Assessment of Bleeding Risk in Patients with Cirrhosis

Reduced Clot Stability by Thromboelastography as a Potential Indicator of Procedure-Related Bleeding in Decompensated Cirrhosis

In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, procedure-related bleeding is a potentially lethal complication. Routine coagulation tests such as international normalized ratio and platelet count do not predict bleeding risk. We investigated whether thromboelastography (TEG) can identify patients with cirrhosis who are at risk of procedure-related bleeding. As a part of a prospective study on hemostasis in decompensated cirrhosis, patients had TEG performed on admission and were followed prospectively during hospitalization for the development of procedure-related bleeding. Eighty patients with cirrhosis were included. Among the 72 who had procedures performed, 7 had procedure-related bleeding, which was major in three cases (two following paracentesis and one following thoracentesis). Conventional coagulation tests were comparable between bleeding and nonbleeding patients, whereas TEG parameters of k-time (4.5 minutes vs. 2.2 minutes; P = 0.02), α-angle (34° vs. 59°; P = 0.003), and maximum amplitude (37 mm vs. 50 mm; P = 0.004) were significantly different (all indicative of hypocoagulability). TEG maximum amplitude (MA), a marker of overall clot stability, accurately discriminated between patients who had major, life-threatening bleeding (all with MA < 30 mm) and those who had mild or no bleeding (all with MA > 30 mm), whereas a platelet count < 50 × 109/L could not discriminate between bleeding (minor or major) and nonbleeding patients. Conclusion: In a prospective cohort of hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis, TEG parameters associated with hypocoagulability appeared to predict procedure-related bleeding, particularly a TEG MA < 30 mm. If results are validated in a larger cohort, this could be a threshold to identify patients with decompensated cirrhosis at higher risk for procedure-related bleeding, in whom to consider preprocedural prophylaxis.

Reducing transfusion requirements in liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) was historically associated with massive blood loss and transfusion. Over the past two decades transfusion requirements have reduced dramatically and increasingly transfusion-free transplantation is a reality. Both bleeding and transfusion are associated with adverse outcomes in LT. Minimising bleeding and reducing unnecessary transfusions are therefore key goals in the perioperative period. As the understanding of the causes of bleeding has evolved so too have techniques to minimize or reduce the impact of blood loss. Surgical “piggyback” techniques, anaesthetic low central venous pressure and haemodilution strategies and the use of autologous cell salvage, point of care monitoring and targeted correction of coagulopathy, particularly through use of factor concentrates, have all contributed to declining reliance on allogenic blood products. Pre-emptive management of preoperative anaemia and adoption of more restrictive transfusion thresholds is increasingly common as patient blood management (PBM) gains momentum. Despite progress, increasing use of marginal grafts and transplantation of sicker recipients will continue to present new challenges in bleeding and transfusion management. Variation in practice across different centres and within the literature demonstrates the current lack of clear transfusion guidance. In this article we summarise the causes and predictors of bleeding and present the evidence for a variety of PBM strategies in LT.