What We Mean When We Talk About MRD in Myeloma. A Review of Current Methods. Part 1 of a Two-Part Series

Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: Benefits of flow cytometry

Over the last 20 years, the approaches to the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) have changed considerably, which led to an increase in remission rate. Using new diagnostic methods has made it possible to assess the response to treatment more reliably and forecast disease recurrence: allele-specific polymerase chain reaction, new-generation sequencing and multicolor flow cytometry enable minimal residual disease (MRD) detection of with sensitivity of 10^-5 to 10^-6 . MRD assessment with flow cytometry using is a rapidly developing area of research. The goal of multicenter groups that use flow cytometry as a tool to detect MRD in patients with MM is achieving standardization and increasing sensitivity and specificity of this method. This article provides data about the methods used for MRD monitoring and describes the advances in the field of flow cytometry.

Single-Tube 10-Fluorochrome Analysis for Efficient Flow Cytometric Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease in Plasma Cell Myeloma

OBJECTIVES

Widespread adoption of recent recommendations for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in myeloma has partly been impeded by a paucity of studies detailing multiparameter flow cytometry (MPF) assay validation. In response, we have validated a novel and efficient single-tube 10-color assay for MRD detection that incorporates the recently recommended plasma cell markers.

METHODS

Aspirate samples from 53 patients with plasma cell disorder were analyzed using a novel single-tube 10-color method. The limit of detection, precision of measurement, and linearity of measurement of our new assay were determined using serial dilution experiments. The stability of the new antibody cocktail and the viability/specificity of stained samples were evaluated using serial time course measurements.

RESULTS

There was a high degree of quantitative agreement between our new 10-color method and an established eight-color method. Four positive samples detected by the 10-color assay were below or at the limit of detection of the eight-color assay, confirming its high sensitivity. In two cases, subsequent revision of the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria was necessary.

CONCLUSION

Adoption of our validated 10-color assay would enable clinical laboratories to satisfy current MRD recommendations without significantly increasing the demands on current workflow practices.