De-escalating Antibiotic Use in the Inpatient Setting: Strategies, Controversies, and Challenges

An agent-based model on antimicrobial de-escalation in intensive care units: Implications on clinical trial design

Antimicrobial de-escalation refers to reducing the spectrum of antibiotics used in treating bacterial infections. This strategy is widely recommended in many antimicrobial stewardship programs and is believed to reduce patients' exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics and prevent resistance. However, the ecological benefits of de-escalation have not been universally observed in clinical studies. This paper conducts computer simulations to assess the ecological effects of de-escalation on the resistance prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-a frequent pathogen causing nosocomial infections. Synthetic data produced by the models are then used to estimate the sample size and study period needed to observe the predicted effects in clinical trials. Our results show that de-escalation can reduce colonization and infections caused by bacterial strains resistant to the empiric antibiotic, limit the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and avoid inappropriate empiric therapies. Further, we show that de-escalation could reduce the overall super-infection incidence, and this benefit becomes more evident under good compliance with hand hygiene protocols among health care workers. Finally, we find that any clinical study aiming to observe the essential effects of de-escalation should involve at least ten arms and last for four years-a size never attained in prior studies. This study explains the controversial findings of de-escalation in previous clinical studies and illustrates how mathematical models can inform outcome expectations and guide the design of clinical studies.

Risk factors and mortality of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection in a tertiary-care hospital in China: an eight-year retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (CRKP-BSI) is increasing worldwide. CRKP-BSI is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality due to limited antibiotic choices. Here, we aim to identify the prevalence and risk factors for infection and mortality of CRKP BSI.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of the past data from January 1st, 2012 to December 31st, 2019 of adult patients with KP-BSI in Xiangya Hospital, China.

RESULTS

Among the 706 incidences included in this study, 27.4% of them (212/753) being CR-KP strains. The occurrence of CRKP-BSI was increased from 20.69 to 37.40% from 2012 to 2019. Hematologic malignancies and ICU acquired infection were identified to be substantial risk factors of carbapenem resistance. The overall 28-day mortality rates of CRKP-BSI patients was significantly higher than that of CSKP-BSI (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified severe sepsis or septic shock incidents, inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy and corticosteroids use preceding infection onset as the independent predictors of 28-day mortality of CRKP-BSI patients. However, high dose carbapenem combination therapy was identified as anticipated factors of low 28-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of CRKP-BSI was significantly increased during the study period. Hematologic malignancies and ICU acquired infection were associated with the development of CRKP BSI. Severe sepsis or septic shock incidents, inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy and corticosteroids use preceding infection onset caused significant increase of mortality rates in CRKP-BSI patients. High dose carbapenem combination therapy was associated with better outcome.

Evidence of Antibiotic Resistance from Population-Based Studies: A Narrative Review

The 20th century witnessed the dawn of the antibiotic revolution and is now facing the rising phenomenon of antibiotic resistance. In this narrative review, we aim to describe antibiotic resistance in clinical practice settings through population-based studies from different countries reporting the role of misuse of antibiotics in the development of resistance and the clinical and economic burden associated. The misuse of antibiotics was documented in the wide population as well as in hospitals and care facilities. It was mainly reported as over-use and inappropriate prescribing. Improper dosage regimens and longer treatment duration were regarded as pivotal factors related to antibiotic resistance; the emerging strategy of "antibiotic-de-escalation" could be the key to overcome these issues. The investigation of the self-medication attitude revealed widespread antibiotic use without following medical instructions or medical consultation. Moreover, several studies established the association of antibiotic resistance with increased risk of longer hospitalizations and mortality, highlighting the heavy clinical and economic burden of this phenomenon. In this narrative review, the widespread inappropriate use of antibiotics emerged as one of the main causes of antibiotic resistance, which negative outcomes call for the development of antibiotic stewardship programs and global surveillance networks.

Poor compliance with an antibiotic directive-A call for intensified monitoring

BACKGROUND

In April 2017, the Central Denmark Region Antibiotic Stewardship Committee issued a directive to reduce the general use of piperacillin-tazobactam and prescribe narrow-spectrum antibiotics for mild and moderate pneumonia. The directive was distributed to all regional hospital clinicians.

METHODS

Electronic medical records were used to obtain de-identified details of all antibiotics administered (together with diagnosis codes) to all in-hospital patients (pre-directive and post-directive) in the nine regional hospitals. Average moving range statistical process control charts were used to analyze pre-directive and post-directive variation in antibiotic usage patterns.

RESULTS

Upon the distribution of the directive, a period of decline of the overall usage of piperacillin-tazobactam ensued. Rather than benzylpenicillin, as recommended for pneumonia, the initial decline in piperacillin/tazobactam usage was accompanied by increased use of cefuroxime.

CONCLUSIONS

A steward-directed reduction in piperacillin-tazobactam usage was accompanied by less desirable usage of a broad-spectrum alternative. Future antibiotic stewardship initiatives will hopefully benefit from close monitoring and timely feedback to clinicians. A dialogue with clinicians based on near real-time data is predicted to improve antibiotic stewardship actions.

Risk Factors Affecting Clinical Outcome in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant K. pneumoniae: A Retrospective Study

Background

The increased prevalence of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) poses a great threat worldwide. Early identification of CRKP in patients is paramount. Moreover, fully understanding the risk factors affecting clinical outcome and actively providing targeted treatment can improve the cure rate of patients with CRKP. Therefore, our study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and identify the risk factors affecting clinical outcomes in patients with CRKP.

Material/Methods

From January 2016 to September 2017, CRKP strains and clinical data from 97 hospitalized patients were collected. We first performed an antibiotic susceptibility test on CRKP strains using the Kirby-Bauer disc agar diffusion method. Logistic regression analysis was then performed to analyze risk factors.

Results

According to clinical outcome, among the 97 CRKP patients, 67 were in the effective group and 30 patients were in the noneffective group. Risk factors found to correlate with poor clinical outcome in patients with CRKP included ICU admission, arteriovenous catheterization, indwelling gastric tube, indwelling urethral catheter, tracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, hypoproteinemia, and exposure to carbapenems. Multivariate analysis showed that hypoproteinemia (OR: 2.83, p=0.042), presence of an indwelling gastric tube (OR: 4.54, p=0.005), and exposure to carbapenems (OR: 2.77, p=0.045) negatively affected clinical outcome in patients with CRKP.

Conclusions

Adverse risk factors correlated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with CRKP were determined. This could be of help in identifying high-risk patients with whom clinicians should take extra precautions and adjust therapeutic strategy to supplement conventional basic treatment with additional measures.

The learning hospital: From theory to practice in a hospital infection prevention program

The learning hospital is distinguished by ceaseless evolution of erudition, enhancement, and implementation of clinical best practices. We describe a model for the learning hospital within the framework of a hospital infection prevention program and argue that a critical assessment of safety practices is possible without significant grant funding. We reviewed 121 peer-reviewed manuscripts published by the VCU Hospital Infection Prevention Program over 16 years. Publications included quasi-experimental studies, observational studies, surveys, interrupted time series analyses, and editorials. We summarized the articles based on their infection prevention focus, and we provide a brief summary of the findings. We also summarized the involvement of nonfaculty learners in these manuscripts as well as the contributions of grant funding. Despite the absence of significant grant funding, infection prevention programs can critically assess safety strategies under the learning hospital framework by leveraging a diverse collaboration of motivated nonfaculty learners. This model is a valuable adjunct to traditional grant-funded efforts in infection prevention science and is part of a successful horizontal infection control program.

Audit of Antibiotic Practices: An Experience from a Tertiary Referral Center

Aims

To estimate the prevalence of antibiotic de-escalation at admission in patients referred to a tertiary hospital in India. The secondary outcomes were the adequacy of empirical antibiotic therapy and culture positivity rates in the de-escalated group.

Materials and methods

A prospective observational study, in a 20-bedded intensive care unit (ICU) of tertiary care hospital. Patients >18 years, surviving > 48 hours, were included (June– December 2017). Demographic data, previous cultures, and antibiotics from other hospitals, laboratory parameters in the first 24 hours, and severity of illness were noted. Changes made in antibiotic therapy within 48 hours were recorded. Patients were analyzed into three groups: “No change”–empiric therapy was maintained, “Escalation”–switch to or addition of an antibiotic with a broader spectrum, and “De-escalation”–switch to or interruption of a drug class.

Results

The total number of patients eligible was 75. The mean age of the population is 43.38 (SD + 3.4) and groups were comparable in terms of mean sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA) and acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation (APACHE) 2. The prevalence of de-escalation was 60% at admission. The escalation group consisted of 24%. Sixteen percent patients belonged to no change group. Results showed that 38% of patients were on carbapenems, dual gram negative was given to 26%, and empirical methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage was 28% on admission.

Conclusion

Our study aims to provide data about actual practices in the Indian scenario. It highlights the generous use of high-end antibiotics in the community. Indian practices are far cry from theoretical teaching and western data. The need for antibiotic stewardship program in our country for both public and private health sectors is the need of the hour.

How to cite this article

Singh R, Azim A, Gurjar M, Poddar B, Baronia AK. Audit of Antibiotic Practices: An Experience from a Tertiary Referral Center. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, January 2019;23(1):7-10.

The GISA call to action for the appropriate use of antimicrobials and the control of antimicrobial resistance in Italy

The spread of antibiotic resistance is one of the leading public health problems in Italy. A European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control country visit recently confirmed the major challenges and made important suggestions. In response, the Ministry of Health published the National Plan for Antimicrobial Resistance Containment, and a group of experts belonging to the Italian Group of Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA) convened to develop a summary of practical recommendations. The GISA document is intended for use by practising physicians; it aims to increase the rational use of antimicrobials in the treatment of infections, and to change the culture of infection control of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, through the translation of theoretical knowledge into priority actions. This document has been endorsed by several national scientific societies, and reflects the particular challenges that are faced in Italy. Nevertheless, it is considered that the general principles and approaches discussed are relevant, particularly to other developed economies.

Clinical and molecular characteristics, risk factors and outcomes of Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit

Background

To analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp) and carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae (CSKp) bloodstream infections (BSIs), and to study the risk factors for development of CRKp BSI and K. pneumoniae BSI-related mortality.

Methods

A retrospective case control study of patients with K. pneumoniae BSI was conducted in the intensive care unit of the First Affiliated Hospital, Medical of College, Zhejiang University from January 2013 to December 2014. Carbapenem resistance was defined in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2016 guidelines. Risk factors for the development of CRKp BSI and risk factors for mortality due to K. pneumoniae BSI were assessed. Virulence genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction assay.

Results

In total, 48 patients were enrolled in the study, including 31 (65%) patients with CRKp BSI and 17 (35%) patients with CSKp BSI. CSKp infection was associated with more severe clinical symptoms, particularly a higher serum creatinine level (165.06 ± 127.01 in the CSKp group vs. 93.77 ± 84.35 μmol/L in the CRKp group, p = 0.039), but there was no significant difference in prognosis between the CSKp and CRKp groups. On multivariate analysis, indwelling central venous catheter (p = 0.045) was the only factor independently associated with CRKp bacteremia. However, the mortality of K. pneumoniae BSI patients was not correlated with carbapenem resistance. In addition, the isolates had diverse clonality and different origins. The frequency of detection of the allS and magA virulence genes was higher in the CSKp group than in the CRKp group (alls p = 0.04; magA p = 0.047).

Conclusions

Patients in the CSKp group experienced more severe clinical symptoms, although mortality did not differ significantly between the CRKp and CSKp groups. An indwelling central venous catheter was the only factor independently associated with CRKp BSI. The mortality of patients with K. pneumoniae BSI was not associated with carbapenem resistance. The frequency of virulence genes was higher in the CSKp group than in the CRKp group.

Enhanced antimicrobial de-escalation for pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: a cross-over study

Background

Antibiotics are commonly administered to hospitalized patients with infiltrates for possible bacterial pneumonia, often leading to unnecessary treatment and increasing the risk for resistance emergence. Therefore, we performed a study to determine if an enhanced antibiotic de-escalation practice could improve antibiotic utilization in mechanically ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia cared for in an academic closed intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

This was a prospective cross-over trial comparing routine antibiotic management (RAM) and enhanced antimicrobial de-escalation (EAD) performed within two medical ICUs (total 34 beds) at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, an academic referral center. Patients in the EAD group had their antibiotic orders and microbiology results reviewed daily by a dedicated team comprised of a second-year critical care fellow, an ICU attending physician and an ICU pharmacist. Antibiotic de-escalation recommendations were made when appropriate based on microbiologic test results and clinical response to therapy.

Results

There were 283 patients evaluable, with suspected pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation: 139 (49.1%) patients in the RAM group and 144 (50.9%) in the EAD group. Early treatment failure based on clinical deterioration occurred in 33 (23.7%) and 40 (27.8%) patients, respectively (P = 0.438). In the remaining patients, antimicrobial de-escalation occurred in 70 (66.0%) and 70 (67.3%), respectively (P = 0.845). There was no difference between groups in total antibiotic days ((median (interquartile range)) 7.0 days (4.0, 9.0) versus 7.0 days (4.0, 8.8) (P = 0.616)); hospital mortality (25.2% versus 35.4% (P = 0.061)); or hospital duration (12.0 days (6.0, 20.0) versus 11.0 days (6.0, 22.0) (P = 0.918).

Conclusions

The addition of an EAD program to a high-intensity daytime staffing model already practicing a high-level of antibiotic stewardship in an academic ICU was not associated with greater antibiotic de-escalation or a reduction in the overall duration of antibiotic therapy.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02685930. Registered on 26 January 2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1772-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.