Pulmonary Vascular Disease: Hemodynamic Assessment and Treatment Selection—Focus on Group II Pulmonary Hypertension

Standardization of the Right Heart Catheterization and the Emerging Role of Advanced Hemodynamics in Heart Failure

The accurate assessment of hemodynamics is paramount to providing timely and efficacious care for patients presenting in cardiogenic shock. Recently, the regular use of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiogenic shock has had a resurgence with emerging data indicating improved survival in the modern era. Optimal multidisciplinary management of advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock relies on our ability to effectively communicate and understand the complete hemodynamic assessment. Standardization of data acquisition and a renewed focus on the physiological processes, and thresholds driving disease progression, including the coupling ratio and myocardial reserve, are needed to fully understand and interpret the hemodynamic assessment. This State-of-the-Art review discusses best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory as well as emerging data on the prognostic role of emerging advanced hemodynamic parameters.

Echocardiographic evaluation of right heart failure which might be associated with DNA damage response in SU5416-hypoxia induced pulmonary hypertension rat model

Right heart failure is the leading cause of death in pulmonary hypertension (PH), and echocardiography is a commonly used tool for evaluating the risk hierarchy of PH. However, few studies have explored the dynamic changes in the structural and functional changes of the right heart during the process of PH. Previous studies have found that pulmonary circulation coupling right ventricular adaptation depends on the degree of pressure overload and other factors. In this study, we performed a time-dependent evaluation of right heart functional changes using transthoracic echocardiography in a SU5416 plus hypoxia (SuHx)-induced PH rat model. Rats were examined in 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-week using right-heart catheterization, cardiac echocardiography, and harvested heart tissue. Our study found that echocardiographic measures of the right ventricle (RV) gradually worsened with the increase of right ventricular systolic pressure, and right heart hypofunction occurred at an earlier stage than pulmonary artery thickening during the development of PH. Furthermore, sarco-endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 2 (SERCA2), a marker of myocardial damage, was highly expressed in week 2 of SuHx-induced PH and had higher levels of expression of γ-H2AX at all timepoints, as well as higher levels of DDR-related proteins p-ATM and p53/p-p53 and p21 in week 4 and week 6. Our study demonstrates that the structure and function of the RV begin to deteriorate with DNA damage and cellular senescence during the early stages of PH development.

Features Associated With Discordance Between Pulmonary Arterial Wedge Pressure and Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure in Clinical Practice: Implications for Pulmonary Hypertension Classification

BACKGROUND

The measurements used to define pulmonary hypertension (PH) etiology, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP), and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) vary in clinical practice. We aimed to identify clinical features associated with measurement discrepancy between PAWP and LVEDP in patients with PH.

METHODS

We extracted clinical data and invasive hemodynamics from consecutive patients undergoing concurrent right and left heart catheterization at Vanderbilt University between 1998 and 2014. The primary outcome was discordance between PAWP and LVEDP in patients with PH in a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

We identified 2,270 study subjects (median age, 63 years; 53% men). The mean difference between PAWP and LVEDP was -1.6 mm Hg (interquartile range, -15 to 12 mm Hg). The two measurements were moderately correlated by linear regression (R = 0.6, P < .001). Results were similar when restricted to patients with PH. Among patients with PH (n = 1,331), older age (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.23-2.45) was associated with PAWP underestimation in multivariate models, whereas atrial fibrillation (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.08-2.84), a history of rheumatic valve disease (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.36-3.52), and larger left atrial diameter (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.24-2.32) were associated with PAWP overestimation of LVEDP. Results were similar in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically meaningful disagreement between PAWP and LVEDP is common. Atrial fibrillation, rheumatic valve disease, and larger left atrial diameter are associated with misclassification of PH etiology when relying on PAWP alone. These findings are important because of the fundamental differences in the treatment of precapillary and postcapillary PH.