Novel approaches to imatinib- and sunitinib-resistant GIST

Advances in Drug Therapy for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is a common gastrointestinal sarcoma located in the stromal cells of the digestive tract, and molecular studies have revealed the pathogenesis of mutations in KIT and PDGFRA genes. Since imatinib opened the era of targeted therapy for GIST, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that can treat GIST have been developed successively. However, the lack of new drugs with satisfactory therapeutic standards has made addressing resistance a significant challenge for TKIs in the face of the resistance to first-line and second-line drugs. Therefore, we need to find as many drugs and new treatments that block mutated genes as possible.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive collection of literature using databases, integrated and analysed the selected literature based on keywords and the comprehensive nature of the articles, and finally wrote articles based on the content of the studies.

RESULTS

In this article, we first briefly explained the relationship between GIST and KIT/ PDGFRα and then introduced the related drug treatment. The research progress of TKIs was analyzed according to the resistance of the drugs.

CONCLUSION

This article describes the research progress of some TKIs and briefly introduces the currently approved TKIs and some drugs under investigation that may have better therapeutic effects, hoping to provide clues to the research of new drugs.

Therapeutic targets in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common type of mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. The tumorigenesis of GISTs is driven by gain-of-function mutations in KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA), resulting in constitutive activation of the tyrosine kinase and its downstream signaling pathways. Oncogenic KIT or PDGFRA mutations are compelling therapeutic targets for the treatment of GISTs, and the KIT/PDGFRA inhibitor imatinib is the standard of care for patients with metastatic GISTs. However, most GIST patients develop clinical resistance to imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Five mechanisms of resistance have been characterized: (1) acquisition of a secondary point mutation in KIT or PDGFRA; (2) genomic amplification of KIT; (3) activation of an alternative receptor tyrosine kinase; (4) loss of KIT oncoprotein expression; and (5) wild-type GIST. Currently, sunitinib is used as a second-line treatment for patients after imatinib failure, and regorafenib has been approved for patients whose disease is progressing on both imatinib and sunitinib. Phase II/III trials are currently in progress to evaluate novel inhibitors and immunotherapies targeting KIT, its downstream effectors such as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, protein kinase B and mammalian target of rapamycin, heat shock protein 90, and histone deacetylase inhibitor. Other candidate targets have been identified, including ETV1, AXL, insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, KRAS, FAS receptor, protein kinase c theta, ANO1 (DOG1), CDC37, and aurora kinase A. These candidates warrant clinical evaluation as novel therapeutic targets in GIST.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care in Austria

Optimal treatment for patients suffering from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is based on an interdisciplinary treatment approach. Austrian representatives of Medical and Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Gastroenterology, and Laboratory Medicine issued this manuscript on a consensual base within the context of currently available and published literature. This paper contains guidelines and recommendations for diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of GIST patients in Austria.

Role of operative therapy in treatment of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Operative resection of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is controversial. Current treatment strategies rely on the response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with resultant individualization of operative intervention. We investigated the role of operative therapy in patients with metastatic GIST.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all consecutive patients treated for metastatic and/or recurrent GIST from January 2002 to June 2011. The patients were stratified by the use of operative therapy and disease response to TKI therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses with log-rank comparisons tested the effects of operative therapy and the response to TKIs on survival.

RESULTS

Of the 438 patients treated for GIST during the study period, 87 (median age 61 y, interquartile range 50-71; 55% male) had metastatic GIST (84% metastatic, 3% recurrent, and 13% metastatic and recurrent). Of these patients, 54 (62%) underwent operative exploration. Subtotal resection for palliative debulking (R2 resection) were performed in 19 patients; 32 patients underwent R0 resection. Operative intervention was associated with improved overall survival (OS) compared with systemic therapy alone (1 y OS, 98% versus 80% and 5-y OS, 65% versus 11%, respectively; P < 0.001). A TKI was used before resection in 32 patients. The disease response was partial in 13 patients, stable in 10, and progressive in 9. The 1- and 5-y OS and progression-free survival were strongly associated with the preoperative response to TKI and an R0 resection (all P ≤ 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with metastatic GIST, preoperative response to TKI therapy and margin-negative resection were strongly associated with improved progression-free and OS.

[Legal liability problems in outpatient operations. View from an anesthesiological perspective]

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are known to be poorly responsive to conventional chemotherapy and historically considered resistant to radiotherapy. In the past the mainstay of GIST treatment was surgery, but the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) imatinib and sunitinib marked the beginning of a new era in the treatment of GIST patients. To date, radiotherapy for GIST has not been administered in clinical practice except for limited palliative settings and there are no clear data on the administration of radiotherapy, alone or in combination with TKIs, with a purely cytoreductive intent. We describe the clinical case of a 48-year-old woman with metastatic GIST treated with external radiotherapy in a critical supraclavicular tumor localization progressively increasing in size with several symptoms and not responsive to systemic TKI therapies. We obtained an initial shrinkage of the mass and subsequent stabilization with an immediate and clear clinical benefit. Although the historical medical literature considered GISTs resistant to radiation therapy, our clinical case suggests this treatment may be appropriate in selected patients.

Nilotinib counteracts P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance and synergizes the antitumoral effect of doxorubicin in soft tissue sarcomas

The therapeutic effect of doxorubicin (DXR) in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is limited by its toxicity and the development of multidrug resistance (MDR), the latter mainly induced by high expression of efflux pumps (e.g., P-glycoprotein [P-gp]). Therefore, the search for alternative therapies, which sensitize these tumors to chemotherapy while maintaining a low toxicity profile, is a rational approach. We assessed efficacy and molecular mechanisms involved in the antiproliferative effects of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, nilotinib and imatinib, as single agents or in combination with DXR, in human synovial sarcoma SW982 and leiomyosarcoma SK-UT-1 cells. As single compound nilotinib (1-10 µM) was more potent than imatinib inhibiting the growth of SK-UT-1 and SW982 cells by 33.5-59.6%, respectively. Importantly, only nilotinib synergized the antitumoral effect of DXR (0.05-0.5 µM) by at least 2-fold, which clearly surpassed the mere sum of effects according to isobolographic analysis. Moreover, nilotinib in combination with DXR had a sustained effect on cell number (-70.3±5.8%) even 12 days after withdrawal of drugs compared to DXR alone. On the molecular level, only nilotinib fully blocked FBS-induced ERK1 and p38 MAPK activation, hence, reducing basal and DXR-induced up-regulation of P-gp levels. Moreover, efflux activity of the MDR-related proteins P-gp and MRP-1 was inhibited, altogether resulting in intracellular DXR retention. In high-risk STS tumors 53.8% and 15.4% were positive for P-gp and MRP-1 expression, respectively, with high incidence of P-gp in synovial sarcoma (72.7%). In summary, nilotinib exhibits antiproliferative effects on cellular models of STS and sensitizes them to DXR by reverting DXR-induced P-gp-mediated MDR and inhibiting MRP-1 activity, leading to a synergistic effect with potential for clinical treatment.

Rapamycin and IL-2 reduce lethal acute graft-versus-host disease associated with increased expansion of donor type CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells

Previous work has demonstrated that both rapamycin (RAPA) and IL-2 enhance CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ regulatory T-cell (Treg) proliferation and function in vitro. We investigated whether the combination of RAPA plus IL-2 could impact acute GVHD induction after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). RAPA plus IL-2 resulted in improved survival and a reduction in acute GVHD lethality associated with an increased expansion of donor type CD4⁺Foxp3⁺ Tregs and reduced CD4⁺CD25⁻ conventional T cells (Tcons). RAPA plus IL-2, but not either drug alone, increased both expansion of donor natural Tregs and conversion of induced Tregs from donor CD25⁻ Tcons while IL-2 alone increased conversion of Tregs from CD25⁻ Tcon. RAPA plus IL-2 treatment resulted in less production of IFN-γ and TNF, cytokines known to be important in the initiation of acute GVHD. These studies indicate that the pharmacologic stimulation of T cells with IL-2 and the suppression of Tcon proliferation with RAPA result in a selective expansion of functional Tregs and suppression of acute GVHD.

Small-Intestinal Rhabdoid Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)

Rhabdoid features in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare. To the authors’ knowledge, only 51 cases have been reported. Most of these reports consist of case series in which the rhabdoid GISTs comprise a small proportion of the tumors studied. Information regarding site of origin and clinical behavior is sparse. Although the stomach is the only site of origin documented, most reports do not include this data. Malignancy has not been reported, though follow-up is inadequate in most cases to comment on tumor behavior. Exon 11 mutations comprise all previously described KIT mutations, the majority of which are deletions. The authors present the case of a malignant small-intestinal rhabdoid GIST that recurred twice following resection and treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The tumor harbored a KIT exon 11, 579-580 LY insertion that, to the authors’ knowledge, has not been previously reported. This case is the first rhabdoid GIST described in the small intestine and is the first to show documented evidence of malignancy.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): an updated experience

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are relatively common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract characterized by c-KIT mutations. This is a comprehensive review of the current data of the literature on the various aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of these tumors.

METHODS

The stomach is the most commonly involved site for these tumors in the digestive tract. Computed tomography and endoscopy can usually establish the diagnosis. The study of certain specific immunohistochemical markers may contribute to better characterization of these tumors.

RESULTS

Surgical resection of GISTs has been the most effective therapy. In addition, targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors may reduce the development of recurrence or decrease the disease progression in patients with metastatic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has resulted in significant improvement in the overall prognosis of these patients. Furthermore, preoperative imatinib can decrease tumor volume and is associated with complete surgical resection in locally advanced primary GISTs.

Implications of mutational analysis for the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors and the application of targeted therapies

The receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, imatinib and sunitinib, have significantly improved the prognosis for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Most GISTs exhibit mutations in the genes encoding the stem cell factor receptor (KIT) or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). Imatinib is more effective in patients with KIT exon 11 mutations compared with KIT exon 9 mutations and wild-type genotype, while sunitinib confers greater in vitro efficacy in patients with KIT exon 9 mutants and wild-type genotype than in KIT exon 11 mutants. This review examines the potential role of mutational analysis to optimize therapy with imatinib and sunitinib for GIST.

Synergistic induction of apoptosis by the Bcl-2 inhibitor ABT-737 and imatinib mesylate in gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells

BACKGROUND

Although imatinib mesylate has revolutionized the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), resistance and progression almost inevitably develop with long-term monotherapy. To enhance imatinib-induced cytotoxicity and overcome imatinib-resistance in GIST cells, we examined the antitumor effects of the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2/Bcl-x(L) inhibitor ABT-737, alone and in combination with imatinib.

METHODS

We treated imatinib-sensitive, GIST-T1 and GIST882, and imatinib-resistant cells with ABT-737 alone and with imatinib. We determined the anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects by cell viability assay, flow cytometric apoptosis and cell cycle analysis, immunoblotting, and nuclear morphology. Synergism was determined by isobologram analysis.

RESULTS

The IC(50) of single-agent ABT-737 at 72 h was 10 μM in imatinib-sensitive GIST-T1 and GIST882 cells, and 1 μM in imatinib-resistant GIST48IM cells. ABT-737 and imatinib combined synergistically in a time- and dose-dependent manner to inhibit the proliferation and induce apoptosis of all GIST cells, as evidenced by cell viability and apoptosis assays, caspase activation, PARP cleavage, and morphologic changes. Isobologram analyses revealed strongly synergistic drug interactions, with combination indices <0.5 for most ABT-737/imatinib combinations. Thus, clinically relevant in vitro concentrations of ABT-737 have single-agent antitumor activity and are synergistic in combination with imatinib.

CONCLUSION

We provide the first preclinical evidence that Bcl-2/Bcl-x(L) inhibition with ABT-737 synergistically enhances imatinib-induced cytotoxicity via apoptosis, and that direct engagement of apoptotic cell death may be an effective approach to circumvent imatinib-resistance in GIST.

A phase I-II study of everolimus (RAD001) in combination with imatinib in patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Imatinib is standard therapy for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but most patients develop resistance. This phase I-II study assessed the safety and efficacy of co-administering everolimus with imatinib in imatinib-resistant GIST.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In phase I, patients received imatinib (600/800 mg/day) combined with weekly (20 mg) or daily (2.5/5.0 mg) everolimus to determine the optimal dose. In phase II, patients were divided into two strata (progression on imatinib only; progression after imatinib and sunitinib/other tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and received everolimus 2.5 mg plus imatinib 600 mg/day. Primary end point was 4-month progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Combination treatment was well tolerated. Common adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and anemia. In phase II strata 1 and 2, 4 of 23 (17%) and 13 of 35 (37%) assessable patients, respectively, were progression free at 4 months; median PFS was 1.9 and 3.5 months, and median overall survival was 14.9 and 10.7 months, respectively. In stratum 1, 36% had stable disease (SD) and 54% progressive disease (PD), while in stratum 2, 2% had partial response, 43% SD, and 32% PD.

CONCLUSION

Predetermined efficacy criteria were met in both strata. The combination of everolimus and imatinib after failure on imatinib and sunitinib merits further investigation in GIST.

Optimal use of targeted agents for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Imatinib is the recommended 1st-line treatment for a KIT-positive unresectable and/or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST). However, some patients experience intolerance to imatinib and most patients will eventually experience disease progression while on imatinib treatment. Sunitinib is approved for treatment of a GIST after disease progression on, or intolerance to, imatinib therapy. Progression may occur early or later on, in treatment and is determined by factors including initial GIST genotype and mutational status. GISTs with KIT exon 11 mutations appear to be sensitive to standard dose imatinib, and patients with GISTs exhibiting KIT exon 9 mutations whose disease has progressed on imatinib 400 mg/day have been shown to respond to imatinib 800 mg/day, albeit with a higher incidence of adverse events. Sunitinib has shown clinical benefit in all major GIST mutational subtypes, particularly in patients with wild-type or KIT exon 9 genotype and against GISTs with secondary KIT exon 13 or 14 mutations. The choice between higher-dose imatinib and sunitinib after progression on standard dose imatinib is unclear, and apart from the GIST primary resistance genotype and mutational status, individual patient factors such as tumour characteristics, drug pharmacokinetics, and other clinical factors may affect response to treatment. Individualisation of therapy may help to maximise clinical benefit of therapy in these patients.

Growth factors as active participants in carcinogenesis: a perspective

Growth factors are low molecular peptides active in the stimulation of cell proliferation and in the regulation of embryonic development and cellular differentiation. Significant progress has been made in developing effective strategies to treat human malignancies with new chemical compounds based on a rationale directed against various components of signaling pathways. Many of these drugs target a growth factor receptor--for instance, in the form of monoclonal antibodies or inhibitors of tyrosine kinases, such as monoclonal antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptors used in treating certain types of breast cancer. Imatinib mesylate [Gleevec]) is an excellent example of mediators of signal transduction, such as tyrosine kinases. Growth factors proper are used to ameliorate various and sometimes fatal side effects of cytotoxic and/or myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Basic characteristics of several growth families are discussed with therapeutic modalities based on growth factor activity or, more often, inhibition of such activity.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Recommendations on diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care in Austria

Adequate treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is linked to an interdisciplinary treatment approach. Austrian representatives of medical oncology, surgery, pathology, radiology and gastroenterology have issued this consensus manuscript within the context of currently available and published literature. The paper contains guidelines and recommendations for diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of GIST patients in Austria.

Imatinib treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST)

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs are believed to originate from intersticial cells of Cajal (the pacemaker cells of the gastrointestinal tract) or related stem cells, and are characterized by KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) activating mutations. The use of imatinib has revolutionized the management of GIST and altered its natural history, substantially improving survival time and delaying disease progression in many patients. The success of imatinib in controlling advanced GIST led to interest in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant use of the drug. The neoadjuvant (preoperative) use of imatinib is recommended to facilitate resection and avoid mutilating surgery by decreasing tumour size, and adjuvant therapy is indicated for patients at high risk of recurrence. The molecular characterization (genotyping) of GISTs has become an essential part of the routine management of the disease as KIT and PDGFRA mutation status predicts the likelihood of achieving response to imatinib. However, the vast majority of patients who initially responded to imatinib will develop tumour progression (secondary resistance). Secondary resistance is often related to secondary KIT or PDGFRA mutations that interfere with drug binding. Multiple novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be potentially useful for the treatment of imatinib-resistant GISTs as they interfere with KIT and PDGFRA receptors or with the downstream-signalling proteins.

Combined treatment strategies in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) after imatinib and sunitinib therapy

Resistance to tyrosine-kinase inhibitors remains an open issue in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. The complex biology of disease in the multi-resistant setting has led a progressively growing urgency and interest in development combined or integrated therapies. This mini-review outlines the rationale for developing new combined therapeutic approaches, and describes the state of the art of the various potential strategies and the promising research perspectives.

[Treatment of extensive disease]

In locally advanced inoperable patients and metastatic patients imatinib is a standard treatment. Standard dose of imatinib is 400 mg daily. Treatment should be continued indefinitely, since treatment interruption is generally followed by relatively rapid tumor progression in virtually all patients. Dose intensity should be maintained by adequate management of side effects and a correct policy of dose reductions and interruptions in the case of excessive toxicity. The standard approach in the case of tumor progression is to increase the imatinib dose to 800 mg daily with special attention to the occurrence of side effects. Patient non-compliance should be ruled out as a possible cause of tumor progression as well as drug interactions with concomitant medications. In case of progression or intolerance to imatinib standard second-line treatment is sunitinib. The drug was approved effective in terms of progression-free survival according to a 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off regimen. Preliminary data show that a continuous regimen with lower daily dose may be equally effective but possibly better tolerated. After failing on sunitinib, the patient should be considered for participation in a clinical trial of new therapeutic agents or combinations such as tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (e.g., nilotinib), sorafenib, or inhibitors of the mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin)-pathway.

[Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and aftercare in Austria]

Diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) requires an interdisciplinary treatment approach. This strategy should be reflected by the content of this article. Austrian representatives of 'GIST relevant' specialties authored this publication on a consensual base. This manuscript should be regarded as a guideline for 'GIST involved' colleagues in Austria.

Role of imatinib in the management of early, operable, and advanced GI stromal tumors (GISTs)

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), the most common sarcoma of the GI tract, have unique kinase mutations that serve as targets for medical therapy. This article reviews the data supporting the use of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib in GIST patients, and how this treatment should be combined with surgical resection (when possible) to optimize patient outcomes. Although surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment for these tumors, patients with resected GISTs have high relapse rates that can be reduced by 1 year of adjuvant imatinib. Data also support the use of imatinib for patients with recurrent or unresectable GIST. In these patients the drug should be continued until progression, intolerance, or the patients are rendered resectable. Patients with advanced GIST who are successfully resected after imatinib treatment should be placed back on imatinib postoperatively. Patients who develop generalized progression (progression at 2 or more sites) on imatinib should move to other treatments, such as newer TKIs or other targeted approaches currently under study. Genotyping of the tumor should be considered in all pediatric GISTs and high risk adult GISTs, especially if there is progression on imatinib. Quality of life and the cost/benefit of new therapies are important issues for further study in patients with GIST.