes.

CONCLUSION

We found that community pharmacists can improve clinical outcomes in a wide array of chronic diseases, including diabetes, hyperlipidemia, HIV/AIDS, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. More robust studies are needed to further assess the impact of specific interventions on economic and utilization outcomes.

Effect of a Smart Pill Bottle and Pharmacist Intervention on Medication Adherence in Patients with Multiple Myeloma New to Lenalidomide Therapy

BACKGROUND

U.S. specialty drug spend is expected to reach $400 billion by 2020, with significant growth in oncology. New oral oncology approvals have allowed for more convenient outpatient administration compared with physician-administered chemotherapies; however, patients may encounter challenges with adherence when taking medications at home. Emerging medication adherence technology (MAT) attempts to provide at-home adherence support, and while one such technology, smart pill bottles (SPB), claims to improve medication adherence, few studies have formally assessed their effects.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of an SPB with pharmacist intervention on medication adherence in adult patients with multiple myeloma (MM) new to lenalidomide therapy (≤ 5 cycle dispenses). Secondary objectives were to evaluate treatment cycles completed, evaluate the significance of real-time pharmacist engagement (intervention group only), determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and evaluate patient satisfaction and likelihood to use an SPB.

METHODS

This prospective, random assignment, single-site, and single-blinded study recruited 40 adult patients diagnosed with MM new to lenalidomide at a specialty pharmacy. Recruitment was completed January-February 2016, and the length of study was 6 months. Participants were randomized 1:1 between the intervention and control groups. The intervention group received lenalidomide in activated SPBs with light, chimes, text message reminders, and pharmacist follow-up if weekly SPB adherence rates dropped below 80%. The control group received lenalidomide in identical SPBs with all alerts deactivated. SBPs contained cellular capabilities, enabling around-the-clock data transmission and captured data upon bottle-uncapping events. Patient adherence was calculated by dividing the number of bottle-uncapping events by the total number of doses supplied for each dosing cycle. Lenalidomide cycles completed and pharmacist outreach to the same patient were counted to determine pharmacist intervention. The ICER was calculated to determine SPB cost-effectiveness, and a Likert scale survey was given to the intervention group to evaluate patient satisfaction with the full-service SPB.

RESULTS

Sixteen participants in each arm completed the study; 4 patients in each arm were lost to follow-up. Median adherence was improved for the intervention group compared with the control group (median = 100% vs. 87.4%; P = 0.001). The ICER per patient percentage adherence increase was found to be $96.03. Sixty percent of patients in the intervention group who responded to the post-satisfaction survey rated the full SPB service very positively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, SPB interventions were associated with increased medication adherence and patient satisfaction. This pilot also provides empirical data on the cost-effectiveness of adherence technology used in a specialty pharmacy oncology setting.

DISCLOSURES

This study was supported by Avella Specialty Pharmacy and AdhereTech. All authors are employees of Avella; Eric Sredzinski was an option holder of Avella; and none of the Avella authors had a financial interest in AdhereTech. AdhereTech provided the SPBs and data services for the duration of this study. The authors report no other potential conflicts of interest. Interim study data were presented at the 2016 Southwestern States Residency Conference (SSRC) on June 20, 2016, in Phoenix, AZ.

Undergraduate pharmacy students' attitudes and perceived barriers toward provision of pharmaceutical care: a multi-institutional study in Nepal

Background: Pharmaceutical care (PC) has a significant impact on optimizing pharmacotherapy and improving patients’ quality of life. We aimed to determine the attitudes and perceived barriers of final year pharmacy undergraduates towards provision of PC services in Nepal.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 232 students using a 13-item-standard PC attitude survey (PCAS) questionnaire and 12-itemed PC barrier questionnaires. Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to measure the median difference between groups, at alpha=0.05, and Spearman’s rho test was used to measure the strength of the correlation.

Results: Majority of students were self-motivated in undertaking the current pharmacy education (178, 76.7%) and had no previous incomplete grades that could delay their graduation (177, 76.3%). Over 80% of students had a positive attitude toward all items of PCAS (agreed and strongly agreed) except for two items. Whereas, 61 (26.3%) disagreed and strongly disagreed that providing PC takes too much time and effort. The major barriers perceived were inadequate PC training (176, 75.9%), inadequate drug information resources in the pharmacy (170, 73.3%), and lack of access to patient medical records in the pharmacy (165, 71.1%). A significant relationship was noticed between positive attitude towards PC and three factors; source of motivation, current employment in pharmacy job, and incomplete grades delaying graduation. Age factor was significant but negatively correlated with the scores of positive attitudes namely “I would like to perform PC as a pharmacist practitioner”, “Providing PC is professionally rewarding” and “I feel that the PC is the right direction for the provision to be headed”.

Conclusion: Nepalese undergraduate pharmacy students had positive attitudes toward PC. Exercising proper pharmacy practice regulations and educational efforts to overcome the perceived barriers may lead to better delivery of PC.

Impact of a Pharmacist-Led Intervention on 30-Day Readmission and Assessment of Factors Predictive of Readmission in African American Men With Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is responsible for more 30-day readmissions than any other condition. Minorities, particularly African American males (AAM), are at much higher risk for readmission than the general population. In this study, demographic, social, and clinical data were collected from the electronic medical records of 132 AAM patients (control and intervention) admitted with a primary or secondary admission diagnosis of HF. Both groups received guideline-directed therapy for HF. Additionally the intervention group received a pharmacist-led intervention. Data collected from these patients were used to develop and validate a predictive model to evaluate the impact of the pharmacist-led intervention, and identify predictors of readmission in this population. After propensity score matching, the intervention was determined to have a significant impact on readmission, as a significantly smaller proportion of patients in the intervention group were readmitted as compared to the control group (11.5% vs. 42.9%; p = .03). A predictive model for 30-day readmission was developed using K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classification algorithm. The model was able to correctly classify about 71% patients with an AUROC of 0.70. Additionally, the model provided a set of key patient attributes predictive of readmission status. Among these predictive attributes was whether or not a patient received the intervention. A relative risk analysis identified that patients who received the intervention are less likely to be readmitted within 30 days. This study demonstrated the benefit of a pharmacist-led intervention for AAM with HF. Such interventions have the potential to improve quality of life for this patient population.

In-Hospital Initiation of Guideline-Directed Heart Failure Pharmacotherapy to Improve Long-Term Patient Adherence and Outcomes

Heart failure is a burdensome cardiovascular condition associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The 3-month period after hospitalization is a vulnerable phase in which patients are at high risk for mortality and rehospitalization. To reduce risk during this period, patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction should receive guideline-directed pharmacological therapies—the right drugs at the right doses—before hospital discharge. Optimal pharmacotherapies for these patients include agents that suppress the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, suppress the sympathetic nervous system, enhance vasodilation, slow heart rate when needed, and reduce excess volume. Because optimal prescription and adherence are both necessary to ensure the best clinical outcomes, nurses need to participate in interventions that optimize prescription and drug use over time. Collaboration with pharmacists and advanced practice acute care nurses may help ensure that medication selection and dosing are consistent with national guidelines. Use of a predischarge order set and electronic medical records checklist can enhance collaborative care.

Body image and psychological distress in women with breast cancer: a French online survey on patients' perceptions and expectations

BACKGROUND

Altered body image caused by alopecia, loss of eyebrows or eyelashes, or mastectomy is a major source of psychological distress in women with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and to assess patients' perceptions and expectations regarding altered body image.

METHOD

Opinion survey conducted among patients treated for breast cancer and member of French online support groups. Anonymous online self-administered survey sent to women with breast cancer.

RESULTS

85% of the women interviewed experienced alopecia during treatment and 67% of them loss of eyebrows or eyelashes. About half of patients suffering alopecia and loss of eyebrows or eyelashes reported fearing what others think. Mastectomy was experienced by 84% of the women in our study, but only 32% of them reported fearing what others think. 87% of our study cohort received information about the possibility of adverse events. 70, 56, and 60% of women felt helped by information they received for the management of alopecia, loss of eyebrows or eyelashes, or mastectomy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that altered body image is a critical psychosocial issue for women with breast cancer. Effective information can be a source of reassurance and may constitute one of the most important sources of emotional support.