Coexisting Morbidities in Heart Failure: No Robust Interaction with the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Endothelial-cell-mediated mechanism of coronary microvascular dysfunction leading to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Although the prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is growing worldwide, its complex pathophysiology has yet to be fully elucidated, and multiple hypotheses have all failed to produce a viable target for therapeutic action or provide effective treatment. Cardiac remodeling has long been considered an important mechanism of HFpEF. Strong evidence has been reported over the past years that coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), manifesting as structural and functional abnormalities of coronary microvasculature, also contributes to the evolution of HFpEF. However, the mechanisms of CMD are still not well understood and need to be studied further. Coronary microvascular endothelial cells (CMECs) are one of the most abundant cell types in the heart by number and active players in cardiac physiology and pathology. CMECs are not only important cellular mediators of cardiac vascularization but also play an important role in disease pathophysiology by participating in the inception and progression of cardiac remodeling. CMECs are also actively involved in the pathogenesis of CMD. Numerous studies have confirmed that CMD is closely related to cardiac remodeling. ECs may serve a critical function in mediating the connection between CMD and HFpEF. It follows that CMECs participate in the mechanism of CMD leading to HFpEF. In this review article, we focus on the role of CMD in the pathogenesis of HFpEF resulting from cardiac remodeling and highlight the subsequent complexity of the EC-mediated correlation between CMD and HFpEF.

Differences in Outcomes between Heart Failure Phenotypes in Patients with Coexistent COPD: A Cohort Study

RATIONALE

Differences in clinical presentation and outcomes between HF phenotypes in patients with COPD have not been assessed.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and healthcare resource use (HRU) between patients with COPD and HF with preserved (HFpEF), mildly-reduced (HFmrEF), and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS

Patients with COPD and HF were identified in the United States (US) administrative claims database OptumLabs® DataWarehouse between 2008-2018. All-cause and cause-specific (HF) hospitalization, acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD, severe and moderate combined), mortality and HRU were compared between HF phenotypes.

RESULTS

From 5,419 patients with COPD, 70% had HFpEF, 20% had HFrEF and 10% had HFmrEF. All-cause hospitalization did not differ across groups, however patients with COPD and HFrEF had a greater risk of HF-specific hospitalization (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.29-1.84) and mortality (HR: 1.17, 95%CI 1.03-1.33) compared to patients with COPD and HFpEF. Conversely, patients with COPD and HFrEF had a lower risk of AECOPD compared with those with COPD and HFpEF (HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.66-0.87). Rates of long-term stays (in skilled-nursing facilities) and emergency room visits were lower for those with COPD and HFrEF than for those with COPD and HFpEF.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes in patients with comorbid COPD and HFpEF are largely driven by COPD. Given the paucity in treatments for HFpEF, better differentiation between cardiac and respiratory symptoms may provide an opportunity to reduce the risk of AECOPD. Risk of death and HF hospitalization were highest among patients with COPD and HFrEF, emphasizing the importance of optimizing guideline-recommended HFrEF therapies in this group.