Prosthetic Joint Infection

A retrospective study of outcomes of device-associated osteomyelitis treated with daptomycin

Background

Daptomycin appears well tolerated and effective for osteomyelitis treatment. However, limited data exist regarding daptomycin use for treatment of device-associated osteomyelitis (DAO).

Methods

We used a retrospective, observational database (Cubicin® Outcomes Registry and Experience [CORE® 2007–2009]) that assessed patients treated with daptomycin to evaluate the characteristics of patients with DAO, outcomes after daptomycin treatment, and safety of daptomycin in this setting. Information from 54 institutions for patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and other hardware-associated osteomyelitis (OHAO) who received daptomycin from January 2007 to December 2008 with follow-up data in 2009 was collected using a standardized data collection form.

Results

Eighty-two patients receiving daptomycin were identified in CORE 2007–2009; 48 patients (59 %) had follow-up data. Sixty-seven percent of patients had received a previous antibiotic. Surgical intervention was similar between the 2 groups: PJI, 22 of 27 (82 %) and OHAO, 17 of 21 (81 %). However, device removal or replacement was more frequent in the PJI patients (17 of 27, 63 %) than in the OHAO patients (8 of 21, 38 %). Clinical success was reported in 22 of 27 (82 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 62–94 %) patients with PJI and 18 of 21 (86 %; 95 % CI, 64–97 %) patients with OHAO at follow-up (13–402 days). Adverse events occurred in 8 of 50 (16 %) patients in the safety population and did not differ by daptomycin dose.

Conclusion

Daptomycin appeared effective and well tolerated in patients with DAO, including PJI or OHAO.

Epidural collection following a late infected total knee replacement--a case report

Prosthetic joint infection is a well-described complication following primary joint replacement. The association between an epidural abscess and joint replacement surgery following the use of epidural anaesthetics has been previously documented. There is however, no report in the literature of an epidural abscess forming as a result of haematogenous spread from an infected prosthetic joint. This case report presents such a scenario and highlights the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of infected prosthetic joints to avoid further systemic complications.

[Knee joint infections]

Knee joint infection represents an emergency case at every age. Joint infection occurs frequently after trauma or joint surgery. The infection can be caused by numerous bacteria, viruses, or yeasts; however, Staphylococcus aureus is identified as the cause in 85-95 % of joint infections. Early treatment is important for patient outcome. In addition to synovectomy and therapeutic arthroscopy, antibiotic therapy is essential and should be started after sample recovery.

The management of failed ankle replacement

Advances in the design of the components for total ankle replacement have led to a resurgence of interest in this procedure.

Between January 1999 and December 2004, 16 patients with a failed total ankle replacement were referred to our unit. In the presence of infection, a two-stage salvage procedure was planned. The first involved the removal of the components and the insertion of a cement spacer. Definitive treatment options included hindfoot fusion with a circular frame or amputation. When there was no infection, a one-stage salvage procedure was planned. Options included hindfoot fusion with an intramedullary nail or revision total ankle replacement. When there was suspicion of infection, a percutaneous biopsy was performed. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months.

Of the 16 patients, 14 had aseptic loosening, five of whom underwent a revision total ankle replacement and nine a hindfoot fusion. Of the two with infection, one underwent fusion and the other a below-knee amputation. There were no cases of wound breakdown, nonunion or malunion.

Management of the failed total ankle replacement should be performed by experienced surgeons and ideally in units where multidisciplinary support is available. Currently, a hindfoot fusion appears to be preferable to a revision total ankle replacement.