Antihypertensive Therapy and the J-curve: Fact or Fiction?

Admission Left-Arm Systolic Blood Pressure and In-Hospital Mortality After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair

AIM

Admission systolic blood pressure is a significant predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). While previous studies have focussed on recording the highest blood pressure value from both arms, this study aimed to evaluate the associations between blood pressure in bilateral arms and in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

Data were analysed from 262 patients with ATAAD treated at a single centre. The relationship between bilateral arm blood pressure upon admission and in-hospital mortality was assessed in a logistic regression model. To comprehensively evaluate potential non-linear relationships, the association between admission bilateral systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the risk of in-hospital mortality was analysed using restricted cubic splines on a continuous scale.

RESULTS

Mean age was 53.6±12.5 years and 194 (74.0%) were male. Baseline and operative data showed that ages, body mass index, smoking, left-arm SBP, left-arm diastolic blood pressure (DBP), right-arm SBP, right-arm DBP, syncope, cerebral/cardiac ischaemia, retrograde brain perfusion, Bentall procedure, coronary artery bypass grafting, and aortic valve replacement significantly differed among the left-arm SBP tertiles. In-hospital mortality was 17.6% (46 of 262). Restricted cubic splines demonstrated that the relationship between presenting left-arm SBP and in-hospital mortality followed a U-shaped curve, whereas non-linearity was not detected in the right arm.

CONCLUSION

This study found a U-shaped association between admission left-arm SBP and in-hospital mortality in ATAAD surgery patients, whereas a non-linearity relationship was not detected for right-arm SBP. Low left-arm SBP independently correlated with increased in-hospital mortality, underscoring the significance of bilateral blood pressure differences in ATAAD prognosis.

Blood pressure and long-term mortality in older patients: results of the Fiesole Misurata Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND

Optimal blood pressure (BP) control can prevent major adverse health events, but target values are still controversial, especially in older patients with comorbidities, frailty and disability.

AIMS

To evaluate mortality according to BP values in a cohort of older adults enrolled in the Fiesole Misurata Study, after a 6-year follow-up.

METHODS

Living status as of December 31, 2016 was obtained in 385 subjects participating in the Fiesole Misurata Study. Patients' characteristics were analysed to detect predictors of mortality. At baseline, all participants had undergone office BP measurement and a comprehensive geriatric assessment.

RESULTS

After a 6-year follow-up, 97 participants had died (25.2%). After adjustment for comorbidities and comprehensive geriatric assessment, mortality was significantly lower for SBP 140-159 mmHg as compared with 120-139 mmHg (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.89). This result was also confirmed in patients aged 75 + (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.85), and in those with disability (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.86) or taking antihypertensive medications (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.86).

DISCUSSION

An intensive BP control may lead to greater harm than benefit in older adults. Indeed, the European guidelines recommend caution in BP lowering in older patients, especially if functionally compromised, to minimize the risk of hypotension-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

After a 6-year follow-up, mortality risk was lower in participants with SBP 140-159 mmHg as compared with SBP 120-139 mmHg, in the overall population and in the subgroups of subjects aged 75 + , with a disability or taking anti-hypertensive medications.

Prevalence of hypotension in hypertensive treated patients within the Primary Care setting. The PRESCAP 2010 study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of hypotension and associated factors in hypertensive patients treated in the Primary Care setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional, descriptive, and multicentre study was conducted with a total of 2635 general practitioners consecutively including 12,961 hypertensive patients treated in a Primary Care setting in Spain. An analysis was performed on the variables of age, gender, weight, height, body mass index, waist circumference, cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, dyslipidaemia, smoking, obesity, sedentary lifestyle), fasting plasma glucose, complete lipid profile, as well as the presence of target organ damage (left ventricular hypertrophy, microalbuminuria, carotid atherosclerosis) and associated clinical conditions. Hypotension was defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 110mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure less than 70mmHg. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the variables associated with the presence of hypotension.

RESULTS

The mean age was 66.2 years, and 51.7% of patients were women. The mean time of onset of hypertension was 9.1 years. A total of 13.1% of patients (95% confidence interval 12.4-13.6%) had hypotension, 95% of whom had low diastolic blood pressure. The prevalence of hypotension was higher in elderly patients (25.7%) and in those individuals with coronary heart disease (22.6%). The variables associated with the presence of hypotension included a history of cardiovascular disease, being treated with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs, diabetes, and age.

CONCLUSIONS

One out of 4-5 elderly patients, or those with cardiovascular disease, had hypotension. General practitioners should identify these patients in order to determine the causes and adjust treatment to avoid complications.

Effects of lowering diastolic blood pressure to <80 mmHg on cardiovascular mortality and events in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The target of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) remains controversial in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We systematically searched PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Central database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of reducing DBP in CAD patients from January 1965 to July 2017. Seven placebo-controlled RCTs enrolling 34,814 CAD patients who achieved DBP <80 mmHg were included in the drug-intervention group. The average achieved blood pressures (BPs) were 126.3/75.1 and 131.5/77.8 mmHg in the drug-intervention and placebo-control groups, respectively. Drug intervention was associated with an 11% reduction in coronary revascularization and a 31% reduction in heart failure. In the drug-intervention group, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, and stroke were reduced with marginal significance, whereas hypotension was increased by 123%. A meta-analysis of four RCTs, in which the achieved DBP was <75 mmHg, showed that the drug intervention was associated with a 22% reduction in heart failure. These results suggest that reducing DBP to 80 mmHg or less would significantly reduce coronary revascularization and heart failure but at the expense of causing hypotension in CAD patients. Further trials are warranted to prove this issue.

On-Treatment Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults With Isolated Systolic Hypertension

Our aim was to assess optimal on-treatment blood pressure (BP) at which cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality risks are minimized in Japanese older adults with isolated systolic hypertension. We used data from the VALISH study (Valsartan in Elderly Isolated Systolic Hypertension) that recruited older adults (n=3035; mean age, 76 years) with systolic BP (SBP) of ≥160 mm Hg and diastolic BP of <90 mm Hg. Patients were treated by valsartan. Patients were also categorized into 3 groups based on achieved on-treatment SBP of <130 mm Hg (n=317), 130 to <145 mm Hg (n=2025), or ≥145 mm Hg (n=693). The primary outcome was composite CVD (coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, cardiovascular deaths, other vascular diseases, and kidney diseases) with secondary outcome being all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the CVD risk for each group. Over a median 3-year follow-up (8022 person-years), 93 CVD events and 52 deaths occurred. Using the on-treatment SBP of 130 to <145 mm Hg as reference stratum, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of CVD and all-cause mortality risks for those with SBP<130 mm Hg were 2.08 (1.12–3.83) and 2.09 (0.93–4.71) and for those with SBP≥145 mm Hg were 2.29 (1.44–3.62) and 2.51 (1.35–4.66), respectively. On-treatment diastolic BP yielded no relationships with CVD or all-cause mortality risk. In conclusion, among Japanese older adults with isolated systolic hypertension, SBP in the range between 130 and 144 mm Hg was associated with minimal adverse outcomes and a reduction in CVD and all-cause mortality. The BP range will need to be confirmed in randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00151229.

Invasively Measured Aortic Systolic Blood Pressure and Office Systolic Blood Pressure in Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

Aortic systolic blood pressure (BP) represents the hemodynamic cardiac and cerebral burden more directly than office systolic BP. Whether invasively measured aortic systolic BP confers additional prognostic value beyond office BP remains debated. In this study, office systolic BP and invasively measured aortic systolic BP were recorded in 21 908 patients (mean age: 63 years; 58% men; 14% with diabetes mellitus) with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective coronary angiography during January 2001 to December 2012. Multivariate Cox models were used to assess the association with incident myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Discrimination and reclassification were assessed using Harrell’s C and the Continuous Net Reclassification Index. Data were analyzed with and without stratification by diabetes mellitus status. During a median follow-up period of 3.7 years (range: 0.1–10.8 years), 422 strokes, 511 myocardial infarctions, and 1530 deaths occurred. Both office and aortic systolic BP were associated with stroke in patients with diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio per 10 mm Hg, 1.18 [95% confidence interval, 1.07–1.30] and 1.14 [95% confidence interval, 1.05–1.24], respectively) and with myocardial infarction in patients without diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.12] and 1.05 [95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.10], respectively). In models including both BP measurements, aortic BP lost statistical significance and aortic BP did not confer improvement in either C-statistics or net reclassification analysis. In conclusion, invasively measured aortic systolic BP does not add prognostic information about cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality compared with office BP in patients with stable angina pectoris, either with or without diabetes mellitus.