1
|
Li L, Liu Z. SRF Facilitates Transcriptional Inhibition of Gem Expression by m6A Methyltransferase METTL3 to Suppress Neuronal Damage in Epilepsy. Mol Neurobiol 2024:10.1007/s12035-024-04396-x. [PMID: 39190265 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-024-04396-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
A bioinformatics analysis was conducted to screen for relevant expression datasets of the transcription factor SRF knockout mice. The aim was to investigate the relationship between SRF and m6A-related genes, predict how SRF regulates the m6A modification of GEM genes mediated by METTL3, and explore potential molecular mechanisms associated with neurotrauma. Disease gene databases such as GeneCards, DisGeNET, and Phenolyzer, and transcription factor databases TFDB and TRRUST, were used to obtain epilepsy-related genes and transcription factors. The intersection was then selected. Expression data of SRF knockout epilepsy mice were obtained from the GEO database and used to filter differentially expressed genes. Important module genes related to the disease were selected through WGCNA co-expression analysis. The intersection between these genes and the differentially expressed genes was performed, followed by PPI network analysis and GO/KEGG enrichment analysis. Furthermore, the core genes were selected using the cytoHubba plugin of the Cytoscape software. Differential expression analysis was performed on m6A-related factors in the GEO dataset, and the relationship between SRF and m6A-related factors and core genes was analyzed. The m6A binding sites of SRF with the METTL3 promoter and target gene Gem were predicted using the AnimalTFDB and SRAMP websites, respectively. We found that the transcription factor SRF may be a key gene in epilepsy during neuronal development. Further WGCNA analysis showed that 129 module genes were associated with SRF knockout epilepsy, and these differentially expressed genes were mainly enriched in the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway. The final results indicate that knocking out SRF may inhibit the transcription of METTL3, thereby inhibiting the m6A modification of Gem and leading to upregulation of Gem expression, thereby playing an important role in neuronal damage. Knocking out the SRF gene may inhibit the transcription of m6A methyltransferase METTL3, thereby inhibiting the m6A modification of GEM genes mediated by METTL3, promoting GEM gene expression, and leading to the occurrence of epilepsy-related neuron injury. Further investigation revealed that SRF overexpression can potentially enhance the transcription of METTL3, thus promoting m6A modification of GEM, resulting in downregulation of GEM expression. This process regulates oxidative stress in epileptic mouse neurons, suppresses inflammatory responses, and mitigates associated damage. Additionally, an in vitro neuronal epileptic model was established, and experimental techniques such as qRT-PCR and WB were employed to assess the expression of SRF, METTL3, and GEM in hippocampal tissues and neurons. The experimental results were consistent with our predictions, demonstrating that overexpression of SRF can inhibit the development of epilepsy-related neuronal damage. This study reveals that knockout of the SRF gene may suppress the transcription of m6A methyltransferase METTL3, thereby inhibiting m6A modification of the GEM gene mediated by METTL3 and subsequently promoting the expression of the GEM gene, leading to the occurrence of epilepsy-related neuronal damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianling Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, P. R. China.
| | - Zhiguo Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centtal Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Langbein J, Boddeti U, Kreinbrink M, Khan Z, Rampalli I, Bachani M, Ksendzovsky A. Therapeutic approaches targeting seizure networks. FRONTIERS IN NETWORK PHYSIOLOGY 2024; 4:1441983. [PMID: 39171119 PMCID: PMC11335476 DOI: 10.3389/fnetp.2024.1441983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, affecting over 65 million people worldwide. Despite medical management with anti-seizure medications (ASMs), many patients fail to achieve seizure freedom, with over one-third of patients having drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Even with surgical management through resective surgery and/or neuromodulatory interventions, over 50 % of patients continue to experience refractory seizures within a year of surgery. Over the past 2 decades, studies have increasingly suggested that treatment failure is likely driven by untreated components of a pathological seizure network, a shift in the classical understanding of epilepsy as a focal disorder. However, this shift in thinking has yet to translate to improved treatments and seizure outcomes in patients. Here, we present a narrative review discussing the process of surgical epilepsy management. We explore current surgical interventions and hypothesized mechanisms behind treatment failure, highlighting evidence of pathologic seizure networks. Finally, we conclude by discussing how the network theory may inform surgical management, guiding the identification and targeting of more appropriate surgical regions. Ultimately, we believe that adapting current surgical practices and neuromodulatory interventions towards targeting seizure networks offers new therapeutic strategies that may improve seizure outcomes in patients suffering from DRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna Langbein
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ujwal Boddeti
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Matthew Kreinbrink
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ziam Khan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ihika Rampalli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Muzna Bachani
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Alexander Ksendzovsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fatima H, Riaz F, Mustafa MS, Rangwala BS, Abbas SR, Rangwala HS. Compound 350: A New Hope for Individuals with Drug-resistant Epilepsy. Ann Neurosci 2024; 31:80-82. [PMID: 38694714 PMCID: PMC11060129 DOI: 10.1177/09727531231192758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hareer Fatima
- Department of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Faiza Riaz
- Department of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | | | | | - Syed Raza Abbas
- Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Warren AEL, Tobochnik S, Chua MMJ, Singh H, Stamm MA, Rolston JD. Neurostimulation for Generalized Epilepsy: Should Therapy be Syndrome-specific? Neurosurg Clin N Am 2024; 35:27-48. [PMID: 38000840 PMCID: PMC10676463 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Current applications of neurostimulation for generalized epilepsy use a one-target-fits-all approach that is agnostic to the specific epilepsy syndrome and seizure type being treated. The authors describe similarities and differences between the 2 "archetypes" of generalized epilepsy-Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy-and review recent neuroimaging evidence for syndrome-specific brain networks underlying seizures. Implications for stimulation targeting and programming are discussed using 5 clinical questions: What epilepsy syndrome does the patient have? What brain networks are involved? What is the optimal stimulation target? What is the optimal stimulation paradigm? What is the plan for adjusting stimulation over time?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron E L Warren
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Steven Tobochnik
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa M J Chua
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hargunbir Singh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michaela A Stamm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John D Rolston
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gusain P, Taketoshi M, Tominaga Y, Tominaga T. Functional Dissection of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Neural Activity Propagation Using Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging in Mouse Prefrontal Cortex. eNeuro 2023; 10:ENEURO.0161-23.2023. [PMID: 37977827 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0161-23.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Prefrontal cortex (PFC) intrahemispheric activity and the interhemispheric connection have a significant impact on neuropsychiatric disorder pathology. This study aimed to generate a functional map of FC intrahemispheric and interhemispheric connections. Functional dissection of mouse PFCs was performed using the voltage-sensitive dye (VSD) imaging method with high speed (1 ms/frame), high resolution (256 × 256 pixels), and a large field of view (∼10 mm). Acute serial 350 μm slices were prepared from the bregma covering the PFC and numbered 1-5 based on their distance from the bregma (i.e., 1.70, 1.34, 0.98, 0.62, and 0.26 mm) with reference to the Mouse Brain Atlas (Paxinos and Franklin, 2008). The neural response to electrical stimulation was measured at nine sites and then averaged, and a functional map of the propagation patterns was created. Intracortical propagation was observed in slices 3-5, encompassing the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and corpus callosum (CC). The activity reached area 33 of the ACC. Direct white matter stimulation activated area 33 in both hemispheres. Similar findings were obtained via DiI staining of the CC. Imaging analysis revealed directional biases in neural signals traveling within the ACC, whereby the signal transmission speed and probability varied based on the signal direction. Specifically, the spread of neural signals from cg2 to cg1 was stronger than that from cingulate cortex area 1(cg1) to cingulate cortex area 2(cg2), which has implications for interhemispheric functional connections. These findings highlight the importance of understanding the PFC functional anatomy in evaluating neuromodulators like serotonin and dopamine, as well as other factors related to neuropsychiatric diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooja Gusain
- Institute of Neuroscience, Tokushima Bunri University, Sanuki 769-2193, Japan
| | - Makiko Taketoshi
- Institute of Neuroscience, Tokushima Bunri University, Sanuki 769-2193, Japan
| | - Yoko Tominaga
- Institute of Neuroscience, Tokushima Bunri University, Sanuki 769-2193, Japan
| | - Takashi Tominaga
- Institute of Neuroscience, Tokushima Bunri University, Sanuki 769-2193, Japan
- Kagawa School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokushima Bunri University, Sanuki 769-2193, Japan
| |
Collapse
|