Modern multidisciplinary management of brain metastases

Modern possibilities of neurosurgical treatment of brain metastases

Despite significant progress in neuroimaging and introduction of new combined treatments for solid tumors, brain metastases are still adverse factor for overall survival. Brain metastases are diagnosed in 8-10% of patients and associated with extremely poor prognosis. These lesions result focal and general cerebral symptoms. Literature review highlights the current principles of surgical treatment of metastatic brain lesions in patients with solid tumors.

Radiation-Free myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A comparison of outcomes between patients with and without central nervous system involvement

For patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), total body irradiation (TBI) has been particularly advocated as a part of the conditioning regimen in case of extramedullary involvement in sanctuary sites such as the central nervous system (CNS), to ensure greater tissue penetration. In resource-limited countries lacking TBI facilities; however, ALL patients undergo radiation-free myeloablative conditioning, though its impacts on post-HSCT outcomes of the patients with pre-HSCT CNS involvement have not been analyzed. In this 14-year series of 278 adult (> 18 y) ALL patients undergoing TBI-free busulfan/cyclophosphamide conditioning allo-HSCT, we found that the long-term probabilities of overall survival, disease free survival, relapse and non-relapse mortality were not significantly different between CNS-involved and CNS-spared patients. Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of post-HSCT CNS relapse between CNS-involved and CNS-spared patients. Pre-HSCT cranial radiation therapy (CRT) showed no significant preventive effect on the likelihood of post-HSCT CNS relapse. Through multivariable regression analysis, grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), extensive chronic GvHD and post-HSCT relapse were ascertained as independent determinants of mortality (Adj.R² = 53.9 %, F_(12,265) = 28.1, P < 0.001), while other parameters including Philadelphia translocation, pre-HSCT CNS involvement and CRT were found to have no independent effect. Although this study was not an attempt to compare TBI-based vs. non-TBI conditioning, the TBI-free myeloablative allo-HSCT was shown to be feasible and an option for adult ALL patients with CNS involvement, considering the comparable outcomes between patients with and without CNS involvement.

Feasibility and potential advantages using VMAT in SRS metastasis treatments

Background

Utilization of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) has become the technique of choice as opposed to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). The aim of this work is to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits in terms of normal tissue (NT) and dose escalation of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in SRS metastasis treatment. A VMAT optimization procedure has therefore been developed for internal dose scaling which minimizes planner dependence.

Materials and methods

Five patient-plans incorporating treatment with frame-based SRS with dynamic conformal arc technique (DA) were re-planned for VMAT. The lesions selected were between 4-6 cm³. The same geometry used in the DA plans was maintained for the VMAT cases. A VMAT planning procedure was performed attempting to scale the dose in inner auxiliary volumes, and to explore the potential for dose scaling with this technique. Comparison of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were obtained.

Results

VMAT allows a superior NT sparing plus conformity and dose scaling using the auxiliary volumes. The VMAT results were significantly superior in NT sparing, improving both the V₁₀ and V₁₂ values in all cases, with a 2-3 cm³ saving. In addition, VMAT improves the dose coverage D₉₅ by about 0.5 Gy. The objective of dose escalation was achieved with VMAT with an increment of the Dmean and the Dmedian of about 2 Gy.

Conclusions

This work shows a benefit of VMAT in SRS treatment with significant NT sparing. A VMAT optimization procedure, based on auxiliary inner volumes, has been developed, enabling internal dose escalation.

Interinstitutional Plan Quality Assessment of 2 Linac-Based, Single-Isocenter, Multiple Metastasis Radiosurgery Techniques

Purpose

Interest and application of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases continue to increase. Various planning systems are available for linear accelerator (linac)–based single-isocenter multiple metastasis radiosurgery. Two of the most advanced systems are BrainLAB Multiple Metastases Elements (MME), a dynamic conformal arc (DCA) approach, and Varian RapidArc (RA), a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) approach. In this work, we systematically compared plan quality between the 2 techniques.

Methods and Materials

Thirty patients with 4 to 10 metastases (217 total; median 7.5; V_min = 0.014 cm³; V_max = 17.73 cm³) were planned with both Varian RA and MME at 2 different institutions with extensive experience in each respective technique. All plans had a single isocenter and used Varian linac equipped with high-definition multileaf collimator. RA plans used 2 to 4 noncoplanar VMAT arcs with 10 MV flattening filter-free beam. MME plans used 4 to 9 noncoplanar DCAs and 6 MV flattening filter-free beam, (minimum planning target volume [PTV_min] = 0.49 cm³; PTV_max = 27.32 cm³; PTV_median = 7.05 cm³). Prescriptions were 14 to 24 Gy in a single fraction. Target coverage goal was 99% of volume receiving prescription dose (D99% ≥ 100%). Plans were evaluated by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/Paddick conformity index (CI) score, 12 Gy volume (V_12Gy), V_8Gy, V_5Gy, mean brain dose (D_mean), and beam-on time.

Results

Conformity was favorable among RA plans (median: MME CI^RTOG = 1.38; RA CI^RTOG = 1.21; P < .0001). V_12Gy and V_8Gy were lower for RA plans (median: MME V12 = 23.7 cm³; RA V12 = 19.2 cm³; P = .0001; median: MME V_8Gy = 53.6 cm³; RA V_8Gy = 44.1 cm³; P = .024). V_5Gy was lower for MME plans (median: MME V_5Gy = 141.4 cm³; RA V_5Gy = 142.8 cm³; P = .009). Mean brain was lower for MME plans (median: MME D_mean = 2.57 Gy; RA D_mean = 2.76 Gy; P < .0001).

Conclusions

For linac-based multiple metastasis stereotactic radiosurgery, RapidArc VMAT facilitates favorable conformity and V_12Gy/V_8Gy volume compared with the MME DCA plan. MME planning facilitates reduced dose spill at levels ≤V_5Gy.

Advances in the management of brain metastases from cancer of unknown primary

Cancer of unknown primary accounts for 3-5% of all cancers for which an adequate investigation does not identify the primary tumor. The particular subset of brain metastasis in cancer of unknown primary (BMCUP) is a clinical challenge that lacks standardized diagnostic and therapeutic options. It is diagnosed predominantly in male patients in the sixth decade of age with complaints of headache, neurological dysfunction, cognitive and behavioral disturbances and seizures. The therapeutic approach to patients with BMCUP relies on local control and systemic treatment. Surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery and/or whole brain radiation therapy seems to be the cornerstone of the treatment approach to BMCUP. Systemic therapy remains essential as cancers of unknown primary are conceptually metastatic tumors. The benefits of chemotherapy were disappointing whereas those of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors remain to be evaluated. In this Review, we address the advances in the diagnosis and treatment of BMCUP.

Postoperative local fractionated radiotherapy for resected single brain metastases

PURPOSE

Evaluation of postoperative fractionated local 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DRT) of the resection cavity in brain metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2016, 57 patients underwent resection of a single, previously untreated (37/57, 65%) or recurrent (20/57, 35%) brain metastasis (median maximal diameter 3.5 cm [1.1-6.5 cm]) followed by 3DRT. For definition of the gross tumor volume (GTV), the resection cavity was used and for the clinical target volume (CTV), margins of 1.0-1.5 cm were added. Median dose was 48.0 Gy (30.0-50.4 Gy) in 25 (10-28) fractions; most patients had 36.0-42.0 Gy in 3.0 Gy fractions (n = 16, EQD2_10Gy 39.0-45.5 Gy) or 40.0-50.4 Gy in 1.8-2.0 Gy fractions (n = 37, EQD2_10Gy 39.3-50.0 Gy).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 18 months. Local control rates were 83% at 1 year and 78% at 2 years and were significantly influenced by histology (breast cancer 100%, non-small lung cancer 87%, melanoma 80%, colorectal cancer 26% at 2 years, p = 0.006) and resection status (p < 0.0001), but not by EQD2_10Gy or size of the planning target volume (median 96.7 ml [16.7-282.8 ml]). At 1 and 2 years, 74% and 52% of the patients were free from distant brain metastases. Salvage procedures were applied in 25/27 (93%) of recurrent patients. Survival was 68% at 1 year and 41% at 2 years and was significantly improved in younger patients (p = 0.006) with higher Karnofsky performance score (p < 0.0001) and without prior radiotherapy (54% vs. 9% at 2 years, p = 0.006). No cases of radiographic or symptomatic radionecrosis were observed.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant fractionated local 3DRT is highly effective in radiosensitive, completely resected metastases and should be considered for treating large resection cavities as an alternative to postoperative stereotactic single dose or hypofractionated radiosurgery.

Brain Metastases from Adult Sarcoma: Prognostic Factors and Impact of Treatment. A Retrospective Analysis from the French Sarcoma Group (GSF/GETO)

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) from adult soft tissue or bone sarcomas are rare, and sparse data exist on their prognostic factors and management.

SUBJECTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in 15 centers of the French Sarcoma Group, plus one Canadian and one Swiss center, to report on clinical, histological, and treatment characteristics and to identify predictive factors of outcome.

RESULTS

Between 1992 and 2012, 246 patients with a median age of 50 years (range: 16-86) were managed for BM. BM included 221 cerebral and cerebellar metastases and 40 cases of meningeal sarcomatosis. The most frequent histopathological subtype was leiomyosarcoma (18.7%). Histological grade was high in 118 (48%) cases. Surgery of BM was carried out for 38 (15.5%) patients. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were administered in 168 (68.3%) and 91 (37.0%) patients, respectively. Irrespective of treatment modality, BM were controlled in 113 patients (45.9%), including 31 partial responses (12.6%) and 18 complete responses (7.3%). The median overall survival from diagnosis of brain metastasis was 2.7 months (range: 0-133). In the multivariate analysis, the following parameters influenced overall survival: chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.48), surgery (HR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.22-0.72), stereotactic radiotherapy (HR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.19-0.90), whole-brain radiotherapy (HR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.35-0.76), and grade (HR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43-0.98).

CONCLUSION

BM of sarcomas are rare and associated with a dismal outcome. Multidisciplinary management with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery is associated with a better survival.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The incidence of brain and meningeal metastasis in bone and soft tissue sarcomas is estimated between 1% and 8%. Published data are derived from small retrospective case series, often in the pediatric population. A prognostic index is important to guide both clinical decision-making and outcomes research, but one such is lacking for adult sarcoma patients with brain metastases. The current study describes brain metastasis in a large cohort of sarcoma patients. This study, conducted within the French Sarcoma Group, describes the natural history of sarcoma brain metastasis and enables the proposal of strategic recommendations for subsequent clinical trials and for the management of such patients.

Phase 1 Study of Ipilimumab Combined With Whole Brain Radiation Therapy or Radiosurgery for Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

We performed a phase 1 study to determine the maximum tolerable dose and safety of ipilimumab with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases from melanoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Based on the intracranial disease burden, patients underwent WBRT (arm A) or SRS (arm B). The ipilimumab starting dose was 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, starting on day 3 of WBRT or 2 days after SRS. The ipilimumab dose was escalated to 10 mg/kg using a 2-stage, 3+3 design. The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerable dose of ipilimumab combined with radiation therapy. The secondary endpoints were overall survival, intracranial and extracranial control, progression-free survival, and toxicity. The ClinicalTrials.gov registration number is NCT01703507.

RESULTS

The characteristics of the 16 patients enrolled between 2011 and 2014 were mean age, 60 years; median number of brain metastases, 2 (range 1->10); and number with EC disease, 13 (81%). Treatment included WBRT (n=5), SRS (n=11), and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (n=7) or 10 mg/kg (n=9). The median follow-up was 8 months (arm A) and 10.5 months (arm B). A total of 21 grade 1 to 2 neurotoxic effects occurred, with no dose-limiting toxicities. One patient experienced grade 3 neurotoxicity before ipilimumab administration. Ten additional grade 3 toxicities were reported, with gastrointestinal toxicities (n=5; 31%) the most common. No patient developed grade 4 or 5 toxicity. The median progression-free survival and overall survival in arm A was 2.5 months and 8 months and in arm B was 2.1 months and not reached, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent ipilimumab 10 mg/kg with SRS is safe. The WBRT arm was closed early because of slow accrual but demonstrated safety with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg. No patient experienced dose-limiting toxicity. Larger studies, including those with combination checkpoint inhibitor therapy and SRS, are warranted.

A Randomized Controlled Open-Label Pilot Study of Simvastatin Addition to Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in Patients With Brain Metastases

Statins have been reported to have a potential radiosensitizing effect that has not been evaluated in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of simvastatin in addition to whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases (BM). A prospective randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study was conducted on 50 Egyptian patients with BM who were randomly assigned to receive 30-Gy WBRT (control group: 25 patients) or 30 Gy WBRT + simvastatin 80 mg/day for the WBRT period (simvastatin group: 25 patients). The primary outcome was radiological response at 4 weeks after WBRT. Secondary outcomes were 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year overall survival (OS), and health-related quality of life (HRQL) that was assessed using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its brain module (BN-20), at baseline, after WBRT, and 4 weeks after WBRT. The addition of simvastatin was tolerated. Twenty-one patients were not evaluated for radiological response because of death (n = 16), noncompliance to follow-up (n = 4), and clinical deterioration (n = 1). Response rates were 60% and 78.6% (p = 0.427), 1-year PFS rates were 5.2% and 17.7% (p = 0.392), and 1-year OS rates were 12% and 8% (p = 0.880) for the control group and simvastatin group, respectively. Nonsignificant differences were found between the two arms regarding HRQL scales. The addition of simvastatin 80 mg/day did not improve the clinical outcomes of patients with BM receiving WBRT.

Dosimetric validation for an automatic brain metastases planning software using single-isocenter dynamic conformal arcsDosimetric validation for an automatic brain metastases planning software using single-isocenter dynamic conformal arcs

An automatic brain‐metastases planning (ABMP) software has been installed in our institution. It is dedicated for treating multiple brain metastases with radiosurgery on linear accelerators (linacs) using a single‐setup isocenter with noncoplanar dynamic conformal arcs. This study is to validate the calculated absolute dose and dose distribution of ABMP. Three types of measurements were performed to validate the planning software: 1, dual micro ion chambers were used with an acrylic phantom to measure the absolute dose; 2, a 3D cylindrical phantom with dual diode array was used to evaluate 2D dose distribution and point dose for smaller targets; and 3, a 3D pseudo‐in vivo patient‐specific phantom filled with polymer gels was used to evaluate the accuracy of 3D dose distribution and radiation delivery. Micro chamber measurement of two targets (volumes of 1.2 cc and 0.9 cc, respectively) showed that the percentage differences of the absolute dose at both targets were less than 1%. Averaged GI passing rate of five different plans measured with the diode array phantom was above 98%, using criteria of 3% dose difference, 1 mm distance to agreement (DTA), and 10% low‐dose threshold. 3D gel phantom measurement results demonstrated a 3D displacement of nine targets of 0.7±0.4 mm (range 0.2 ~ 1.1 mm). The averaged two‐dimensional (2D) GI passing rate for several region of interests (ROI) on axial slices that encompass each one of the nine targets was above 98% (5% dose difference, 2 mm DTA, and 10% low‐dose threshold). Measured D95, the minimum dose that covers 95% of the target volume, of the nine targets was 0.7% less than the calculated D95. Three different types of dosimetric verification methods were used and proved the dose calculation of the new automatic brain metastases planning (ABMP) software was clinical acceptable. The 3D pseudo‐in vivo patient‐specific gel phantom test also served as an end‐to‐end test for validating not only the dose calculation, but the treatment delivery accuracy as well.

PACS number(s): 87.53.Lv, 87.55.km, 87.55.Qr

Symptoms and quality of life in patients with brain metastases receiving whole-brain radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Patients with multiple brain metastases may be treated with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). For these patients, symptom palliation and improvement of quality of life (QOL) and performance status is of the upmost importance. The objective of the present study was to determine the symptom experience and overall QOL in patients with brain metastases before and after WBRT.

METHODS

A total of 14 symptom scores and overall QOL were collected prospectively in 217 patients for up to 3 months. Wilcoxon signed rank test was applied to determine significant symptoms and QOL changes. Spearman's correlations were applied to determine the relationship between symptom scores and QOL.

RESULTS

Appetite loss, weakness, and nausea significantly increased from baseline, while balance, headache, and anxiety significantly decreased from baseline. At baseline, all symptoms other than coordination were significantly correlated with QOL. At 1-month follow-up (FU), changes in concentration, weakness, coordination, and balance were significantly associated with QOL changes. At 2-month FU, changes in pain, insomnia, concentration, balance, and depression were significantly associated with QOL changes. At 3-month FU, only change in nausea was significantly associated with QOL changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Following WBRT, certain symptoms may influence overall QOL to a greater extent than others, which may fluctuate with time.

Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases: Non-Coplanar RapidArc vs. Gamma Knife

Objectives

This study compares the dosimetry and efficiency of two modern radiosurgery [stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)] modalities for multiple brain metastases [Gamma Knife (GK) and LINAC-based RapidArc/volumetric modulated arc therapy], with a special focus on the comparison of low-dose spread.

Methods

Six patients with three or four small brain metastases were used in this study. The size of targets varied from 0.1 to 10.5 cc. SRS doses were prescribed according to the size of lesions. SRS plans were made using both Gamma Knife^® Perfexion and a single-isocenter, multiple non-coplanar RapidArc^®. Dosimetric parameters analyzed included RTOG conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), 12 Gy isodose volume (V_12Gy) for each target, and the dose “spread” (Dspread) for each plan. Dspread reflects SRS plan’s capability of confining radiation to within the local vicinity of the lesion and to not spread out to the surrounding normal brain tissues. Each plan has a dose (Dspread), such that once dose decreases below Dspread (on total tissue dose–volume histogram), isodose volume starts increasing dramatically. Dspread is defined as that dose when volume increase first exceeds 20 cc/0.1 Gy dose decrease.

Results

RapidArc SRS has smaller CI (1.19 ± 0.14 vs. 1.50 ± 0.16, p < 0.001) and larger GI (4.77 ± 1.49 vs. 3.65 ± 0.98, p < 0.01). V_12Gy results were comparable (2.73 ± 1.38 vs. 3.06 ± 2.20 cc, p = 0.58). Moderate to lower dose spread, V6, V4.5, and V3, were also equivalent. GK plans achieved better very low-dose spread (≤3 Gy) and also had slightly smaller Dspread, 1.9 vs. 2.5 Gy. Total treatment time for GK is estimated between 60 and 100 min. GK treatments are between 3 and 5 times longer compared to RapidArc treatment techniques.

Conclusion

Dosimetric parameters reflecting prescription dose conformality (CI), dose fall off (GI), radiation necrosis indicator (V_12Gy), and dose spread (Dspread) were compared between GK SRS and RapidArc SRS for multi-mets. RapidArc plans have smaller CI but larger GI. V_12Gy are comparable. GK appears better at reducing only very low-dose spread (<3 Gy). The treatment time of RapidArc SRS is significantly reduced compared to GK SRS.

The Brain Symptom and Impact Questionnaire in brain metastases patients: a prospective long-term follow-up study

AIMS

To assess the ability of the Brain Metastases Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (BASIQ) in evaluating symptoms and impact on daily life.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Patients with brain metastases completed BASIQ, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, FACT-Brain at baseline and at 1, 2 and 3 months follow-ups.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients completed all follow-ups. BASIQ correlated well (r ≥ 0.40) with FACT subscales, except for social/family and emotional wellbeing. Linear regression analysis found no significant changes in quality of life (QOL) over time in both the BASIQ and FACT scales. Therefore, the two questionnaires coincide as both detected nonchanges.

CONCLUSION

The ability of the BASIQ in evaluating symptoms and impact on over longer assessment periods was supported by the FACT questionnaires.

Psychometric validation of the Brain Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (BASIQ) version 1.0 to assess quality of life in patients with brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

To test the reliability, clinical and psychometric validity of the Brain Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (BASIQ) in patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

Brain metastases patients were interviewed using the BASIQ, Functional Assessment of Cancer-Brain (FACT-Br) and FACT-General (FACT-G) at baseline, with a follow-up assessment at 1 month.

RESULTS

Forty patients had complete one data and the median age was 64 years. Patients with higher KPS, ECOG of 2, primary breast cancer, or >3 brain metastases, scored higher on the symptom scale of the BASIQ. All subscales showed no significant change in patient symptoms from baseline to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study supports that the reliability, clinical and psychometric validity of BASIQ to be used in brain metastases patients.

Role for radiation therapy in melanoma

Although melanoma is generally considered a relative radioresistant tumor, radiation therapy (RT) remains a valid and effective treatment option in definitive, adjuvant, and palliative settings. Definitive RT is generally only used in inoperable patients. Despite a high-quality clinical trial showing adjuvant RT following lymphadenectomy in node-positive melanoma patients prevents local and regional recurrence, the role of adjuvant RT in the treatment of melanoma remains controversial and is underused. RT is highly effective in providing symptom palliation for metastatic melanoma. RT combined with new systemic options, such as immunotherapy, holds promise and is being actively evaluated.

S100B protein as a possible participant in the brain metastasis of NSCLC

Brain metastasis is a frequent occurrence in lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the prognosis for NSCLC with brain metastasis is very poor. Our previous study found high S100B expression in the brain-specific metastatic NSCLC line PC14/B, suggested S100B is closely correlated with brain metastasis in NSCLC. However, the details have not yet been revealed. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between S100B and brain metastasis in NSCLC and to study the effects of S100B on non-brain metastatic NSCLC line PC14. We investigated serum S100B levels in 30 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients (15 with brain metastasis and 15 without brain metastasis) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results showed that serum S100B levels were significant higher in NSCLC patients with brain metastasis compared to those without brain metastasis (P<0.01). We constructed the full-length S100B expression vector and transfected into PC14 cells. MTT and flow cytometric analysis showed that S100B transfection promoted cell proliferation and inhibited cell apoptosis (P<0.05). Transwell migration and invasion assays indicated that S100B transfection promoted cell invasion and cell migration compared to control cells transfected with empty vector alone (P<0.01). These results suggested that S100B could be involved in the development of brain metastasis in NSCLC.

Surgery for brain metastases

The use of surgery in the treatment of brain metastases is controversial. Patients who present certain clinical characteristics may experience prolonged survival with resection compared with radiation therapy. Thus, for patients with a single metastatic lesion in the setting of well-controlled systemic cancer, surgery is highly indicated. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone can provide a similar survival advantage, but when used as postoperative adjuvant therapy, patients experience extended survival times. Furthermore, surgery remains the only treatment option for patients with life-threatening neurological symptoms, who require immediate tumor debulking. Treatment of brain metastases requires a careful clinical assessment of individual patients, as different prognostic factors may indicate various modes or combinations of therapy. Since surgery is an effective method for achieving tumor management in particular cases, it remains an important consideration in the treatment algorithm for brain metastases.

Controversies in the management of brain metastases

The multidisciplinary management of brain metastases has generated substantial controversy as treatment has diversified in recent years. Debate about the type, role, and timing of different diagnostic and therapeutic strategies has promoted rigorous scientific research into efficacy. However, much still remains unanswered in the treatment of this difficult disease process. This manuscript seeks to highlight some of the controversies identified in previous sections of this supplement, including prognosis, pathology, radiation and surgical treatment, neuroimaging, and the biochemical underpinnings of brain metastases. By recognizing what is yet unanswered, we hope to identify areas in which further research may yield promising results.

Time trends in survival from cancer of unknown primary: small steps forward

BACKGROUND

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a fatal cancer for which incidence trends have changed but detailed survival trends remain unexplored. These could point out successful diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. We investigate survival trends in CUP according to histology, locations of metastases and site-specific causes of death.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 20,523 CUP patients with nodal and extranodal metastases were identified from the Swedish Cancer Registry. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated, comparing three different time periods (1987-1993, 1994-2000 and 2001-2008) with respect to histological subtype, CUP location and the cause of death.

RESULTS

Survival for patients with CUP increased over the study period (HR=0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.84], p<0.001 for trend). Adenocarcinoma was the only histology associated with increased survival (0.78 [0.74-0.82], p<0.001 for trend). Survival was improved most clearly for CUP of the pelvis (0.55 [0.36-0.83]), peritoneum (0.58 [0.53-0.65]) and nervous system (0.46 [0.29-0.72]). Survival improved substantially in patients with ovarian (0.57 [0.46-0.70]), peritoneal (0.39 [0.24-0.65]) and biliary system cancers (0.67 [0.52-0.87]). Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant survival gains for all CUP and adenocarcinoma patients (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Over time, survival for patients with CUP increased for adenocarcinoma and for CUP of the pelvis, peritoneum and nervous system. Survival trends in CUP may be related to (1) similar trends in other common metastatic tumours, particularly pancreatic and hepatobiliary cancers, which are common 'hidden' primaries for CUP, (2) earlier detection and (3) advances in the management of metastatic cancers. The improvement in survival at specific locations suggests true therapeutic gains.

Management of brain metastasis: past lessons, modern management, and future considerations

Brain metastasis is a major challenge for patients, physicians, and the broader health care system, with approximately 170,000 new cases per year. After a diagnosis of brain metastasis, patients have a poor prognosis, but modern management has made significant advances in the past two decades to improve palliative efficacy and patient survival through a multidisciplinary approach. A number of factors must be taken into consideration in the treatment approach, including the number of intracranial lesions, the control of extracranial disease, and the patient's overall health, while weighing the benefits of treatment against the toxicities, both acute and chronic. With quality of life as an emphasis, emerging concepts for modern management of brain metastasis have sought to minimize long-term toxicities. The economic impact of such strategies for patients and the health care system has been demonstrated in some studies, but has not been a consistent area of focus. Each of these strategies, as well as novel therapeutics, has embraced the concept of personalized treatment. This review will discuss the current knowledge of modern multidisciplinary management of brain metastasis and look forward to emerging concepts.

Surgical management of brain metastases

In the past 20 years, surgical resection has found an established role in the management of metastatic brain tumors. Several factors, however, make strong evidence-based medicine impossible to provide for all possible patient presentations. These important factors, such as patient variables (eg, age, medical comorbidities, preoperative performance), tumor variables (eg, number, size, location, histology), and primary disease status must be taken into account on a case-by-case basis to guide patient selection and treatment strategy. Although progress has been made to answer some of the major questions in the management of metastatic brain tumors, several important questions remain. Future studies comparing surgery with stereotactic radiosurgery, for example, are needed to delineate patient selection, complications, and outcome for both of these important modalities.