Brain metastases

Treatments for brain metastases from EGFR/ALK-negative/unselected NSCLC: A network meta-analysis

More clinical evidence is needed regarding the relative priority of treatments for brain metastases (BMs) from EGFR/ALK-negative/unselected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Overall survival (OS), central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were selected for Bayesian network meta-analyses. We included 25 eligible randomized control trials (RCTs) involving 3,054 patients, investigating nine kinds of treatments for newly diagnosed BMs and seven kinds of treatments for previously treated BMs. For newly diagnosed BMs, adding chemotherapy, EGFR-TKIs, and other innovative systemic agents (temozolomide, nitroglycerin, endostar, enzastaurin, and veliparib) to radiotherapy did not significantly prolong OS than radiotherapy alone; whereas radiotherapy + nitroglycerin showed significantly better CNS-PFS and ORR. Surgery could significantly prolong OS (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.52, 95% credible intervals: 0.41-0.67) and CNS-PFS (HR: 0.32, 95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.59) compared with radiotherapy alone. For previously treated BMs, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy, nivolumab + ipilimumab, and cemiplimab significantly prolonged OS than chemotherapy alone. Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy also showed better CNS-PFS and ORR than chemotherapy. In summary, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies, especially ICI-combined therapies, showed promising efficacies for previously treated BMs from EGFR/ALK-negative/unselected NSCLC. The value of surgery should also be emphasized. The result should be further confirmed by RCTs.

Temporal evolution of metastatic disease: part I-an in-depth review of the evolution of metastatic disease across diverse spectrum of non-neural solid tumors on serial oncologic imaging studies and relevant practical applications

With improved survival rates of patients with metastatic disease due to continuously evolving multimodality treatment options, radiologists are increasingly interpreting imaging studies from patients with protracted metastatic disease. It is thus crucial for radiologists to have an in-depth understanding of the temporal evolution of metastatic spread and the accompanying findings on imaging studies, to provide accurate interpretation that supports optimal management. A general overview of the evolution of cancer spread on serial imaging studies and common pathways of tumor spread across multiple tumor types and tumor locations is not readily available in radiology literature. The key common pathways of tumor spread across diverse spectrum of tumors relevant to radiologists are summarized in a logical schematic approach which focusses on aiding radiologists to understand the pathways of spread resulting in current sites of metastatic disease involvement and then to potentially predict future sites of metastatic involvement. This article also summarizes the practical applications of this knowledge to the routine oncologic imaging interpretation.

Temporal evolution of metastatic disease: part II-a novel proposal for subcategorization of metastatic disease from non-neural solid tumors with diverse histologies and locations

Tumor spread is a continuous process and metastases can further disseminate. Currently, metastatic disease from most primary tumors is subcategorized as M0 if absent and M1 if present. However, metastatic disease in different locations may have different prognostic implications, even if it is from the same primary tumor. The current staging systems for metastatic disease have not evolved to match our understanding of the disease's evolution or the evolving treatment paradigms. Primary tumor-specific subcategorization of metastatic disease is currently available for a few tumors, but not all of them imply further remote spread of tumor, similar to tumor (T) and N (node) subcategorizations of the TNM staging, nor are they applicable to wide spectrum of other tumors. In this era of precision medicine, tumor-type agnostic therapies based on common biomarkers rather than primary tumor sites are emerging, but a subcategorization system applicable to metastatic disease from diverse primary tumor locations and with diverse histologies is not available. In this article, we discuss the need to further classify the metastatic disease and present a subcategorization applicable to metastatic disease from non-neural solid tumors from different primary tumor sites and with different histologies, which is based on the temporal spread of metastatic disease. Our proposed subcategorization scheme for metastatic disease into M0, M1, M2 and M3, is universally applicable to a diverse spectrum of non-neural solid tumors, and increasing M subcategorization represents further remote spread of tumor.

Concomitant or adjuvant temozolomide with whole-brain irradiation for brain metastases: a meta-analysis

The objective of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of concomitant or adjuvant tomozolomide with whole-brain irradiation (WBI) in patients with brain metastases. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched to identify relevant original published trails, and the references of eligible studies were manually screened. Randomized controlled trails reported in any language, comparing concomitant or adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) and WBI with WBI alone in patients with brain metastases, were eligible for inclusion. Two investigators independently assessed the quality of included trials and extracted data. The RevMan 5 software was used for statistical analysis. Four trials involving 280 patients were included. The result showed that the group TMZ+WBI was superior to group WBI in partial response, stable disease, progressive disease, and objective response with the pooled risk ratio value and 95% confidence interval, respectively, 1.89 (1.19-3.02), 0.82 (0.45-1.50), 0.29 (0.10-0.78), and 1.72 (1.32-2.24). The incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms and > or =grade 3 myelosuppression presented statistical difference, TMZ+WBI group is higher than WBI group, the pooled risk ratio value and 95% confidence interval were 3.75 (1.04-13.44) and 13 (1.75-96.79), respectively. The currently available evidence showed that the combination of TMZ and WBI may moderately improve the response rate, but accordingly increase the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms and myelosuppression. Future large-scale, high-quality, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials are needed.

Neuroimaging patterns of central nervous system metastases in neuroblastoma: report of 2 recent cases and literature review

The authors describe imaging patterns of intracranial metastases in 2 children with grade 4 neuroblastoma. Central nervous system metastases from neuroblastoma are extremely rare and may involve the cerebral parenchyma, leptomeninges, or dura. Cerebral parenchymal metastases can be cystic with mural nodules or solid with hemorrhagic elements. The first patient in our study had multiple cystic parenchymal metastases with calcific mural nodules, while the second patient developed solid hemorrhagic parenchymal metastatic lesions along with extensive leptomeningeal and dural deposits. Central nervous system involvement in both patients occurred within a time span ranging from 12 to 14 months from the time of initial diagnosis.

Phase 2 trial of temozolomide using protracted low-dose and whole-brain radiotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer and breast cancer patients with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Temozolomide (TMZ), an oral methylating imidazotetrazinone, has antitumor activity against gliomas, malignant melanomas, and brain metastasis and is presently administered as a 5-day oral schedule every 4 weeks.

METHODS

A single-institution phase 2 clinical trial was conducted to determine the efficacy and the safety profile of a new regimen based on a dose-intensified, protracted course of TMZ after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Patients were eligible if they had at least 1 bidimensionally measurable brain metastasis from breast cancer and nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Twenty-seven patients were treated with 30 grays (Gy) of WBRT with concomitant TMZ (75 mg/m(2)/day) for 10 days, and subsequent TMZ at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) per day for 21 days every 4 weeks, for up to 12 cycles.

RESULTS

Two complete responses (7.4%) and 11 partial responses (40.7%) were achieved. The schedule appeared to be well tolerated, with grade 3 toxicity (graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) observed in only 2 patients. The overall median survival was 8.8 months and the median progression-free survival was 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The concomitant use of WBRT and protracted low-dose TMZ appears to be an active, well-tolerated regimen. The observed antitumor activity suggests the need for further investigation of this schedule in combination with other anticancer agents for the concomitant treatment of brain metastases and primary cancers.

A phase II trial of vinorelbine and intensive temozolomide for patients with recurrent or progressive brain metastases

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of the combination of vinorelbine and intensive temozolomide for recurrent or progressive brain metastases from solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients > or =18 years of age and with Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) > or = 60, adequate organ function and progressive or recurrent brain metastases were eligible. This was a phase II trial with 28-day cycles using temozolomide (150 mg/m(2), days 1-7 and 15-21) and vinorelbine 25 or 30 mg/m(2 )on days one and eight. The primary endpoint was objective radiographic response.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (15 men, 23 women) with a median age of 57 years (range, 39-75) and median KPS of 80 were enrolled. The primary tumor sites were lung (n = 20), breast (n = 11), colorectal (n = 2), kidney (n = 2), bladder (n = 1), endometrium (n = 1), head and neck (n = 1). Prior therapies included chemotherapy (97%), whole-brain radiation therapy (79%), brain metastasis resection (53%) and stereotatic radiosurgery (47%). Objective radiographic response rate was 5% (one complete response and one minor response); five patients had stable disease, 29 progressive disease and two patients were not evaluable. Twenty-nine patients (76%) have died and the median follow-up of survivors was six months. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 1.9 and 5 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities were mainly hematological and two patients discontinued the study due to myelosuppression.

CONCLUSIONS

In this heavily pretreated population of patients with brain metastases, adding vinorelbine and increasing the intensity of temozolomide do not improve response rates compared to previous studies with single-agent temozolomide at standard doses.

Cognitive Functions in Brain Tumor Patients

As effective treatment interventions have increased survival rates, there has been greater awareness that many brain tumor patients experience cognitive dysfunction despite adequate disease control. Cognitive difficulties often have an impact on quality of life and interfere with the patient's ability to function at premorbid levels; however, the incidence of cognitive dysfunction in brain tumor patients is unknown, because it has not been investigated systematically. Future prospective clinical trials in neuro-oncology should include cognitive outcome measures to increase understanding of the contribution of the tumor and the delayed effects of treatment to cognitive dysfunction.

Vinorelbine combined with a protracted course of temozolomide for recurrent brain Metastases: a phase I trial

Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown modest efficacy in the treatment of recurrent brain metastasis (BM). We designed a new regimen utilizing dose-intensified, protracted course of TMZ in combination with vinorelbine, a lipophilic large-spectrum agent, in an attempt to improve the efficacy of TMZ. This phase I study was conducted to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine for this combination. Patients with recurrent or progressive BM were eligible. Chemotherapy consisted of 28-day cycles with TMZ (150 mg/m2, days 1-7 and 15-21) and vinorelbine (days one and eight at escalating doses). The starting dose was 15 mg/m2, with increments of 5 mg/m2 for each cohort of 3-6 patients, until MTD was reached (30 mg/m2). A total of 21 patients were enrolled; the median age was 59 (41-77). The primary tumor was lung cancer in 13 patients (NSCLC in 10, SCLC in 3), breast in 6, renal in 1 and endometrial in 1. Vinorelbine dose was 15 mg/m2 in seven patients, 20 mg/m2 in five, 25 mg/m2 in four and 30 mg/m2 in six. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia developed in six patients, lymphopenia in nine, and thrombocytopenia in six; other toxicities were rare. No dose-limiting toxicity was seen. Out of 18 evaluable patients 2 had a radiographic response (one partial and one minor). Disease was stable in 6 of 18 patients and the median survival was 27 weeks. This regimen was well tolerated and a phase II trial using a dose of 30 mg/m2 of vinorelbine is warranted.

High incidence of disease recurrence in the brain and leptomeninges in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma after response to gefitinib

BACKGROUND

Gefitinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that induces an early and dramatic response in 10% of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Long- term outcome and patterns of disease recurrence after response have not been described.

METHODS

The authors evaluated 139 patients with NSCLC treated with gefitinib at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) between 1998 and 2002. They focused on patterns of disease recurrence, risk of brain metastases (BM) and leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), and long-term outcome after initial response to gefitinib.

RESULTS

Of the 139 patients treated with gefitinib, 21 (15%) achieved a partial response. The median age of the responders was 64 years (range, 38-87 years), the median Karnofsky performance score was 80 (range, 60-90), and 4 of the patients were men. All responders had adenocarcinoma. The central nervous system (CNS) was the initial site of disease recurrence in 7 (33%) patients (BM in 5 and LM in 2). In 9 (43%) patients, the initial site of disease recurrence was the lung and in 1 it was the liver and bone. Four (57%) of the patients with disease recurrence in the CNS had lung disease under control. BM also developed in 2 patients who had initial disease recurrence in the lungs. The actuarial 5-year incidence of CNS metastases was 60%. The median overall survival periods were 15 months and 23 months for patients with and without CNS metastases, respectively (P = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

The CNS was a frequent site of disease recurrence in patients with NSCLC after an initial response to gefitinib, regardless of disease control in the lungs. Patients should be carefully monitored for neurologic symptoms. Intrinsic resistance of metastatic clones, incomplete CNS penetrance of the drug, and longer survival are possible explanations for this high incidence.

Metastatic disease of the brain: extra-axial metastases (skull, dura, leptomeningeal) and tumour spread

Extra-axial intracranial metastases may arise through several situations. Hematogenous spread to the meninges is the most frequent cause. Direct extension from contiguous extra-cranial neoplasms, secondary invasion of the meninges by calvarium and skull base metastases, and migration along perineural or perivascular structures are less common. Leptomeningeal invasion gives rise to tumour cell dissemination by the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), eventually leading to neoplastic coating of brain surfaces. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is complementary to CSF examinations and can be invaluable, detecting up to 50% of false-negative lumbar punctures. MR findings range from diffuse linear leptomeningeal enhancement to multiple enhancing extra-axial nodules, obstructive communicating and non-communicating hydrocephalus. Both calvarial and epidural metastases infrequently transgress the dura, which acts as a barrier against tumour spread. Radionuclide bone studies are still a valuable screening test to detect bone metastases. With computed tomography (CT) and MR, bone metastases extending intracranially and primary dural metastases show the characteristic biconvex shape, usually associated with brain displacement away from the inner table. Although CT is better in detecting skull base erosion, MR is more sensitive and provides more detailed information about dural involvement. Perineural and perivascular spread from head and neck neoplasms require thin-section contrast-enhanced MR.