Altered fractionation in the treatment of head and neck cancer

Radiation Therapy Intensification for Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

PURPOSE

To systematically review the outcomes of randomized trials testing radiation therapy (RT) intensification, including both dose escalation and/or the use of altered fractionation, as a strategy to improve disease control for a number of malignancies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a literature search to identify randomized trials testing RT intensification for cancers of the central nervous system, head and neck, breast, lung, esophagus, rectum, and prostate. Findings were described qualitatively. Where adequate data were available, pooled estimates for the effect of RT intensification on local control (LC) or overall survival (OS) were obtained using the inverse variance method.

RESULTS

In primary central nervous system tumors, esophageal cancer, and rectal cancer, randomized trials have not demonstrated that RT intensification improves clinical outcomes. In breast cancer and prostate cancer, dose escalation has been shown to improve LC or biochemical disease control but not OS. Radiation therapy intensification may improve LC and OS in head and neck and lung cancers, but these benefits have generally been limited to studies that did not incorporate concurrent chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In randomized trials, the benefits of RT intensification have largely been restricted to trials in which concurrent chemotherapy was not used. Novel strategies to optimize the incorporation of RT in the multimodality treatment of solid tumors should be explored.

Acute toxicity and preliminary clinical outcomes of concurrent radiation therapy and weekly docetaxel and daily cisplatin for head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine the feasibility and efficacy of concurrent weekly docetaxel and radiation therapy as a definitive treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with primary HNC, who were treated with concurrent weekly docetaxel and radiation therapy, were analysed. The distribution of the disease stage was as follows: Stage II, 18 patients; Stage III, 3 patients; Stage IVA, 7 patients; Stage IVB, 3 patients; the patient of cervical lymph node metastasis with unknown primary tumor was not assessable. The average total dose of radiotherapy was 67.5 Gy. Docetaxel (10 mg/m(2), intravenously, once a week) was given to all patients up to four cycles, and cisplatin (6 mg/m(2), intravenously, five times a week) was also administered to all patients for up to 3 weeks from the beginning of the radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Only in two patients did the radiotherapy need to be temporarily interrupted due to the development of acute mucositis. Grade 3 toxicity was observed in six patients. Grade 4 acute mucositis was seen in one patient. The response rate was 100%, and complete response (CR) was observed in 30 patients (94%). At the time of the analysis, the 2 year local control and relapse-free rates in the 30 patients showing CR were 90 and 76%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent weekly docetaxel and radiation therapy did not affect the compliance of the patients for the radiation therapy, indicating that the acute toxicities were within acceptable limits.

An intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

The Head and Neck Intergroup conducted a phase III randomized trial to test the benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiation in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned between arm A (the control), single daily fractionated radiation (70 Gy at 2 Gy/d); arm B, identical radiation therapy with concurrent bolus cisplatin, given on days 1, 22, and 43; and arm C, a split course of single daily fractionated radiation and three cycles of concurrent infusional fluorouracil and bolus cisplatin chemotherapy, 30 Gy given with the first cycle and 30 to 40 Gy given with the third cycle. Surgical resection was encouraged if possible after the second chemotherapy cycle on arm C and, if necessary, as salvage therapy on all three treatment arms. Survival data were compared between each experimental arm and the control arm using a one-sided log-rank test.

RESULTS

Between 1992 and 1999, 295 patients were entered on this trial. This did not meet the accrual goal of 362 patients and resulted in premature study closure. Grade 3 or worse toxicity occurred in 52% of patients enrolled in arm A, compared with 89% enrolled in arm B (P <.0001) and 77% enrolled in arm C (P <.001). With a median follow-up of 41 months, the 3-year projected overall survival for patients enrolled in arm A is 23%, compared with 37% for arm B (P =.014) and 27% for arm C (P = not significant).

CONCLUSION

The addition of concurrent high-dose, single-agent cisplatin to conventional single daily fractionated radiation significantly improves survival, although it also increases toxicity. The loss of efficacy resulting from split-course radiation was not offset by either multiagent chemotherapy or the possibility of midcourse surgery.

Maximizing local control and organ preservation in stage IV squamous cell head and neck cancer With hyperfractionated radiation and concurrent chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Results are reported from an aggressive chemoradiotherapy protocol for advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer were treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (72 Gy at 1.2 Gy twice per day) and two courses of concurrent chemotherapy with fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m(2)/d) and cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d), both given as 96-hour continuous intravenous infusions during weeks 1 and 4 of radiation therapy. Primary-site resection was reserved for residual or recurrent primary-site disease after chemoradiotherapy. Neck dissection was considered for N2 or greater disease, irrespective of clinical response, and for residual or recurrent neck disease after nonoperative treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients with stage IV disease were treated. Toxicity was significant, with grade 3 to 4 mucositis in 98%, dysphagia in 88%, and skin reaction in 85%. Neutropenic fever requiring hospitalization occurred in 51%. Despite feeding tube placement in 35 patients (85%), the mean weight loss during chemoradiotherapy was 13.3% of initial body weight. One patient died during treatment as a result of a pulmonary embolus. At a median follow-up period of 30 months, the 3-year Kaplan-Meier projected overall survival was 59%, disease-specific survival 69%, likelihood of local control without surgical resection 91%, and local control with surgical resection 97%. The likelihood of distant disease control at 3 years was 74%, and distant metastases were present in eight of 13 patients who died.

CONCLUSION

This chemoradiotherapy schedule produces considerable but manageable toxicity. Survival and organ preservation are excellent for this poor-prognosis patient cohort. Distant metastases are the most common cause of treatment failure.