Intermittent androgen deprivation

Androgen via p21 inhibits tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced JNK activation and apoptosis

The male hormone androgen is a growth/survival factor for its target tissues or organs. Yet, the underlying mechanism is incompletely understood. Here, we report that androgen via p21 inhibits tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced JNK activation and apoptosis. Inhibition by androgen requires the transcription activity of androgen receptor (AR) and de novo protein synthesis. Androgen.AR induces expression of p21 that in turn inhibits tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced JNK and apoptosis. Furthermore, genetic interruption of p21 alleles abolishes the inhibition by androgen. Our results reveal a novel cross-talk between androgen x AR and JNK, thereby providing a molecular mechanism underlying the survival function of androgen.

[The treatments of localized prostate cancer: the impact on sexuality]

Nowadays, taking into account the sexuality is an essential component of the management of prostate cancer patients. This implies the necessity for providing accurate, clear and transparent information about the potential adverse effects on the sexual functioning for each proposed treatment. This information is not only given to the patient, but also to his female partner. The association of extended radical prostatectomy (without preservation of neurovascular bundles) and androgen suppression therapy will be proposed for men with locally advanced prostate cancer at high-risk for recurrence. The impact of such combined management regarding sexual functioning is high in terms of erection and sexual interest. Early pharmacological treatment of erectile dysfunction (within the three months following surgical treatment) with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors or intracavernous injections will allow an optimal recovery of a certain quality of erection. Moreover, monotherapy with bicalutamide will be associated with significant advantage in terms of sexual interest. The sexuality after treatment will certainly be different but will be accomplished.

Effects on Sexual Function by the Drugs used in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer. A Practical Guide for the Urologist

The effects on sexual function (SF) by the drugs commonly used in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PC) have been analyzed. BPH therapy: alpha-blockers have no adverse effects on SF; the only one without significant hypotensive effect, Tamsulosin, can cause retrograde ejaculation in 4–8% of cases. 5-Alpha-reductase (Finasteride and Dutasteride) inhibitors could have detrimental effects on erectile function, libido and ejaculation in a small percentage of cases rarely exceeding 10%; these effects are reversible and their incidence reduces after 1 yr. Phytotherapy (extracts from pygeum africanum and serenoa repens) and mepartricin have no unfavorable action on SF. PC therapy: Loss of erectile function and libido are the norm with the use of LH-RH analogues, estrogens and steroidal antiandrogens (cyproterone acetate). Non-steroidal antiandrogens (Flutamide, Bicalutamide and Nilutamide) allow the preservation of SF in two-thirds of cases.

Clinical strategies in the management of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in men, following lung cancer. Although radical prostatectomy continues to be a curative treatment for most patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, nearly 25% of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy will have biochemical recurrence as defined by an increase in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level to >0.4 ng/mL after prostatectomy or a rapid doubling of the PSA over a 10-year follow-up period. The clinical challenges, an overview of available data, and a framework for the integration of this information for clinical management of biochemical recurrence postprostatectomy for prostate carcinoma are presented in this article. Therapeutic options, in addition to conservative management and watchful waiting, include radiation therapy and androgen deprivation. These options are discussed herein along with expected outcomes.

Intermittent versus continuous total androgen blockade in the treatment of patients with advanced hormone-naive prostate cancer: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of total intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) versus total continuous androgen deprivation (CAD) for treating patients with advanced prostate cancer in a phase III randomized trial. A total of 68 evaluable patients with hormone-naive advanced or relapsing prostate cancer were randomized to receive combined androgen blockade according to a continuous (n = 33) or intermittent (n = 35) regimen. Therapeutic monitoring was assessed by use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements. Patients in the CAD and IAD groups were equally stratified for age, biopsy Gleason score, and baseline serum PSA levels. The outcome variable was time to androgen-independence of the tumor, which was defined as increasing serum PSA levels despite androgen blockade. Mean follow-up was 30.8 months. The 35 IAD-treated patients completed 91 cycles, and 19 of them (54.3%) completed > or = 3 cycles. Median cycle length and percentage of time off therapy were 9.0 months and 59.5, respectively. The estimated 3-year progression rate was significantly lower in the IAD group (7.0% +/- 4.8%) than in the CAD group (38.9% +/- 11.2%, P = 0.0052). Our data suggest that IAD treatment may maintain the androgen-dependent state of advanced human prostate cancer, as assessed by PSA measurements, at least as long as CAD treatment. Further studies with longer follow-up times and larger patient cohorts are needed to determine the comparative impacts of CAD and IAD on survival.

Androgen receptor in prostate cancer

The normal development and maintenance of the prostate is dependent on androgen acting through the androgen receptor (AR). AR remains important in the development and progression of prostate cancer. AR expression is maintained throughout prostate cancer progression, and the majority of androgen-independent or hormone refractory prostate cancers express AR. Mutation of AR, especially mutations that result in a relaxation of AR ligand specificity, may contribute to the progression of prostate cancer and the failure of endocrine therapy by allowing AR transcriptional activation in response to antiandrogens or other endogenous hormones. Similarly, alterations in the relative expression of AR coregulators have been found to occur with prostate cancer progression and may contribute to differences in AR ligand specificity or transcriptional activity. Prostate cancer progression is also associated with increased growth factor production and an altered response to growth factors by prostate cancer cells. The kinase signal transduction cascades initiated by mitogenic growth factors modulate the transcriptional activity of AR and the interaction between AR and AR coactivators. The inhibition of AR activity through mechanisms in addition to androgen ablation, such as modulation of signal transduction pathways, may delay prostate cancer progression.

Controversies in the systemic management of patients with evidence of biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy

The management of patients with evidence of a detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) following prostatectomy is an increasingly common and difficult issue for patients and clinicians alike. In the setting in which biochemical failure is believed representative of early systemic failure, therapeutic options primarily involve the use of hormonal therapy. Extrapolating results of early vs. delayed hormonal therapy from studies of patients with more advanced prostate cancer is problematic. Antiandrogen monotherapy and intermittent androgen deprivation are increasingly popular approaches, although their ultimate utility remains unproven. This patient subset is an optimal one in which to conduct clinical trials to both define the role of hormonal therapy and to investigate novel, non-hormonal approaches. The most appropriate therapeutic intervention for patients with evidence of biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy remains undefined.