First-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer

Absence of transcriptomic signature of response to chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients

Aim: Tumor gene-expression profiling may define signatures capable of discriminating between responders and nonresponders to chemotherapy. Patients & methods: Fifty seven metastatic colorectal cancer patients were prospectively included and 40 tumors were analyzed. Patients were treated in first line with 5-fluorouracil associated with irinotecan or oxaliplatin. Response was evaluated using WHO criteria every 2 months after chemotherapy. Gene-expression profiling was performed using Applied Biosystems microarrays (Human Genome Survey Microarray v2.0; Paris, France). Data were analyzed using Bioconductor packages. Differential-expression analysis was performed by fitting a linear model. Moderated t-statistics were computed and p-values were adjusted for false-discovery rate. Pearson correlations tests were evaluated between gene expression and progression-free and overall survival. Results: Nonsupervised analysis did not show any clustering of expression levels according to treatment response. Supervised analysis compared expression levels between responders and nonresponders, within each treatment group and independently from treatment. No genes were identified as differentially expressed at a p-value of 10-3 and false-discovery rate of 30%. No correlation between expression levels and survival data was found. Conclusion: These negative results show that the determinants of response to chemotherapy should be sought not only in the tumor characteristics, but also among the processes leading to drug availability to the tumor.

Original submitted 7 July 2011; Revision submitted 17 October 2011

A phase II experience with neoadjuvant irinotecan (CPT-11), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy may improve survival in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may help identify patients with occult extrahepatic disease (averting unnecessary metastasectomy), and it provides in vivo chemosensitivity data.

METHODS

A phase II trial was initiated in which patients with resectable CLM received CPT-11, 5-FU and LV for 12 weeks. Metastasectomy was performed unless extrahepatic disease appeared. Postoperatively, patients with stable or responsive disease received the same regimen for 12 weeks. Patients with progressive disease received either second-line chemotherapy or best supportive care. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

35 patients were accrued. During preoperative chemotherapy, 16 patients (46%) had grade 3/4 toxicities. Resection was not possible in 5 patients. One patient died of arrhythmia following surgery, and 1 patient had transient liver failure. During the postoperative treatment phase, 12 patients (55%) had grade 3/4 toxicities. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) occurred in 11 patients (34%) at various times during treatment. Of those who underwent resection, median DFS was 23.0 mo. and median OS has not been reached. The overall survival from time of diagnosis of liver metastases was 51.6 mo for the entire cohort.

CONCLUSION

A short course of chemotherapy prior to hepatic metastasectomy may serve to select candidates best suited for resection and it may also direct postoperative systemic treatment. Given the significant incidence of DVT, alternative systemic neoadjuvant regimens should be investigated, particularly those that avoid the use of a central venous line.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00168155.

Minimal hepatic toxicity of Onyx-015: spatial restriction of coxsackie-adenoviral receptor in normal liver

We administered an adenoviral vector, Onyx-015, into the hepatic artery of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer involving the liver. Thirty-five patients enrolled in this multi-institutional phase I/II trial received up to eight arterial infusions of up to 2 × 10¹² viral particles. Hepatic toxicity was the primary dose-limiting toxicity observed in preclinical models. However, nearly 200 infusions of this adenoviral vector were administered directly into the hepatic artery without significant toxicity. Therefore, we undertook this analysis to determine the impact of repeated adenoviral exposure on hepatic function. Seventeen patients were treated at our institution, providing a detailed data set on the changes in hepatic function following repeated exposure to adenovirus. No changes in hepatic function occurred with the first treatment of Onyx-015 among these patients. Transient increases in transaminase levels occurred in one patient starting with the second infusion and transient increases in bilirubin was observed in two patients starting with the fifth treatment. These changes occurred too early to be explained by viral-mediated lysis of hepatocytes. In addition, viremia was observed starting 3–5 days after the viral infusion in half of the patient, but was not associated with hepatic toxicity. To further understand the basis for the minimal hepatic toxicity of adenoviral vectors, we evaluated the replication of adenovirus in primary hepatocytes and tumor cells in culture and the expression of the coxsackie-adenoviral receptor (CAR) in normal liver and colon cancer metastatic to the liver. We found that adenovirus replicates poorly in primary hepatocytes but replicates efficiently in tumors including tumors derived from hepatocytes. In addition, we found that CAR is localized at junctions between hepatocytes and is inaccessible to hepatic blood flow. CAR is not expressed on tumor vasculature but is expressed on tumor cells. Spatial restriction of CAR to the intercellular space in normal liver and diminished replication of adenovirus in hepatocytes may explain the minimal toxicity observed following repeated hepatic artery infusions with Onyx-015.

Multicenter phase II study of fixed sequences of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin or irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of fixed sequences of capecitabine/oxaliplatin followed by capecitabine/irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult patients with histologically confirmed, previously untreated, nonresectable, locally advanced or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled in the study. Patients were treated as follows: capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily) on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 2-hour intravenous infusion) on day 1, followed by capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily) on days 1-14 and irinotecan (240 mg/m2 1.5-hour intravenous infusion) on day 1. Each combination was administered every 21 days during 4 consecutive cycles followed by the alternating sequence to a maximum of 16 cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 35 eligible patients have been included in this ongoing study. Response rate (complete responses plus partial responses) was 37.1%. With a median follow-up of 9.5 months, the median time to disease progression and overall survival were 7.4 months and 16.4 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with only 6% of the patients developing grade 3/4 neurotoxicity. However, the low number of patients treated beyond 4 cycles limits the interpretation of the data.

CONCLUSION

The preliminary results from this ongoing study suggest the feasibility of this strategy, which resulted in promising antitumor activity with less neurotoxicity.