Hyperkalaemia in Heart Failure-Pathophysiology, Implications and Therapeutic Perspectives

Assessing potassium levels in critically ill patients with heart failure: application of a group-based trajectory model

AIMS

Abnormalities in potassium homeostasis are frequently seen in hospitalized patients. A poor outcome in heart failure (HF) has been linked to both hypokalaemia and hyperkalaemia. The studies on the connection between variations in potassium levels and all-cause mortality remain scarce. We delineated trajectories of potassium levels and investigated the association of these trajectories with all-cause mortality of critically ill patients with HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective analysis of blood potassium levels (9 times) in patients with HF after being admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Potassium levels were divided into three groups according to the first serum potassium level in ICU and thereafter categorized as follows: hypokalaemia group (n = 336) (<3.5 mmol/L), normal blood potassium-level group (n = 3322) (3.5-5.0 mmol/L), and hyperkalaemia group (n = 395) (>5.0 mmol/L). According to the group-based trajectory modelling (GBTM), the hyperkalaemia group and the normal blood potassium-level group can be divided into three trajectory groups: the low-level stable group, the medium-level stable group, and the high-level decline group. The hypokalaemia group can be divided into two trajectory groups: the low-level rise group and the high-level rise group. A total of 4053 HF patients were included (mean age 71.81 ± 13.12 years, 54.90% males, 45.10% females). After adjusting for possible confounding variables, in the hyperkalaemia group, the low-level stable group had lower 28 day [high-level decline group vs. low-level stable group hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.917, 1.555-5.473; P < 0.05] and 365 day (high-level decline group vs. low-level stable group HR, 95% CI: 2.854, 1.820-4.475; P < 0.05) all-cause mortality. In the normal blood potassium-level group, the medium-level stable group had lower 28 day (medium-level stable group vs. low-level stable group HR, 95% CI: 0.776, 0.657-0.918; P < 0.05) and 365 day (medium-level stable group vs. low-level stable group HR, 95% CI: 0.827, 0.733-0.934; P < 0.05) all-cause mortality. In the hypokalaemia group, the cumulative survival of the high-level rise group and the low-level rise group did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Critically ill patients with HF have blood potassium trajectories. And the trajectories are associated with all-cause mortality for hyperkalaemia and normal blood potassium-level patients. GBTM is a granular method to describe the evolution of blood potassium, which may increase the current knowledge of blood potassium-level adjustment.

Binding Potassium to Improve Treatment With Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors: Results From Multiple One-Stage Pairwise and Network Meta-Analyses of Clinical Trials

This manuscript presents findings from the first dichotomous data pooling analysis on clinical trials (CT) regarding the effectiveness of binding potassium. The results emanated from pairwise and network meta-analyses aiming evaluation of response to commercial potassium-binding polymers, that is, to achieve and maintain normal serum potassium (n = 1,722), and the association between this response and an optimal dosing of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) needing individuals affected by heart failure (HF) or resistant hypertension, who may be consuming other hyperkalemia-inducing drugs (HKID) (e.g., β-blockers, heparin, etc.), and frequently are affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n = 1,044): According to the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA), sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) (SUCRA >0.78), patiromer (SUCRA >0.58) and sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) (SUCRA <0.39) were different concerning their capacity to achieve normokalemia (serum potassium level (sK+) 3.5-5.0 mEq/L) or acceptable kalemia (sK+ ≤ 5.1 mEq/L) in individuals with hyperkalemia (sK+ >5.1 mEq/L), and, when normokalemia is achieved, patiromer 16.8-25.2 g/day (SUCRA = 0.94) and patiromer 8.4-16.8 g/day (SUCRA = 0.41) can allow to increase the dose of spironolactone up to 50 mg/day in subjects affected by heart failure (HF) or with resistant hypertension needing treatment with other RAASi. The potential of zirconium cyclosilicate should be explored further, as no data exists to assess properly its capacity to optimize dosing of RAASi, contrarily as it occurs with patiromer. More research is also necessary to discern between benefits of binding potassium among all type of hyperkalemic patients, for example, patients with DM who may need treatment for proteinuria, patients with early hypertension, etc. Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42020185614, CRD42020185558, CRD42020191430.

Comparative risk of new-onset hyperkalemia for antihypertensive drugs in patients with diabetic nephropathy: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the risk of hyperkalemia of antihypertensive drugs on diabetic nephropathy, yet the results are conflicting. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for RCTs investigating the risk of antihypertensive drugs on hyperkalemia in diabetic nephropathy from inception to May 31, 2020. Direct comparative meta-analysis showed that the proportion of patients with hyperkalemia was significantly higher in the ARB, aldosterone antagonist, renin inhibitor group than in the placebo group. Moreover, the risk of hyperkalemia in the ARB group was higher than that in the CCB group. Network meta-analysis showed the risk of hyperkalemia in the ARB, aldosterone antagonist, and renin inhibitor group was higher than in the placebo group, but there was no statistical difference between the CCB, ACEI, β blocker, endothelin inhibitor, and diuretic groups than in the placebo group. The possibility of antihypertensive drugs in risk of hyperkalemia being the worst treatment was aldosterone antagonist (98.8%), followed by ARB (73.8%), renin inhibitor (63.8%), diuretic (53.1%), ACEI (46.9%), β blocker (36.8%), endothelin inhibitor (35.2%), placebo (27.1%), and finally CCB (14.3.1%). Therefore, aldosterone antagonist seems worse than other antihypertensive drugs in the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

The importance of developing hyperkalaemia in heart failure during long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Hyperkalaemia is a potentially life-threatening condition. Furthermore, it is one of the main reasons for discontinuation and dose reduction of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) in clinical practice. However, exact data on the prevalence and consequences of occurrence of hyperkalaemia when taking RAASi in a dedicated heart failure care setting are scarce.

METHODS

Consecutive patients diagnosed with heart failure from a single tertiary hospital between August 2000 and May 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Primary endpoint was the development of hyperkalaemia (≥5.5 mmol/L) at any moment during follow-up.

RESULTS

About 396 patients were included in the current analysis (mean follow-up 6.9 years). 26% (n = 104) and 12% (n = 46) of patients developed hyperkalaemia (≥5.5 mmol/L and ≥6.0 mmol/L, respectively). Diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.03-3.19) and baseline creatinine (mg/dL) (OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 2.37-3.85) were independent risk factors for hyperkalaemia. Development of hyperkalaemia was associated with 6.5 higher odds for recurrence. Only 10% developed hyperkalaemia during up-titration of RAASi, while 90% developed during later follow-up on stable doses of RAASi. hyperkalaemia was not associated with worse outcome after multivariate adjustment for baseline co-morbidities. However, hyperkalaemia was associated with discontinuation and lower doses of MRAs during follow-up (p = 0.007). Discontinuation of MRA due to hyperkalaemia was associated with an increase in all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients (HR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.05-2.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately, one-fourth of patients developed hyperkalaemia during follow-up which was associated with a lower MRA dose during follow-up. Discontinuation of MRA, but not hyperkalaemia itself, was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and heart failure admission in HFrEF patients.

Practical guidance for the use of potassium binders in the management of hyperkalaemia in patients with heart failure and/or chronic kidney disease

Given the critical physiological role of potassium, it is understandable that the development of severe hyperkalaemia requires effective management to reduce its effects, which include muscle weakness, paralysis and cardiac arrhythmias. Hyperkalaemia most often results from the failure of renal adaptation to potassium imbalance. Patients who are most susceptible to the development of hyperkalaemia include those with chronic kidney disease and those with heart failure. These patients are often treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II-receptor blockers, but the development of hyperkalaemia can require down-titration or cessation of RAAS inhibitors. This presents a significant challenge to nephrologists, cardiologists and healthcare professionals treating these patients as this can prevent them from receiving maximum guideline-directed RAAS inhibitor therapy. Panellists in this roundtable discussion shared their clinical experiences of using potassium binders to manage hyperkalaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease and patients with heart failure (illustrated with case studies) in Northern Ireland and considered recommendations for the implementation and maintenance of chronic potassium-lowering treatment.

Serum potassium levels provide prognostic information in symptomatic heart failure beyond traditional clinical variables

Aims

Despite of recent advances in the pharmacological treatment, heart failure (HF) maintains significant morbidity and mortality rates. While serum potassium disorders are common and associated with adverse outcomes, the exact recommended potassium level for patients with HF are not entirely established. We aimed to investigate the prognostic role of potassium levels on a cohort of patients with symptomatic chronic HF.

Methods and results

Patients with symptomatic chronic HF were identified at the referral to 6 min walking test (6MWT) and were prospectively followed up for cardiovascular events. Clinical and laboratorial data were retrospectively obtained. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, hospitalization due to HF, and heart transplantation. The cohort included 178 patients with HF with the mean age of 51 ± 12.76 years, 39% were female, 85% of non‐ischaemic cardiomyopathy, and 38% had New York Heart Association Class III with a relatively high Meta‐Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score (12.91 ± 6.6). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 39.98 ± 15.79%, and the mean 6MWT distance was 353 ± 136 m. After a median follow‐up of 516 days, there were 22 major cardiovascular events (4 cardiovascular deaths, 13 HF admissions, and 5 heart transplants). Patients were stratified according to cut‐point level of serum potassium of 4.7 mmol/L to predict combined cardiac events based on receiver operating characteristic analysis. Individuals with higher potassium levels had worse renal function (glomerular filtration rate, K ≤ 4.7: 102.8 ± 32.2 mL/min/1.73 m² vs. K > 4.7: 85.42 ± 36.2 mL/min/1.73 m², P = 0.004), higher proportion of New York Heart Association Class III patients (K ≤ 4.7: 28% vs. K > 4.7: 48%, P = 0.0029), and also higher MAGGIC score (K ≤ 4.7: 12.08 ± 5.7 vs. K > 4.7: 14.9 ± 7.9, P = 0.0089), without significant differences on the baseline pharmacological HF treatment. Both potassium levels [hazard ratio (HR) 4.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59–11.421, P = 0.003] and 6MWT distance (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.993–0.999, P = 0.01) were independently associated with the primary outcome. After adjustments for MAGGIC score and 6MWT distance, potassium levels > 4.7 mmol/L maintained a significant association with outcomes (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.305–9.807, P = 0.013). Patients with K > 4.7 mmol/L were more likely to present clinical events during the follow‐up (log rank = 0.005). Adding potassium levels to the model including 6MWT and MAGGIC significantly improved the prediction of events over 2 years (integrated discrimination index 0.105, 95% CI 0.018–0.281, P = 0.012 and net reclassification index 0.447, 95% CI 0.077–0.703, P = 0.028).

Conclusions

Potassium levels were independently associated with worse outcomes in patients with chronic symptomatic HF, also improving the accuracy model for prognostic prediction when added to MAGGIC score and 6MWT distance. The potassium levels above 4.7 mmol/L might identify those patients at an increased risk of cardiovascular events.

Adult North Star Network (ANSN): Consensus Guideline For The Standard Of Care Of Adults With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

There are growing numbers of adults with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy living well into their fourth decade. These patients have complex medical needs that to date have not been addressed in the International standards of care. We sought to create a consensus based standard of care through a series of multi-disciplinary workshops with specialists from a wide range of clinical areas: Neurology, Cardiology, Respiratory Medicine, Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Palliative Care Medicine, Rehabilitation, Renal, Anaesthetics and Clinical Psychology. Detailed reports of evidence reviewed and the consensus building process were produced following each workshop and condensed into this final document which was approved by all members of the Adult North Star Network including service users. The aim of this document is to provide a framework to improve clinical services and multi-disciplinary care for adults living with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Hyperkalemia in heart failure

Hyperkalemia is increasingly prevalent in the heart failure population as more people live with heart failure and comorbid conditions such as diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Furthermore, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone (RAAS) inhibitors are a key component of clinical therapy in these populations. Until now, we have not had any reliable or tolerable therapies for treatment of hyperkalemia resulting in inability to implement or achieve target doses of RAAS inhibition. This review will focus on two new therapies for hyperkalemia: patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC).