Secondary Headaches in Children and Adolescents: What Not to Miss

How Can Specialist Advice Influence the Neuroimaging Practice for Childhood Headache in Emergency Department?

Differentiating between primary and secondary headaches can be challenging, especially in the emergency department (ED). Since symptoms alone are inadequate criteria for distinguishing between primary and secondary headaches, many children with headaches undergo neuroimaging investigations, such as brain CT and MRI. In various studies, the frequency of neuroimaging utilization is influenced by several factors, including teaching status, ownership, metropolitan area, insurance status, and ethnicity of patients. However, only a few studies have considered the role of specialist consultations in ordering neuroimaging studies on childhood headaches. We report the contributions of different specialists to the evaluation of children with headaches admitted to the ED and their influence on neuroimaging decisions. We retrospectively reviewed the medical reports of paediatric patients who presented with headaches to the paediatric ED of the Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milano between January 2017 and January 2022. Overall, 890 children with headaches were evaluated (mean age: 10.0 years; range: 1 to 17 years). All patients were examined by the ED paediatricians, while specialist consultations were required for 261 patients, including 240 neurological (92.0%), 46 ophthalmological (17.6%), and 20 otorhinolaryngological (7.7%) consultations. Overall, 173 neuroimaging examinations were required, of which 51.4 and 48.6% were ordered by paediatricians and neurologists, respectively. In particular, paediatricians required 61.4% of brain CT scans, and neurologists required 92.0% of brain MRI scans. In conclusion, paediatricians were responsible for the management of most children with headaches admitted to the ED, while specialist consultations were required only in about a third of the cases. Although there was no significant difference in the number of neuroimaging studies ordered by specialists, brain CT scans were most often used by paediatricians, and MRI scans by neurologists.

The diagnostic values of red flags in pediatric patients with headache

BACKGROUND

Headache is a common complaint in childhood and adolescence. Differentiating benign primary headaches from ominous secondary headaches is often difficult. Clinicians usually seek red flags to determine the need for neuroimaging. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic values of red flags in pediatric headaches.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1510 pediatric patients (1470 with primary headache, 40 with secondary headache) presenting with headache and underwent neuroimaging from two centers between March 2010 and December 2019.

RESULTS

The secondary-headache group exhibited significantly higher frequencies of abnormal neurologic signs/symptoms (40.0% vs 6.8%, p < 0.001), Valsalva maneuver/exercise-induced headache (15.0% vs 4.9%, p = 0.004), headache with vomiting (35.0% vs 17.9%, p = 0.006), and onset under age 6 (25.0% vs 10.3%, p = 0.003) than the primary-headache group, with the following positive likelihood ratio (PLR): 5.88, 3.06, 1.96, and 2.42, respectively. The sensitivity values were as follows: abnormal neurologic signs/symptoms (16/40, 40.0%), headache with vomiting (14/40, 35.0%), onset under age 6 (10/40, 25.0%), and Valsalva maneuver/exercise-induced headache (6/40, 15.0%). The overall sensitivity for ominous secondary headaches requiring surgical treatment was 86.2% (25/29).

CONCLUSIONS

Certain red flags, including abnormal neurologic signs/symptoms, Valsalva maneuver/exercise-induced headache, headache with vomiting, and onset under age 6, were more prevalent in the secondary-headache group; nonetheless, their sensitivity values and PLR were relatively low. Notwithstanding, considering these red flags' high overall sensitivity for ominous secondary headaches, neuroimaging in patients presenting these red flags should rely on careful follow-up of symptom progression.

Diagnostic Yield of Neuroimaging and Electroencephalography in Children with Recurrent Headaches

Neuroimaging and electroencephalography (EEG) are commonly used for pediatric recurrent headache evaluation, although not routinely recommended. In this study, data of 517 children with recurrent headaches were analyzed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of neuroimaging and EEG. Neuroimaging was performed in 55% (n = 283) of children, 61% with magnetic resonance imaging and 39% with computed tomography. Abnormal findings were reported in 17% (n = 48), and 5% (n = 13) were significant abnormalities altering headache management. Among children with significant imaging abnormalities, 85% had alarming signs on history, physical, or neurological examination. The diagnostic yield of imaging was 0.7% (n = 2), picking a cavernous hemangioma and a giant arachnoid cyst. EEG was performed in 69% (n = 356) of children, significant findings were reported in 8% (n = 29), with sharp waves/spikes in 4.1% (n = 15), and intermittent focal slow waves in 3.9% (n = 14). EEG was diagnostic for epilepsy in 1.6% (n = 6) of children with recurrent headaches. When there are no red flags on history or physical examination, diagnostic yield of neuroimaging is low for pediatric recurrent headaches. EEG can be helpful in selective cases, and when performed during and at headache-free periods.

Pediatric headache: Are the red flags misleading or prognostic?

BACKGROUND

Symptoms and findings called orange or red flags may indicate the etiology of pediatric headaches and may point to a life-threatening situation requiring urgent treatment and thus can alter patient management. These findings can be either misleading or prognostic for clinicians. We aimed to identify the etiology and prognostic value of orange/red flags in pediatric patients.

METHODS

This study included 810 children with headaches who underwent neuroimaging due to the existence of orange/red flags. Their hospital records were examined to obtain demographical, clinical, laboratory data, and re-classify the headaches and determine orange/red flags on admission.

RESULTS

Secondary causes were identified in 17.0% (n: 138) of patients, however, those who were diagnosed with a life-threatening headache that required emergency treatment were 5.2% of all patients and 30.4% of the patients diagnosed with a secondary headache. Those with secondary headaches and with life threatening secondary headaches which required urgent treatment were younger (p = 0,018, p = 0,022), had more emergency department visits (p < 0,001), and acute onsets (p < 0,001). Red flags, like systemic symptoms (p < 0,001), sudden onset (p = 0,023, p = 0.039), papilledema (p < 0,001), and progressive headaches (p = 0,048, p = 0.006), were more common with secondary headaches and its subgroup, while headache awakening from sleep (p = 0.009) and family history of primary headache (P > 0,001) were more common in primary headaches. No correlation existed between the number of red flags and etiology. However, older age (p = 0,001) and a shorter duration between symptoms and admission (p = 0,032), and the number of emergency service visits (p = 0,020) increased with increasing red flags.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians always look for flags when they encounter patients with headaches, which is a common symptom, so as not to overlook anything. However, red flags do not always mean that the underlying cause requires emergency treatment and the severity of the cause is not correlated with the number of flags.