Utilizing Implementation Science to Bridge Cerebrovascular Health Disparities: a Local to Global Perspective

A retrospective analysis of the social determinants of health affecting stroke outcomes in a small hospital situated in a health professional shortage area (HPSA)

Where someone lives is a major determinant of population health. In the United States, people who live in Health Professional Shortage Areas are considered medically underserved and have a higher propensity for conditions such as stroke, hypertension, and diabetes. Our goal was to better understand the diverse needs of patients presenting to the Crouse Hospital emergency department with stroke symptoms. Crouse Hospital is a small community hospital located in a shortage area serving both urban and rural populations in and around Syracuse, New York. Despite its small size, Crouse Hospital quickly became a major comprehensive stroke center in Central New York. With this study we assessed the social factors affecting the stroke patient population in the community and compared these characteristics between those living in served and underserved areas. Informed by the social determinants of health framework, we analyzed 1731 incidents of stroke that occurred between January 2019 and January 2021, and observed that the circumstances associated with stroke varied by service category and race, with White patients and those from served areas having better stroke outcomes compared to those residing in underserved areas and those that were not White. Our analyses help us to understand the underlying factors influencing the observed disparities and allow us to move forward by implementing informed community-based interventions to decrease stroke incidence and improve post-stroke care. Using our example other small hospitals can enact similar strategies to address the social determinants affecting their patients to improve stroke outcomes in their region.

Deciphering the contextual barriers to mainstreaming the implementation of stroke thrombolysis in a Ghanaian hospital: Findings from the activate mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

Each year, stroke-related death and disability claim over 143 million years of healthy life globally. Despite accounting for much of the global stroke burden, acute stroke care in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries remains suboptimal. Thrombolysis, an effective treatment option for stroke, is only received by a minority of stroke patients in these settings.

AIM

To determine the context-specific barriers and facilitators for the implementation of mainstream stroke thrombolysis in a Ghanaian hospital.

METHODS

We employed a mixed-methods approach involving key stakeholders (recipients, providers, and leaders) in the acute stroke care continuum. Surveys were administered to acute stroke patients, and in-depth key informant interviews were conducted with experts in stroke care, including a neurologist, medical director, neurology residents, a stroke nurse, emergency physicians, a radiologist, and a pharmacist. The data collected from these interviews were transcribed and analysed using content analysis with the CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) model as a guiding template. Two independent coders were involved in the analysis process to ensure reliability and accuracy.

RESULTS

The stroke thrombolysis rate over a 6-month period was 0.83% (2 out of 242), with an average door-to-needle time among thrombolyzed patients being 2 hours, 37 minutes. Only 12.8% of patients (31 out of 242) presented within 4.5 hours of stroke symptom onset. The most significant obstacle to the implementation of acute stroke thrombolysis was related to the characteristics of the individuals involved, notably delays in presenting to the hospital among stroke patients due to a lack of knowledge about stroke symptoms and cultural beliefs. Additionally, a significant bottleneck that contributed to the discrepancy between the number of patients who presented within the 4.5-6 hour window and the number of patients who actually received thrombolysis was the inability to pay for the cost of thrombolytic agents. This was followed by challenges in the implementation processes.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing challenges related to stroke awareness, and financial constraints via multi-level stakeholder engagement, and enactment of stroke protocols are crucial steps in ensuring a successful implementation of a stroke thrombolysis program in a resource-limited setting.

Participation by patients from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in trial evidence supporting secondary stroke prevention guideline recommendations

BACKGROUND

One out of every four strokes is a highly preventable recurrent stroke. However, while low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) experience a disproportionate global burden of stroke, individuals in these regions seldomly participate in pivotal clinical trials, which form the basis for international expert consensus guideline recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a contemporary and globally prominent expert consensus secondary stroke prevention guideline statement for the participation of clinical trial subjects recruited from LMICs in formulating key therapeutic recommendations.

METHODS

We examined the 2021 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Stroke and TIA. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) cited in the Guideline were independently reviewed by two authors for study populations and participating countries with a focus on trials for vascular risk factor control and management by underlying stroke mechanism. We also reviewed all cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the original RCTs.

RESULTS

Among 320 secondary stroke prevention clinical trials, 262 (82%) focused on vascular risk control addressing diabetes (n = 26), hypertension (n = 23), obstructive sleep apnea (n = 13), dyslipidaemia (n = 10), lifestyle (n = 188) and obesity (n = 2); and 58 focused on stroke mechanism management including atrial fibrillation (n = 10), large vessel atherosclerosis (n = 45) and small vessel disease (n = 3). Overall, 53 of 320 studies (16.6%) had contributions from LMICs ranging from 55.6% for dyslipidemia, 40.7% for diabetes, 26.1% for hypertension, 15.4% for OSA, 6.4% for lifestyle, 0% for obesity, and by mechanism: 60.0% for atrial fibrillation, 22.2% large vessel atherosclerosis and 33.3% for small vessel disease trials. Only 19 (5.9%) of the trials had participatory contributions from a country in sub-Saharan Africa (South Africa only).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to their global burden of stroke, LMICs are underrepresented in key clinical trials used in formulating a prominent global stroke prevention guideline. While current therapeutic recommendations are likely applicable to practice settings throughout the world, greater involvement of patients from LMIC settings will enhance the contextual relevance and generalizability of recommendations to these disparate populations.

Promise of Physiological Profiling to Prevent Stroke in People of African Ancestry: Prototyping Ghana

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Worldwide, compared to other racial/ethnic groups, individuals of African ancestry have an excessively higher burden of hypertension-related morbidities, especially stroke. Identifying modifiable biological targets that contribute to these disparities could improve global stroke outcomes. In this scoping review, we discuss how pathological perturbations in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathways could be harnessed via physiological profiling for the purposes of improving blood pressure control for stroke prevention among people of African ancestry.

RECENT FINDINGS

Transcontinental comparative data from the USA and Ghana show that the prevalence of treatment-resistant hypertension among stroke survivors is 42.7% among indigenous Africans, 16.1% among African Americans, and 6.9% among non-Hispanic Whites, p < 0.0001. A multicenter clinical trial of patients without stroke in 3 African countries (Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa) demonstrated that physiological profiling using plasma renin activity and aldosterone to individualize selection of antihypertensive medications compared with usual care resulted in better blood pressure control with fewer medications over 12 months. Among Ghanaian ischemic stroke survivors treated without renin-aldosterone profiling data, an analysis revealed that those with low renin phenotypes did not achieve any meaningful reduction in blood pressure over 12 months on 3-4 antihypertensive medications despite excellent adherence. For a polygenic condition such as hypertension, individualized therapy based on plasma renin-aldosterone-guided selection of therapy for uncontrolled BP following precision medicine principles may be a viable strategy for primary and secondary stroke prevention with the potential to reduce disparities in the poor outcomes of stroke disproportionately shared by individuals of African ancestry. A dedicated clinical trial to test this hypothesis is warranted.