ICU Management of the Potential Organ Donor: State of the Art

Management of Potential Organ Donor: Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine-Position Statement

This position statement is documented based on the input from all contributing coauthors from the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM), following a comprehensive literature review and summary of current scientific evidence. Its objective is to provide the standard perspective for the management of potential organ/tissue donors after brain death (BD) in adults only, regardless of the availability of technology. This document should only be used for guidance only and is not a substitute for proper clinical decision making in particular circumstances of any case. Endorsement by the ISCCM does not imply that the statements given in the document are applicable in all or in a particular case; however, they may provide guidance for the users thus facilitating maximum organ availability from brain-dead patients. Thus, the care of potential brain-dead organ donors is "caring for multiple recipients."

How to cite this article

Zirpe K, Pandit R, Gurav S, Mani RK, Prabhakar H, Clerk A, et al. Management of Potential Organ Donor: Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine-Position Statement. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(S2):S249-278.

Frequent Preservation of Neurologic Function in Brain Death and Brainstem Death Entails False-Positive Misdiagnosis and Cerebral Perfusion

Some patients who have been diagnosed as "dead by neurologic criteria" continue to exhibit certain brain functions, most commonly, neuroendocrine functions. This preservation of neurologic function after the diagnosis of "brain death" or "brainstem death" is an ongoing source of controversy and concern in the medical, bioethics, and legal literatures. Most obviously, if some brain function persists, then it is not the case that all functions of the entire brain have ceased and hence, declaring such a patient to be "dead" would be a false positive, in any nation with so-called "whole brain death" laws. Furthermore, and perhaps more concerning, the preservation of any brain function necessarily entails the preservation of some amount of brain perfusion, thereby raising the concern as to whether additional areas of neural tissue may remain viable, including areas in the brainstem. These and other considerations cast significant doubt on the reliability of diagnosing either "brain death" or "brainstem death."

Anesthetic Considerations of Organ Procurement After Brain and Cardiac Death: A Narrative Review

Organ donation procedures have become more frequent in the US as the need for transplants is increasing. Defining the anesthesiologist's role in organ donations after brain and cardiac death is important, as is understanding its ethics and practical physiologic and perioperative implications. Despite this, there are few papers specifically addressing the anesthetic management of organ donors. This review summarizes the preoperative, intraoperative, and postmortem considerations for the anesthesiologist involved in organ donation after either brain or cardiac death. A search of the published literature was performed using PubMed, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), and Google Scholar in March of 2022 for articles addressing anesthetic considerations of organ procurement surgeries after brain and cardiac death. This review demonstrates that anesthesiologists play a significant role in the organ procurement process. Their role in the perioperative management of the donor may affect the outcomes of organ transplantation. The gap between the number of organs harvested and the number of patients awaiting organ transplantation remains high despite continued efforts to increase the number of available organs. Perioperative management of organ donors aims at counteracting the associated unique physiologic derangements and targets optimization of oxygenation of the organs intended for procurement. Optimizing care after death can help ensure the viability of organs and the best outcomes for recipients. As organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) becomes more frequent in the US, anesthesiologists should be aware of the DCD classifications of donors and emerging novel perfusion techniques.

Hemodynamic Effects of High-dose Levothyroxine and Methylprednisolone in Brain-dead Potential Organ Donors

BACKGROUND

Hormonal replacement therapy is administered to many brain-dead organ donors to improve hemodynamic stability. Previous clinical studies present conflicting results with several randomized studies reporting no benefit.

METHODS

Consecutive adult donors (N = 199) were randomized to receive high-dose levothyroxine, high-dose methylprednisolone, both (Combo), or no hormonal therapy (Control). Vasopressor requirements using the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) were assessed at baseline, 4 h, and at procurement. Crossover to the Combo group was sufficient to require separate intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean (±SD) reduction in VIS from baseline to procurement was 1.6 ± 2.6, 14.9 ± 2.6, 10.9 ± 2.6, and 7.1 ± 2.6 for the levothyroxine, methylprednisolone, Combo, and Control groups, respectively. While controlling for the baseline score, the reduction in VIS was significantly greater in the methylprednisolone and Combo groups and significantly less in the levothyroxine group compared with controls. Results were similar in the per-protocol analysis.

CONCLUSION

High-dose methylprednisolone alone or in combination with levothyroxine allowed for significant reduction in vasopressor support in organ donors. Levothyroxine alone offered no advantage in reducing vasopressor support. Organ yield, transplantation rates, and recipient outcomes were not adversely affected.

Management of the brain-dead organ donor

Organ transplantation is a life-saving intervention for patients suffering from end-stage organ failure, but it relies on the availability of donor organs. However, even when donors are available, the brain-dead organ donor is a clinically complex patient who presents many management challenges. Donor management with a goal of optimization of organ function is essential to maximizing the number of patients who can be helped by each individual donor. Thoughtful critical care management of the potential organ donor, with a focus on meeting donor management goals, can lead to improved donation outcomes.

Hypothalamic function in patients diagnosed as brain dead and its practical consequences

Some patients who have been diagnosed as "dead by neurologic criteria" continue to exhibit certain brain functions, most commonly, neuroendocrine functions. In this chapter, we review the pathophysiology of brain death that can lead either to neuroendocrine failure or to preserved neuroendocrine functioning. We review the evidence on continued hypothalamic functioning in patients who have been declared "brain dead," examine potential mechanisms that would explain these findings, and discuss how these findings create additional confounds for brain death testing. We conclude by reviewing the evidence for the management of hypothalamic-pituitary failure in the setting of brain death and organ transplantation.

Indicadores clínicos para o diagnóstico de enfermagem Síndrome do equilíbrio fisiológico prejudicado para doadores de órgãos

RESUMO Objetivo Selecionar indicadores clínicos para o diagnóstico de enfermagem em desenvolvimento Síndrome do equilíbrio fisiológico prejudicado para potenciais doadores de órgãos em morte encefálica. Método Estudo de consenso de especialistas, realizado através da técnica Delphi, dos indicadores clínicos de um diagnóstico de enfermagem em desenvolvimento. A amostra do estudo foi intencional mediante convite e constituída por 37 enfermeiros que atenderam a critérios de inclusão. Os indicadores que obtiveram um consenso igual ou maior que 70% foram considerados validados. Resultados Especialistas recomendaram 25 dos 44 indicadores avaliados, dos quais oito pertenciam ao grupo Alterações endócrino-metabólicas, sete ao grupo Alterações hemodinâmicas e/ou cardiovasculares, cinco ao grupo Alterações ventilatórias, dois ao grupo Alterações nutricionais e três ao grupo Alterações de coagulação, inflamatórias e/ou imunológicas. Conclusão e implicações para a prática Esse novo diagnóstico de enfermagem pode colaborar com o desenvolvimento de conhecimento da enfermagem na área de doação de órgãos, contribuindo para o ensino e pesquisa, além de acarretar implicações para a prática, proporcionando acurácia diagnóstica e embasando a implementação e a avaliação de intervenções que impactam na melhora da manutenção do potencial doador.

Management of the brain-dead donor in the ICU: general and specific therapy to improve transplantable organ quality

PURPOSE

To provide a practical overview of the management of the potential organ donor in the intensive care unit.

METHODS

Seven areas of donor management were considered for this review: hemodynamic management; fluids and electrolytes; respiratory management; endocrine management; temperature management; anaemia and coagulation; infection management. For each subchapter, a narrative review was conducted.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Most elements in the current recommendations and guidelines are based on pathophysiological reasoning, epidemiological observations, or extrapolations from general ICU management strategies, and not on evidence from randomized controlled trials. The cardiorespiratory management of brain-dead donors is very similar to the management of critically ill patients, and the same applies to the management of anaemia and coagulation. Central diabetes insipidus is of particular concern, and should be diagnosed based on clinical criteria. Depending on the degree of vasopressor dependency, it can be treated with intermittent desmopressin or continuous vasopressin, intravenously. Temperature management of the donor is an area of uncertainty, but it appears reasonable to strive for a core temperature of > 35 °C. The indications and controversies regarding endocrine therapies, in particular thyroid hormone replacement therapy, and corticosteroid therapy, are discussed. The potential donor should be assessed clinically for infections, and screening tests for specific infections are an essential part of donor management. Although the rate of infection transmission from donor to receptor is low, certain infections are still a formal contraindication to organ donation. However, new antiviral drugs and strategies now allow organ donation from certain infected donors to be done safely.

Donor biomarkers as predictors of organ use and recipient survival after neurologically deceased donor organ transplantation

PURPOSE

We sought to build prediction models for organ transplantation and recipient survival using both biomarkers and clinical information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We abstracted clinical variables from a previous randomized trial (n = 556) of donor management. In a subset of donors (n = 97), we measured two candidate biomarkers in plasma at enrollment and just prior to explantation.

RESULTS

Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) was significant for predicting liver transplantation (C-statistic 0.65 (0.53, 0.78)). SLPI also significantly improved the predictive performance of a clinical model for liver transplantation (integrated discrimination improvement (IDI): 0.090 (0.009, 0.210)). For other organs, clinical variables alone had strong predictive ability (C-statistic >0.80). Recipient 3-years survival was 80.0% (71.9%, 87.0%). Donor IL-6 was significantly associated with recipient 3-years survival (adjusted Hazard Ratio (95%CI): 1.26(1.08, 1.48), P = .004). Neither clinical variables nor biomarkers showed strong predictive ability for 3-year recipient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma biomarkers in neurologically deceased donors were associated with organ use. SLPI enhanced prediction within a liver transplantation model, whereas IL-6 before transplantation was significantly associated with recipient 3-year survival. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00987714.

Development of key interventions and quality indicators for the management of an adult potential donor after brain death: a RAND modified Delphi approach

Background

A substantial degree of variability in practices exists amongst donor hospitals regarding the donor detection, determination of brain death, application of donor management techniques or achievement of donor management goals. A possible strategy to standardize the donation process and to optimize outcomes could lie in the implementation of a care pathway. The aim of the study was to identify and select a set of relevant key interventions and quality indicators in order to develop a specific care pathway for donation after brain death and to rigorously evaluate its impact.

Methods

A RAND modified three-round Delphi approach was used to build consensus within a single country about potential key interventions and quality indicators identified in existing guidelines, review articles, process flow diagrams and the results of the Organ Donation European Quality System (ODEQUS) project. Comments and additional key interventions and quality indicators, identified in the first round, were evaluated in the following rounds and a subsequent physical meeting. The study was conducted over a 4-month time period in 2016.

Results

A multidisciplinary panel of 18 Belgian experts with different relevant backgrounds completed the three Delphi rounds. Out of a total of 80 key interventions assessed throughout the Delphi process, 65 were considered to contribute to the quality of care for the management of a potential donor after brain death; 11 out of 12 quality indicators were validated for relevance and feasibility. Detection of all potential donors after brain death in the intensive care unit and documentation of cause of no donation were rated as the most important quality indicators.

Conclusions

Using a RAND modified Delphi approach, consensus was reached for a set of 65 key interventions and 11 quality indicators for the management of a potential donor after brain death. This set is considered to be applicable in quality improvement programs for the care of potential donors after brain death, while taking into account each country’s legislation and regulations regarding organ donation and transplantation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3386-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Organ donation: the reality of an intensive care unit in Portugal

OBJECTIVE

To clinically and demographically characterize potential organ donors admitted to a general intensive care unit and analyze data on donated organs.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted from 2010 to 2015 and analyzed demographic and clinical variables and the number of harvested organs and tissues.

RESULTS

A total of 92 potential organ donors were identified, of whom eight were non-effective donors and 84 were effective donors (59.5% were expanded criteria donors). The mean age of the potential donors was 60.7 years, and the majority were men. Hemorrhagic stroke accounted for 55.4% of brain deaths. The most common blood type among the donors was A Rh+ (43.5%), and the most common comorbidity was arterial hypertension (43.3%). The most frequently collected organs were the kidneys (84.5%) and liver (66.7%). The average number of organs harvested per donor was 2.8, and this ratio was smaller for donors with expanded criteria compared to other donors.

CONCLUSION

In most cases, potential organ donors died of brain death, were older than middle age, were male and were victims of a hemorrhagic stroke. The majority of the donors were expanded criteria donors and donated an average of two to three organs. The organs donated most frequently were the kidneys and liver.

Variation in Pediatric Organ Donor Management Practices Among US Organ Procurement Organizations

INTRODUCTION

Reports of actual pediatric organ donor management practice among US organ procurement organizations are sparse, and the use of standardized management guidelines is unknown. A recent consensus statement from the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the American College of Chest Physicians, and the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations offers guidelines for the management of the pediatric organ donor.

RESEARCH QUESTION

To describe the use of guidelines and routine practices in the management of the pediatric organ donor with respect to hemodynamics, lung and ventilator management, fluid and electrolytes, hormonal replacement therapy, the use of blood products, thermoregulation, and prophylactic antibiotics.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational study using a survey and follow-up telephone interview with respondents from all 58 US organ procurement organizations.

RESULTS

All 58 US Organ Procurement Organizations participated. A majority employed written guidelines for the management of pediatric donor hemodynamics, thermoregulation, fluids, and electrolytes. Management of blood products, the lung, and mechanical ventilation were less commonly committed to written guidelines, but common practices were described. All used various forms of hormonal replacement therapy and the majority administered empiric antibiotic therapy. Wide variation was observed in the management of the lung, mechanical ventilation, and glycemic control.

DISCUSSION

Most OPOs used forms of standardized donor management for the pediatric organ donor although variation in the content of that management exists. Barriers to an evidence-based approach to the pediatric donor need to be determined and addressed.

Organ donor management: Eight common recommendations and actions that deserve reflection

Despite major advances in our understanding of the physiopathology of brain death (BD), there are important controversies as to which protocol is the most appropriate for organ donor management. Many recent reviews on this subject offer recommendations that are sometimes contradictory and in some cases are not applied to other critically ill patients. This article offers a review of the publications (many of them recent) with an impact upon these controversial measures and which can help to confirm, refute or open new areas of research into the most appropriate measures for the management of organ donors in BD, and which should contribute to discard certain established recommendations based on preconceived ideas, that lead to actions lacking a physiopathological basis. Aspects such as catecholamine storm management, use of vasoactive drugs, hemodynamic objectives and monitoring, assessment of the heart for donation, and general care of the donor in BD are reviewed.