Hormonal treatment in recurrent and metastatic gynaecological cancers: a review of the current literature

Hormone Receptor Expression and Activity for Different Tumour Locations in Patients with Advanced and Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Response to hormonal therapy in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) can be predicted by oestrogen and progesterone receptor immunohistochemical (ER/PR-IHC) expression, with response rates of 60% in PR-IHC > 50% cases. ER/PR-IHC can vary by tumour location and is frequently lost with tumour progression. Therefore, we explored the relationship between ER/PR-IHC expression and tumour location in EC.

METHODS

Pre-treatment tumour biopsies from 6 different sites of 80 cases treated with hormonal therapy were analysed for ER/PR-IHC expression and classified into categories 0-10%, 10-50%, and >50%. The ER pathway activity score (ERPAS) was determined based on mRNA levels of ER-related target genes, reflecting the actual activity of the ER receptor.

RESULTS

There was a trend towards lower PR-IHC (33% had PR > 50%) and ERPAS (27% had ERPAS > 15) in lymphogenic metastases compared to other locations (p = 0.074). Hematogenous and intra-abdominal metastases appeared to have high ER/PR-IHC and ERPAS (85% and 89% ER-IHC > 50%; 64% and 78% PR-IHC > 50%; 60% and 71% ERPAS > 15, not significant). Tumour grade and previous radiotherapy did not affect ER/PR-IHC or ERPAS.

CONCLUSIONS

A trend towards lower PR-IHC and ERPAS was observed in lymphogenic sites. Verification in larger cohorts is needed to confirm these findings, which may have implications for the use of hormonal therapy in the future.

A phase 2 study of anastrozole in patients with oestrogen receptor and/progesterone receptor positive recurrent/metastatic granulosa cell tumours/sex-cord stromal tumours of the ovary: The PARAGON/ANZGOG 0903 trial

BACKGROUND

Hormonal therapies are commonly prescribed to patients with metastatic granulosa cell tumours (GCT), based on high response rates in small retrospective studies. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are reported to have high response rates and an accepted treatment option. We report the results of a phase 2 trial of an AI in recurrent/metastatic GCTs.

METHODS

41 patients with recurrent ER/PR + ve GCT received anastrozole 1 mg daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 12 weeks, evaluated by RECIST1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), CBR duration, quality of life and toxicity.

RESULTS

The CBR at 12 weeks in 38 evaluable patients was 78.9%, which included one (2.6%; 95% CI: 0.5-13.5%) partial response and 76.3% stable disease. Two additional patients without measurable disease were stable, based on inhibin. Median PFS was 8.6 m (95% CI 5.5-13.5 m). There were delayed responses observed after 12 weeks with a total of 4 pts. (10.5%; 95% CI 4.2%-24.1%) with a RECIST partial response; 23 (59%) patients were progression-free at 6 months. The adverse effects were predominantly low grade.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospective trial of hormonal therapy in GCTs. Although there was a high CBR, the objective response rate to anastrozole was much lower than the pooled response rates of >70% to AIs reported in most retrospective series and case reports. PARAGON demonstrates the importance of prospective trials in rare cancers and the need to reconsider the role of AIs as single agents in GCTs.

Phase 2 study of anastrozole in patients with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positive recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas: The PARAGON trial (ANZGOG 0903)

BACKGROUND

Aromatase inhibitors are standard of care for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LGESS), based on very high response rates reported in retrospective studies. We evaluated the activity of anastrozole in recurrent/metastatic LGESS patients enrolled in PARAGON, a basket trial of anastrozole in estrogen receptor (ER±)/progesterone receptor (PR+) gynecological cancers.

METHOD

An investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective open-label trial of anastrozole 1 mg/day in patients with ER ± PR + ve LGESS with measurable disease, treated until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit (complete/partial response + stable disease) rate (CBR) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life and toxicity.

RESULTS

15 eligible patients were enrolled. CBR at 3 months was 73% (95% CI: 48-89.1%); unchanged at 6 months. Best response was 26.7%, including complete response in one (6.7%; 95% CI 1.2-29.8%), partial response in three (20%, 95% CI 7.1-45.2%) and stable disease in seven (46.7%). Four patients ceased treatment by 3 months due to progression. Median PFS was not reached (25th percentile: 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.2-NR)). PFS was 73.3%, 73.3% and 66% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Six patients remained on treatment for an average of 44.2 months (range 34.5-63.6) up until data cut. Toxicity was as expected, with 3 patients stopping due to adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

The 26.7% objective response rate with anastrozole is lower than reported in retrospective series, but the CBR was high and durable. The results underscore the importance of prospective trials in rare cancers.

Mifepristone mediates anti-proliferative effect on ovarian mesenchymal stem/stromal cells from female BRCA1-/2- carriers

INTRODUCTION

Women with hereditary mutation in breast cancer-associated genes (BRCA^1-/2- ) have a higher lifetime risk of developing ovarian cancer. Here, we aimed to investigate the effect of mifepristone, a selective progesterone receptor modulator of ovarian mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) from BRCA^1-/2- carriers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ovarian BRCA^1-/2- MSC were positively selected using the markers CD90, CD73 and CD105 from nine healthy women. The effect of dose response and combination treatment with mifepristone and analogs of progesterone- or glucocorticoid-receptors were investigated on BRCA^1-/2- MSC in vitro using a panel of markers for proliferation (ki67, BrdU, CDK2, p21^CIP ), apoptosis (BAX, BCL2, CASPASE3), tumor suppression (TP53, PTEN) and cell survival (PI3KCA, MAPK3, mTOR).

RESULTS

The dose response with mifepristone treatment suggested an optimal effect with 10 μm mifepristone, exhibiting >90% viability and significantly reducing growth signaling markers (TP53 and MAPK3). Furthermore, combined treatment with progesterone plus mifepristone (PG+MIFE) gave an enhanced anti-proliferative effect in comparison with hydrocortisone plus mifepristone (HC+MIFE) by significantly reducing markers of proliferation (BrdU⁺ and Ki67 expression) and tumor suppressors (PTEN, TP53), and increasing the percentage of pro-apoptotic cells. Consequently, accumulation of p21^CIP together with reduced levels of CDK2 confirms growth inhibition by reversibly arresting cell-cycle progression at the G1-S phase, not by inducing apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed an anti-proliferative effect on ovarian BRCA^1-/2- MSC on in vitro combined treatment with mifepristone and progesterone. These findings suggest that mifepristone or other selective progesterone receptor modulators could be developed as a preventive treatment and postpone early use of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy as well as reduce the risk of ovarian cancer.

Paragon (ANZGOG-0903): Phase 2 Study of Anastrozole in Women With Estrogen or Progesterone Receptor-Positive Platinum-Resistant or -Refractory Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

There is some evidence that a subset of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer may benefit from antiestrogen therapy. The Paragon study is a basket protocol that includes a series of phase 2 trials investigating the activity of anastrozole in patients with estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive recurrent gynecological cancers. We report the results of treatment in patients with platinum-resistant or -refractory recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Postmenopausal women who had estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory recurrent ovarian cancer and disease measurable by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or GCIG (Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup) CA-125 criteria were eligible. Patients received anastrozole 1 mg daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The study was prospectively registered (ACTRN12610000796088).

RESULTS

There were 49 evaluable patients, and clinical benefit was observed in 13 (27%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16%-40%). There were no complete or partial RECIST version 1.1 responses. Clinical benefit was associated with higher global quality-of-life scores. Median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.0-2.8 months). The median duration of clinical benefit was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.6-5.7 months). Most patients (83%) progressed within 6 months. Seven patients continued on treatment for longer than 6 months. Anastrozole was well tolerated in most patients. Subgroup analysis suggested greater clinical benefit in patients with tumors with estrogen-receptor histoscore of more than 200, but this difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of patients with estrogen- or progesterone-positive platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory recurrent epithelial ovarian cancers derives clinical benefit from anastrozole, with acceptable toxicity. The challenge remains how to identify them.

Cytokeratin 5/6 expression, prognosis, and association with estrogen receptor α in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma remains one of the most lethal malignancies in women. For histopathologic differentiation from mesothelioma cytokeratin, 5/6 immunohistochemistry is widely used. Another preferred marker for differential diagnosis to mesothelioma is estrogen receptor α (ER-α). In this study, we determined the rate of cytokeratin 5/6-positive cells in primary high-grade serous carcinoma. A cohort of 215 patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma was evaluated immunohistochemically for the protein expression of cytokeratin 5/6. Most tumors demonstrated at least partly positive for cytokeratin 5/6 (n=148; 68.3%), showing different staining patterns from scattered stained cells to a diffuse staining, at times with a distinctive tumor-stroma border motif. Sixty-seven (31%) were entirely negative. No correlation of cytokeratin immunoreactivity score (IRS) with conventional staging parameters could be demonstrated. From the different IRS values for cytokeratin 5/6, IRS=12 (n=6; 2.9%) seemed to indicate a worse prognosis, albeit not statistically significant. An association with ER-α expression could not be detected but the combination of cytokeratin 5/6 IRS=12 and ER-α negativity resulted in a significant negative prognostic marker (overall survival: P=.003 and progression-free survival: P<.0001). We substantiate cytokeratin 5/6 protein expression as a frequent feature of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with various staining patterns, an important fact for the routine differential diagnosis with mesothelioma. Furthermore, cytokeratin 5/6 in combination with ER-α proved to be a negative prognostic marker, wherefore we suggest further investigation of its biological significance and possible manifestation of a basal differentiation.

Association of Hormone Receptor Expression with Survival in Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma: Biological Validation and Clinical Implications

This paper aims to validate whether hormone receptor expression is associated with longer survival among women diagnosed with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC), and whether it identifies patients with stage IC/II tumors with excellent outcome that could be spared from toxic chemotherapy. Expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) was assessed on 182 EC samples represented on tissue microarrays using the Alberta Ovarian Tumor Type (AOVT) cohort. Statistical analyses were performed to test for associations with ovarian cancer specific survival. ER or PR expression was present in 87.3% and 86.7% of cases, respectively, with co-expression present in 83.0%. Expression of each of the hormonal receptors was significantly higher in low-grade tumors and tumors with squamous differentiation. Expression of ER (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.08–0.42, p = 0.0002) and of PR (HR = 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.10–0.53, p = 0.0011) were significantly associated with longer ovarian cancer specific survival adjusted for age, grade, treatment center, stage, and residual disease. However, the five-year ovarian cancer specific survival among women with ER positive stage IC/II EC was 89.0% (standard error 3.3%) and for PR positive tumors 89.9% (standard error 3.2%), robustly below the 95% threshold where adjuvant therapy could be avoided. We validated the association of hormone receptor expression with ovarian cancer specific survival independent of standard predictors in an independent sample set of EC. The high ER/PR co-expression frequency and the survival difference support further testing of the efficacy of hormonal therapy in hormone receptor-positive ovarian EC. The clinical utility to identify a group of women diagnosed with EC at stage IC/II that could be spared from adjuvant therapy is limited.

Cytokeratin 5-Positive Cells Represent a Therapy Resistant subpopulation in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Cytokeratin 5 (CK5) is an epithelial cell marker implicated in stem and progenitor cell activity in glandular reproductive tissues and endocrine and chemotherapy resistance in estrogen receptor (ER)(+) breast cancer. The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of CK5 expression in ovarian cancer and the response of CK5(+) cell populations to cisplatin therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cytokeratin 5 expression was evaluated in 2 ovarian tissue microarrays, representing 137 neoplasms, and 6 ovarian cancer cell lines. Cell lines were treated with IC(50) (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) cisplatin, and the prevalence of CK5(+) cells pretreatment and posttreatment was determined. Proliferation of CK5(+) versus CK5(-) cell populations was determined using 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine incorporation. Chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in CK5(+) versus CK5(-) cells was measured using immunohistochemical staining for cleaved caspase-3.

RESULTS

Cytokeratin 5 was expressed in 39.3% (42 of 107) of epithelial ovarian cancers with a range of 1% to 80% positive cells. Serous and endometrioid histologic subtypes had the highest percentage of CK5(+) specimens. Cytokeratin 5 expression correlated with ER positivity (38 of 42 CK5(+) tumors were also ER(+)). Cytokeratin 5 was expressed in 5 of 6 overall and 4 of 4 ER(+) epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines ranging from 2.4% to 52.7% positive cells. Cytokeratin 5(+) compared with CK5(-) cells were slower proliferating. The prevalence of CK5(+) cells increased after 48-hour cisplatin treatment in 4 of 5 cell lines tested. Cytokeratin 5(+) ovarian cancer cells compared with CK5(-) ovarian cancer cells were more resistant to cisplatin-induced apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytokeratin 5 is expressed in a significant proportion of epithelial ovarian cancers and represents a slower proliferating chemoresistant subpopulation that may warrant cotargeting in combination therapy.

Fulvestrant for the treatment of endometrial cancer

INTRODUCTION

About one third of patients with endometrial cancer (EC) relapse and face a limited prognosis, if surgery or radiotherapy are not feasible. The remaining therapeutic options are chemotherapy and endocrine therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the development of the first selective estrogen receptor (ER) down-regulator fulvestrant. This article provides its mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and the available preclinical and clinical data. Furthermore, this review provides an overview of the market of treatments for recurrent or metastatic EC (RMEC) while also taking into account studies of fulvestrant in metastatic breast cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

Even if fulvestrant showed only marginal activity in two phase II trials, it shouldn't be abandoned but instead further developed in EC. Firstly, the dose of fulvestrant used in these trials was too low from today's point of view. Secondly, the available literature on other endocrine agents is full of limitations and does not provide a gold standard. Furthermore, given the activity of mTOR inhibitors in EC, there may also be synergistic effects, given the cross-regulation of ER and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. The authors suggest that a prospective, phase II trial in ER positive RMEC would help to further explore the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant together with a mTOR inhibitor.

Prolonged response to exemestane following multiple surgical resections and hormonal therapies in a patient with recurrent endometrial stromal sarcoma

Background

Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESSs) are rare, indolent tumors with high recurrence rates. Management includes surgery and hormonal therapy given high estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) expression.

Case

A pre-menopausal patient with stage II ESSs (ER +/PR +) underwent primary surgery followed by adjuvant megestrol. Recurrence in the bladder/upper vagina (ER +/PR −) was diagnosed one year later and treated with anterior pelvic exenteration and adjuvant letrozole. Two years later she recurred and was treated with radical surgery and adjuvant exemestane therapy (tumor ER strongly +/PR +). The patient then had a five-year disease free interval before being diagnosed with her third recurrence (ER +).

Conclusion

Exemestane treatment for ESSs can lead to a prolonged response, even in the setting of progression after prior aromatase inhibitor treatment.

•

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are used in the treatment of endometrial stromal sarcoma.

•

Letrozole and anastrozole are type 2 reversible nonsteroidal AIs.

•

Exemestane is a type 1 irreversible steroidal AI.

•

Exemestane demonstrated a prolonged clinical response and is well-tolerated.

Management of recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer in Germany: results of the nationwide AGO pattern of care studies from the years 2013, 2009 and 2006

PURPOSE

The available literature on the treatment options for recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer (EC) is full of controversies. Therefore, we explore the results of the AGO pattern of care studies from the years 2013, 2009 and 2006.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed and sent to all 682 German gynecological departments in 2013 (775 in 2009, 500 in 2006, respectively). The results of the questionnaires were compared with each other using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Responses were available in 40.0 % in 2013, 33.3 % in 2009 and 35.8 % in 2006. In 2013 the most preferred endocrine drug was progestin (79.8 %), followed by tamoxifen (42.8 %), aromatase inhibitor (19.8 %), fulvestrant (16.3 %) and a combination (3.9 %) (p < 0.001). 65.3, 59.8, 51.7 and 38.2 % of the participants used platinum, taxane, a combination of cytostatic drugs, anthracycline in metastatic EC, respectively (p = 0.215). 96.2, 92.7, 49.8 and 60.9 % of the participants performed an operation, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy and chemotherapy in 2013 because of a local recurrence, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared to 2009 and 2006 these rates remained stable (no p value <0.05). Because of a distant metastasis 50.4, 64.2, 78.5 and 90.8 % of the participants performed an operation, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy and chemotherapy in 2013, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared to 2009 and 2006 more participants performed an operation or radiotherapy and less an endocrine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas progestin was the favorite drug, the participants of this study did not prefer a specific cytostatic drug for metastatic EC in 2013. This might have reflected the available literature, which did not provide a real standard of care.

17β-estradiol inhibits spreading of metastatic cells from granulosa cell tumors through a non-genomic mechanism involving GPER1

Granulosa cell tumor (GCT) is a rare and severe form of sex-cord stromal ovarian tumor that is characterized by its long natural history and tendency to recur years after surgical ablation. Because there is no efficient curative treatment beyond surgery, ~20% of patients die of the consequences of their tumor. However, very little is known of the molecular etiology of this pathology. About 70% of GCT patients present with elevated circulating estradiol (E2). Because this hormone is known to increase tumor growth and progression in a number of cancers, we investigated the possible role of E2 in GCTs. Cell-based studies with human GCT metastases and primary tumor-derived cells, ie KGN and COV434 cells, respectively, aimed at evaluating E2 effect on cell growth, migration and invasion. Importantly, we found that E2 did not affect GCT cell growth, but that it significantly decreased the migration and matrix invasion of metastatic GCT cells. Noteworthy, our molecular studies revealed that this effect was accompanied by the inhibition through non-genomic mechanisms of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), which is constitutively activated in GCTs. By using pharmacological and RNA silencing approaches, we found that E2 action was mediated by G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) signaling pathway. Analyses of GPER1 expression on tissue microarrays from human GCTs confirmed its expression in ~90% of GCTs. Overall, our study reveals that E2 would act via non-classical pathways to prevent metastasis spreading in GCTs and also reveals GPER1 as a possible target in this disease.