Treatment of Aortic Graft Infection in the Endovascular Era

Infection of Vascular Prostheses: A Comprehensive Review

Vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI) is a complex disease that complicates vascular-surgery and endovascular-surgery procedures and determines high morbidity and mortality. This review article provides the most updated general evidence on the pathogenesis, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VGEI. Several microorganisms are involved in VGEI development, but the most frequent one, responsible for over 75% of infections, is Staphylococcus aureus. Specific clinical, surgical, radiologic, and laboratory criteria are pivotal for the diagnosis of VGEI. Surgery and antimicrobial therapy are cornerstones in treatment for most patients with VGEI. For patients unfit for surgery, alternative treatment is available to improve the clinical course of VGEI.

Management of Postoperative Complications Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a minimally invasive therapeutic approach to manage abdominal aortic pathologies (eg, aneurysm and dissection). EVAR was first introduced in 1991. In 1994, endovascular technique was also applied for thoracic aorta, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). In recent decades, EVAR has become an acceptable first-line treatment with 50% utilization rate across most practices, especially in high-risk patients. The safety profile of EVAR is comparable to the open approach, with superiority in terms of perioperative mortality and morbidity. This article summarizes the most common complications following EVAR/TEVAR and the most current treatment modalities across practices.

Endograft Infection Due to Secondary Aortoenteric Fistula Treated With Custom-Made Bovine In Situ Aortic Bifurcation Graft

Purpose:

To increase awareness of the clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, and treatment options for endograft infections.

Case Report:

A 75-year-old male patient was admitted with suspected endograft infection 4 years after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Although preoperative diagnostics showed no definitive signs of endograft infection, eventual surgical exposure of the endograft revealed signs of advanced inflammation, including the unexpected finding of an aortoduodenal fistula.

Conclusion:

A detailed evaluation of patient history and clinical examination, performed as a part of routine follow-ups, may be beneficial in identifying possible severe complications after EVAR early on. Regarding options for aortic reconstruction in case of endograft infection, bovine pericardium deserves consideration as a promising, feasible, and easily available graft material.

Successful Treatment of an Infected Zenith Fenestrated Endograft Without Explantation

Current surgical dogma for infected aortic endografts consists of complete explantation concurrent with revascularization via extra-anatomic bypass or in situ infection-resistant conduit. However, this treatment paradigm is associated with high rates of postoperative mortality and major morbidity. Therefore, patients with prohibitive operative risk are often not offered surgical intervention. In the following manuscript, we report the successful treatment of an 85-year-old gentleman with a fenestrated aortic endograft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Indiana) infected secondary to the formation of an aortoenteric fistula with primary bowel repair, washout, and lifelong antibiotics and followed for nearly 2 years after intervention. Therefore, this nonexplantation approach can be considered for patients who may otherwise have no surgical recourse.