An Exercise in Extrapolation: Clinical Management of Atypical CML, MDS/MPN-Unclassifiable, and MDS/MPN-RS-T

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, genetics, risk stratification, and management

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) defined by persistent mature neutrophilic leukocytosis and bone marrow granulocyte hyperplasia. Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) (myelodysplastic "[MDS]/MPN with neutrophilia" per World Health Organization [WHO]) is a MDS/MPN overlap disorder featuring dysplastic neutrophilia and circulating myeloid precursors. Both manifest with frequent hepatosplenomegaly and less commonly, bleeding, with high rates of leukemic transformation and death. The 2022 revised WHO classification conserved CNL diagnostic criteria of leukocytosis ≥25 × 109/L, neutrophils ≥80% with <10% circulating precursors, absence of dysplasia, and presence of an activating CSF3R mutation. ICC criteria are harmonized with those of other myeloid entities, with a key distinction being lower leukocytosis threshold (≥13 × 109/L) for cases CSF3R-mutated. Criteria for aCML include leukocytosis ≥13 × 109/L, dysgranulopoiesis, circulating myeloid precursors ≥10%, and at least one cytopenia for MDS-thresholds (ICC). In both classifications ASXL1 and SETBP1 (ICC), or SETBP1 ± ETNK1 (WHO) mutations can be used to support the diagnosis. Both diseases show hypercellular bone marrow due to a granulocytic proliferation, aCML distinguished by dysplasia in granulocytes ± other lineages. Absence of monocytosis, rare/no basophilia, or eosinophilia, <20% blasts, and exclusion of other MPN, MDS/MPN, and tyrosine kinase fusions, are mandated. Cytogenetic abnormalities are identified in ~1/3 of CNL and ~15-40% of aCML patients. The molecular signature of CNL is a driver mutation in colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor-classically T618I, documented in >80% of cases. Atypical CML harbors a complex genomic backdrop with high rates of recurrent somatic mutations in ASXL1, SETBP1, TET2, SRSF2, EZH2, and less frequently in ETNK1. Leukemic transformation rates are ~10-25% and 30-40% for CNL and aCML, respectively. Overall survival is poor: 15-31 months in CNL and 12-20 months in aCML. The Mayo Clinic CNL risk model for survival stratifies patients according to platelets <160 × 109/L (2 points), leukocytes >60 × 109/L (1 point), and ASXL1 mutation (1 point); distinguishing low- (0-1 points) versus high-risk (2-4 points) categories. The Mayo Clinic aCML risk model attributes 1 point each for: age >67 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, and TET2 mutation, delineating low- (0-1 risk factor) and high-risk (≥2 risk factors) subgroups. Management is risk-driven and symptom-directed, with no current standard of care. Most commonly used agents include hydroxyurea, interferon, Janus kinase inhibitors, and hypomethylating agents, though none are disease-modifying. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative modality and should be considered in eligible patients. Recent genetic profiling has disclosed CBL, CEBPA, EZH2, NRAS, TET2, and U2AF1 to represent high-risk mutations in both entities. Actionable mutations (NRAS/KRAS, ETNK1) have also been identified, supporting novel agents targeting involved pathways. Preclinical and clinical studies evaluating new drugs (e.g., fedratinib, phase 2) and combinations are detailed.

Recurrent bilateral adrenal infarction with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm-unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U): a case report

BACKGROUND

Bilateral adrenal infarction is rare and only a small number of cases have been reported so far. Adrenal infarction is usually caused by thrombophilia or a hypercoagulable state, such as antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, pregnancy, and coronavirus disease 2019. However, adrenal infarction with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) has not been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 81-year-old man with a sudden severe bilateral backache presented to our hospital. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) led to the diagnosis of bilateral adrenal infarction. Previously reported causes of adrenal infarction were all excluded and a diagnosis of MDS/MPN-unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U) was reached, which was considered to be attributed to adrenal infarction. He developed a relapse of bilateral adrenal infarction, and aspirin administration was initiated. Partial primary adrenal insufficiency was suspected as the serum adrenocorticotropic hormone level was persistently high after the second bilateral adrenal infarction.

CONCLUSION

This is the first case of bilateral adrenal infarction with MDS/MPN-U encountered. MDS/MPN has the clinical characteristics of MPN. It is reasonable to assume that MDS/MPN-U may have influenced bilateral adrenal infarction development, considering the absence of thrombosis history and a current comorbid hypercoagulable disease. This is also the first case of recurrent bilateral adrenal infarction. It is important to carefully investigate the underlying cause of adrenal infarction once adrenal infarction is diagnosed, as well as to assess adrenocortical function.

Molecular genetics and management of world health organization defined atypical chronic myeloid leukemia

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a rare BCR::ABL1-negative hematopoietic stem cell disease characterized by granulocytic proliferation and granulocytic dysplasia. Due to both the challenging diagnosis and the rarity of atypical CML, comprehensive molecular annotation-based analyses of this disease population have been scarce, and it is currently difficult to identify the optimal treatment for atypical CML. To explore atypical CML genomic landscape and treatment options, we performed a systematic retrospective of the clinical data and outcomes of 31 atypical CML patients. We observed that the molecular landscape of atypical CML was highly heterogeneous, with multiple molecular events driving its pathogenesis. Patients with atypical CML had a low response to current therapies, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 33.3% to hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based therapy. The current treatment strategies, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), did not improve overall survival (OS) in atypical CML patients, with a median survival of 20 months. Thus, the benefits from HSCT and candidates for HSCT remain to be further evaluated. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-like chemotherapy followed by bridging allogeneic HSCT may be an ideal regimen for suitable individuals. The large-scale and prospective clinical studies will help to address the dilemma.

Trametinib: Could It Be a Promising Drug to Treat Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia?

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) is a rare disease that is currently classified under the myelodysplastic (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) disease spectrum. MDS/MPN diseases are characterized by the absence of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome and the overlap between bone marrow fibrosis and dysplastic features. The Ph chromosome, resulting from BCR-ABL1 translocation, helps to distinguish aCML from chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The currently reported incidence of aCML is imprecise because aCML is diagnosed primarily based on morphological features and other unspecified laboratory findings, and there is an especially high chance of under-diagnosis of aCML and other MDS/MPN diseases. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have allowed a greater understanding of the nature of aCML, providing better opportunities to achieve higher diagnostic accuracy and for the use of more targeted treatment to achieve better outcomes. Herein, we present a case of a 68-year-old woman who came to our hospital complaining of shortness of breath, fatigue, and weakness, who was found to have significantly increased leukocytosis, hepatosplenomegaly, and was negative for the Ph chromosome. Further investigations with NGS revealed mutations in ASXL1, GATA2, NRAS, and SRSF2 but not CSF3R. In addition to this, peripheral smear and bone marrow aspiration findings were suggestive of aCML based on specific morphological findings. Since the patient was ineligible for a stem cell transplant (SCT), symptomatic treatment was started with cell transfusion; however, the patient continued to have symptomatic anemia that required multiple transfusions. A trial with trametinib, a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor, was later started as a targeted therapy based on one of her genetic mutations. Interestingly, the patient’s blood counts stabilized, she reported feeling better, and she did not need any blood transfusions for four consecutive months during treatment with trametinib. Unfortunately, our patient later died from sepsis resulting from secondary infections. In light of the significant advancements in NGS, clinicians should always consider utilizing it as a helpful tool to not only establish a rare diagnosis of aCML but also to offer the best available targeted therapy when applicable. This might alleviate the burden associated with the poor prognosis of aCML.

Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T): Mayo-Moffitt collaborative study of 158 patients

The current World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid malignancies includes myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) as a distinct entity. Previous literature on predictors of survival was based on the provisional category of refractory anemia with ring sideroblast and thrombocytosis (RARS-T), which was not subject to MDS/MPN-RS-T exclusionary criteria such as PB blast% ≥1, BM blast% ≥5 or cytogenetic abnormalities such as t(3;3)(q21.2;q26.2), inv(3)(q21.23q26.2) or isolated del(5q). We examined overall (OS) and leukemia-free (LFS) survival and its predictors, among 158 patients with WHO-defined MDS/MPN-RS-T. In univariate analysis, age ≥70 years (P = 0.006), hemoglobin (Hb) ≤10 g/dL (P = 0.03) and abnormal karyotype (excluding -Y, P = 0.008) were associated with shortened OS, which was otherwise not affected by either ASXL1 (P = 0.7), SF3B1 (P = 0.4) or JAK2 V617F (P = 0.7) mutations; in multivariable analysis, Hb ≤ 10 g/dL (P = 0.03) and abnormal karyotype (P = 0.001) remained significant, and thus allowed the development of an operational survival model with low (0 risk factors, median OS 10.5 years), intermediate (1 risk factor, median OS 4.8 years) and high risk (2 risk factors, median OS 1.4 years) categories (P = 0.0009). Comparison of MDS/MPN-RS-T (n = 158) and MDS/MPN-U with BM RS ≥ 15% (MDS/MPN-U-RS; n = 25) did not reveal significant differences in frequency of thrombosis, OS, or LFS, although SF3B1 mutation frequency was higher in the former (93% versus 59%; P = 0.0005). These data suggest limited survival impact for molecular abnormalities and the morphological distinction between MDS/MPN-RS-T and MDS/MPN-U-RS.

Molecular Pathogenesis of BCR-ABL-Negative Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia is a rare disease whose pathogenesis has long been debated. It currently belongs to the group of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative disorders. In this review, an overview on the current knowledge about diagnosis, prognosis, and genetics is presented, with a major focus on the recent molecular findings. We describe here the molecular pathogenesis of the disease, focusing on the mechanisms of action of the main mutations as well as on gene expression profiling. We also present the treatment options focusing on emerging targeted therapies.

Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: New Developments from Molecular Diagnosis to Treatment

Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, BCR-ABL1 negative (aCML) is a rare hematological entity, included in the group of myelodysplastic (MDS)/myeloproliferative (MPN) overlap syndromes. It is characterized by an aggressive course, a high rate of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformation, and a dismal outcome. The clinical presentation includes splenomegaly and leukocytosis with neutrophilia and left-shifted granulocytosis accompanied by granulocytic dysplasia and sometimes multilineage dysplasia. In past years, the disease incidence was likely underestimated, as diagnosis was only based on morphological features. Recently, the improving knowledge in the molecular biology of MDS/MPN neoplasms has made it possible to distinguish aCML from other overlapping syndromes, basing on next generation sequencing. Among the most commonly mutated genes, several involve the Jak-STAT, MAPK, and ROCK signaling pathways, which could be actionable with targeted therapies that are already used in clinical practice, opening the way to tailored treatment in aCML. However, currently, there are few data available for small samples, and allogeneic transplant remains the only curative option for eligible patients.

Traipsing Through Muddy Waters: A Critical Review of the Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MDS/MPN) Overlap Syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndrome/Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPNs) are molecularly complex, clinically heterogeneous diseases that exhibit proliferative and dysplastic features. Diagnostic criteria use clinical, pathologic, and genomic features to distinguish between disease entities, though considerable clinical and genetic overlap persists. MDS/MPNs are associated with a poor prognosis, save for MDS/MPN with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis, which can behave more indolently. The current treatment approach is risk-adapted and symptom-directed and largely extrapolated from experience in MDS or MPN. Gene sequencing has demonstrated frequent mutations involving signaling, epigenetic, and splicing pathways, which present numerous therapeutic opportunities for clinical investigation.

Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Where Are We Now?

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL1 negative (aCML) is a rare myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) with a high rate of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia, and poor survival. Until now, the diagnosis has been based on morphological grounds only, possibly making the real frequency of the disease underestimated. Only recently, new insights in the molecular biology of MDS/MPN syndromes have deepened our knowledge of aCML, enabling us to have a better molecular profile of the disease. The knowledge gleaned from next generation sequencing has complemented morphologic and laboratory WHO criteria for myeloid neoplasms and can provide greater specificity in distinguishing aCML from alternative MDS/MPN or MPNs. The most commonly mutated genes (>20%) in aCML are SETBP1, ASXL1, N/K-RAS, SRSF2, and TET2, and less frequently (< 10%) CBL, CSFR3, JAK2, EZH2, and ETNK1. Several of these mutations affect the JAK-STAT, MAPK, and ROCK signaling pathways, which are targetable by inhibitors that are already in clinical use and may lead to a personalized treatment of aCML patients unfit for allogeneic transplant, which is currently the only curative option for fit patients. In this review, we present two emblematic clinical cases and address the new molecular findings in aCML and the available treatment options.

Outcome of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms-Unclassifiable: A Retrospective Nationwide Study of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

To date, there are no data focusing on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U). This study aimed to evaluate outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with MDS/MPN-U after allo-HSCT using Japanese nationwide registry data. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included the cumulative incidence of relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We evaluated the prognostic factors for 3-year OS by univariate analysis using the log-rank test. In our cohort of 86 patients with MDS/MPN-U, we found a 3-year OS of 48.5%, cumulative incidence of relapse of 23.7%, and NRM of 26.3%. The 3-year OS was significantly worse in patients age ≥50 years compared with those age <50 years (38.1% versus 65.0%; P = .049) and in patients with disease progression compared with those without disease progression (28.4% versus 57.2%; P = .042). Our results suggest that allo-HSCT may offer a curative option for patients with MDS/MPN-U, and that age and disease status could be important indicators in helping clinicians determine treatment options for these patients.

Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm with Ring Sideroblasts and Thrombocytosis with Cooccurrent SF3B1 and MPL Gene Mutations: A Case Report and Brief Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) is a new disease entity in the current WHO classification. Genetically, 60%-90% of cases have mutations in SF3B1, strongly associated with RS, and more than half of them cooccur with JAK2 V617F. This report describes the rare case of MDS/MPN-RS-T with SF3B1 mutation cooccurring with an MPL mutation.

METHODS

We report a 79-year-old man who was referred because of generalized edema. Peripheral blood testing showed macrocytic anemia and thrombocytosis, and bone marrow analysis demonstrated dyserythropoiesis with RS and increased megakaryocytes. A molecular study was performed to detect SF3B1 mutations and recurrent mutations in MPN disease (JAK2 V617F/exon 12, CALR gene exon 9, and MPL gene exon 10 mutations).

RESULTS

The molecular study revealed SF3B1 K666T and MPL W515R mutations, while BCR-ABL1 or JAK2 V617F/exon 12 and CALR mutations were all negative.

CONCLUSION

This is a rare case of concomitant SF3B1 and MPL mutations in MDS/MPN-RS-T.

Defining the Boundary Between Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

In this article we provide a practical and comprehensive review of myeloid neoplasms with overlapping myelodysplastic (MDS) and myeloproliferative (MPN) features, with emphasis on recent updates in classification, particularly the utility of morphologic, cytogenetic, and molecular findings in better defining and classifying these disease entities. We provide the reader with a summary of the most recent developments and updates that have helped further our understanding of the genomic landscape, clinicopathologic features, and prognostic elements of myeloid neoplasms with MDS/MPN features.

Diagnosis and classification of hematologic malignancies on the basis of genetics

Genomic analysis has greatly influenced the diagnosis and clinical management of patients affected by diverse forms of hematologic malignancies. Here, we review how genetic alterations define subclasses of patients with acute leukemias, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and classical Hodgkin lymphoma. These include new subtypes of acute myeloid leukemia defined by mutations in RUNX1 or BCR-ABL1 translocations as well as a constellation of somatic structural DNA alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Among patients with MDS, detection of mutations in SF3B1 define a subgroup of patients with the ring sideroblast form of MDS and a favorable prognosis. For patients with MPNs, detection of the BCR-ABL1 fusion delineates chronic myeloid leukemia from classic BCR-ABL1^- MPNs, which are largely defined by mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL In the B-cell lymphomas, detection of characteristic rearrangements involving MYC in Burkitt lymphoma, BCL2 in follicular lymphoma, and MYC/BCL2/BCL6 in high-grade B-cell lymphomas are essential for diagnosis. In T-cell lymphomas, anaplastic large-cell lymphoma is defined by mutually exclusive rearrangements of ALK, DUSP22/IRF4, and TP63 Genetic alterations affecting TP53 and the mutational status of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region are important in clinical management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Additionally, detection of BRAFV600E mutations is helpful in the diagnosis of classical hairy cell leukemia and a number of histiocytic neoplasms. Numerous additional examples provided here demonstrate how clinical evaluation of genomic alterations have refined classification of myeloid neoplasms and major forms of lymphomas arising from B, T, or natural killer cells.