Systemic therapy for advanced soft-tissue sarcomas

Genomic and proteomic biomarkers for cancer: a multitude of opportunities

Biomarkers are molecular indicators of a biological status, and as biochemical species can be assayed to evaluate the presence of cancer and therapeutic interventions. Through a variety of mechanisms cancer cells provide the biomarker material for their own detection. Biomarkers may be detectable in the blood, other body fluids, or tissues. The expectation is that the level of an informative biomarker is related to the specific type of disease present in the body. Biomarkers have potential both as diagnostic indicators and monitors of the effectiveness of clinical interventions. Biomarkers are also able to stratify cancer patients to the most appropriate treatment. Effective biomarkers for the early detection of cancer should provide a patient with a better outcome which in turn will translate into more efficient delivery of healthcare. Technologies for the early detection of cancer have resulted in reductions in disease-associated mortalities from cancers that are otherwise deadly if allowed to progress. Such screening technologies have proven that early detection will decrease the morbidity and mortality from cancer. An emerging theme in biomarker research is the expectation that panels of biomarker analytes rather than single markers will be needed to have sufficient sensitivity and specificity for the presymptomatic detection of cancer. Biomarkers may provide prognostic information of disease enabling interventions using targeted therapeutic agents as well as course-corrections in cancer treatment. Novel genomic, proteomic and metabolomic technologies are being used to discover and validate tumor biomarkers individually and in panels.

Combined vascular endothelial growth factor receptor/epidermal growth factor receptor blockade with chemotherapy for treatment of local, uterine, and metastatic soft tissue sarcoma

PURPOSE

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a rare heterogeneous malignancy. Overall survival has been stagnant for decades, primarily because systemic therapies are ineffective versus metastases, the leading cause of STS lethality. Consequently, we examined whether tyrosine kinase receptors active in STS growth signaling might be blockable and whether multireceptor blockade might synergize with low-dose STS chemotherapy by therapeutically affecting STS cells and their associated microenvironment.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Vandetanib (AstraZenca), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and epidermal growth factor receptor, was evaluated alone and with chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo in three human STS nude mouse xenograft models of different STS locations (muscle, uterus, lung), stages (primary, metastatic), and subtypes (leiomyosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, uterine sarcoma: luciferase-expressing MES-SA human uterine sarcoma cells surgically implanted into uterine muscularis with bioluminescence tumor growth assessment; developed by us).

RESULTS

In vitro, human STS cells were sensitive to vandetanib. Vandetanib alone and with chemotherapy statistically significantly inhibited leiomyosarcoma local growth and fibrosarcoma lung metastasis. Direct injection of MES-SA into nude mice uterine muscularis resulted in high tumor take (88%), whereas s.c. injection resulted in no growth, suggesting microenvironmental tumor growth modulation. Vandetanib alone and with chemotherapy statistically significantly inhibited uterine sarcoma growth. In all models, vandetanib induced increased apoptosis, decreased tumor cell proliferation, and decreased angiogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Vandetanib has antitumor effects against human STS subtypes in vitro and in vivo, where it also affects the tumor-associated microenvironment. Given the urgent need for better systemic approaches to STS, clinical trials evaluating vandetanib, perhaps with low-dose chemotherapy, seem warranted.

A multicenter Phase II study of bortezomib in recurrent or metastatic sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Based on evidence of activity in preclinical and Phase I studies, the authors undertook a study of bortezomib, a reversible proteasome inhibitor, for patients with metastatic sarcomas.

METHODS

Two arms were opened, each using a Simon two-stage design. Arm A included patients with osteogenic sarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. Arm B accrued patients with other types of soft tissue sarcomas. Patients were not allowed to have received previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The initial dose of bortezomib was a 1.5 mg/m2 intravenous push twice weekly followed by a rest week. The dose was escalated to 1.7 mg/m2 if patients tolerated Cycle 1 well. The dose escalation was eliminated due to toxicity observed in the first six patients.

RESULTS

Painful neuropathy, myalgias, and asthenia were the most significant observed toxicities. The most frequent toxicities included fatigue, diarrhea, constipation, and nausea. Pharmacodynamic data from 18 patients with complete data collection did not show consistent differences between patients with or without Grade 2 or Grade 3 neuropathy (toxicity graded according the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). Arm A had low accrual and was closed. One confirmed partial response among 21 evaluable patients was observed on Arm B in a patient with leiomyosarcoma. Due to the inactivity of this agent, the study was closed after the first stage of accrual.

CONCLUSIONS

Bortezomib has minimal activity in soft tissue sarcoma as a single agent. If studied further in sarcomas, bortezomib should be investigated in combination with agents with demonstrated preclinical synergy.

Emerging treatments for soft tissue sarcoma of adults

Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies arising from mesenchymal tissues. Patients can present with a localised tumour (primary or local recurrence) at different sites (e.g., extremity, abdomen) or metastatic disease, which may require different treatment strategies. Is the surgical resection of a localised sarcoma enough or is it better to give an additional treatment like adjuvant and/or preoperative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy? Which chemotherapy should be selected in the first or second line situation? Do new treatment options exist, such as targeted therapies? This review provides answers to some of these questions. To decide on consecutive treatment steps, it is important to know as many relevant factors as possible at first presentation. Therefore, the first part of this review discusses the specific characteristics and prognostic factors of importance for treatment planning. A short summary of current therapy strategies and existing standards is then given. The main body of the review summarises information on new and emerging clinical compounds for patients with soft tissue sarcoma of adults, including recent developments of targeted therapy.