The genetics of the epilepsies

The Benefit of Multigene Panel Testing for the Diagnosis and Management of the Genetic Epilepsies

With the increasing use of genetic testing in pediatric epilepsy, it is important to describe the diagnostic outcomes as they relate to clinical care. The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield and impact on patient care of genetic epilepsy panel testing. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) who had genetic testing between the years of 2013–2020. We identified 227 patients that met criteria for inclusion. The majority of patients had their testing performed as “out-of-province” tests since province-based testing during this period was limited. The diagnostic yield for multi-gene epilepsy panel testing was 17% (39/227) and consistent with the literature. Variants of unknown significance (VUS) were reported in a significant number of undiagnosed individuals (77%; 128/163). A higher diagnostic rate was observed in patients with a younger age of onset of seizures (before one year of age; 32%; 29/90). A genetic diagnosis informed prognosis, recurrence risk counselling and expedited access to resources in all those with a diagnosis. A direct change in clinical management as a result of the molecular diagnosis was evident for 9% (20/227) of patients. The information gathered in this study provides evidence of the clinical benefits of genetic testing in epilepsy and serves as a benchmark for comparison with the current provincial Ontario Epilepsy Genetic Testing Program (OEGTP) that began in 2020.

Monogenic developmental and epileptic encephalopathies of infancy and childhood, a population cohort from Norway

INTRODUCTION

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE) is a group of epilepsies where the epileptic activity, seizures and the underlying neurobiology contributes to cognitive and behavioral impairments. Uncovering the causes of DEE is important in order to develop guidelines for treatment and follow-up. The aim of the present study was to describe the clinical picture and to identify genetic causes in a patient cohort with DEE without known etiology, from a Norwegian regional hospital.

METHODS

Systematic searches of medical records were performed at Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Health Trust, to identify patients with epilepsy in the period 1999-2018. Medical records were reviewed to identify patients with DEE of unknown cause. In 2018, patients were also recruited consecutively from treating physicians. All patients underwent thorough clinical evaluation and updated genetic diagnostic analyses.

RESULTS

Fifty-five of 2,225 patients with epilepsy had DEE of unknown etiology. Disease-causing genetic variants were found in 15/33 (45%) included patients. Three had potentially treatable metabolic disorders (SLC2A1, COQ4 and SLC6A8). Developmental comorbidity was higher in the group with a genetic diagnosis, compared to those who remained undiagnosed. Five novel variants in known genes were found, and the patient phenotypes are described.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study illustrate the importance of performing updated genetic investigations and/or analyses in patients with DEE of unknown etiology. A genetic cause was identified in 45% of the patients, and three of these patients had potentially treatable conditions where available targeted therapy may improve patient outcome.

Novel treatments in epilepsy guided by genetic diagnosis

In recent years, precision medicine has emerged as a new paradigm for improved and more individualized patient care. Its key objective is to provide the right treatment, to the right patient at the right time, by basing medical decisions on individual characteristics, including specific genetic biomarkers. In order to realize this objective researchers and physicians must first identify the underlying genetic cause; over the last 10 years, advances in genetics have made this possible for several monogenic epilepsies. Through next generation techniques, a precise genetic aetiology is attainable in 30-50% of genetic epilepsies beginning in the paediatric age. While committed in such search for novel genes carrying disease-causing variants, progress in the study of experimental models of epilepsy has also provided a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the condition. Such advances are already being translated into improving care, management and treatment of some patients. Identification of a precise genetic aetiology can already direct physicians to prescribe treatments correcting specific metabolic defects, avoid antiseizure medicines that might aggravate functional consequences of the disease-causing variant or select the drugs that counteract the underlying, genetically determined, functional disturbance. Personalized, tailored treatments should not just focus on how to stop seizures but possibly prevent their onset and cure the disorder, often consisting of seizures and its comorbidities including cognitive, motor and behaviour deficiencies. This review discusses the therapeutic implications following a specific genetic diagnosis and the correlation between genetic findings, pathophysiological mechanisms and tailored seizure treatment, emphasizing the impact on current clinical practice.

Gene therapy in epilepsy

Gene therapy may constitute a promising alternative to conventional pharmacological tools and surgeries for epilepsy. For primary epilepsy, a single variant leading to a significant effect is relatively rare, while other forms are considered complex in inheritances with multiple susceptible mutations and impacts from the environment. Gene therapy in preclinical models of epilepsy has attempted to perform antiepileptogenic, anticonvulsant, or disease-modifying effects during epileptogenesis or after establishing the disease. Creating gene vectors tailored for different situations is the key to expanding gene therapy, and choosing the appropriate therapeutic target remains another fundamental problem. A variety of treatment strategies, from overexpressing inhibitory neuropeptides to modulating the expression of neurotransmitters or ion channels, have been tested in animal models. Additionally, emerging new approaches of optogenetics and chemogenetics, as well as genome-editing tools will further boost the prosperity of gene therapy. This review summarizes the experience obtained to date and discusses the challenges and opportunities in clinical translations.

From Genetic Testing to Precision Medicine in Epilepsy

Epilepsy includes a number of medical conditions with recurrent seizures as common denominator. The large number of different syndromes and seizure types as well as the highly variable inter-individual response to the therapies makes management of this condition often challenging. In the last two decades, a genetic etiology has been revealed in more than half of all epilepsies and single gene defects in ion channels or neurotransmitter receptors have been associated with most inherited forms of epilepsy, including some focal and lesional forms as well as specific epileptic developmental encephalopathies. Several genetic tests are now available, including targeted assays up to revolutionary tools that have made sequencing of all coding (whole exome) and non-coding (whole genome) regions of the human genome possible. These recent technological advances have also driven genetic discovery in epilepsy and increased our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of many epileptic disorders, eventually providing targets for precision medicine in some syndromes, such as Dravet syndrome, pyroxidine-dependent epilepsy, and glucose transporter 1 deficiency. However, these examples represent a relatively small subset of all types of epilepsy, and to date, precision medicine in epilepsy has primarily focused on seizure control, and other clinical aspects, such as neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric comorbidities, have yet been possible to address. We herein summarize the most recent advances in genetic testing and provide up-to-date approaches for the choice of the correct test for some epileptic disorders and tailored treatments that are already applicable in some monogenic epilepsies. In the next years, the most probably scenario is that epilepsy treatment will be very different from the currently almost empirical approach, eventually with a "precision medicine" approach applicable on a large scale.

Advances in genetic testing and optimization of clinical management in children and adults with epilepsy

Introduction: Epileptic disorders are a heterogeneous group of medical conditions with epilepsy as the common denominator. Genetic causes, electro-clinical features, and management significantly vary according to the specific condition.Areas covered: Relevant diagnostic advances have been achieved thanks to the advent of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based molecular techniques. These revolutionary tools allow to sequence all coding (whole exome sequencing, WES) and non-coding (whole genome sequencing, WGS) regions of human genome, with a potentially huge impact on patient care and scientific research.Expert opinion: The application of these tests in children and adults with epilepsy has led to the identification of new causative genes, widening the knowledge on the pathophysiology of epilepsy and resulting in therapeutic implications. This review will explore the most recent advancements in genetic testing and provide up-to-date approaches for the choice of the correct test in patients with epilepsy.

Efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in the era of pharmacogenomics: A focus on childhood

BACKGROUND

In recent years advances in the field of pharmacogenomics have expanded the concept for more individualized treatments. Our aim is to provide literature data about the relationship between genetic polymorphisms and efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in children.

METHODS

Pubmed was used as the main medical database source. Only original research papers were considered. No year-of-publication restriction was placed. Quality of evidence was assessed according to American Academy of Neurology guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 12 cross-sectional and case-control studies fulfilled our selection criteria. ABCB1 gene was associated with drug responsiveness in 2 out of 6 studies and ABCC2 gene in 1 out of 1 studies. SCN1A gene was also associated with seizure control in 4 out of 5 studies. Cytochrome P450 genes were found to significantly affect drug responsiveness in 2 out of 4 studies, while polymorphisms of uridinediphosphateglucuronosyltransferaseUGT2B7 gene predisposed to drug-resistance in 1 out of 2 studies.

CONCLUSION

Variability in genes coding for sodium channels, drug transporters and cytochrome P450 enzymes can have a significant impact on response to antiepileptic drugs. Larger prospective studies with better stratification of samples are needed to shed light on these associations.

Functional Nutrients for Epilepsy

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder of which seizures are a core symptom. Approximately one third of epileptic patients are resistant to antiepileptic drugs and therefore require alternative therapeutic options. Dietary and nutritional supplements can in some cases replace drugs, but with the exception of ketogenic diets, there are no officially recommended dietary considerations for patients with epilepsy. In this review we summarize a selection of nutritional suggestions that have proved beneficial in treating different types of epilepsy. We describe the types of seizures and epilepsy and follow this with an introduction to basic molecular mechanisms. We then examine several functional nutrients for which there is clinical evidence of therapeutic efficacy in reducing seizures or epilepsy-associated sudden death. We also discuss experimental results that demonstrate possible molecular mechanisms elicited by the administration of various nutrients. The availability of multiple dietary and nutritional candidates that show favorable outcomes in animals implies that assessing the clinical potential of these substances will improve translational medicine, ultimately benefitting epilepsy patients.

Development of Criteria for Epilepsy Genetic Testing in Ontario, Canada

Multiple genes/variants have been implicated in various epileptic conditions. However, there is little general guidance available on the circumstances in which genetic testing is indicated and test selection in order to guide optimal test appropriateness and benefit. This is an account of the development of guidelines for genetic testing in epilepsy, which have been developed in Ontario, Canada. The Genetic Testing Advisory Committee was established in Ontario to review the clinical utility and validity of genetic tests and the provision of genetic testing in Ontario. As part of their mandate, the committee also developed recommendations and guidelines for genetic testing in epilepsy. The recommendations include mandatory prerequisites for an epileptology/geneticist/clinical biochemical geneticist consultation, prerequisite diagnostic procedures, circumstances in which genetic testing is indicated and not indicated and guidance for selection of genetic tests, including their general limitations and considerations. These guidelines represent a step toward the development of evidence-based gene panels for epilepsy in Ontario, the repatriation of genetic testing for epilepsy into Ontario molecular genetic laboratories and public funding of genetic tests for epilepsy in Ontario.

Commonalities in epileptogenic processes from different acute brain insults: Do they translate?

The most common forms of acquired epilepsies arise following acute brain insults such as traumatic brain injury, stroke, or central nervous system infections. Treatment is effective for only 60%-70% of patients and remains symptomatic despite decades of effort to develop epilepsy prevention therapies. Recent preclinical efforts are focused on likely primary drivers of epileptogenesis, namely inflammation, neuron loss, plasticity, and circuit reorganization. This review suggests a path to identify neuronal and molecular targets for clinical testing of specific hypotheses about epileptogenesis and its prevention or modification. Acquired human epilepsies with different etiologies share some features with animal models. We identify these commonalities and discuss their relevance to the development of successful epilepsy prevention or disease modification strategies. Risk factors for developing epilepsy that appear common to multiple acute injury etiologies include intracranial bleeding, disruption of the blood-brain barrier, more severe injury, and early seizures within 1 week of injury. In diverse human epilepsies and animal models, seizures appear to propagate within a limbic or thalamocortical/corticocortical network. Common histopathologic features of epilepsy of diverse and mostly focal origin are microglial activation and astrogliosis, heterotopic neurons in the white matter, loss of neurons, and the presence of inflammatory cellular infiltrates. Astrocytes exhibit smaller K+ conductances and lose gap junction coupling in many animal models as well as in sclerotic hippocampi from temporal lobe epilepsy patients. There is increasing evidence that epilepsy can be prevented or aborted in preclinical animal models of acquired epilepsy by interfering with processes that appear common to multiple acute injury etiologies, for example, in post-status epilepticus models of focal epilepsy by transient treatment with a trkB/PLCγ1 inhibitor, isoflurane, or HMGB1 antibodies and by topical administration of adenosine, in the cortical fluid percussion injury model by focal cooling, and in the albumin posttraumatic epilepsy model by losartan. Preclinical studies further highlight the roles of mTOR1 pathways, JAK-STAT3, IL-1R/TLR4 signaling, and other inflammatory pathways in the genesis or modulation of epilepsy after brain injury. The wealth of commonalities, diversity of molecular targets identified preclinically, and likely multidimensional nature of epileptogenesis argue for a combinatorial strategy in prevention therapy. Going forward, the identification of impending epilepsy biomarkers to allow better patient selection, together with better alignment with multisite preclinical trials in animal models, should guide the clinical testing of new hypotheses for epileptogenesis and its prevention.

Targeted next generation sequencing: the diagnostic value in early-onset epileptic encephalopathy

We investigated the genetic background of early-onset epileptic encephalopathy (EE) using targeted next generation sequencing analysis. Thirty sporadic or familial cases associated with early-onset EE were included. An early-onset EE gene panel including sixteen genes (ARX, CDKL5, CNTNAP2, FOLR1, FOXG1, LAMC3, MBD5, MECP2, NTNG1, PCDH19, PNKP, SCN1A, SCN1B, SCN2A, STXBP1, KCNQ2) was constituted. Nine definite and three potential causal mutations in 30 cases (40 %) were identified. All mutations presented heterozygously except one. Five mutations had been previously detected (SCN1A c.842C > T (p.P281L), SCN1A c.4907G > C (p.A1636P), PCDH19 c.1091dupC (p.Y366LfsX10), CNTNAP2 c.416A > G (p.N139S), MBD5 c.3595G > A(p.Y1199R) while other seven were novel (SCN1A c.4907G > C (p.A1636P), SCN2A c.4633A > G (p.M1545 V), CDKL5 c.197_198delCT (p.L67QfsX23), FOXG1 c.*6C > T, KCNQ2 c.560c > A (p.S187Y), KCNQ2 c.835G > A (p.G279S), STXBP1 c.1105G > T (p.E369X)). Eight of 12 mutations were de novo. While the overall mutation detection rate was found 40 %, this ratio was 55.5 % (10 out of 18) and 16.6 % (2 out of 12) in patients born to nonconsanguineous parents and consanguineous parents, respectively. In conclusion, a selected gene panel approach including mainly de novo and channel-encoding genes will result in the detection of variants in isolated patients and support the channelopathy theory underlying epilepsy, while consanguineous families will remain less diagnosed. Targeted next generation sequencing approach is an efficient diagnostic tool in the detection of the genetic basis of early-onset EE.

When Should Genetic Testing Be Performed in Epilepsy Patients?

This review is a summary of a talk presented at the 2015 American Epilepsy Society Annual Meeting. Its purposes are 1) to review developments in epilepsy genetics, 2) to discuss which groups of patients with epilepsy might benefit from genetic testing, and 3) to present a rational approach to genetic testing in epilepsy in the rapidly evolving era of genomic medicine.

[Genetics and treatment of early infantile epileptic encephalopathies]

Epileptic encephalopathies (EE) are the group of progressive conditions with various etiologies that can produce neurocognitive deficit both per se and due to constant epileptiform discharges. Epileptic encephalopathies constitute about 15% of epilepsy in childhood and 40% of all seizures occurring in the first 3 years of life. Ten syndrome forms of EE are identified. Genetic factors contribute to 70-80% of all epileptic diseases and approximately 40% of idiopathic epilepsies have a monogenic mode of inheritance. Thirty-five genes of EE have been identified and the search is still continuing. The marked genetic heterogeneity of early EE, including 16 with autosomal-dominant-, 13 with autosomal-recessive-, 4 with X-linked recessive- and 2 with X-linked autosomal inheritance, was shown. The article describes differentiated approaches to the treatment of certain EE syndromes. Recent publications record the effectiveness of targeted therapy for certain forms of monogenic early EE (stiripentol in SCN1A mutations, diphenine in SCN8A mutations, levetiracetam in STXBP1 mutations). These results indicate the necessity for accurate diagnosis of genetic variants in early infantile EE for preventive actions in burdened families and for increasing the effectiveness of treatment.

The search for imaging biomarkers in psychiatric disorders

The field of medicine is moving toward the use of biomarkers for the optimization of individualized care. This is a particular challenge for the field of psychiatry, in which diagnosis is based on a descriptive collection of behaviors without the availability of any objective test to stratify patients. Neuroimaging techniques such as molecular imaging with positron-emission tomography (PET) or structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide an opportunity to bring psychiatry from an era of subjective descriptive classification into objective and tangible brain-based measures. Here we provide steps toward the development of robust, reliable and valid biomarkers. The success of such development is crucial because it will enable the field of psychiatry to move forward into the era of modern medicine.

If genetic variation could talk: What genomic data may teach us about the importance of gene expression regulation in the genetics of autism

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been long known to have substantial genetic etiology. Much research has attempted to identify specific genes contributing to ASD risk with the goal of tying gene function to a molecular pathological explanation for ASD. A unifying molecular pathology would potentially increase understanding of what is going wrong during development, and could lead to diagnostic biomarkers or targeted preventative or therapeutic directions. We review past and current genetic mapping approaches and discuss major results, leading to the hypothesis that global dysregulation of gene or protein expression may be implicated in ASD rather than disturbance of brain-specific functions. If substantiated, this hypothesis might indicate the need for novel experimental and analytical approaches in order to understand this neurodevelopmental disorder, develop biomarkers, or consider treatment approaches.

Epilepsy

Our cognitive abilities emerge from the coordinated activity of neurons in the brain. The average human brain contains 86 billion neurons that are richly interconnected through synapses, contact points for electrochemical communication. Patterns of synaptic connectivity create functional ensembles of neurons, called neural circuits, which mediate information processing in the brain. Neural circuits can be deconstructed further into basic motifs ('microcircuits') involving feedforward and feedback connections between different types of neurons that exert excitatory or inhibitory influence. At each level of neural circuitry, the opposing forces of excitation and inhibition are normally held in balance through a variety of homeostatic mechanisms.

Involvement of cortical fast-spiking parvalbumin-positive basket cells in epilepsy

GABAergic interneurons of the parvalbumin-positive fast-spiking basket cells subtype (PV INs) are important regulators of cortical network excitability and of gamma oscillations, involved in signal processing and cognition. Impaired development or function of PV INs has been associated with epilepsy in various animal models of epilepsy, as well as in some genetic forms of epilepsy in humans. In this review, we provide an overview of some of the experimental data linking PV INs dysfunction with epilepsy, focusing on disorders of the specification, migration, maturation, synaptic function, or connectivity of PV INs. Furthermore, we reflect on the potential therapeutic use of cell-type specific stimulation of PV INs within active networks and on the transplantation of PV INs precursors in the treatment of epilepsy and its comorbidities.

Antagonist Targeting microRNA-155 Protects against Lithium-Pilocarpine-Induced Status Epilepticus in C57BL/6 Mice by Activating Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

Epilepsy is a severe brain disorder affecting numerous patients. Recently, it is inferred that modulation of microRNA-155 (miR-155) could serve as a promising treatment of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. In the current study, the therapeutic potential of miR-155 antagonist against temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) was evaluated and the underlying mechanism involved in this regulation was explored. TLE model was induced by lithium-pilocarpine method. The effect of miR-155 antagonist on epilepticus symptoms of TLE mice was assessed using Racine classification and electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. The expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its association with miR-155 were also assessed with a series of experiments. Our results showed that level of miR-155 was significantly up-regulated after induction of TLE model. Based on the results of EEG and behavior analyses, seizures in mice were alleviated by miR-155 antagonist. Moreover, administration of miR-155 antagonist also significantly increased the level of BDNF. The results of dual luciferase assay and Western blotting showed that miR-155 antagonist exerted its action on status epilepticus by directly regulating the activity of BDNF. Taken all the information together, our results demonstrated that miR-155 antagonist might firstly induce the expression of BDNF, which then contributed to the alleviation of epilepsy in the current study.

Emerging roles of Na⁺/H⁺ exchangers in epilepsy and developmental brain disorders

Epilepsy is a common central nervous system (CNS) disease characterized by recurrent transient neurological events occurring due to abnormally excessive or synchronous neuronal activity in the brain. The CNS is affected by systemic acid-base disorders, and epileptic seizures are sensitive indicators of underlying imbalances in cellular pH regulation. Na(+)/H(+) exchangers (NHEs) are a family of membrane transporter proteins actively involved in regulating intracellular and organellar pH by extruding H(+) in exchange for Na(+) influx. Altering NHE function significantly influences neuronal excitability and plays a role in epilepsy. This review gives an overview of pH regulatory mechanisms in the brain with a special focus on the NHE family and the relationship between epilepsy and dysfunction of NHE isoforms. We first discuss how cells translocate acids and bases across the membrane and establish pH homeostasis as a result of the concerted effort of enzymes and ion transporters. We focus on the specific roles of the NHE family by detailing how the loss of NHE1 in two NHE mutant mice results in enhanced neuronal excitability in these animals. Furthermore, we highlight new findings on the link between mutations of NHE6 and NHE9 and developmental brain disorders including epilepsy, autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). These studies demonstrate the importance of NHE proteins in maintaining H(+) homeostasis and their intricate roles in the regulation of neuronal function. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying NHE1, 6, and 9 dysfunctions in epilepsy formation may advance the development of new epilepsy treatment strategies.