Dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma: Diagnostic Controversies and Emerging Therapeutic Targets

Comparisons of clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes among different pathological subtypes of chondrosarcoma in the spine

INTRODUCTION

Spinal chondrosarcoma exhibits higher invasiveness and a worse prognosis compared to chondrosarcoma in the extremities. The prognosis and therapeutic plan vary greatly among different pathological subtypes of chondrosarcoma. This study aimed to analyze the differences in clinical characteristics, molecular features, therapeutic effects, and prognostic factors among the subtypes of chondrosarcoma in the spine.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on 205 patients with spinal chondrosarcoma. The clinical features and immunohistochemical (IHC) markers were compared among the pathological subtypes of chondrosarcoma grade 1, grade 2, grade 3, mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MCS), dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (DCS), and clear cell chondrosarcoma (CCCS). Chondrosarcoma grade 1/2/3 are collectively referred to as conventional chondrosarcoma (CCS) for multivariate survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with spinal chondrosarcoma. Furthermore, independent prognostic factors for OS and RFS were identified in CCS and MCS.

RESULTS

MCS patients were younger than the other subtypes. Patients with chondrosarcoma grade 1/2 had better OS than those with chondrosarcoma grade 3, MCS and DCS, while only chondrosarcoma grade 1 patients showed better RFS than chondrosarcoma grade 2/3, MCS and DCS patients. Ki-67 index was higher in chondrosarcoma grade 3, MCS and DCS than chondrosarcoma grade 1/2. The comparison of IHC markers further highlighted the overexpression of P53/MDM2 in MCS and DCS. Gross total resection, including en-bloc and piecemeal resection, significantly improved OS and RFS for CCS patients, while only en-bloc resection significantly improved the prognosis of MCS patients. Chemotherapy appeared to be important for the OS of MCS patients.

CONCLUSION

P53/MDM2 pathway was upregulated in MCS and DCS compared to chondrosarcoma grade 1/2. Radical tumor resection is crucial for the treatment of spinal chondrosarcoma, while MCS patients require further comprehensive treatments perioperatively.

Surgical Management and Reconstruction of Dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma in the Proximal Femur: A Case Report

A primary malignant bone tumor, or more commonly, metastasis, can occur in the proximal femur. Surgical treatment can have palliative or curative purposes. In the case of the latter, it involves two stages: resection of the tumor, which aims to address the cancer, and reconstruction of the bone and soft tissue, which aims to restore function. It is important for the excision to be wide with adequate resection margins in the soft tissue, particularly when the goal is curative treatment. Typically, surgery involves excision and reconstruction to ensure good mechanical stability. Reconstruction can be done using different methods, such as a composite prosthesis or a massive prosthesis, which may be modular or custom-made. Joint reconstruction options include hemiarthroplasty, intermediate prosthesis, or, in some cases, total hip replacement.

Chondrosarcoma of the Femur: Is Local Recurrence Influenced by the Presence of an Extraosseous Component?

BACKGROUND

Chondrosarcoma (CS) is the second most common surgically treated primary malignancy of the bone. The current study explored the effect of the margin and extraosseous tumor component in CS in the femur on local recurrence (LR), LR-free survival (LRFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS).

METHODS

Among 202 patients, 115 were in the proximal extremity of the femur, 4 in the corpus of the femur, and 83 in the distal extremity of femur; 105 patients had an extraosseous tumor component.

RESULTS

In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, factors significant for decreased LRFS were the extraosseous tumor component (p < 0.001), extraosseous tumor component arising from the superior aspect (p < 0.001), histological grade (p = 0.031), and narrow surgical margin < 3 mm (p < 0.001). Factors significantly affecting DSS were the histological grade (p < 0.001), extraosseous component (p < 0.001), LR (p < 0.001), metastases (p < 0.001), and surgical margin (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In CS of the femur, the presence of an extraosseous tumor component has a predictive role in LRFS, and extraosseous tumor component arising from the superior aspect was significant for decreased LRFS. Wide margins were more commonly achieved when the tumor had only an intraosseous component, and the rate of LR was significantly higher in cases with an extraosseous tumor component. When the extraosseous component arose from the superior aspect of the femur, LR occurred more frequently despite achieving adequate margins.